,ABA Task Force on Corporate Responsibility, Preliminary Report of the ABA Task Force on Corporate Responsibility, (2002) 58 Business Lawyer189Google Scholar

Abel, R., The Legal Profession in England and Wales (Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd, 1988)Google Scholar

Abel, R., English Lawyers Between Market and State (Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Albert, C. C., ‘The lawyer-director: an oxymoron?’, (1996) 9 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics413Google Scholar

Alcock, A., ‘An accidental change to directors’ duties?', (2009) 30 Company Lawyer362Google Scholar

Alexander, V., ‘The corporate attorney–client privilege: a study of the participants’, (1989) 63 St. John's Law Review191Google Scholar

Alfieri, A., ‘The fall of legal ethics and the rise of risk management’, (2008) 93 Georgetown Law Journal1Google Scholar

Andrews, T. R., ‘Nonlawyers in the business of law: does the one who has the gold really make the rules?’, (1989) 40 Hastings Law Journal577Google Scholar

Armour, J., ‘Enforcement strategies in the UK: a roadmap and empirical assessment’, in Armour, J. and Payne, J., Rationality in Company Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar

Armour, J. and Skeel, D., ‘Who writes the rules for hostile takeovers and why? The peculiar divergence of US and UK takeover regulation’, (2007) 95 Georgetown Law Journal1727Google Scholar

Armour, J., Black, B., Cheffins, C. and Nolan, R., ‘Private enforcement of corporate law: an empirical comparison of the United Kingdom and the United States’, (2009) 6 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies687CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arthur, H. W., ‘A global code of ethics for the transnational legal field’, (1999) 2 Legal Ethics59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Association of Corporate Counsel, Chief Legal Officer Survey (2003)

Auburn, J., Legal Professional Privilege: Law and Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar

Austin, R. P. and Ramsay, I. M., Ford's Principles of Corporations Law, 12th edn (Australia: LexisNexis, Butterworths, 2005)Google Scholar

,Australian Bureau of Statistics, Legal Services Australia, 2007–08 (June 2009)

Avery Jones, J. F., ‘Tax law: rules or principles?’, (1996) British Tax Review580Google Scholar

Avgouleas, E., The Mechanics and Regulation of Market Abuse (Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J., Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Bainbridge, S., ‘The Tournament at the intersection of business and legal ethics’, (2004) 1 University of St Thomas Law Journal909Google Scholar

Bainbridge, S., ‘Sarbanes-Oxley: legislating in haste, repenting in leisure’, (2006) UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 06–14

Bainbridge, S. and Johnson, C., ‘Managerialism, legal ethics and Sarbanes-Oxley Section 307’, (2004) Michigan State Law Review299Google Scholar

Baldwin, R., Cave, M. and Malleson, K., ‘Regulating legal services: time for the big bang?’, (2004) 67 MLR787CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Bar Council, Annual Statistics December 2009

,Bar Council, Code of Conduct of the Bar of England and Wales, 8th edn (2004)

Batson, N., Court Appointed Examiner, Final Report, In Re Enron Corporation (November 2005)

Baysinger, B. D. and Butler, H. N., ‘Revolution versus evolution in corporation law: the ALI's project and the independent director’, (1983) 52 George Washington Law Review557Google Scholar

Bazley, S., ‘The financial services authority, risk-based regulation, principles-based rules and accountability’, (2008) Journal of Banking Law and Regulation422Google Scholar

Beattie, D., ‘Legal opinions in international transactions’, (2005) International Trade Law and Regulation69Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L., ‘The case for increasing shareholder power’, (2005) 118 Harvard Law Review833Google Scholar

Bell, R. E., ‘The prosecution of lawyers for money laundering offences’, (2002) 6 Journal of Money Laundering Compliance17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Ishai, S., ‘Corporate gatekeeper liability in Canada’, (2007) 42 Texas International Law Journal442Google Scholar

Bennett, C., ‘The market abuse link between Shell and Enron’, (2005) Company Lawyer180Google Scholar

Bentch, S., ‘Confidentiality, corporate counsel, and competition law: representing multi-national corporations in the European Union’, (2004) 35 Saint Mary's Law Journal1003Google Scholar

Berle, A. and Means, G., The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York: Macmillan, 1947)Google Scholar

Bhagat, S. and Black, B., ‘The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance’, (2002) 27 Journal of Corporation Law231Google Scholar

Birks, P., ‘The content of fiduciary obligation’, (2000) 34 Israel Law Review3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, J., ‘Forms and paradoxes of principles-based regulation’, (2008) 3 Capital Markets Law Journal425CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, J., ‘Risk-based regulation’, in Legal Services Board, The Future of Legal Services: Emerging Thinking (June 2010)

Blum, J., ‘Shell to pay $151 million in regulatory fines’, Washington Post, 30 July 2004

Bolocan, M. (ed.), Professional Legal Ethics: A Comparative Perspective (Central European and Eurasian Law Initiative, 2002) (available on ABA website)Google Scholar

Boon, A. and Flood, J., ‘Globalisation of professional ethics? the significance of lawyers’ international codes of conduct', (1999) 2 Legal Ethics29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boon, A. and Levin, J., The Ethics and Conduct of Lawyers in England and Wales, 2nd edn (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P., ‘Foreword’, in Dezalay, Y. and Sugarman, D. (eds.), Professional Competition and Professional Power: Lawyers, Accountants and the Social Construction of Markets (London: Routledge, 1995)Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J., Minority Shareholders' Remedies (Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, C., ‘Transatlantic misunderstandings: corporate law and societies’, (1999) 53 University of Miami Law Review269Google Scholar

Bratton, W., ‘Enron and the dark side of shareholder value’, (2002) 76 Tulane Law Review1275Google Scholar

Bratton, W., ‘Enron, Sarbanes-Oxley and accounting: rules versus principles versus rents’, (2003) 48 Villanova Law Review1023Google Scholar

Brockman, J., ‘An update on self-regulation in the legal profession (1989–2000): funnel in and funnel out’, (2004) 19 Canadian Journal of Law and Society55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, L., ‘Reconsidering the corporate attorney client privilege: a response to the compelled waiver paradox’, (2006) 34 Hofstra Law Review897Google Scholar

Brown, L. and Higgins, H., ‘Managing earnings surprises in the US versus 12 other countries’, (2001) Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 373Google Scholar

Bruner, C. M., ‘The enduring ambivalence of corporate law’, (2008) 59 Alabama Law Review1385Google Scholar

Bruner, C. M., ‘Power and purpose in the Anglo-American corporation’, (2010) 50 Virginia Journal of International Law579Google Scholar

Buckland, R., ‘UK company board structures and corporate performance: a cohort study of 1990s IPOs in the UK’, (2001), EFMA 2001 Lugano Meetings, Aberdeen Accountancy, Finance & Mgmt. Working Paper 01-01, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=269807 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.269807CrossRef

Burkard, P., ‘Attorney–client privilege in the EEC: the perspective of multinational corporate counsel’, (1986) 20 International Lawyer677Google Scholar

Cameron, C., ‘Hired guns and smoking guns: McCabe v. British American Tobacco Australia Ltd’, (2002) 25 University of New South Wales Law Journal768Google Scholar

Cameron, C. and Liberman, J., ‘Destruction of documents before proceedings commence: what is a court to do?’, (2003) 27 Melbourne University Law Review273Google Scholar

,Canadian Bar Association Task Force on Conflicts of Interest, Conflicts of Interest: Final Report, Recommendations & Toolkit (August 2008)

Carle, S. D., ‘Lawyers’ duty to do justice: a new look at the history of the 1908 canons', (1999) 24 Law and Social Inquiry1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carty, H., ‘Joint tortfeasance and assistance liability’, (1999) Legal Studies489Google Scholar

Carver, A., ‘Corporate governance – capitalism's fellow traveller’, in Patfield, F. (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law: 2 (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997)Google Scholar

Carver, J. P., ‘The role of lawyers: hired guns or public servants?’, in O'Brien, J. (ed.), Governing the Corporation: Regulation and Corporate Governance in an Age of Scandal and Global Markets (Chichester: John Wiley, 2005)Google Scholar

