Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:48:38.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Sandra D. Mitchell
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, J. (1987). “Ardent Adaptationist.” Natural History 96: 4Google Scholar
Allen, G. (1978). Life Science in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Anderson, R. H. (1963). “The Laying Worker in the Cape Honeybee, Apis mellifera capensis.” Journal of Apicultural Research 2: 85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. (1969). “Dispositions Are Causes.” Analysis 30: 23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austad, S. N. (1984). “A Classification of Alternative Reproductive Behaviors and Methods for Field-Testing ESS Models.” American Zoologist 24: 309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, F. (1970). “Teleological Explanations in Evolutionary Biology.” Philosophy of Science 37: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, J. (1987). “Natural Selection and the Null Hypothesis.” In J. Dupré, ed., The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Cambridge: MIT Press: 53–76
Beatty, J. (1994). “Ernst Mayr and the Proximate/Ultimate Distinction.” Biology and Philosophy 9: 333–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, J. (1995). “The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis.” In G. Wolters and J. G. Lennox, eds., Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press: 45–81
Beatty, J. (1997). “Why Do Biologists Argue like They Do?Philosophy of Science 64 (4): S432–S443Google Scholar
Bechtel, W. (1986). Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff
Bechtel, W., and R. C. Richardson (1993). Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Belnap, N. D., and J. B. Steel, Jr. (1976). The Logic of Questions and Answers. New Haven: Yale University Press
Bernstein, H., , G. S. Byers, and , R. E. Michod (1981). “The Evolution of Sexual Reproduction: The Importance of DNA Repair, Complementation, and Variation.” American Naturalist 117: 537–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beshers, S. N., and , J. H. Fewell (2001). “Models of Division of Labor in Social Insects.” Annual Review of Entomology 46: 413–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickle, J. (1997). Psychoneural Reductionism: The New Wave. Cambridge: MIT Press
Bigelow, J., and Pargetter, R. (1987). “Functions.” Journal of Philosophy 84 (4): 181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. (1979). “More about Metaphor.” In A. Ortony, ed., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 19–43
Bock, W. J. (1977). “Adaptation and the Comparative Method.” In M. K. Hecht, B. M. Hecht, and P. C. Goody, eds., Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 57–81CrossRef
Bonabeau, E., , G. Theraulaz, and , J. L. Deneubourg (1996). “Quantitative Study of the Fixed Threshold Model for the Regulation of Division of Labour in Insect Societies.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences 263: 1565–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonabeau, E., , G. Theraulaz, , J. Deneubourg, , S. Aron, and , S. Camazine (1997). “Self-Organization in Social Insects.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12 (5): 188-193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, J. T. (1969). The Scale of Nature. New York: Pegasus
Bonner, J. T. (1988). The Evolution of Complexity. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Bonner, J. T. (1998). “The Origins of Multicellularity.” Integrative Biology 1: 27–363.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, J. J. (1990). “Science, Discourse, and Literature: The Role/Rule of Metaphor in Science.” In S. Peterfreund, ed., Literature and Science: Theory and Practice. Boston: Northeastern University Press: 59–90
Boomsma, J. J., , E. J. Fjerdingstad, and , J. Frydenberg (1999). “Multiple Paternity, Relatedness and Genetic Diversity in Acromyrmex Leaf-Cutter Ants.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B (266): 249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, C. (1976). “Wright on Functions.” Philosophical Review 85: 70–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G. (1988). “Worker Reproduction in the Higher Eusocial Hymenoptera.” Quarterly Review of Biology 63: 291–311Google Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G., and N. R. Franks (1995). Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Boyd, R. (1979). “Metaphor and Theory Change: What Is ‘Metaphor’ a Metaphor For?” In A. Ortony, ed., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 356–408
Boyd, R. N., and Peter J. Richerson (1985). Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Boyd, R. N., and Peter. J. Richerson (1991). “Culture and Co-Operation.” In R. A. Hinde and J. Groebel, eds., Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 27–48
Brandon, R. (1978). “Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 9: 181–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, R. (1980). “A Structural Description of Evolutionary Theory.” In P. D. Asquith and Ronald Giere, eds., PSA 1980. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. 2: 427–439CrossRef
Brandon, R. (1981). “Biological Teleology: Questions and Explanations.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 12: 91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, R. (1982). “The Levels of Selection.” In P. Asquith and T. Nickles, eds., PSA 1982. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. 1: 315–323CrossRef
Brandon, R. (1985a). “Adaptation Explanations: Are Adaptations for the Good of Replicators or Interactors?” In D. Depew and B. Weber, eds., Evolution at a Crossroads: The New Biology and the New Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press/A Bradford Book: 81–96
Brandon, R. (1985b). “Phenotypic Plasticity, Cultural Transmission and Human Sociobiology.” In J. H. Fetzer, ed., Sociobiology and Epistemology. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing: 57–74
Brandon, R. (1997). “Does Biology Have Laws? The Experimental Evidence.” Philosophy of Science 64 (4): S444–S457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, R., and Beatty, J. (1984). “Discussion: The Propensity Interpretation of ‘Fitness’ – No Interpretation Is No Substitute.” Philosophy of Science 51: 342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breed, M. D., , G. E. Robinson, and Page, R. E. Jr. (1990). “Division of Labor during Honey Bee Colony Defense.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27: 395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, J. (1960). “Experimental Studies of Mimicry.” American Naturalist 44: 271–283Google Scholar
Brower, L. P. (1988). “Avian Predation on the Monarch Butterfly and Its Implications for Mimicry Theory.” American Naturalist 131: S4–S6Google Scholar
Brown, J. H., and G. West, eds. (2000). Scaling in Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Burian, R. M. (1981). “Human Sociobiology and Genetic Determinism.” Philosophical Forum 13: 43–66Google Scholar
Burian, R. M. (1983). “Adaptation.” In M. Grene, ed., Dimensions of Darwinism: Themes and Counterthemes in Twentieth-Century Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 287–314
Burian, R. M. (1986). “On Integrating the Study of Evolution and Development: Comments on Kauffman and Wimsatt.” In W. Bechtel, ed., Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff: 209–228CrossRef
