Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T19:09:29.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - The Affect System

What Lurks below the Surface of Feelings?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
John T. Cacioppo ,
Jeff T. Larsen ,
N. Kyle Smith  and
Gary G. Berntson
Edited by
Antony S. R. Manstead ,
Nico Frijda  and
Agneta Fischer
John T. Cacioppo
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Jeff T. Larsen
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University
N. Kyle Smith
Affiliation:
Ohio Wesleyan University
Gary G. Berntson
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Antony S. R. Manstead
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Nico Frijda
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Agneta Fischer
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

The structure of affective space has been debated for more than fifty years. According to the model of evaluative space (Cacioppo & Berntson, 1994; Cacioppo, Gardner, & Berntson, 1997), the common metric governing approach/withdrawal is generally a single bipolar dimension at response stages that itself is the consequence of multiple operations, such as the activation function for positivity (appetition) and the activation function for negativity (aversion), at earlier affective processing stages. Accordingly, affective space can be bipolar or bivariate depending on specific circumstances. We further extend the model by reviewing evidence for coactivated emotional states and component processes underlying affect, emotion, and feeling. Two different event-related brain components that reflect implicit affective processing provide specific information on the general location and timing of component affective processing.

Not long ago, the camera was a metaphor for memory, the computer for the brain. Memory, however, does not activate a stored depiction of the event but rather reconstructs the event (Loftus, 1979; Roediger & McDermott, 2000). Contrary to the doctrine of rationality, the inferences drawn from facts (e.g., syllogisms) are not coldly calculated conditional probabilities but a calculus shaped in part by wishful thinking (McGuire, 1981). People do not weigh evidence objectively but generally exercise a confirmatory bias. For example, disagreeing parties who receive mixed messages containing evidence for and against each party's position tend to polarize rather than moderate their attitudes (Lord, Ross, & Lepper, 1979).