Chambers, A., ‘Gatekeepers, the professions and corporate governance: review’, (2007) 15 Corporate Governance93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambliss, E., ‘The nirvana fallacy in law firm regulation debates’, (2005) 33 Fordham Urban Law Journal119Google Scholar

Chayes, A. and Chayes, A., ‘Corporate counsel and the elite law firm’, (1985) 37 Stanford Law Review277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheffins, B., Corporate Ownership and Control: British Business Transformed (Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheffins, B., ‘Law as bedrock: the foundations of an economy dominated by widely held public companies’, (2003) 1 OJLS1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,City of London Law Society, Letter to the Review of the Regulation of Corporate Legal Work, 8 January 2009 (City of London Law Society website)

,City of London Law Society, Letter to the Rt Honourable Lord Hunt of Wirral, 9 April 2009 (City of London Law Society website)

Clark, D. S., ‘Comparing the work and organization of lawyers worldwide: the persistence of legal traditions’, in Barcelo, J. and Cramton, R. C. (eds.), Lawyers' Practice and Ideals: A Comparative View (Leiden: Kluwer Law International, 1999)Google Scholar

Clarke, T. (ed.), Theories of Corporate Governance: The Philosopohical Foundations of Corporate Governance (London: Routledge, 2008)Google Scholar

Clementi, D., Report of the Review of the Regulatory Framework for Legal Services in England and Wales (December 2004)

Coates, J. C., ‘The goal and promise of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’, (2007) 21 Journal of Economic Perspectives91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cochran, R. F., Rhode, D. L., Tremblay, P. R. and Shaffer, T. L., ‘Client counselling and moral responsibility’, (2003) 30 Pepperdine Law Review591Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘The attorney as gatekeeper: an agenda for the SEC’, (2003) 103 Columbia Law Review1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘Can Lawyers wear blinders? Gatekeepers and third party opinions’, (2005) 84 Texas Law Review59Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘Gatekeeper failure and reform: the challenge of fashioning relevant reforms’, (2004) 84 Boston University Law Review301Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., Gatekeepers: The Professions and Corporate Governance (Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘Understanding Enron: “It's about the gatekeepers, stupid”’, (2002) 57 Business Lawyer1403Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘What went wrong? An initial inquiry into the causes of the 2008 financial crisis’, (2009) 9 Journal of Corporate Law Studies1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Commerce & Industry Group, A Fine Line (July 2006)

,Commerce & Industry Group, Blowing the Whistle (April 2007)

,Commerce & Industry Group, Reconciling the Irreconcilable (March 2005)

Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance Report (Cadbury Report) (1992)

,Companies House, Statistical Tables on Companies Registration Activities 2009–10

,Company Law Review Steering Group, Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Developing the Framework (URN 00/656) (2000)

,Competition Bureau of Canada, Self-Regulated Professions – Balancing Competition and Regulation (December 2007)

Conaglen, M., ‘Fiduciary regulation of conflict between duties’, (2009) LQR111Google Scholar

Conaglen, M., ‘Remedial ramifications of conflicts between a fiduciary's duties’, (2010) LQR72Google Scholar

Cone, S., ‘International legal practice involving England and New York following adoption of the United Kingdom Legal Services Act 2007’, (2008) 28 Northwestern Journal of International Law415Google Scholar

Corones, S., ‘Solicitors’ liability for misleading conduct', (1998) 72 Australian Law Journal775Google Scholar

,Council of the Bars and Law Societies of Europe, Code of Conduct for European Lawyers (2006)

,Council of the Bars and Law Societies of Europe, Response from the Council of the Bars and Law Societies of the European Union (CCBE) to the Home Office Consultation on the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the Money Laundering Regulations 2003: Obligations of Accountants to Report Money Laundering (September 2004)

,Council of the Bars and Law Societies of Europe, Response to the SRA's Consultation on New Forms of Practice and Regulation for Alternative Business Structures (September 2009)

Cox, J. D., ‘The paradoxical corporate and securities law implications of counsel serving on the client's board’, (2002) 80 Washington University Law Quarterly541Google Scholar

Cramton, R. C., ‘A comparative look at legal ethics rules and professional ideologies in a time of change’, in Barcelo, J. and Cramton, R. C. (eds.), Lawyers' Practice and Ideals: A Comparative View (Leiden: Kluwer Law International, 1999)Google Scholar

Cramton, R. C., ‘Enron and the corporate lawyer: a primer on legal and ethical issues’, (2002) 58 Business Lawyer143Google Scholar

Cramton, R. C. and Koniak, S. P., ‘Rule, story and commitment in the teaching of legal ethics’, (1996) 38 William & Mary Law Review145Google Scholar

Cramton, R. C., Cohen, G. and Koniak, S., ‘Legal and ethical duties of lawyers after Sarbanes-Oxley’, (2004) 49 Villanova Law Review725Google Scholar

Cranston, R. (ed.), Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 1995)

Cunningham, L. A., ‘Sharing accounting's burden: business lawyers in Enron's dark shadows’, (2002) 57 Business Lawyer1421Google Scholar

Dal Pont, G. E., Lawyers' Professional Responsibility, 3rd edn (Sydney: Lawbook Co, 2006)Google Scholar

Daly, M. C., ‘The cultural, ethical and legal challenges in lawyering for a global organization: the role of the general counsel’, (1997) 46 Emory Law Journal1057Google Scholar

Daly, M. C., ‘The dichotomy between standards and rules: a new way of understanding the differences in perceptions of lawyer codes of conduct by US and foreign lawyers’, (1999) 32 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law1117Google Scholar

Das, O., ‘Legal process outsourcing: transforming the legal landscape’, in Legal Services Board, The Future of Legal Services: Emerging Thinking (June 2010)Google Scholar

Davey, J. and Ashton, J., ‘Standoff over Stuart Rose's executive chairman plan at Marks and Spencer’, The Times, 30 March 2008Google Scholar

Davies, M., ‘The demise of professional self-regulation? Evidence from the “ideal type” professions of medicine and law’, (2010) Professional Negligence3Google Scholar

Davies, P. L., Gower and Davies: The Principles of Modern Company Law, 8th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008)Google Scholar

Davies, P. L., ‘Liability for misstatements to the market: some reflections’, (2009) 2 Journal of Corporate Law Studies295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, P. L., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H. and Rock, E. (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: a Comparative and Functional Approach, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009)

Deakin, S. and Hughes, A., ‘Comparative corporate governance: an interdisciplinary agenda’, (1997) 24 Journal of Law and Society1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deakin, S. and Hughes, A., Directors Duties: Empirical Findings Report to the Law Commission (August 1999)

Dean, J., ‘ABS regulation “will fail”’, Law Society Gazette, 4 June 2009Google Scholar

Dean, J., ‘City brokers law firm private equity talks’, Law Society Gazette, 3 July 2008Google Scholar

Dean, J., ‘Partner exodus forecast once alternative business structures available’, Law Society Gazette, 25 March 2010Google Scholar

Dean, J., ‘Top firms gear up for private investors’, Law Society Gazette, 5 August 2010Google Scholar

Deards, E., ‘MDPs: a cause for concern or celebration?’, (2001) 8 International Journal of the Legal Profession125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeBuse, J. R., ‘Opening at $25½ is big firm USA: why America may eventually have a publicly traded law firm, and why law firms can succeed without going public’, (2008) 34 Journal of Corporation Law317Google Scholar

DeMott, D. A., ‘The discrete roles of general counsel’, (2005) 74 Fordham Law Review955Google Scholar

DeMott, D. A., ‘Organisational incentives to care about the law’, (1997) Law and Contemporary Problems39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (G. MacGregor FCA, G. Newey, QC), Report on the Affairs of Phoenix Venture Holdings Ltd, MG Rover Group Ltd, and 33 Other Companies (Inspectors appointed by the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry under section 432(2) of the Companies Act 1985), Vols. 1 and 2 (London: Stationery Office, 2009)

,Department for Constitutional Affairs, The Future of Legal Services: Putting Consumers First (2005)

,Department of Trade and Industry (Heilbron, H. and Boohan, M.), Blue Arrow plc. Investigation under Section 432(2) of the Companies Act 1985 (DTI) (London: Stationery Office, 1991)Google Scholar

,Department of Trade and Industry (M. Crystal and D. Lane Spence) County NatWest Limited, County NatWest Securities Limited: Investigation under Section 432(2) of the Companies Act 1985 (London: Stationery Office, 1989)Google Scholar

