Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T19:48:48.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Reform of the Scottish Judiciary

from JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2013

Gavin F M Little
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Elaine Sutherland
Affiliation:
Lewis and Clark Law School Portland Oregon
Kay Goodall
Affiliation:
Stirling Law School
Gavin Little
Affiliation:
Stirling Law School
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Scottish judges possess considerable power over their fellow citizens and under the constitution. The Scottish Parliament has, in its first decade of law-making, introduced important statutory reforms of the judiciary with the objective of modernising its position in the constitution and strengthening its internal structures and processes. Indeed, for the higher judiciary in the Court of Session in particular, the passing by the Parliament of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008 (hereafter “the 2008 Act”) is one of the most significant legislative landmarks since the Act of Union 1707.

This chapter is set out as follows. First, brief consideration is given to the importance of a strong, independent judiciary for the maintenance of the rule of law. Second, the constitutional and legal provision for Scottish judges prior to the 2008 Act is evaluated. Third, the main reforms introduced by the 2008 Act are analysed. The chapter then concludes with a short assessment of the Parliament's contribution to the area.

THE JUDICIARY AND THE RULE OF LAW

The independence, impartiality and competence of the judiciary are fundamental to maintaining the authority of the courts. Judicial independence is sustained by the legal and constitutional protections which seek to ensure that judges are collectively and individually safeguarded from external influences when adjudicating. Impartiality requires that individual judges are unbiased decision-takers. Scottish judges have tended to take a pragmatic approach to the distinction between independence and impartiality, recognising that they may be inter-linked.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law Making and the Scottish Parliament
The Early Years
, pp. 183 - 207
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×