Buss, L. (1987). The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Calderone, N. W. (1998). “Proximate Mechanisms of Age Polyethism in the Honey Bee Apis mellifera L.Apidologie 29: 127–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderone, N. W., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1988). “Genotypic Variability in Age Polyethism and Task Specialisation in the Honey Bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae).” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22: 17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderone, N. W., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1991). “The Evolutionary Genetics of Division of Labor in Colonies of the Honey Bee (Apis mellifera).” American Naturalist 138: 69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderone, N. W., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1992). “Effects of Interactions among Genotypically Diverse Nestmates on Task Specializations by Foraging Honey Bees (Apis mellifera).” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30: 219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderone, N. W., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1996). “Temporal Polyethism and Behavioural Canalization in the Honey Bee, Apis mellifera.” Animal Behavior 51: 631–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderone, N. W., , G. E. Robinson, and Page, R. E. Jr. (1989). “Genetic Structure and Division of Labor in Honeybee Societies.” Experientia 45: 765–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camazine, S. (1993). “The Regulation of Pollen Foraging by Honey Bees: How Foragers Assess the Colony's Need for Pollen.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 32: 265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camazine, S., and , J. Sneyd (1991). “A Model of Collective Nectar Source Selection by Honey Bees: Self-Organization Through Simple Rules.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 149: 547–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950). “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4: 20–40Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1956). “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (1950): 20–40. Reprinted in the Supplement to Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, enlarged edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 205–221
Carrier, M. (1995). “Evolutionary Change and Lawlikeness: Beatty on Biological Generalization.” In G. Wolters and J. G. Lennox, eds., Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press: 82–97
Cartwright, N. D. (1980). “The Truth Doesn't Explain Much.” American Philosophical Quarterly 17: 159–163Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. D. (1982). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Cartwright, N. D. (1986). “Two Kinds of Teleological Explanation.” In A. Donagan, A. N. Perovich, Jr., and M. V. Wedin, eds., Human Nature and Natural Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel: 201–210CrossRef
Cartwright, N. D. (1989). Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Cartwright, N. D. (1994). “Fundamentalism vs. the Patchwork of Laws.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94: 279–292Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. D. (1999). The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Causey, R. L. (1977). Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel
Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, Mass., and London: MIT Press
Clutton-Brock, T. H., and , P. H. Harvey (1977). “Primate Ecology and Social Organization.” Journal of Zoology London 183: 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H., , P. H. Harvey, and , B. Rudder (1977). “Sexual Dimorphism, Socioeconomic Sex Ratio and Body Weight in Primates.” Nature 269: 797–800Google Scholar
Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Beverly Hills and London: Sage
Collins, H. M., ed. (1982). The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: A Sourcebook. Bath: Bath University Press
Comte, A. (1830 (1975)). “Course of Positive Philosophy.” In G. Lenzer, ed., Auguste Comte and Positivism: The Essential Writings. New York: Harper: 71–86
Cox, P. A. (1989). The Elements: Their Origin, Abundance, and Distribution. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Crozier, R. H., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1985). “On Being the Right Size: Male Contributions and Multiple Mating in Social Hymenoptera.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 18: 105–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culver, D. A. (1999). Ecological Modeling of Lake Erie Trophic Dynamics. http://www.ijc.org/boards/cglr/modsum/culver.html
Cummins, R. (1975). “Functional Analysis.” Journal of Philosophy 72: 741–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, L. (1986). “Relations among Fields in the Evolutionary Synthesis.” In W. Bechtel, ed., Integrating Scientific Disciplines. Dordrecht: Nijhoff: 113–123CrossRef
Darden, L. (1991). Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press
Darden, L., and , J. Cain (1989). “Selection Type Theories.” Philosophy of Science 56: 106–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, L., and , N. Maull (1977). “Interfield Theories.” Philosophy of Science 44: 43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1857). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species, 6th ed. New York: Macmillan, 1962
Darwin, C. (1964). On the Origin of Species. Harvard: Harvard University Press
Darwin, C. (1965). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Darwin, C. (1981). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (1871). Princeton: Princeton University Press
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Dawkins, R. (1978). “Replicator Selection and the Extended Phenotype.” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 47: 61–76Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1982a). The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Dawkins, R. (1982b). “Replicators and Vehicles.” In King's College Sociobiology Group, ed., Current Problems in Sociobiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 45–64
Deneubourg, J., , S. Goss, , J. Pasteels, , D. Fresneau, and , J. Lachaud (1987). “Self-Organization Mechanisms in Ant Societies (II): Learning in Foraging and Division of Labor.” Experientia Supplementum 54 (Behavior in Social Insects): 177–196Google Scholar
Done, T. J. 1992. “Constancy and Change in Some Great Barrier Reef Coral Communities: 1980–1990.” American Zoologist 32: 655–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreller, C., , M. K. Fondrk, and Page, R. E. Jr. (1995). “Genetic Variability Affects the Behavior of Foragers in a Feral Honeybee Colony.” Naturwissenschaften 82: 243–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (1977). “Laws of Nature.” Philosophy of Science 44: 248–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J. (1983). “The Disunity of Science.” Mind 92: 321–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J. (1993). The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Dupré, J. (1996). “Metaphysical Disorder and Scientific Disunity.” In P. Galison and D. Stump, eds., The Disunity of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press: 101–117
Durham, W. H. (1979). “Towards a Coevolution Theory of Human Biology and Culture.” In N. A. Chagnon and W. Irons, eds., Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. North Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury Press: 39–59