,Department of Trade and Industry (H. Brooker, QC, and H. G. C. Aldous, QC) House of Fraser Holdings plc: Investigation under Section 432(2) of the Companies Act 1985 (London: Stationery Office, 1988)Google Scholar

,Department of Trade and Industry (H. B. H. Carlisle and M. G. Lickiss) Milbury plc, Westminster Property Group Ltd: Investigation under Section 432(1) and Section 442 of the Companies Act 1985 (London: Stationery Office, 1988)Google Scholar

,Department of Trade and Industry (R. M. Owen and P. D. Powell) The Milford Docks Company: Investigation under Section 432(2) of the Companies Act 1985 (London: Stationery Office, 1992)Google Scholar

,Department of Trade and Industry (Sir Roger Thomas and R Turner) Mirror Group Newspapers plc: Investigations under Section 432(1) and Section 442 of the Companies Act 1985 (London: Stationery Office, 2001)Google Scholar

,Department of Trade and Industry (R. G. B. McCombe and J. K. Heywood) Norton Group plc: Investigation under Section 432(2) of the Companies Act 1985 (London: Stationery Office, 1993)Google Scholar

,Department of Trade and Industry (M. H. Arden and G. N. Lane) Rotaprint plc: Investigations under Section 432(1) and Section 442 of the Companies Act 1985 (London: Stationery Office, 1991)Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y., ‘Professional competition and the social construction of transnational regulatory expertise’, in McCahery, J., Picciotto, S. and Scott, C. (eds.), Corporate Control and Accountability (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Dezelay, Y. and Garth, B., ‘The Big Five versus big law: confrontational rhetoric in the service of legitimating shifting relationships between business and law’, in Drolshammer, J. and Pfeifer, M. (eds.), The Internationalisation of the Practice of Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001)Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y. and Sugarman, D. (eds.), Professional Competition and Professional Power: Lawyers, Accountants and the Social Construction of Markets (London: Routledge, 1995)Google Scholar

Dignam, A. and Galanis, M., ‘Australia inside/out: governance determinants in Australian listed companies’, (2004) 28 Melbourne University Law Review623Google Scholar

Dignam, A. and Galanis, M., The Globalisation of Corporate Governance (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar

Di Lorenzo, V., ‘Does the law encourage unethical conduct in the securities industry?’, (2006) 11 Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law765Google Scholar

Dodek, A., ‘Canadian legal ethics: ready for the twenty-first century at last’, (2009) 46 Osgoode Hall Law Journal1Google Scholar

Duggin, S., ‘The pivotal role of general counsel in promoting corporate integrity and professional responsibility’, (2007) 51 St Louis University Law Journal989Google Scholar

Dzienkowski, J. and Peroni, R., ‘Multidisciplinary practice and the American legal profession: a market approach to regulating the delivery of legal services in the twenty-first century’, (2000) 69 Fordham Law Review83Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R., The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (London: Harvard University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Eisenberg, M., ‘Corporate law and social norms’, (1999) 99 Columbia Law Review1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenberg, T. and Macey, J., ‘Was Arthur Andersen different? An empirical examination of major accounting firm audits of large clients’, (2004) 1 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies263CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, S., ‘Fiduciary liability for client mortgage frauds’, (1999) 13 Trust Law International74Google Scholar

Etherington, L. and Lee, R., ‘Ethical codes and cultural context: ensuring legal ethics in the global law firm’, (2007) 14 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,European Commission, The Application to the Legal Profession of Directive 91/ 308/EEC on the Prevention of the Use of the Financial Systems for the Purpose of Money Laundering, Staff Working Document, SEC (2006)

Evers, M. and Harris, J., ‘The duties of in-house counsel: the bold, the bright and the blurred?’, (2009) 37 Australian Business Law Review267Google Scholar

Faulconbridge, J., ‘Managing the transnational law firm: a relational analysis of professional systems, embedded actors, and time-space-sensitive governance’, (2008) 84 Economic Geography185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faulconbridge, J., ‘Negotiating cultures of work in transnational law firms’, (2008) 8 Journal of Economic Geography497CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faulconbridge, J. R. and Muzio, D., ‘The financialization of large law firms: situated discourses and practices of reorganization’, (2009) 9 Journal of Economic Geography641CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Federation of the Law Societies of Canada, Advisory Committee on Conflicts of Interest, Final Report (June 2010)

Ferran, E., ‘Are US-style investor suits coming to the UK?’, (2009) 2 Journal of Corporate Law Studies315CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Financial Reporting Council, 2009 Review of the Combined Code: Final Report (December 2009)

,Financial Reporting Council, Progress Report: Review of the Effectiveness of the Combined Code (July 2009)

,Financial Reporting Council, Review of the 2003 Combined Code (January 2006)

,Financial Reporting Council, Turnbull Guidance on Internal Control (October 2005)

,Financial Reporting Council, The UK Corporate Governance Code (June 2010)

Financial Reporting Council and Financial Services Authority, Enhancing the Auditor's Contribution to Financial Regulation, Discussion Paper 10/3 (June 2010)

,Financial Services Authority, The Approved Persons Regime –Significant Influence Function Review, Consultation Paper 8/25 (December 2008)

,Financial Services Authority, The Turner Review: A Regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis (March 2009)

Finch, V., ‘Personal accountability and corporate control: the role of directors’ and officers' liability insurance', (1994) 57 MLR880CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelstein, S. and Mooney, A., ‘Not the usual suspects: how to use board process to make boards better’, (2003) 17 Academy of Management Executive101Google Scholar

Finn, P. D., ‘Fiduciary law and the modern commercial world’, in McKendrick, E. (ed.), Commercial Aspects of Trusts and Fiduciary Obligations (Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Finn, P. D., Fiduciary Obligations (Sydney: Law Book Co., 1977)Google Scholar

Fisch, J. and Rosen, K., ‘Is there a role for lawyers in preventing future Enrons?’, (2003) 48 Villanova Law Review1097Google Scholar

Flanagan, R., ‘The adulteration of fiduciary doctrine in corporate law’, (2006) LQR449Google Scholar

Flenley, W. and Leech, T., Solicitors' Negligence and Liability, 2nd edn (West Sussex: Tottel Publishers, 2008)Google Scholar

Flood, J., ‘Doing business – the management of uncertainty in lawyers’ work', (1991) 25 Law and Society Review1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flood, J., ‘Globalisation and large law firms’, in Cane, P. and Congahan, J. (eds.), The New Oxford Companion to Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Flood, J., ‘Megalawyering in the global order: the cultural, social and economic transformation of global legal practice’, (1996) 3 International Journal of the Legal Profession169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flood, J., ‘The Re-landscaping of the legal profession: large law firms and professional re-regulation’ (forthcoming, Current Sociology, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flood, J. and Sosa, F., ‘Lawyers, law firms and the stabilization of transnational business’, (2008) 28 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business489Google Scholar

Fortney, S., ‘Chicken Little lives: the anticipated and actual effect of Sarbanes-Oxley on corporate lawyers’ conduct', (2004) 33 Capital University Law Review61Google Scholar

Francis, A., ‘Legal ethics, the marketplace and the fragmentation of legal professionalism’, (2005) 12 International Journal of the Legal Profession173CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, J., ‘Defining taxpayer responsibility: in support of a general anti-avoidance principle’, (2004) British Tax Review332Google Scholar

Freedman, J., ‘Limited liability: large company theory and small firms’, (2000) 63 MLR317CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, R. E., Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Boston: Pitman, 1984)Google Scholar

Fung, E. T. S., ‘Buy out order and shareholders agreement’, (1997) 18 Company Lawyer59Google Scholar

Galanter, M. and Henderson, W., ‘The Elastic Tournament: A Second Transformation of the Big Law Firm’, (2008) 60 Stanford Law Review1867Google Scholar

Galanter, M. and Palay, T., ‘Large law firms and professional responsibility’, in Cranston, R. (ed.), Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Gallant, M., ‘Canada, crime control and co-opting legal counsel: canvassing the confidentiality crisis’, (2003) 10 Journal of Financial Crime308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garcia, B., ‘Board independence and real earnings management: the case of R and D expenditure’, (2008) 16 Corporate Governance116Google Scholar

