Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T06:18:57.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Graph algebras and widths of graphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2012

Bruno Courcelle
Affiliation:
Université de Bordeaux
Joost Engelfriet
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Get access

Summary

We will define graph operations that generalize the concatenation of words. Some of these operations have been used in Section 1.1 to define the cographs and the series-parallel graphs. We will define actually two signatures of graph operations, hence two graph algebras. Both algebras will be defined in such a way that their equational sets are exactly the sets defined by certain context-free graph grammars. (The notion of an equational set has been presented informally in Section 1.1.4 and will be studied in detail in Chapter 3.)

Two main types of context-free sets of graphs defined by certain graph rewriting mechanisms have emerged from the intense research conducted from around 1980 and synthesized in the handbook [*Roz] edited by Rozenberg.

We will first define the HR graph algebra that corresponds in this respect to the hyperedge replacement grammars. It turns out that the operations of this algebra yield an exact characterization (as equational sets) of the sets of graphs of tree-width bounded by fixed integers. The terms built with the operations of the HR algebra can be seen as algebraic expressions of tree-decompositions. (Tree-width and the corresponding tree-decompositions are important for the construction of efficient graph algorithms and also for the characterization of the graphs that exclude a fixed graph as a minor.)

The second algebra, called the VR algebra, is defined so that its equational sets are those generated by the (context-free) vertex replacement grammars. A new graph complexity measure called clique-width has arisen in a natural way from the definition of the VR algebra, without having (yet) any independent combinatorial characterization.

Type
Chapter
Information
Graph Structure and Monadic Second-Order Logic
A Language-Theoretic Approach
, pp. 80 - 187
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×