Type
Chapter
Information
Feelings and Emotions
The Amsterdam Symposium
 , pp. 223 - 242
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aloise, P. A. (1993). Trait confirmation and disconfirmation: The development of attribution biases. Special Issue: Social context, social behavior, and socialization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 177–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272–279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, N. H. (1981). Integration theory applied to cognitive responses and attitudes. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, and T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 361–397). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Ansolabehere, S. D.; Iyengar, S.; & Simon, A. (1999). Replicating experiments using surveys and aggregate data: The case of negative advertising. American Political Science Review, 93, 901–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, J. A. (2001). The psychology of the mere. In J. A. Bargh and D. K. Apsley (Eds.), Unraveling the complexities of social life: A festschrift in honor of Robert B. Zajonc (pp. 25–37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Bargh, J. A.; Chaiken, S.; Govender, R.; & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893–912CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berntson, G. G.; Boysen, S. T.; & Cacioppo, J. T. (1993). Neurobehavioral organization and the cardinal principle of evaluative bivalence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 702, 75–102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berntson, G. G.; Cacioppo, J. T.; & Sarter, M. (2003). Bottom-up: Implications for neurobehavioral models of anxiety and autonomic regulation. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Sherer, and H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 1105–1116). New York: Oxford University Press
Blascovich, J.; Ernst, J. M.; Tomaka, J.; & Kelsey, R. M. (1993). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of autonomic reactivity during decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 165–176CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boysen, S. T.; Berntson, G. G.; Hannan, M. B.; & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Quantity-based choices: Interference and symbolic representations in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 76–86Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M.; Lang, P. J.; & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Affective norms for English words. Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention – National Institute of Mental Health (CSEA-NIMH), University of Florida, Gainesville
Brehm, J. W. (1956). Post-decision changes in desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system: Architecture and operating characteristics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1993). What underlies medical donor attitudes and behavior?Health Psychology, 12, 269–271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Effects of extent of thought on the pleasantness ratings of p-o-x triads: Evidence for three judgmental tendencies in evaluating social situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1000–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T.; Crites, S. L. Jr.; Berntson, G. G.; & Coles, M. G. H. (1993). If attitudes affect how stimuli are processed, should they not affect the event-related brain potential?Psychological Science, 4, 108–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T.; Crites, S. L. Jr.; Gardner, W. L.; & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorizations: I. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of trait negativity and extremity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 115–125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T.; Crites, S. L. Jr.; & Gardner, W. L. (1996). Attitudes to the right: Evaluative processing is associated with lateralized late positive event-related brain potentials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1205–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T.; Gardner, W. L.; & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cacioppo, J. T.; Gardner, W. L.; & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T.; Priester, J. R.; & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitude: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannon, W. B. (1929). Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage. New York: Appleton
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention – National Institute of Mental Health (CSEA-NIMH). (1995). The international affective picture system: Digitized photographs. Gainesville: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida
Coles, M. G. H.; Donchin, E.; & Porges, S. (1986). Psychophysiology: Systems, processes, and applications. New York: Guilford Press
Collani, G. von; Jacobsen, T.; & Schröger, E. (2000). Evaluatives Priming von Einstellungen und EKP-Messung. In Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie (Hrsg.) Abstract CD-ROM zum 42. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers
Crites, S. L. Jr.; Cacioppo, J. T.; Gardner, W. L.; & Berntson, G. G. (1995). Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorization: II. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of attitude registration rather than attitude report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 997–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crites, S. L. Jr., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1996). Electrocortical differentiation of evaluative and nonevaluative categorizations. Psychological Science, 7, 318–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1998). Expression of the emotions in man and animals (3d ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1872.)
Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J. (2000). The perception of emotion by ear and by eye. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diener, E. (1999). Introduction to the special section on the structure of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 803–804CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabiani, M.; Gratton, G.; & Coles, M. G. H. (2000). Event-related brain potentials: Methods, theory, and application. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, and G. G Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2d ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Ganzach, Y. (1995). Negativity (and positivity) in performance evaluation: Three field studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 491–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. L. (1996). Biases in impression formation: A demonstration of a bivariate model of evaluation. Ph. D. dissertation, The Ohio State University
Gardner, W. L., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1995). Multi-gallon blood donors: Why do they give?Transfusion, 35, 795–798CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hass, R. G.; Katz, I.; Rizzo, N.; Bailey, J.; & Eisenstadt, D. (1991). Cross-racial appraisal as related to attitude ambivalence and cognitive complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holbrook, A. L.; Krosnick, J. A.; Visser, P. S.; Gardner, W. L.; & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Attitudes toward presidential candidates and political parties: Initial optimism, inertial first impressions, and a focus on flaws. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 930–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, T. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence of implicit and explicit categorization processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 660–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, T. A.; Larsen, J. T.; Smith, N. K.; & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887–900CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, T. A.; Cacioppo, J. T.; & Lang, P. J. (1998). Eliciting affect using the International Affective Picture System: Trajectories through evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 855–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (1958). Evolution and dissolution of the nervous system (Croonian Lectures). In J. Taylor (Ed.), Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson (Vol. 2). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1884.)
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory. Econometrica, 47, 263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawasaki, H.; Adolphs, R.; Kaufman, O.; Damasio, H.; Damasio, A. R.; Granner, M.; Bakken, H.; Hori, T.; Howard, M. A. (2001). Single-neuron responses to emotional visual stimuli recorded in human ventral prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 15–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiewiet, D., & Rivers, D. (1984). A retrospective on retrospective voting. Political Behavior, 6, 369–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). The cognitive unconscious. Science, 237(4821), 1445–1452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, J. G. (1991). Negativity effects in impression formation: A test in the political arena. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 412–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, J. G. (1996). Negativity in impressions of presidential candidates revisited: The 1992 election. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, P. J.; Bradley, M. M.; & Cuthbert, B. N. (1990). Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review, 97, 377–395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lang, P. J.; Bradley, M. M.; & Cuthbert, B. N. (1995). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. The NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, University of Florida, Gainesville
Larsen, J. T.; McGraw, P.; & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 684–696CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, J. T.; McGraw, A. P.; Mellers, B. A.; & Cacioppo, J. T. (in press). “The agony of victory and the thrill of defeat: Mixed emotional reactions to disappointing wins and relieving losses.” Manuscript under review, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
LeDoux, J. E. (1995). Emotion: Clues from the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 209–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Cognitive-emotional interactions: Listen to the brain. In R. D. Lane, L. Nadel et al., (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience of emotion. Series in affective science (pp. 129–155). New York: Oxford University Press
Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Lord, C. G.; Ross, L.; & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 2098–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C. N.; Milne, A. B.; & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1981). The probabilogical model of cognitive structure and attitude change. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, and T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 291–307). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1991). The content, structure, and operation of thought systems. In R. S. Wyer and T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 4, pp. 1–78)
McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1992). Cognitive-versus-affective asymmetries in thought systems. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 571–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, N. E. (1959). Liberalization of basic S-R concepts: Extensions to conflict behavior, motivation and social learning. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science, Study 1 (pp. 198–292). New York: McGraw-Hill
Miller, N. E. (1961). Some recent studies on conflict behavior and drugs. American Psychologist, 16, 12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. S.; Öhman, A.; & Dolan, R. J. (1999). A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 1680–1685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Doherty, J. O.; Kringelbach, M. L.; Rolls, E. T.; Hornak, J.; & Andrews, C. (2001). Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 95–102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osgood, C. E.; Suci, G. J.; & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 380–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson-Whelen, S.; Kim, C.; MacCallum, R. C.; & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1997). Distinguishing optimism from pessimism in older adults: Is it more important to be optimistic or not to be pessimistic?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1345–1353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2000). Tricks of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 347–353Google Scholar
Rowe, P. M. (1989). Unfavorable information and interview decisions. In R. W. Eder and G. R. Ferris (Eds.), The employment interview: theory, research, and practice (pp. 77–89). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, J.; Higgins, E. T.; & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285–293CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2001). Affect and cognitive appraisal processes. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 75–92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Smith, N. K.; Larsen, J. T.; Chartrand, T. L.; & Cacioppo, J. T. (under review). Being bad isn't always good: Evaluative context moderates the attention bias toward negative information
Spelke, E.; Hirst, W.; & Neisser, U. (1976). Skills of divided attention. Cognition, 4, 215–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermann, R.; Spies, K.; Stahl, G.; & Hesse, F. W. (1996). Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 557–5803.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ybarra, O., & Stephan, W. G. (1996). Misanthropic person memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 691–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×