Garth, B., ‘Comparative law and the legal profession: notes towards a reorientation of research’, in Barcelo, J. and Cramton, R. C. (eds.), Lawyers' Practice and Ideals: A Comparative View (Leiden: Kluwer Law International, 1999)Google Scholar

Gibb, G., ‘Solicitors to be freed from red tape for a “grown-up relationship” with regulator’, The Times, 30 March 2010Google Scholar

Gillers, S., Simon, R. and Perlman, A., Regulation of Lawyers, Standards and Statutes 2010 (New York: Aspen, 2010)Google Scholar

Gilson, R. J. and Kraakman, R. H., ‘The mechanisms of market efficiency’, (1984) 70 Vanderbilt Law Review549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glenn, H. P., ‘Professional structures and professional ethics’, (1989) 35 McGill Law Journal424Google Scholar

Goddard, D., ‘Corporate personality – limited recourse and its limits’, in Rickett, C. E. F. and Grantham, R. B. (eds.), Corporate Personality in the 20th Century (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998)Google Scholar

Goddard, R., ‘Enforcing the hypothetical bargain: sections 459–461 of the Companies Act 1985’, (1999) Company Lawyer66Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J., ‘The core values of the legal profession for lawyers today and tomorrow’, (2008) 28 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business441Google Scholar

Gordon, R., ‘A new role for lawyers? The corporate counselor after Enron’, (2003) 35 Connecticut Law Review1185Google Scholar

Gordon, R., ‘The role of lawyers in producing the rule of law: some critical reflections’, (2010) 11 Theoretical Inquiries in Law441CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goubran, S., ‘Conflicts of duty: the perennial lawyers’ tale – a comparative study of the law in England and Wales', (2006) 30 Melbourne University Law Review4Google Scholar

Grantham, R., ‘The doctrinal basis of the rights of company shareholders’, (1998) 57 Cambridge Law Journal554Google Scholar

Green, N., ‘The future of the Bar’, 10 June 2010 (Bar Council website)

Greenfield, K., ‘From rights to regulation in corporate law’, in Patfield, F. (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law: 2 (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997)Google Scholar

Griffin, L., ‘Compelled co-operation and the new corporate criminal procedure’, (2007) 82 New York University Law Review311Google Scholar

Griffith, S. J., ‘Towards an ethical duty to market investors’, (2003) 35 Connecticut Law Review1223Google Scholar

Griffiths-Baker, J. E., Serving Two Masters: Conflicts of Interest in the Modern Law Firm, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002)Google Scholar

Grimshaw, C., ‘Top firms falling out of love with old-school lockstep as merit pay spreads’, Legal Week, 31 May 2007Google Scholar

Grinyer, J., Russell, A. and Collinson, D., ‘Evidence of managerial short-termism in the UK’, (1998) 9 British Journal of Management13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, L., ‘Ethical problems of law firm associates’, (1985) 26 William & Mary Law Review259Google Scholar

Grout, P., The Clementi Report: Potential Risks of External Ownership and Regulatory Reponses: A Report to the Department of Constitutional Affairs, CMPO Working Paper Series No.05/135 (July 2005)

Gunz, H. and Gunz, S., ‘Client capture and the professional service firm’, (2008) 45 American Business Law Journal685CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunz, H. and Gunz, S., ‘Hired professional to hired gun: an identity theory approach to understanding the ethical behaviour of professionals in non-professional organizations’, (2007) 60 Human Relations851CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunz, H. and Gunz, S., ‘The lawyer's response to organizational professional conflict: an empirical study of the ethical decision making of in-house counsel’, (2002) 39 American Business Law Journal24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hainsworth, A., ‘The legal limits of the “gatekeeper” concept – the civil liability of professional service providers for assistance in corporate malpractice’, (2003) 19 Professional Negligence449Google Scholar

Hamdani, A., ‘Gatekeeper liability’, (2003) 77 Southern California Law Review53Google Scholar

Hamilton, J., ‘Negligence in the corridors? The interaction between “separate rooms” of regulation and the common law in financial services’, (2007) Professional Negligence134Google Scholar

Hanlon, G., ‘A profession in transition? Lawyers, the marketplace and significant others’, (1997) 60 MLR798CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hannigan, B., Company Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Hannigan, B., ‘Drawing boundaries between derivative claims and unfairly prejudicial conduct’, (2009) JBL606Google Scholar

Hannigan, B., ‘Section 459 of the Companies Act 1985 – a code of conduct for the quasi-partnership?’, (1988) LMCLQ60Google Scholar

Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘Agency problems and legal strategies’, in Davies, P., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Rock, E. (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘What is corporate law?’, in Davies, P., Hansmann, H., Hertig, G., Hopt, K., Kanda, H. and Rock, E. (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Harrington, C., ‘Attorney gatekeeper duties in an increasingly complex world: revisiting the “noisy withdrawal” proposal of SEC Rule 205’, (2009) 22 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics893Google Scholar

Harris, M. S. and Valihura, K., ‘Outside counsel as director: the pros and potential pitfalls of dual service’, (1998) Business Lawyer479Google Scholar

Hart, O., ‘Corporate governance: some theory and implications’, (1995) 105 Economic Journal678CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hazard, G., ‘Ethical dilemmas of corporate counsel’, (1997) 46 Emory Law Journal1011Google Scholar

Hazard, G., ‘Three afterthoughts’, (1997) 46 Emory Law Journal1053Google Scholar

Heinz, J. P. and Laumann, E. O., Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar (Illinois: Northwestern University Law Press, 1982)Google Scholar

Hellwig, H., ‘The legal profession in Europe: achievements, challenges and chances’, (2003) 4 German Law Journal263Google Scholar

Hicks, A., ‘Corporate form: questioning the unsung hero’, (1997) JBL306Google Scholar

Higgins, A., ‘Corporate abuse of legal professional privilege’, (2008) 27 CJQ377Google Scholar

Higgins, A., ‘Legal advice privilege and its relevance to corporations’, (2010) 73 MLR371CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgs, D., Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors, DTI, January 2003

Hill, A., ‘A problem of privilege: in-house counsel and the attorney–client privilege in the United States and the European Community’, (1995) Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law145Google Scholar

Hirt, H. C., ‘The company's decision to litigate against its directors: legal strategies to deal with the board of directors’ conflict of interest', (2005) JBL152Google Scholar

Hirt, H. C., ‘In what circumstances should breaches of directors’ duties give rise to a remedy under ss. 459–461 of the Companies Act 1985', (2003) 24 Company Lawyer1Google Scholar

,HM Treasury, Davies Review of Issuer Liability: Liability for Misstatements to the Market: Discussion Paper (March 2007)

,HM Treasury, Final Report of the Davies Review on Issuer Liability (June 2007)

,HM Treasury, A New Approach to Financial Regulation: Judgment, Focus and Stability Cm7874 (July 2010)

,HM Treasury, Professional Services Global Competitiveness Group Report (March 2009)

Hollander, C., QC, and Salzedo, S., Conflicts of Interest, 3rd edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008)Google Scholar

Hollander, G., ‘Firm leaders evenly split over ABS issue’, The Lawyer, 7 June 2010Google Scholar

Hollander, G., ‘Freshfields to go live with new associate pay model’, The Lawyer, 12 November 2009Google Scholar

Hollander, G., ‘Kraft fallout threatens M&A landscape as Takeover Panel flexes its muscles’, The Lawyer, 7 June 2010Google Scholar

Hollander, G., ‘Linklaters “could face litigation” over explosive Lehman report’, The Lawyer, 15 March 2010Google Scholar

,House of Lords, Report of European Union Committee on Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism (2009 HL 132-I)

Howe, R., ‘The duties and liabilities of attorneys in rendering legal opinions’, (1989) Columbia Business Law Review283Google Scholar

Ibrahim, D. M., ‘Solving the Problem of client identity in the context of closely held businesses’, (2004) 56 Alabama Law Review181Google Scholar

,International Bar Association, GATS: A Handbook for International Bar Association Member Bars (May 2002)

,International Bar Association, International Code of Ethics (1988)

,International Financial Services London (IFSL), Legal Services 2009

,International Legal Services Advisory Council, Second Survey of International Legal Services (2006–7)

