Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T09:49:19.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix E - 2005 Follow-up Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Tom Rosenstiel
Affiliation:
Project for Excellence in Journalism, Washington D.C.
Marion Just
Affiliation:
Wellesley College, Massachusetts
Todd Belt
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Hilo
Walter Dean
Affiliation:
Project for Excellence in Journalism, Washington D.C.
Dante Chinni
Affiliation:
Project for Excellence in Journalism, Washington D.C.
Get access

Summary

In 2005 the Project for Excellence in Journalism decided to conduct a small follow-up study of local TV news to determine whether the basic findings about local news content gained over the course of the five-year study still held true.

Methodology

The 2005 follow-up study used newscast rundowns from Video Monitoring Services (VMS) (available from Lexis-Nexis) to gather data about newscast content. The rundowns included: start and end times of each story (used to determine story length), descriptions of the story topic matter, and indication of the names and/or identities of additional sources used in reporting the story.

The basis of the study was a sample of 50 newscasts from 10 different markets. Markets were randomly chosen from a list of the 40 largest TV markets (i.e., markets for which VMS rundowns were available). This produced the following list of markets: Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Washington, Houston, Phoenix, St. Louis, San Diego, Cincinnati, Salt Lake City, and Grand Rapids. Network affiliations were then assigned at random to determine a specific station to study in each market, which resulted in the inclusion of three ABC stations, three CBS stations, and four NBC stations. Newscast dates were selected at random to produce a full work-week of newscasts (i.e., Monday through Friday) scattered over the period January to May 2005. The exact dates were: January 14 (Friday), February 10 (Thursday), March 21 (Monday), April 27 (Wednesday), and May 17 (Tuesday). Rundowns were then pulled from Lexis-Nexis for the corresponding dates.

Type
Chapter
Information
We Interrupt This Newscast
How to Improve Local News and Win Ratings, Too
, pp. 204 - 207
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×