Durham, W. H. (1991). Coeveolution: Genes, Culture and Human Diversity. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Earman, J. (1984). “Laws of Nature: The Empiricist's Challenge.” In R. J. Bogdan, ed., D. M. Armstrong. Kluwer Academic Publishers: 191–224CrossRef
Earman, J., J. Roberts, and S. Smith (2002). “Ceteris Paribus Lost.” Erkenntnis 57, no. 3CrossRef
Eckert, C. D., , M. L. Winston, and , R. C. Ydenberg (1995). “The Relationship between Population Size, Amount of Brood, and Individual Foraging Behaviour in the Honey Bee, Apis mellifera.” Oecologia 97: 248–255Google Scholar
Egerton, F. N. (1973). “Changing Concepts of the Balance of Nature.” Quarterly Review of Biology 48: 322–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endler, J. A. (1986). Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Evans, H. E. (1966). “The Behavior Patterns of Solitary Wasps.” Annual Review of Entomology 11: 123–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. A., and H. E. Evans (1970). William Morton Wheeler, Biologist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Fergusson, L. A., and , M. L. Winston (1985). “The Effect of Worker Loss on Temporal Caste Structure in Colonies of the Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.).” Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 777–780Google Scholar
Fewell, J. H., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1993). “Genotypic Variation in Foraging Responses to Environmental Stimuli by Honey Bees, Apis mellifera.” Experientia 49: 1106–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fewell, J. H., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1999). “The Emergence of Division of Labour in Forced Associations of Normally Solitary Ant Queens.” Evolutionary Ecology Research 1: 537–548Google Scholar
Fewell, J. H., and , M. L. Winston (1992). “Colony State and Regulation of Pollen Foraging in the Honey Bee, Apis mellifera L.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30: 387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against Method. London: New Left Books
Feyerabend, P. K. (1981). Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Feynman, R. (1985). QED, the Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Harmondsworth: Penguin
Feynman, R. (1995). The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge: MIT Press
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Fodor, J. (1974). “Special Sciences.” Synthese 28: 97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1974). “Explanation and Scientific Understanding.” Journal of Philosophy 71: 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frumhoff, P. C., and , J. Baker (1988). “A Genetic Component to Division of Labor within Honey Bee Colonies.” Nature 333: 358–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, P. (1996). “Introduction: The Context of Disunity.” In P. Galison and D. J. S. Galison, eds., The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press
Galison, P., and D. Stump, eds. (1996). The Disunity of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Garfinkel, A. (1981). Forms of Explanation. New Haven: Yale University Press
Gelfand, A. E., and C. C. Walker (1984). Ensemble Modeling. New York: Marcel Dekker
Ghiselin, M. (1974). The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex. Berkeley: University of California Press
Giray, T., and , G. E. Robinson (1994). “Effects of Intracolony Variability in Behavioral Development on Plasticity of Division of Labor in Honey Bee Colonies.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 35: 13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giray, T., and , G. E. Robinson (1996). “Common Endocrine and Genetic Mechanisms of Behavioral Development in Male and Worker Honey Bees and the Evolution of Division of Labor.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 93: 11718–11722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glymour, C. (1982). “Causal Inference and Causal Explanation.” In R. McLaughlin, ed., What? Where? When? Why? Dordrecht: Reidel: 179–191CrossRef
Glymour, C. (2001). The Mind's Arrows: Bayes Nets and Graphical Causal Models in Psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press
Godfrey-Smith, P. (1994). “A Modern History Theory of Function.” Nous 28 (3): 344–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, B. C. (1994). How the Leopard Changed Its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity. New York: C. Scribner's Sons
Goodwin, B. C., and P. Saunders, eds. (1992). Theoretical Biology: Epigenetic and Evolutionary Order from Complex Systems. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Gordon, D. M. (1996). “The Organization of Work in Social Insect Colonies.” Nature 380: 121–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1977). “Caring Groups and Selfish Genes.” Natural History 86: 20–24Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1978). “Sociobiology: The Art of Storytelling.” New Scientist 80: 530-533Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1980). “Evolutionary Biology of Constraint.” Daedalus 109 (2): 39–52Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1981). “The Units of Evolution: A Metaphysical Essay.” In R. Harre and U. L. Jensen, eds., The Philosophy of Evolution. Brighton: Harvester Press: 22–44
Gould, S. J. (1983). “The Hardening of the Modern Synthesis.” In M. Grene, ed., Dimensions of Darwinism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 72–93
Gould, S. J. (1987a). “Freudian Slip.” Natural History 92: 14–21Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1987b). “Stephen Jay Gould Replies.” Natural History 96: 4–6Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful Life: Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W. W. Norton
Gould, S. J., and , E. S. Vrba (1982). “Exaptation – A Missing Term in the Science of Form.” Paleobiology 8: 4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J., and , R. C. Lewontin (1979). “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Program.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 205: 581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, V. (1963). The Origin of Adaptations. New York: Columbia University Press
Guilford, T. (1988). “The Evolution of Conspicuous Coloration.” American Naturalist 131: S7–S21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán-Novoa, E., and , N. E. Gary (1993). “Genotypic Variability of Components of Foraging Behavior in Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae).” Journal of Economic Entomology 86: 715–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán-Novoa, E., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1994). “Genetic Dominance and Worker Interactions Affect Honeybee Colony Defense.” Behavioral Ecology 5: 91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán-Novoa, E., Page, R. E. Jr., and N. E. Gary (1994). “Behavioral and Life-History Components of Division of Labor in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.).” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 34: 409–417Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1996). “The Disunities of the Sciences.” In P. Galison and D. Stump, eds., The Disunity of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press: 37–74
Harding, S. G. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel (1991). The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hatcher, B., Johannes, R. E., and Robertson, A. (1989). “Review of Research Relevant to the Conservation of Shallow Tropical Marine Ecosystems.” Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual 27: 337–414Google Scholar
