Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Understanding ‘water’
- 1 Climate change and the global water cycle
- 2 Understanding global hydrology
- 3 Groundwater and surface water connectivity
- 4 Understanding the basics of water quality
- 5 Inland water ecosystems
- 6 Water, biodiversity and ecosystems: reducing our impact
- 7 Global food production in a water-constrained world: exploring ‘green’ and ‘blue’ challenges and solutions
- Part II Water resources planning and management
- Part III Water resources planning and management: case studies
- Contributors
- Index
- References
4 - Understanding the basics of water quality
from Part I - Understanding ‘water’
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Understanding ‘water’
- 1 Climate change and the global water cycle
- 2 Understanding global hydrology
- 3 Groundwater and surface water connectivity
- 4 Understanding the basics of water quality
- 5 Inland water ecosystems
- 6 Water, biodiversity and ecosystems: reducing our impact
- 7 Global food production in a water-constrained world: exploring ‘green’ and ‘blue’ challenges and solutions
- Part II Water resources planning and management
- Part III Water resources planning and management: case studies
- Contributors
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
In order to manage water resources it is necessary to take into account not just the amount of water that is used but also its quality. What is usually meant by the term ‘water quality’ is the magnitudes of the physical attributes (like temperature and conductivity) and the concentrations of chemical constituents (like nitrogen, calcium, or aluminium) of a sample of water, although the term ‘water quality’ in fact implies judgement about the suitability of water for a particular use. Sea water is of ‘good’ quality for a marine fish, for instance, but of very poor quality for an insect living in a mountain stream, or for a human being consuming the water. To keep things simple, we will use the term ‘water quality’ to mean ‘what the water is like and what is in it’.
In this chapter we show why natural waters differ physically and chemically from each other; then we explain the importance of some of the major physical attributes and chemical constituents of water, and why some can be considered as pollutants. When describing the contents and effects of a variety of effluents on aquatic ecosystems, we make some comments on management of water impaired by various human activities.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Water Resources Planning and Management , pp. 68 - 89Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
and (2006). Acid mine drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st edn. Washington D.C.: APHA, Water Environment Federation, and American Water Works Association.Google Scholar
and (2008). Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. Water Research, 42, 2849–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004). Spatial variability in macroinvertebrate assemblages: comparing regional and multivariate approaches for classifying reference sites in South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 29 (2), 161–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). The effect of biotope-specific sampling for aquatic macroinvertebrates on reference site classification and the identification of environmental predictors in South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 32 (2), 165–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). Water temperature and riverine ecosystems: an overview of knowledge and approaches for assessing biotic responses, with special reference to South Africa. Water SA, 34 (3), 393–404.Google Scholar
and (2004). The Effect of Water Quality Variables on Aquatic Ecosystems: A Review. Water Research Commission Technical Report No. 224/04, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa. Available at http://www.wrc.org.za/Pages/DisplayItem.aspx?ItemID=7165&FromURL=%2fPages%2fKH_AdvancedSearch.aspx%3fa%3dDallas%26start%3d1%26df%3d3%26dt%3d1%26o%3d1%26as%3d1
and (1995). Geographical patterns in the dominance of major ions in the rivers of South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 91, 299–306.Google Scholar
(1997). The Geochemistry of Natural Waters, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
(1996a). South African Water Quality Guidelines, Volume 1: Domestic Use, 2nd edn. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
. (1996b). South African Water Quality Guidelines, Volume 3: Industrial Use, 2nd edn. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
. (1996c). South African Water Quality Guidelines, Volume 6: Agricultural Water Use, 2nd edn. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
, , et al. (1991). A review of salt sensitivity of the Australian freshwater biota. Hydrobiologia, 210, 105–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974). A Compilation of Australian Water Quality Criteria. Australian Water Resources Council, available at http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/485004.
, and (1999). New generation water quality guidelines for ecosystem protection. Freshwater Biology, 41, 347–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003). A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Research and Applications, 19 (5–6), 619–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1996). Long-term effects of acid rain: response and recovery of a forest ecosystem. Science, 272, 244–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002). Development of Numerical Methods for Predicting Relationships between Stream Flow, Water Quality and Biotic Response in Rivers. WRC Report No. 956/1/02. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
and (2003). Linking flow, water quality and potential effects on aquatic biota within the Reserve determination process. Water SA, 29 (3), 297–304.Google Scholar
, , and (2003). A simple flow–concentration modelling method for integrating water quality and water quantity in rivers. Water SA, 29 (3), 305–12.Google Scholar
and (2005). Handbook of Water and Wastewater Microbiology. London, California: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, , Jr. and (2005). Riparian Buffer Width, Vegetative Cover, and Nitrogen Removal Effectiveness: A Review of Current Science and Regulations. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA/600/R-05/118.
, , and (2003). Effects of increasing salinity on freshwater ecosystems in Australia. Australian Journal of Botany, 51, 655–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). Flow–stressor response approach to environmental flow requirement assessment. In SPATSIM, An Integrating Framework for Ecological Reserve Determination and Implementation: Incorporating Water Quality and Quantity Components of Rivers, ed. . WRC Report No. TT245/04, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
, , and (2005). The development of water quality methods within ecological Reserve assessments, and links to environmental flows. Water SA, 31 (2), 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Water Quality Standards Review and Revision. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
and (1980). Geographic analysis of thermal equilibria: a conceptual model for evaluating the effect of natural and modified thermal regimes on aquatic insect communities. American Naturalist, 115, 667–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 5
- Cited by