Jackson, D. F., QC, Report of the Special Commission of Inquiry into the Medical Research and Compensation Foundation (September 2004)

Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H., ‘Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs, and ownership structure’, (1976) 3 Journal of Financial Economics, 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, L. and Garvis, D., ‘Are corporate officers advised about fiduciary duties?’, (2009) 64 Business Lawyer1105Google Scholar

Johnson, L. and Ricca, R., ‘(Not) advising corporate officers about fiduciary duties’, (2007) 42 Wake Forest Law Review663Google Scholar

,Joint Committee on the Draft Legal Services Bill, Draft Legal Services Bill (2006 HC 1154-I) (2006 HL Paper 232-I), Vol. I

Jones, R., ‘Law, norms and the breakdown of the board: promoting accountability in corporate governance’, (2006) 92 Iowa Law Review105Google Scholar

Kagan, R. A. and Rosen, R. E., ‘On the social significance of large law firm practice’, (1985) 37 Stanford Law Review399CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamar, E., ‘Shareholder litigation under indeterminate corporate law’, (1999) 66 University of Chicago Law Review887CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kamar, E., Karaca-Mandic, P. and Talley, E., ‘Going-private decisions and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002: a cross-country analysis’, (2009) Journal of Law, Economics and Organization107Google Scholar

Keay, A., Directors' Duties (Bristol: Jordans, 2009)Google Scholar

Keay, A., ‘The duty of directors to take account of creditors’ interests: has it any role to play?', (2002) JBL379Google Scholar

Keay, A., ‘Section 172(1) of the Companies Act 2006: an interpretation and assessment’, (2007) 28 Company Lawyer106Google Scholar

Keay, A. and Loughrey, J., ‘Derivative proceedings in a brave new world for company management and shareholders’, (2010) 3 JBL151Google Scholar

Kershaw, D., ‘Evading Enron: taking principles too seriously in accounting regulation’, (2005) 68 MLR594CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kershaw, D., ‘Waiting for Enron: the unstable equilibrium of auditor independence regulation’, (2006) 33 Journal of Law and Society388CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, S. H., ‘The banality of fraud: re-situating the inside counsel as gatekeeper’, (2005) 74 Fordham Law Review983Google Scholar

Kim, S. H., ‘Dual identities and dueling obligations: preserving independence in corporate representation’, (2001) 68 Tennessee Law Review179Google Scholar

Kim, S. H., ‘Gatekeepers inside out’, (2008) 21 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics411Google Scholar

Kim, S. H., ‘Lawyer exceptionalism in the gatekeeping wars’, (2010) 63 SMU Law Review73Google Scholar

Koniak, S. P., ‘Corporate fraud: see, lawyers’, (2003) 26 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy195Google Scholar

Koniak, S. P., ‘The law between the Bar and the state’, (1992) 70 North Carolina Law Review1389Google Scholar

Koniak, S. P., ‘When the hurlyburly's done: the Bar's struggle with the SEC’, (2003) 103 Columbia Law Review1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kostant, P. C., ‘Breeding better watchdogs: multidisciplinary partnerships in corporate legal practice’, (2000) 84 Minnesota Law Review1213Google Scholar

Kraakman, R., ‘Corporate liability and the costs of legal controls’, (1984) 93 Yale Law Journal857CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kraakman, R., ‘Gatekeepers: the anatomy of third-party enforcement strategy’, (1986) 2 Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation53Google Scholar

Kraakman, R., Park, H., and Shavell, S.,‘When are shareholder suits in shareholder interests?’, (1994) 82 Georgetown Law Journal1733Google Scholar

Kroetsch, N. and Petric, S., ‘Task Force on Corporate Responsibility: should the American Bar Association adopt new ethics rules?’, (2003) 16 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics727Google Scholar

Laby, A. B., ‘Differentiating gatekeepers’, (2006) 1 Brooklyn Journal of Corporate Financial and Commercial Law119Google Scholar

Lafferty, L., ‘Lawyers gone bad: money, sex and madness in Canada's legal profession’, (2008) 46 Osgoode Hall Law Journal197Google Scholar

Laing, D. and Weir, C. M., ‘Governance structures, size and corporate performance in UK firms’, (1999) 37 Management Decision457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lander, Sir Stephen, Review of the Suspicious Activity Reports Regime (March 2006)

Langevoort, D. C., ‘The epistemology of corporate-securities lawyering: beliefs, biases and organizational behavior’, (1997) 63 Brooklyn Law Review629Google Scholar

Langevoort, D. C., ‘The human nature of corporate boards: law, norms and the unintended consequences of independence and accountability’, (2001) 89 Georgetown Law Journal797Google Scholar

Langevoort, D. C., ‘Where were the lawyers? A behavioural inquiry into lawyers’ responsibilities for clients' fraud', (1993) 46 Vanderbilt Law Review75Google Scholar

Langevoort, D. C. and Rasmussen, R. K., ‘Skewing the results: the role of lawyers in transmitting legal rules’, (1997) 5 California Interdisciplinary Law Journal375Google Scholar

Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., ‘Investor protection and corporate governance’, (2000) 58 Journal of Financial Economics3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Law Commission, Fiduciary Duties and Regulatory Rules: Report on a Reference under Section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 (Law Com: No. 236; Cm 3049) (London: Stationery Office, 1995)Google Scholar

,Law Commission, Shareholder Remedies, Consultation Paper No. 142, (London: Stationery Office, 1996)Google Scholar

,Law Commission, Shareholder Remedies: Report on a Reference under section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 (Law Com. No. 246, Cm. 3769) (London: Stationery Office, 1997)Google Scholar

,Law Society, Anti-Money Laundering, practice note (22 February 2008)

,Law Society, Corporate Counsel – A Profile (June 2008)

,Law Society, The Hunt Review of the Regulation of Legal Services (October 2009)

,Law Society, Strategic Research Unit, Trends in the Solicitors' Profession: Annual Statistical Report 1995

,Law Society, Strategic Research Unit, Trends in the Solicitors' Profession: Annual Statistical Report 2009

Lee, R., ‘Dishonesty and bad faith after Barlow Clowes: Abou-Rahmah v. Abacha’, (2007 JBL209Google Scholar

Lee, R., Firm Views: Work of and Work in the Largest Law Firms, Law Society Research Study 35 (1999)Google Scholar

Lee, R., ‘From profession to business: the rise and rise of the city law firm’, (1992) 19 Journal of Law and Society31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Legal Services Board, Alternative Business Structures: Approaches to Licensing, Consultation Paper on Draft Guidance (February 2010)

,Legal Services Board, Alternative Business Structures: Approaches to Licensing: Guidance to Licensing Authorities on the Content of Licensing Rules

,Legal Services Board, Alternative Business Structures: Approaches to Licensing, Summary of All Responses and the LSB's Response

,Legal Services Board, Wider Access, Better Value, Strong Protection Discussion Paper (May 2009)

,Legal Services Consultative Panel, Advice to the Secretary of State on an Application by the Law Society to Amend the Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality and Disclosure Rules (June 2005)

,Legal Services Institute, The Regulation of Legal Services: Reserved Legal Activities History and Rationale (August 2010)

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Chapter 11 Proceedings Examiner's Report (March 2010)

Letza, S., Sun, X. and Kirkbride, J., ‘Shareholding versus stakeholding: a critical review of corporate governance’, (2004) 12 Corporate Governance: An International Review242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lomnicka, E., ‘“Knowingly concerned”? Participatory liability to regulators’, (2000) Company Lawyer120Google Scholar

,London Stock Exchange, AIM Rules for Nominated Advisors (February 2007)

Loughrey, J., ‘Legal advice privilege and the corporate client’, (2005) 9 International Journal of Evidence and Proof183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luban, D., Lawyers and Justice: an Ethical Study (Princeton University Press, 1988)Google Scholar

McBarnet, D., ‘After Enron will “whiter than white collar crime” still wash?’, (2006) British Journal of Criminology1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McBarnet, D., ‘Financial engineering or legal engineering? Legal work, legal integrity and the banking crisis’, in MacNeil, I. and O'Brien, J. (eds.), The Future of Financial Regulation (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar

McBarnet, D., ‘Law, policy and legal avoidance: can law effectively implement egalitarian policies?’, (1988) Journal of Law and Society113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McBarnet, D. and Whelan, C., ‘The elusive spirit of the law: formalism and the struggle for legal control’, (1991) 54 MLR848CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCormick, R., Legal Risk in the Financial Markets (Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