Hellmich, R. L., Kulincevic, J. M., and Rothenbuhler, W. C. (1985). “Selection for High and Low Pollen-Hoarding Honey Bees.” Journal of Heredity 76: 155–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1945). “Studies in the Logic of Confirmation.” Mind 54: 97–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1951). “General Systems Theory: A New Approach to Unity of Science 2. General Systems Theory and the Unity of Science.” Human Biology 23: 313Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1965a). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press
Hempel, C. G. (1965b). “The Logic of Functional Analysis.” In Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press: 297–330
Hempel, C. G. (1965c). “Studies in the Logic of Confirmation.” In Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press
Hesse, M. B. (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press
Hesse, M. B. (1974). The Structure of Scientific Inference. London: Macmillan
Hesse, M. B. (1986). “Theories, Family Resemblances and Analogy.” In D. H. Helman, ed., Analogical Reasoning. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 317–340
Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley
Hölldobler, B., and E. O. Wilson (1990). The Ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Holling, C. S. (1986). “The Resilience of Terrestrial Ecosystems: Local Surprise and Global Change.” In W. M. Clark and R. E. Munn, eds., Sustainable Development in the Biosphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 292–320
Horan, B. L. (1989). “Functional Explanations in Sociobiology.” Biology and Philosophy 4: 131–158Google Scholar
Horgan, J. (1996). The End of Science. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley
Huang, Z.-Y., and Robinson, G. E. (1992). “Honeybee Colony Integration: Worker-Worker Interactions Mediate Hormonally Regulated Plasticity in Division of Labor.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 89: 11726–11729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Z.-Y., and Robinson, G. E. (1996). “Regulation of Honey Bee Division of Labor by Colony Age Demography.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 39: 147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1981). “The Units of Evolution: A Metaphysical Essay.” In U. L. Jensen and R. Harre, eds., The Philosophy of Evolution. Brighton: Harvester Press: 22–44
Hull, D. L. (1987). “On Human Nature.” In A. Fine and Peter Machamer, eds., PSA 1986. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association. 2: 3–13
Hull, D. L. (1989). The Metaphysics of Evolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Hunt, G. J., Page, R. E. Jr., Fondrk, M. K., and Dullum, C. J. (1995). “Major Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Honey Bee Foraging Behavior.” Genetics 141: 1537–1545Google Scholar
Irons, W. (1979). “Cultural and Biological Success.” In N. A. Chagon and W. Irons, eds., Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective. North Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury Press: 257–272
James, W. (1950). Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover
Jamieson, I. G. (1986). “The Functional Approach to Behavior: Is It Useful?American Naturalist 127: 195–208Google Scholar
Jamieson, I. G. (1989). “Levels of Analysis or Analyses at the Same Level.” Animal Behavior 37: 696–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, S. (1984). “Emergent Properties in Random Complex Automata.” Physica 10D: 145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, S. (1987). “Developmental Logic and Its Evolution.” BioEssays 6: 82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, S. (1993). The Origins of Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Kauffman, S. (1995). At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press
Keller, E. F., and Segel, L. A. (1970). “Initiation of Slime-Mold Aggregation Viewed as an Instability.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 26: 399–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessen, R. H. (2001). Dictyostelium: Evolution, Cell Biology, and the Development of Multicellularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kettlewell, H. B. D. (1956). “Further Selection Experiments on Industrial Melanism in the Lepidoptera.” Heredity 10: 287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. (1990). “Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept.” Metaphilosophy 21: 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1981). “Explanatory Unification.” Philosophy of Science 48: 507–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1985). Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge and London: MIT Press
Kitcher, P. (1990). “The Division of Cognitive Labor.” Journal of Philosophy 87 (1): 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, W. D., and R. L. Mumme (1990). “Levels of Analysis and the Functional Significance of Helping Behaving.” In M. Bekoff and D. Jamieson, eds., Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Behavior, vol. 2: Explanation, Evolution, and Adaptation. Boulder: Westview Press: 268–303
Koonce, J. F., and A. B. Locci. (1999). Resolution of Issues of Scope and Detail in the Development of the Lake Erie Ecological Model. http://www.ijc.org/boards/cglr/modsum/koonce.html
Krebs, C. J. (1994). Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. New York: Harper Collins
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Kuhn, T. S. (1979). “Metaphor in Science.” In A. Ortony, ed., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 409–419
Lakatos, I. (1970). “The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 91–196
Lakatos, I. (1971). “Falsificationism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In I. Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 91–195
Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lange, M. (2000). Natural Laws in Scientific Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Lange, M. (2002). “Who's Afraid of Ceteris Paribus Laws: Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Them.” Erkenntnis 57, no. 3CrossRef
Latour, B. (1988). “The Politics of Explanation.” In S. Woolgar, ed., Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Sage: 155–176
Lenoir, T. (1989). The Strategy of Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Levin, S. A. (1992). “The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture.” Ecology 73: 1943–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levins, R. (1968). Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Lewontin, R. C. (1970). “The Units of Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1974). “The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Causes.” American Journal of Human Genetics 26: 400–411Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. (1978). “Adaptation.” Scientific American 238: 157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. C., and Dunn, L. C. (1960). “The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse.” Genetics 45: 705–722Google Scholar
Liebold, M. A., Chase, J. M., Shurin, J. B., and Downing, A. L. (1997). “Species Turnover and the Regulation of Trophic Structure.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 467–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindauer, M. (1961). Communication among Social Bees. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Longino, H. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Lumsden, C. (1982). “The Social Regulation of Physical Caste: The Superorganism Revived.” Journal of Theoretical Biology: 749–781CrossRef
