Marine Spaces under National Jurisdiction II: Sovereign Rights

Yoshifumi Tanaka

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511844478.006

This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

4 - Marine Spaces under National Jurisdiction II: Sovereign Rights

Main Issues

from Part I - The Divided Oceans: International Law Governing Jurisdictional Zones

Yoshifumi Tanaka

Show author details

Yoshifumi Tanaka: Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter will examine rules governing the contiguous zone, the EEZ and the continental shelf. In the contiguous zone, the coastal State may exercise the control necessary to prevent and punish infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations within its territory or territorial sea. Whilst the LOSC contains only succinct provisions respecting the contiguous zone, the legal nature of the coastal State jurisdiction over the zone deserves serious consideration. The raison d’être of the institution of the EEZ and the continental shelf involves the conservation and management of natural resources. In this sense, the EEZ and the continental shelf can be considered as a ‘resource-oriented zone’. Owing to the increasing importance of marine natural resources, these zones are particularly important for coastal States. Presently the extension of the continental shelf to a limit of 200 nautical miles attracts particular attention. This chapter will discuss the following issues in particular:

What is the coastal State jurisdiction over the contiguous zone?
What is the coastal State jurisdiction over the EEZ and the continental shelf?
What is the difference between territorial sovereignty and sovereign rights?
What are the freedoms that all States can enjoy in the EEZ?
What residual rights are there in the EEZ?
What are the criteria for determining the outer limits of the continental shelf?

Introduction

The legal regimes governing the EEZ and the continental shelf are essentially a result of the aspiration of coastal States for their need to control offshore natural resources. As will be seen, the coastal State exercises sovereign rights over the EEZ and the continental shelf for the purpose of exploring and exploiting natural resources. Other States cannot explore and exploit these resources in the EEZ and the continental shelf without the consent of the coastal State. On the other hand, as the EEZ and the continental shelf are part of the ocean as a single unit, legitimate activities in these zones by third States, such as freedom of navigation, overflight and the laying of submarine cables and pipelines, must be secured.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The International Law of the Sea , pp. 120 - 148

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844478.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

O’Connell, D. P. The International Law of the Sea Oxford 1984

Fitzmaurice, G. Some Results of the Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea 1959 8 ICLQ 114 Google Scholar

Oda, S. The Concept of the Contiguous Zone 1962 11 ICLQ 153 Google Scholar

Shearer, I. A. Problems of Jurisdiction and Law Enforcement against Delinquent Vessels 1986 35 ICLQ 330 Google Scholar

Lowe, A. V. Law of the Sea Manchester University Press 1999

1995

Smith, R. W. United States Responses to Excessive Maritime Claims The Hague, Nijhoff 1996

Dupuy, R.-J. A Handbook on the New Law of the Sea, v Dordrecht, Nijhoff 1991

Scovazzi, T. The Evolution of International Law of the Sea: New Issues, New Challenges 2000 286 RCADI 96 Google Scholar

Nelson, L. D. M. The Patrimonial Sea 1973 22 ICLQ 668 Google Scholar

Oda, S. Encyclopedia of Public International Law Amsterdam, North-Holland 1989

Churchill, R. R. Stability and Change in the Law of the Sea: The Role of the LOS Convention Leiden and Boston, Nijhoff 2005

1990

Kvinikhidze, S. Contemporary Exclusive Fishery Zones or Why Some States Still Claim an EFZ 2008 23 IJMCL 271 Google Scholar

Combacau, J. Le droit international de la mer: Que sais-je? Paris, PUF 1985

Lowe, A. V. The Legal Order of the Oceans: Basic Documents on the Law of the Sea Oxford 2009

Lowe, A. V. Some Legal Problems Arising from the Use of the Seas for Military Purposes 1986 10 Marine Policy 180; Google Scholar

2002

Karagiannis, S. L’article 59 de la Convention des Nations Unies sur le droit de la mer (ou les mystères de la nature juridique de la zone économique exclusive 2004 37 RBDI 325 Google Scholar

1999

Rozakis, C. L. Encyclopedia of Public International Law Amsterdam, North-Holland 1989

put, Simply Hydrographic Dictionary, Part I Monaco 1994

Oda, S. International Control of Sea Resources Dordrecht, Nijhoff 1989

Weil, P. The Law of Maritime Delimitation: Reflections Cambridge, Grotius 1989

Carleton, C. Article 76 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Implementation Problems from the Technical Perspective 2006 21 IJMCL 293 Google Scholar

Carleton, C. M. Continental Shelf Limits: The Scientific and Legal Interface New York Oxford University Press 2000

Nelson, L. D. M. The Settlement of Disputes Arising from Conflicting Outer Continental Shelf Claims 2009 24 IJMCL 419 Google Scholar

Treves, T. Remarks on Submissions to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in Response to Judge Marotta’s Report 2006 21 IJMCL 364 Google Scholar

2008

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.