MacDougall, I., ‘Akzo Nobel: the worst decision in legal history?’, (2008) European Lawyer53Google Scholar

MacEwen, B., Regan, M. and Ribstein, L., ‘Law firms, ethics, and equity capital’, (2008) 21 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics61Google Scholar

McGuiness, K. and Copp, S., ‘Protecting shareholder expectations: a comparison of UK and Canadian approaches to conduct unfairly prejudicial to shareholders: part 2’, (2000) ICCLR217Google Scholar

McLeod-Roberts, L., ‘BLM is most female friendly firm in UK top 50’, The Lawyer, 27 January 2010Google Scholar

McLeod-Roberts, L., ‘Streamlined firms emerge from ashes of annus horribilis’, The Lawyer, 30 November 2009Google Scholar

McVea, H., ‘Predators and the public interest: the “big four” and multi-disciplinary practices’, (2002) 65 MLR811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maiman, R., McEwan, C. and Mather, L., ‘The future of legal professionalism in practice’, (1999) 2 Legal Ethics71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malek, H., Auburn, J. and Bagshaw, R., Phipson on Evidence, 16th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010)Google Scholar

Mark, S., ‘Views from an Australian regulator’, (2009) Journal of the Professional Lawyer45Google Scholar

Mark, S., ‘Walking the ethical tightrope: balancing the responsibilities of in-house counsel to key stakeholders’, Legalwise Seminars Pty Ltd, 12 November 2009, available at http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/olsc/ll_olsc.nsf/vwFiles/Walking_Ethical_Tightrop _Legalwise_121109.doc/$file/Walking_Ethical_Tightrop_Legalwise_121109.doc

Mark, S. and Cowdroy, G., ‘Incorporated legal practices – a new era in the provision of legal services in the state of New South Wales’, (2004) 22 Penn State International Law671Google Scholar

Mark, S. and Gordon, T., ‘Innovations in regulation – responding to a changing legal services market’, (2009) 22 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics501Google Scholar

Meagher, R., Heydon, D. and Leeming, M., Equity Doctrines and Remedies, 4th edn (Australia: LexisNexis, 2002)Google Scholar

Mill, J. S., On Liberty, 2nd edn (London: John W Parker & Son, 1859)Google Scholar

Mitchell, L., ‘Professional responsibility and the close corporation: toward a realistic ethic’, (1989) 74 Cornell Law Review466Google Scholar

Mokal, R. J., ‘An agency cost analysis of the wrongful trading provisions: redistribution, perverse incentives and the creditors’ bargain', (2000) 59 CLJ335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monks, A. and Minow, N., Corporate Governance, 3rd edn (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004)Google Scholar

Moore, G., ‘Corporate moral agency: review and implications’, (1999) 21 Journal of Business Ethics329CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, N., ‘Expanding duties of attorneys to non-clients: reconceptualising the attorney–client relationship in entity representation’, (1994) 45 South Carolina Law Review659Google Scholar

Moore, N., ‘Regulating law firm conflicts in the 21st century: implications of the globalization of legal services and the growth of the mega law firm’, (2005) 18 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics521Google Scholar

Morgan, T., ‘The clients of the corporate lawyer’, (2004) 33 Capital University Law Review17Google Scholar

Moser, M. P. and Keller, S., ‘Sarbanes-Oxley 307: trusted counselors or informers?’, (2004) 49 Villanova Law Review833Google Scholar

Mulgrew, M. and Forker, J., ‘Independent non-executive directors and earnings management in the UK’, (2006) 13 Irish Accounting Review35Google Scholar

Mura, R., ‘Firm performance: do non-executive directors have minds of their own? Evidence from UK panel data’, (2007) Financial Management81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, G., ‘Is it time to rebrand legal professional privilege in EC competition law?’, (2009) European Competition Law Review125Google Scholar

Muzio, D., ‘The professional project and the contemporary reorganisation of the legal profession in England and Wales’, (2004) 11 International Journal of the Legal Profession, 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, M., ‘Double deontology and the CCBE: harmonizing the double trouble in Europe’, (2007) 6 Washington University Global Studies Law Review455Google Scholar

Nelson, R., ‘Ideology, practice and professional autonomy: social values and client relationships in the large law firm’, (1985) 37 Stanford Law Review503CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, R., Partners with Power: The Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Nelson, R. L. and Nielsen, L. B., ‘Cops, counsel and entrepreneurs: constructing the role of inside counsel in large corporations’, (2000) 34 Law and Society Review457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholson, D., ‘Making lawyers moral? Ethical codes and moral character’, (2005) 25 Legal Studies601CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholson, D., ‘Mapping professional legal ethics: the form and focus of the codes’, (1998) 1 Legal Ethics51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholson, D. and Webb, J., Professional Legal Ethics: Critical Interrogations (Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Nicholson, L., ‘Sarbox 307's impact on subordinate in-house counsel: between a rock and a hard place’, (2004) Michigan State Law Review559Google Scholar

Nolan, R. C., ‘Controlling fiduciary power’, (2009) CLJ293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Note, ‘Attorney–client and work product protection in a utilitarian world: an argument for recomparison’, (1995) 108 Harvard Law Review1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Note, ‘Collective sanctions and large law firm discipline’, (2005) 118 Harvard Law Review2336Google Scholar

,Note, ‘An expectations approach to client identity’, (1993) 106 Harvard Law Review687CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Note, ‘Functional overlap between the lawyer and other professionals: its implications for the privileged communications doctrine’, (1962) 71 Yale Law Journal1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Connor, J., and Jordan, D., ‘Freshfields, the £9bn M&S bid and just a touch of hubris’, The Lawyer, 7 June 2004Google Scholar

O'Dair, R., Legal Ethics: Text and Materials (London: Butterworths, 2001)Google Scholar

Odby, A., ‘Lawyers as “gatekeepers”: the impact of preventative anti-money-laundering obligations on the legal profession in England and Wales’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Westminster, 2006

,Office of Fair Trading, Competition in the Professions (2001)

Oh, P., ‘Gatekeeping’, (2004) 29 Journal of Corporation Law735Google Scholar

Okamoto, K. S., ‘Reputation and the value of lawyers’, (1995) 74 Oregon Law Review15Google Scholar

O'Neill, T., ‘Toward a new theory of the closely-held firm’, (1993) 24 Seton Hall Law Review603Google Scholar

Ong, B., ‘Two tripartite economic torts’, (2008) JBL723Google Scholar

Osiel, M., ‘Lawyers as monopolists, aristocrats, and entrepreneurs’, (1990) 103 Harvard Law Review2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Sullivan, J., ‘Intentional economic torts, commercial transactions and professional liability’, (2008) Professional Negligence164Google Scholar

O'Sullivan, S. R., ‘Professional discipline for law firms? A response to Professor Schneyer's proposal’, (2002) 16 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics1Google Scholar

Painter, R., ‘The moral interdependence of corporate lawyers and their clients’, (1994) Southern California Law Review507Google Scholar

Parker, C., ‘Competing images of the legal profession: competing regulatory strategies’, (1997) 25 International Journal of the Sociology of Law385CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, C., ‘Law firms incorporated: how incorporation could and should make firms more ethically responsible’, (2004) 23 University of Queensland Law Journal347Google Scholar

Parker, C., ‘Regulation of the ethics of Australian legal practice: autonomy and responsiveness’, (2002) University of New South Wales Law Journal676Google Scholar

Parker, C. and Evans, A., Inside Lawyers' Ethics (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, C., Gordon, T. and Mark, S., ‘Regulating law firms ethics management: an empirical assessment of an innovation in regulation of the legal profession in New South Wales’, (2010) 37 Journal of Law and Society466CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, C., Rosen, R. and Nielsen, V., ‘The two faces of lawyers: professional ethics and business compliance with regulation’, (2009) 22 The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics201Google Scholar

Partnoy, F., ‘Barbarians at the gatekeepers? A proposal for a modified strict liability regime’, (2001) 79 Washington University Law Quarterly491Google Scholar