MacDonald, G. (1986). “The Possibility of the Dis-Unity of Science.” In G. MacDonald, ed., Fact, Science and Morality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell: 219–246
Mach, E. (1883). The Science of Mechanics, 6th ed. Chicago: Open Court Publishing, 1960
Maeterlink, M. (1912). The Life of the Bee. New York: Dodd, Mead
Maienschein, J. (1981). “Shifting Assumptions in American Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology 14: 89–113Google Scholar
Martin, J., and R. Harre (1982). “Metaphors in Science.” In D. S. Miall, ed., Metaphor: Problems and Perspectives. Sussex: Harvester Press and Humanities Press: 89–106
Maynard, Smith J. (1985). “The Birth of Sociobiology.” New Scientist (26 September): 48–50Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1987). “How to Model Evolution.” In J. Dupré, The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Cambridge: MIT Press: 119–131
Maynard, Smith J. (1989). “Weismann and Modern Biology.” Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 6: 1–12Google Scholar
Maynard, Smith J. (1990). “Triumphs of Colonialism.” New York Review of Books (27 September): 36–37Google Scholar
Maynard, Smith J., Burian, R., Kauffman, S., Alberch, R., Campbell, J., Goodwin, B., Lande, R., Raup, D., and Wolpert, L. (1985). “Developmental Constraints and Evolution.” Quarterly Review of Biology 60: 265–286Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1961). “Cause and Effect in Biology.” Science 134: 1501–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963). Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Mayr, E. (1974a). “Behavior Programs and Evolutionary Strategies.” American Scientist 62: 650–659Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1974b). “Teleological and Teleonomic, a New Analysis.” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14: 91–117Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1978). “Evolution.” Scientific American 239: 46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge: Belknap Press
Michener, C. D. (1974). The Social Bees. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
Michener, C. D. (1975). The Social Behavior of the Bees. Cambridge: Belknap Press
Miller, J. G. (1978). Living Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill
Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge: MIT Press
Millikan, R. G. (1989). “In Defense of Proper Functions.” Philosophy of Science 56: 288–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, S., and Beatty, J. (1979). “The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness.” Philosophy of Science 46: 263–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (1987a). “Can Evolution Adapt to Cultural Selection?” In A. Fine and P. Machamer, eds., PSA 1986. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association. 2: 87–96
Mitchell, S. D. (1987b). “Competing Units of Selection? A Case of Symbiosis.” Philosophy of Science 54: 351–367Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (1987c). “‘Why’ Functions (in Evolutionary Biology and Cultural Anthropology).” In History and Philosophy of Science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh: 201
Mitchell, S. D. (1989). “The Causal Background for Functional Explanations.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3 (2): 213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (1990). “Units of Behavior in Evolutionary Explanations.” In D. Jamieson and M. Bekoff, eds., Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Animal Behavior. Boulder: Westview Press: 63–83
Mitchell, S. D. (1992). “On Pluralism and Competition in Evolutionary Explanations.” American Zoologist 32: 135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (1993). “Dispositions or Etiologies? A Comment on Bigelow and Pargetter.” Journal of Philosophy 90: 249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (1995a). “Function, Fitness and Disposition.” Biology and Philosophy 10: 39–54Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (1995b). “The Superorganism Metaphor: Then and Now.” In E. M. S. Maasen and P. Weingart, eds., Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 231–248
Mitchell, S. D. (1997). “Pragmatic Laws.” Philosophy of Science 64: S468–S479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (2000). “Dimensions of Scientific Law.” Philosophy of Science 67: 242–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (2002a). “Ceteris Paribus – An Inadequate Representation for Biological Contingency.” Erkenntnis 57, no. 3: 329–350Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. D. (2002b). “Contingent Generalizations: Lessons from Biology.” In R. Mayntz, ed., Akteure, Mechanismen, Modelle: Zur Theoriefähigkeit makro-sozialer Analysen. Frankfurt: Campus: 179–195
Mitchell, S. D. (2002c). “Integrative Pluralism.” Biology and Philosophy 17: 55-70Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. D., and Robert E. Page, Jr. (1992). Idiosyncratic Paradigms and the Revival of the Superorganism. Bielefeld: Center for Interdisciplinary Studies
Mitchell, S. D., L. Daston, G. Gigerenzer, N. Sesardic, and P. Sloep (1997). “The How's and Why's of Interdisciplinarity.” In P. Weingart, S. D. Mitchell, P. Richerson, and S. Maasen, eds., Human by Nature: Between Biology and the Social Sciences. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum Press: 103–150
Mitman, G. (1995). “Defining the Organism in the Welfare State: The Politics of Individuality in American Culture, 1890–1950.” In E. M. S. Maasen and P. Weingart, eds., Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 18 (1994): Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 249–280CrossRef
Morgan, C. L. (1895). An Introduction to Comparative Psychology. London: Walter Scott
Morrison, M. (2000). Unifying Scientific Theories: Physical Concepts and Mathematical Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Moser, P. K., and J. D. Trout, eds. (1995). Contemporary Materialism. London and New York: Routledge
Murray, J. D. (1988). “How the Leopard Gets Its Spots.” Scientific American 259: 80-87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, E. (1977). “Teleology Revisited.” Journal of Philosophy 74: 261–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Science Foundation (1995). NSF in a Changing World: The National Science Foundation's Strategic Plan. http://www.nsf.gov/nsf/nsfpubs/straplan/contents.htm
Neander, K. (1991). “Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense.” Philosophy of Science 58: 168–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, O. (1987). “Unified Science and Physicalism.” In B. McGuiness, ed., Unified Science (1932). Dordrecht: Reidel
Nicolis, G., and I. Prigogine (1989). Exploring Complexity: An Introduction. New York: W. H. Freeman
Nicolis, S. C., and Deneubourg, J. L. (1999). “Emerging Patterns and Food Recruitment in Ants: An Analytical Study.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 198: 575–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, K. C. (1986). “Recognition of Queen Larvae by Worker Honey Bees (Apis mellifera).” Ethology 73: 295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordmann, A. (1990). “Persistent Propensities: Portrait of a Familiar Controversy.” Biology and Philosophy 5: 379–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldroyd, B. P., Rinderer, T. E., and Buco., S. M. (1990). “Nepotism in Bees.” Nature 346: 706–708Google Scholar
