We saw in chapter 5 how seismic data can be used in favourable cases to infer the nature of fluid fill (gas, oil or brine) in a reservoir. An application of this is to follow the way that fluids move through a reservoir during production, by carrying out a baseline seismic survey before production begins and then repeat surveys over the production lifetime. Where 3-D surveys are repeated in this way, they are often referred to as 4-D seismic, with the idea that time is the extra dimension over standard 3-D. Differences in seismic amplitudes or travel-times between the surveys can reveal the movement of fluid contacts (e.g. where produced oil has been replaced by brine) or the extent of pressure changes that affect reservoir properties. As sketched in figs. 8.1 and 8.2, it is not always straightforward to separate out the causes of the changes. At a producing well, the pressure drops, and if it drops far enough then gas will come out of solution. This will result in a decrease in both P velocity and in density, resulting in a drop in acoustic impedance. On the other hand, the drop in pore pressure causes an increase in P velocity and density. At a water injector (fig. 8.2), we replace oil by water, which in itself would increase P velocity and density; however, the injection also increases the pore pressure, which causes the reverse effect on P velocity and density.