Passmore, C., Privilege, 2nd edn (St Albans: XPL, 2006)Google Scholar

Paterson, A. A., ‘Multi-disciplinary partnerships – a critique’, (2001) 8 International Journal of the Legal Profession161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paterson, A. A., ‘Professionalism and the legal services market’, (1996) International Journal of the Legal Profession140Google Scholar

Paterson, P., ‘A criticism of the contractual approach to unfair prejudice’, (2006) Company Lawyer204Google Scholar

Paton, P., ‘Between a rock and a hard place: the future of self-regulation – Canada between the United States and the English/Australian experience’, (2008) Journal of the Professional Lawyer87Google Scholar

Paton, P., ‘Corporate counsel as corporate conscience: ethics and integrity in the post-Enron era’, (2006) 84 Canadian Bar Review533Google Scholar

Paton, P., ‘Multidisciplinary practice redux: globalization, core values, and reviving the MDP debate in America’, (2010) 78 Fordham Law Review2193Google Scholar

Payne, J., ‘Clean hands in derivative actions’, (2002) 61 CLJ76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, J., ‘A re-examination of ratification’, (1999) 58 CLJ604Google Scholar

Payne, J., ‘Section 459 and public companies’, (1999) 115 LQR368Google Scholar

Payne, J., ‘Sections 459–461 Companies Act 1985 in flux: the future of shareholder protection’, (2005) 64 CLJ647CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, J., ‘Shareholders’ remedies reassessed', (2004) 67 MLR500CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, J. and Prentice, D., ‘Company contracts and vitiating factors: developments in the law on directors’ authority', (2005) LMCLQ447Google Scholar

Pechersky, B. J., ‘Representing general partnerships and close corporations: a situational analysis of professional responsibility’ 73 (1995) Texas Law Review919Google Scholar

Pepper, S., ‘Counseling at the limits of the law: an exercise in the jurisprudence and ethics of lawyering’, (1995) 104 Yale Law Journal1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pepper, S., ‘The lawyer's amoral ethical role: a defense, a problem and some possibilities’, (1986) American Bar Foundation Research Journal613Google Scholar

Perrin, C., ‘Solicitors’ conflicts of interest: the context and significance of the new rules', (2005) 58 Amicus Curiae2Google Scholar

Perry, T. and Shivdasani, A., ‘Do boards affect performance? Evidence from corporate restructuring’, (2005) 78 Journal of Business1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petra, S. T., ‘Do outside independent directors strengthen corporate boards?’ (2005) 5 Corporate Governance55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pettifier, N., ‘Corporate counsel poll’, International Financial Law Review, July 2008Google Scholar

Petzold, J., ‘Firm offers: are publicly traded firms abroad indicative of the future of the United States legal sector?’, (2009) Wisconsin Law Review67Google Scholar

Pinnington, A. and Gray, J., ‘The global restructuring of legal services work? A study of the internationalisation of Australian law firms’, (2007) 14 International Journal of the Legal Profession147CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pippel, C., ‘The lawyer as gatekeeper: is there a need for a whistle-blowing securities lawyer? Recent developments in the US and Australia’, (2004) 16 Bond Law Review96Google Scholar

Postema, G. J., ‘Moral responsibility in professional ethics’, (1980) 55 New York University Law Review63Google Scholar

Powell, J., ‘Picking up the pieces’, The Lawyer, 30 September 2002Google Scholar

Powell, J. and Stewart, R. (eds.), Jackson & Powell on Professional Liability, 6th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007)Google Scholar

Powell, M., ‘Professional innovation: corporate lawyers and private lawmaking’, (1993) 18 Law and Social Inquiry423CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prentice, D. D., ‘The theory of the firm: minority shareholder oppression: sections 459–461 of the Companies Act 1985’, (1988) 8 OJLS55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Public Concern at Work, ‘In the Public Interest’ Legal Professional Privilege (website)

Rayner, J. and Baksi, C., ‘“Big bang” set to prove a damp squib’, Law Society Gazette, 17 June 2010Google Scholar

Razzono, F. C., ‘Is the SEC targeting lawyers?’, (2008) 36 Securities Regulation Law Journal1Google Scholar

Regan, M. C., ‘Corporate norms and contemporary law firm practice’, (2002) 70 George Washington Law Review931Google Scholar

Regan, M. C., Eat What You Kill: The Fall of a Wall Street Lawyer (Ann Abor: University of Michigan Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Regan, M. C., ‘Risky business’, (2006) 94 Georgetown Law Journal1957Google Scholar

Reisberg, A., Derivative Actions and Corporate Governance (Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reisberg, A., ‘Shareholder remedies: in search of consistency of principle in English law’, (2005) EBLR1065Google Scholar

Reisberg, A., ‘Shareholders’ remedies: the choice of objectives and the social meaning of the derivative actions', (2005) 6 European Business Organisation Law Review227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reisberg, A., ‘Theoretical reflections on derivative actions: the representative problem’, (2006) 1 ECFR69Google Scholar

Reiter, B. and Swan, J., ‘Contracts and the protection of reasonable expectations’, in Reiter, B. and Swan, J. (eds.), Studies in Contract Law (Toronto: Butterworths, 1980)Google Scholar

Rhode, D. L., In the Interests of Justice: Reforming the Legal Profession (Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Rhode, D. L., ‘Why the ABA bothers: a functional perspective on professional codes’, (1981) 59 Texas Law Review689Google Scholar

Ribstein, L., ‘Market vs. regulatory responses to corporate fraud: a critique of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002’, (2002) 28 Journal of Corporation Law1Google Scholar

Riley, C. A., ‘Contracting out of company law: section 459 of the Companies Act 1985 and the role of the courts’, (1992) 55 MLR782CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roach, L., ‘Auditor liability: the case for limitation, part 1’, (2010) 31 Company Lawyer136Google Scholar

Rock, E., ‘Saints and sinners: how does Delaware corporate law work?’, (1997) 44 UCLA Law Review1009Google Scholar

Romano, R., ‘The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the making of quack corporate governance’, (2005) 114 Yale Law journal1521Google Scholar

Roper, J., ‘Vinson & Elkins settles with Enron for $30 million’, Houston Chronicle, 2 June 2006Google Scholar

Rosen, R. E., ‘We're all consultants now: how change in client organizational strategies influences change in the organisation of corporate legal services’, (2002) 44 Arizona Law Review637Google Scholar

Ross, T., ‘Lawyers and fraud: a better question’, (2003) 43 Washburn Law Journal45Google Scholar

Rostain, T., ‘General counsel in the age of compliance: preliminary findings and new research questions’, (2007) 21 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics465Google Scholar

Rothrock, A., ‘Entity formation: defining the client and the duty of confidentiality’, (2005) 34 Colorado Lawyer77Google Scholar

Report of the Royal Commission on Legal Services, Cmnd. 7648 (London: HMSO, 1979)

Sargent, M., ‘Lawyers in the perfect storm’, (2003) 43 Washburn Law Journal1Google Scholar

Saunders, P. C., ‘When compensation creates culture’, (2006) 19 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics295Google Scholar

Schneyer, T., ‘How things have changed: contrasting the regulatory environments of the canons and the model rules’, (2008) Professional Lawyer 161Google Scholar

Schneyer, T., ‘Professional discipline for law firms?’, (1991) 77 Cornell Law Review1Google Scholar

Schneyer, T., ‘Thoughts on the compatibility of recent UK and Australian reforms with US traditions in regulating law practice’, (2009) Journal of the Professional Lawyer13Google Scholar

Scholz, J. T., ‘Co-operation, deterrence and the ecology of regulatory enforcement’, (1984) 18 Law and Society Review179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarcz, S., ‘Explaining the value of transactional lawyering’, (2007) 12 Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance486Google Scholar

Schwarcz, S., ‘Financial information failure and lawyer responsibility’, (2006) 31 Journal of Corporation Law1097Google Scholar

Scott, W. R., ‘Discussion of “two models of auditor–client interaction: tests with United Kingdom data”’, (1997) 14 Contemporary Accounting Research51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sealy, L. S., ‘Problems of standing, pleading and proof in corporate litigation’, in Pettet, B. (ed.), Company Law in Change, Current Legal Problems (London: Stevens & Sons, 1987)Google Scholar

Seigel, M., ‘Corporate America Fights Back: The Battle over the Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege’, (2008) 49 Boston College Law Review1Google Scholar