Oldroyd, B. P., Rinderer, T. E., and Buco, S. M. (1991). “Honey Bees Dance with Their Super Sisters.” Animal Behavior 42: 121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, P., and Hilary Putnam (1958). “Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis.” In M. S. Herbert Feigl and Grover Maxwell, eds., Concepts, Theories and the Mind-Body Problem. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 2: 3–36
Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., and Belitz, K. (1994). “Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences.” Science 263 (5147): 641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A. (1979). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Oster, G., and E. O. Wilson (1978). Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Oster, G., and Murray, J. (1989). “Pattern Formation Models and Developmental Constraints.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 251: 186–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. E. Jr. (1986). “Sperm Utilization in Social Insects.” Annual Review of Entomology 31: 297–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. E. Jr. (1997). “The Evolution of Insect Societies.” Endeavour 21: 114–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. E. Jr., and Erber, J. (2002). “Levels of Behavioral Organization and the Evolution of Division of Labor.” Naturwissenschaften 89: 91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. E. Jr., and Erickson, E. H. (1984). “Selective Rearing of Queens by Worker Honey Bees: Kin or Nestmate Recognition?Annals of the Entomological Society of America 77: 578–580Google Scholar
Page, R. E. Jr., and Erickson, E. H. (1988). “Reproduction by Worker Honey Bees Apis mellifera L.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 23 (2): 117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. E., Jr., and M. K. Fondrk (1995). “The Effects of Colony-Level Selection on the Social Organization of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Colonies: Colony-Level Components of Pollen Hoarding.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36: 135–144
Page, R. E. Jr., and Metcalf, R. A. (1982). “Multiple Mating, Sperm Utilization, and Social Evolution.” American Naturalist 119: 263–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. E., Jr., and S. D. Mitchell (1991). “Self Organization and Adaptation in Insect Societies.” In A. Fine, M. Forbes, and L. Wessels, eds., PSA 1989. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association. 2: 289–298
Page, R. E. Jr., and Mitchell, S. D. (1998). “Self Organization and the Evolution of Division of Labor.” Apidologie 29: 101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. E. Jr., and Robinson, G. E. (1990). “Nepotism in Bees.” Nature 346: 708Google Scholar
Page, R. E. Jr., and Robinson, G. E. (1991). “The Genetics of Division of Labour in Honey Bee Colonies.” Advances in Insect Physiology 23: 117–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. E. Jr., Robinson, G. E., and Fondrk, M. K. (1989a). “Genetic Specialists, Kin Recognition, and Nepotism in Honey-Bee Colonies.” Nature 338: 576–579Google Scholar
Page, R. E., Jr., G. E. Robinson, N. W. Calderone, and W. C. Rothenbuhler (1989b). “Genetic Structure, Division of Labor, and the Evolution of Insect Societies.” In M. D. Breed and R. E. Page, eds., The Genetics of Social Evolution. Boulder: Westview Press: 15–29
Page, R. E. Jr., Robinson, G. E., Britton, D. S., and Fondrk, M. K. (1992). “Genotypic Variability for Rates of Behavioral Development in Worker Honeybees (Apis mellifera).” Behavioral Ecology 4: 173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. E. Jr., Robinson, G. E., Fondrk, M. K., and Nasr, M. E. (1995a). “Effects of Worker Genotypic Diversity on Honey Bee Colony Development and Behavior (Apis mellifera L.).” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26: 387–396Google Scholar
Page, R. E. Jr., Waddington, K. D., Hunt, G. J., and Fondrk, M. K. (1995b). “Genetic Determinants of Honey Bee Foraging Behavior.” Animal Behavior 50: 1617–1625Google Scholar
Page, R. E. Jr., Erber, J., and Fondryk, M. K. (1998). “The Effect of Genotype on Response Thresholds to Sucrose and Foraging Behavior of Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.).” Journal of Comparative Physiology A 182: 489–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pankiw, T., Waddington, K. D., and Page, R. E. (2001). “Modulation of Sucrose Response Thresholds in Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.): Influence of Genotype, Feeding, and Foraging Experience.” Journal of Comparative Physiology A 187: 293–301Google Scholar
Pereira, H. M., and Gordon, D. M. (2001). “A Trade-Off in Task Allocation Between Sensitivity to the Environment and Response Time.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 208: 165–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietroski, P., and Rey, G. (1995). “When Other Things Aren't Equal: Savings ‘Ceteris Paribus’ Laws from Vacuity.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (1): 81–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, R. (1997). “Why Nature Loves Economies of Scale.” New Scientist 154 (2077): 16Google Scholar
Prior, E. (1985). Dispositions. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press
Prior, E., Pargetter, R., and Jackson, F. (1982). “Three Theses About Dispositions.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 251–257Google Scholar
Raff, R. A. (1996). The Shape of Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Raff, R. A., G. A. Wray, and J. J. Henry (1991). “Implications of Radical Evolutionary Changes in Early Development for Concepts of Developmental Constraints.” In L. Warren and M. Meselson, eds., New Perspectives on Evolution. New York: Wiley-Liss: 189–207
Rappaport, R. (1968). Pigs for the Ancestors. New Haven: Yale University Press
Ratnieks, F. L. W., and Visscher, P. K. (1989). “Worker Policing in the Honeybee.” Nature 342: 796–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, H. K., and Sherman, P. W. (1993). “Adaptation and the Goals of Evolutionary Research.” Quarterly Review of Biology 68 (1): 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reif, F. (1987). Statistical Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill
Resnik, D. (1988). “Survival of the Fittest: Law of Evolution or Law of Probability?Biology and Philosophy 3: 349–362Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J., and R. N. Boyd (1987). “Simple Models of Complex Phenomena: The Case of Cultural Evolution.” In J. Dupré, ed., The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Cambridge: MIT Press: 27–54
Ricklefs, R. (1973). The Economy of Nature. New York: Chiron Press
Robinson, G. E. (1992). “Regulation of Division of Labor in Insect Societies.” Annual Review of Entomology 37: 637–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. E., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1988). “Genetic Determination of Guarding and Undertaking in Honey-Bee Colonies.” Nature 333: 356–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. E., and R. E. Page, Jr. (1989a). “Genetic Basis for Division of Labor in an Insect Society.” In M. D. Breed and R. E. Page, eds., The Genetics of Social Evolution. Boulder: Westview Press: 61–80
Robinson, G. E., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1989b). “Genetic Determination of Nectar Foraging, Pollen Foraging, and Nest-Site Scouting in Honey Bee Colonies.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 24: 317–323Google Scholar