,Serious Organised Crime Agency, The Suspicious Activity Reports Regime Annual Report 2007

,Serious Organised Crime Agency, The Suspicious Activity Reports Regime Annual Report 2009

Shavell, S., ‘The optimal structure of law enforcement’, (1993) 36 Journal of Law and Economics255CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simester, A. P. and Chan, W., ‘Inducing breach of contract: one tort or two?’, 63 (2004) CLJ132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, W., ‘Ethical discretion in lawyering’, (1988) 101 Harvard Law Review1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, W., ‘The Kaye Scholer affair: the lawyer's duty of candor and the Bar's temptations of evasion and apology’, (1998) 23 Law and Social Inquiry243CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, W., ‘Whom (or what) does the organisation's lawyer represent? An anatomy of intraclient conflict’, (2003) 91 California Law Review57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, W., ‘Wrongs of ignorance and ambiguity: lawyer responsibility for collective misconduct’, (2005) 22 Yale Journal on Regulation1Google Scholar

Slaughter, C., ‘Corporate social responsibility: a new perspective’, (1997) Company Lawyer313Google Scholar

Smedley, N., Review of the Regulation of Corporate Legal Work (March 2009)

Smith, B., ‘Sitting on vs sitting in on your client's board of directors’, (2002) 15 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics597Google Scholar

Sokol, D., ‘Globalisation of law firms: a survey of the literature and a research agenda for further study’, (2007) 14 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Ethics5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Solicitors Regulation Authority, Achieving the Right Outcomes (20 January 2010)

,Solicitors Regulation Authority, The Architecture of Change: The SRA's New Handbook (28 May 2010)

,Solicitors Regulation Authority, The Architecture of Change Part 2 – The New SRA Handbook – Feedback and Further Consultation (October 2010)

,Solicitors Regulation Authority, Legal Services Act: New Forms of Practice and Regulation (5 November 2007), Consultation Paper 16 (January 2009)

,Solicitors Regulation Authority, Outcomes-Focused Regulation – Transforming the SRA's Regulation of Legal Serv- ices (April 2010)

,Solicitors Regulation Authority, Regulating Alternative Business Structures: Legal Services Act: New Forms of Practice and Regulation Consultation Paper 18 (June 2009)

Stafford, A., QC, and Ritchie, S., Fiduciary Duties: Directors and Employees (Bristol: Jordans, 2008)Google Scholar

Steinberg, M., ‘Lawyer liability after Sarbanes-Oxley – has the landscape changed?’, (2003) 3 Wyoming Law Review371Google Scholar

Sterling, J. S. and Reichman, N., ‘So you want to be a lawyer? The quest for professional status in a changing legal world’, (2010) 78 Fordham Law Review2289Google Scholar

Steyn, J., ‘Contract law: fulfilling the reasonable expectations of honest men’, (1997) 113 LQR433Google Scholar

Straub, P., ‘ABA Task Force misses the mark: attorneys should not be discouraged from serving on their corporate clients’ board of directors', (2000) 25 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law261Google Scholar

Suchman, M. and Cahill, M., ‘The hired gun as facilitator: lawyers and the suppression of business disputes in Silicon Valley’, (1996) 21 Law and Social Inquiry679CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terry, L. S., ‘An introduction to the European Community's legal ethics code part I: an analysis of the CCBE Code of Conduct’, (1993) 7 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics1Google Scholar

Terry, L. S., ‘An introduction to the European Community's legal ethics code part II: applying the CCBE Code of Conduct’, (1993) 7 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics345Google Scholar

Terry, L. S., ‘MDPs: Reflections from the US perspective’, (2001) 8 International Journal of the Legal Profession151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terry, L. S., ‘US legal ethics: the coming of age of global and comparative perspectives’, (2005) 4 Washington University Global Studies Law Review463Google Scholar

Terry, L., Silver, C., Rosen, E., Haworth McCandless, J., Needham, C., Lutz, R. and Ehrenhaft, P., ‘Transnational legal practice’, (2009) 43 International Lawyer943Google Scholar

Teschner, P., ‘Lawyer morality’, (1970) 38 George Washington Law Review789Google Scholar

Thanki, B., The Law of Privilege (Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Thompson, R. and Thomas, R., ‘The new look of shareholder litigation: acquisition-oriented class actions’, (2004) 57 Vanderbilt Law Review133Google Scholar

Thornburg, E. G., ‘Sanctifying secrecy: the mythology of the corporate attorney–client privilege’, (1993) 69 Notre Dame Law Review157Google Scholar

Turner, J., ‘The potential liability of solicitors for misrepresentation in offer documents’, (1989) Company Lawyer3Google Scholar

,Turner Review, A Regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis (March 2009)

Twitchell, M., ‘The ethical dilemmas of lawyers on teams’, (1988) 72 Minnesota Law Review696Google Scholar

Ulph, J., Commercial Fraud: Civil Liability, Human Rights and Money Laundering (Oxford University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Valukas, A. R., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Chapter 11 Proceedings Examiner's Report (March 2010)

Veasey, E. and Di Guglielmo, C. T., ‘The tensions, stresses and professional responsibilities of the lawyer for the corporation’, (2006) 62 Business Lawyer1Google Scholar

Wadsley, J., ‘Money laundering: professionals as policemen’, (1994) Conveyancer275Google Scholar

Wald, E., ‘Foreword: the great recession and the legal profession’, (2010) 78 Fordham Law Review2051Google Scholar

Wald, E., ‘Lawyers and corporate scandals’, (2004) 7 Legal Ethics54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, D., A Review of Corporate Governance in UK Banks and Other Financial Industry Entities (16 July 2009)

Wan, K. S., ‘Gatekeeper liability versus regulation of wrongdoers’, (2008) 34 Ohio Northern University Law Review483Google Scholar

Watts, P., ‘Stone & Rolls Ltd (In Liquidation) v. Moore Stephens (A Firm): audit contracts and turpitude’, (2010) Law Quarterly Review14Google Scholar

Watts, P., and Reynolds, F. M. B., Bowstead and Reynolds on Agency, 19th edn (London: Thomas Reuters (Legal) Ltd., 2010)Google Scholar

Wedderburn, K. W., ‘Shareholders’ rights and the rule in Foss v. Harbottle', (1957) 15 CLJ94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weimar, J. and Pape, J., ‘A taxonomy of systems of corporate governance’, (1999) 7 Corporate Governance152CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wendel, W. B., ‘Civil obedience’, (2004) 104 Columbia Law Review363CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wendel, W. B., ‘Lawyers, citizens and the internal point of view’, (2006) 75 Fordham Law Review1473Google Scholar

Whelan, C., ‘Ethical conflicts in legal practice: creating professional responsibility’, (2001) 52 South Carolina Law Review697Google Scholar

Whelan, C., ‘Ethics beyond the horizon: why regulate the global practice of law?’, (2001) 34 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law931Google Scholar

Whelan, C., ‘The paradox of professionalism: global law practice means business’, (2008) 27 Penn State Law Review465Google Scholar

Whelan, C., ‘Some realism about professionalism: core values, legality and corporate law practice’, (2007) 54 Buffalo Law Review1067Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. B., ‘Team of rivals? Toward a new model of the corporate attorney–client relationship’, (2010) 78 Fordham Law Review2067Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. B., ‘Who should regulate lawyers?’, (1992) 105 Harvard Law Review799CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, M. A., Walker, C. and Mercer, P., ‘Do codes of ethics actually shape legal practice?’, (2000) 45 McGill Law Journal645Google Scholar

Williams, T., ‘Accessing funding following alternative business structures’, in Legal Services Board, The Future of Legal Services: Emerging Thinking (June 2010)Google Scholar

Wilson, G. and Wilson, S., ‘Market misconduct, the financial services authority and creating a system of “city grasses”: blowing the whistle on whistle-blowing’, (2010) Company Lawyer67Google Scholar

Woolley, A., ‘Integrity in zealousness: comparing the standard conceptions of the Canadian and American lawyer’, (1996) 9 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence61Google Scholar

Wright, C., Riley Shaw, J. and Guan, L., ‘Corporate governance and investor protection: earnings management in the UK and US’, (2006) 5 Journal of International Accounting Research25CrossRefGoogle Scholar