Robinson, G. E., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1995). “Genotypic Constraints on Plasticity for Corpse Removal in Honey Bee Colonies.” Animal Behavior 49: 867-876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. E., Page, R. E. Jr., Strambi, C., and Strambi, A. (1989). “Hormonal and Genetic Control of Behavioral Integration in Honey Bee Colonies.” Science 246: 109–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. E., Page, R. E. Jr., and Fondrk, M. K. (1990). “Intracolonial Behavioral Variation in Worker Oviposition, Oophagy, and Larval Care in Queenless Honey Bee Colonies.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 26: 315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. E., Page, R. E. Jr., and Arensen, N. (1994a). “Genotypic Differences in Brood Rearing in Honey Bee Colonies: Context Specific?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 34: 125–137Google Scholar
Robinson, G. E., Page, R. E. Jr., and Huang, Z.-Y. (1994b). “Temporal Polyethism in Social Insects Is a Developmental Process.” Animal Behavior 48: 467–469Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1982). “Discussion: On the Propensity Interpretation of Fitness.” Philosophy of Science 49: 268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1985). The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ross, K. G. (1988). “Reproductive and Social Structure in Polygamous Fire Ant Colonies.” In M. D. Breed and R. E. Page, eds., The Genetics of Social Evolution. Boulder: Westview Press: 149–162
Rothenbuhler, W. C., and Page, R. E. Jr. (1989). “Genetic Variability for Temporal Polyethism in Colonies Consisting of Similarly-Aged Worker Honey Bees.” Apidologie 29: 433–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. (1988). “Molecules to Men: Evolutionary Biology and Thoughts of Progress.” In M. H. Nitecki, ed., Evolutionary Progress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Salmon, W. C. (1971). Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press
Salmon, W. C. (1990). Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Salthe, S. N. (1985). Evolving Hierarchical Systems: Their Structure and Representation. New York: Columbia University Press
Salthe, S. N. (1993). Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology. Cambridge: MIT Press
Scheiner, R., Page, R. E. Jr., and Erber, J. (2001). “Responsiveness to Sucrose Affects Tactile and Olfactory Learning in Preforaging Honey Bees of Two Genetic Strains.” Behavioral and Brain Research 120: 67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, M. K. D., and Jong, H. L. (1999). “Reduction, Elimination, and Levels: The Case of the LTP-Learning Link.” Philosophical Psychology 12: 237–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, T. (1982). “Adaptive Significance of the Age Polyethism Schedule in Honey Bee Colonies.” Behavior, Ecology and Sociobiology 11: 287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, T. (1985). Honey Bee Ecology: A Study in Adaptation in Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Seeley, T. (1989). “The Honey Bee Colony as a Superorganism.” American Scientist 77: 546–553Google Scholar
Seeley, T. (1995). Wisdom of the Hive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Seeley, T., and Tovey, C. A. (1994). “Why Search Time to Find a Food-Storer Bee Accurately Indicates the Relative Rates of Nectar Collecting and Nectar Processing in Honey Bee Colonies.” Animal Behavior 47 (2): 311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, R. K. (1972). “Sexual Selection and Dimorphism in Birds.” In B. G. Campbell, ed., Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971. Chicago: Aldine: 180–230
Shakespeare, W. (1624). Hamlet. In W. J. Craig, ed., The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. London: Oxford University Press, 1914
Sherman, P. W. (1988). “The Levels of Analysis.” Animal Behavior 36: 616–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, P. W. (1989). “The Clitoris Debates and the Levels of Analysis.” Animal Behavior 37: 697–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, W. M., and Shields, L. M. (1983). “Forcible Rape: An Evolutionary Perspective.” Ethology and Sociobiology 4: 115–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. (1962). “The Architecture of Complexity.” In The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press: 192–229
Simon, H. (1970). Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press
Simon, H. (1981). The Science of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press
Skipper, R. (1999). “Selection and the Extent of Explanatory Unification.” Philosophy of Science: Supplement 66: S196–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1980). Causal Necessity: A Pragmatic Investigation of the Necessity of Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press
Sloep, P. (1993). “Methodology Revitalized?British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2): 231–251Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. (1968). Between Science and Philosophy: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. New York: Random House
Sober, E. (1984a). Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge: MIT Press
Sober, E. (1984b). “Force and Disposition in Evolutionary Theory.” In C. Hookway, ed., Minds, Machines and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 43–61
Sober, E. (1984c). The Nature of Selection. Cambridge and London: MIT Press
Sober, E. (1987). “What Is Adaptationism?” In J. Dupré, ed., The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Cambridge: MIT Press: 105–118
Sober, E. (1997). “Two Outbreaks of Lawlessness in Recent Philosophy of Biology.” Philosophy of Science 64 (4): S458–S467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltis, J., R. N. Boyd, and P. J. Richerson (1991). Can Group-Functional Behaviors Evolve by Cultural Group Selection? An Empirical Test. Bielefeld: Center for Interdiscipinary Research
Spirtes, P., C. Glymour, and R. Scheines (1993). Causation, Prediction, and Search. New York: Springer-Verlag
Stearns, S. C. (1992). The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Stepan, N. (1986). “Race and Gender: The Role of Analogy in Science.” Isis 77: 261–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, P. (1974). Probabilistic Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell
Thornhill, R. (1979). “Review of Insect Behavior by R. W. Matthews and J. R. Matthews.” Quarterly Review of Biology 54: 365–366Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. (1980). “Rape in Panorpa Scorpionflies and a General Rape Hypothesis.” Animal Behavior 28: 52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R. (1984). “Scientific Methodology in Entomology.” Florida Entomologist 67 (1): 74–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R., and J. Alcock (1983). The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Thornhill, R., and Thornhill, N. W. (1983). “Human Rape: An Evolutionary Analysis.” Ethology and Sociobiology 4: 137–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R., and N. W. Thornhill (1987). “Human Rape: The Strengths of the Evolutionary Perspective.” In C. Crawford, M. Smith, and D. Krebs, eds., Sociobiology and Psychology: Ideas, Issues and Applications. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 269–292
Thornhill, R., and N. W. Thornhill (1989). “The Evolution of Psychological Pain.” In R. Bell, ed., Sociobiology and the Social Sciences. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press: 73–103
Tinbergen, N. (1963). “On the Aims and Methods of Ethology.” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie (Journal of Comparative Ethology) 20: 410–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todes, D. (1989). Darwin Without Malthus. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Tofts, C., and Franks, N. R. (1992). “Doing the Right Thing: Ants, Honeybees and Naked Mole-Rats.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 346–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1985). Social Evolution. Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin/Cummings
Trump, R. F., Thompson, V. C., and Rothenbuhler, W. C. (1967). “Behaviour Genetics of Nest Cleaning in Honeybees V. Effect of Previous Experience and Composition of Mixed Colonies on Response to Disease-Killed Brood.” Journal of Apicultural Research 6: 127–131Google Scholar
Van Frassen, B. C. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Van Noppen, J. P., S. de Knop, and R. Jongen (1985). Metaphors: A Bibliography of Post-1970 Publications. Amsterdam: Benjamin
Vayda, A. (1974). “Warfare in Ecological Perspective.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayda, A. (1989). “Explaining Why Marings Fought.” Journal of Anthropological Research 45 (2): 159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, P. K. (1986). “Kinship Discrimination in Queen Rearing by Honey Bees (Apis mellifera).” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 18: 453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, P. K. (1989). “A Quantitative Study of Worker Reproduction in Honey Bee Colonies.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 25: 247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrba, E. (1989). “Levels of Selection and Sorting, with Special Reference to the Species Level.” Oxford Surveys of Evolutionary Biology 6: 111–168Google Scholar
Wade, M. J. (1978). “A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection.” Quarterly Review of Biology 53: 101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, M. J. (1980). “Kin Selection: Its Components.” Science 210: 665–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, C. K. (1986). “Natural Selection Without Survival of the Fittest.” Biology and Philosophy 1: 207–225Google Scholar
Waters, C. K. (1998). “Causal Regularities in the Biological World of Contingent Distributions.” Biology and Philosophy 13: 5–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinert, R. (1995). Laws of Nature. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
West, G. B., Brown, J. H., and Enquist, B. J. (1997). “A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology.” Science 276: 122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. (1981). “Intragroup Selection and the Evolution of Insect Societies.” In R. D. Alexander and D. W. Tinkle, eds., Natural Selection and Social Behavior. New York: Chiron Press: 3–17
West-Eberhard, M. J.(1987). “Flexible Strategy and Social Evolution.” In J. L. Brown and J. Kikkawa, eds., Animal Societies: Theories and Facts. Tokyo: Japan Science Society Press: 35–51
Wheeler, W. M. (1911). “The Ant-Colony as an Organism.” Morphology 22: 307–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. (1923). Social Life among the Insects. New York: Harcourt, Brace
Wheeler, W. M. (1928). The Social Insects: Their Origin and Evolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace
Whitley, R. (1984). Intellectual and Social Organisation of the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Whitman, C. O. (1895). “Prefatory Note.” Biological Lectures 1894: ⅲ–ⅶ
Wickler, W. (1968). Mimicry in Plants and Animals. New York: McGraw-Hill
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Wilson, D. S., and Sober, E. (1989). “Reviving the Superorganism.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 136: 337–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1968). “The Superorganism Concept and Beyond.” In M. N. M. Chauvin and P. Grasse, eds., L'effet de groupe chez les animaux. Paris: Colloque internationaux du centre national de la recherche scientifique. No. 173: 27–39
Wilson, E. O. (1971). The Insect Societies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Wilson, E. O. (1978). On Human Nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Wilson, E. O. (1985a). The Principles of Caste Evolution.” In B. Hölldobler and M. Lindauer, eds., Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates: 307–324
Wilson, E. O. (1985b). “The Sociogenesis of Insect Colonies.” Science 228: 1489–1495
Wimsatt, W. C. (1972). “Teleology and the Logical Structure of Function Statements.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3: 1–80Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (1980). “Reductionistic Research Strategies and Their Biases in the Units of Selection Controversy.” In T. Nickles, ed., Scientific Discovery. Dordrecht: Reidel. 2: 213–259CrossRef
Wimsatt, W. C. (1986). “Forms of Aggregativity.” In P. Donagon and Wedin, eds., Human Nature and Natural Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel: 259–291CrossRef
Wimsatt, W. C. (1987). “False Models as Means to Truer Theories.” In M. H. Nitecki and A. Hoffman, eds., Neutral Models in Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 23–55
Wimsatt, W. C. (2000). “Emergence as Non-Aggregativity and the Biases of Reductionisms.” Foundations of Science 5: 269–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, M. L. (1987). The Biology of the Honey Bee. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Winston, M. L., and Katz, S. J. (1982). “Foraging Differences between Cross-Fostered Honeybee Workers (Apis mellifera) of European and Africanized Races.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 10: 125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winston, M. L., and Slessor, K. N. (1998). “Honey Bee Primer Pheromones and Colony Organization: Gaps in Our Knowledge.” Apidologie 29: 81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (1997). “Explanation, Invariance, and Intervention.” Philosophy of Science 64: S26–S41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (2000). “Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51: 197–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (2001). “Law and Explanation in Biology: Invariance Is the Kind of Stability That Matters.” Philosophy of Science 68: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (2002a). A Theory of Explanation: Causation, Invariance, and Intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Woodward, J. (2002b). “There Is No Such Thing as a Ceteris Paribus Law.” Erkenntnis 57, no. 3
Woolgar, S., ed. (1988). Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. London: Sage
Wouters, A. (1995). “Viability Explanation.” Biology and Philosophy 10: 435–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. (1973). “Functions.” Philosophical Review 82 (2): 139–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. (1976). Teleological Explanations. Los Angeles: University of California Press
Wynne-Edwards, V. C. (1962). Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd
Zimmering, S., Sandler, L., and Nicoletti, B. (1970). “Mechanisms of Meiotic Drive.” Annual Review of Genetics 4: 409–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Sandra D. Mitchell, University of Pittsburgh
  • Book: Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802683.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Sandra D. Mitchell, University of Pittsburgh
  • Book: Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802683.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Sandra D. Mitchell, University of Pittsburgh
  • Book: Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802683.008
Available formats
×