Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-10T03:48:58.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The Need to Transform U.S. Energy Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

By
Matthew Bunn ,
Laura Diaz Anadon  and
Venkatesh Narayanamurti
Edited by
Laura Diaz Anadon ,
Matthew Bunn  and
Venkatesh Narayanamurti
Matthew Bunn
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
Laura Diaz Anadon
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
Venkatesh Narayanamurti
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy School of Government, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Department of Physics, Harvard University
Laura Diaz Anadon
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Massachusetts
Matthew Bunn
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Massachusetts
Venkatesh Narayanamurti
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy School of Government, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences and Department of Physics, Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

The Need for an Energy Technology Revolution

How will countries provide the reliable, affordable energy needed to fuel a growing world economy and lift billions of people out of poverty without causing catastrophic climate change and other environmental disasters? Answering this question is perhaps the greatest challenge human civilization faces in the 21st century. It cannot be done without a revolution in the technologies of both energy production and use. And for that revolution to arrive in time will require a dramatic acceleration in the pace at which new or improved energy technologies are invented, demonstrated, and adopted in the marketplace.

This book outlines policies the U.S. federal government in particular can adopt to foster such an energy technology revolution. These approaches will help meet the myriad energy challenges of the 21st century – and help ensure that the United States plays a leading role in doing so, capturing its share of the multi-trillion-dollar energy technology markets of the coming decades.

This book seeks to answer four basic questions. First, how much should the U.S. government spend on energy research, development, and demonstration (RD&D), and how should that money be allocated? Second, how can the U.S. government best work with the private sector and encourage it to invest its own funds in researching, developing, demonstrating, and deploying new energy technologies? Third, how can the U.S. government manage its energy RD&D investments and the institutions through which they flow to get the most beneficial energy innovation per dollar invested? Fourth, how can the U.S. government best manage competition and cooperation with other countries in energy technology innovation?

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Transforming US Energy Innovation , pp. 1 - 35
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
AEP. (2011). “AEP places carbon capture commercialization on hold, citing uncertain status of climate policy, weak economy.” American Electric Power. 14 July. Columbus, Ohio, United States. Retrieved from (Accessed March 3, 2014).
American Energy InnovationCouncil. (2010). A Business Plan for America's Energy Future. Full Report. June. Washington, D.C.: Energy Innovation Council.Google Scholar
American Enterprise Institute, Brookings Institution, & Breakthrough Institute. (2010). Post Partisan Power: How a Limited Approach to Energy Innovation Can Deliver Cheap Energy, Economic Productivity, and National Prosperity. October. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, Brookings Institution, & Breakthrough Institute.Google Scholar
Anadon, L.D., Bunn, M., Chan, G., Chan, M., Jones, C., Kempener, R., Lee, A., Logar, N., & Narayanamurti, V. (2011). Transforming U.S. Energy Innovation. November. Energy Technology Innovation Policy. Cambridge, Mass.: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Anadon, L.D., & Holdren, J.P. (2009). “Policy for energy-technology innovation.” In Acting in Time on Energy Policy, edited by Gallagher, Kelly Sims, pp. 89–127. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
ARPA-E. (2010). “Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy.” Retrieved from / (Accessed November 1, 2013).
BBC. (2010). “NATO tankers torched in Pakistan.” October 1, 2010. Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).
BNEF. (2013). “New Energy Finance Desktop.” Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).
Brenner, L.A., Koehler, D.J., Liberman, V., & Tversky, A. (1996, March). “Overconfidence in probability and frequency judgments: A critical examination.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision-Making Processes, 65(3):212–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M.A., Chandler, J., Lapsa, M.V., & Moonis, A. (2009). Making Homes Part of the Climate Solution: Policy Options to Promote Energy Efficiency. U.S. Climate Change Technology Program. Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M.A., Chandler, S., Lapsa, M.V., & Sovacool, B.K. (2008). Carbon Lock-In: Barriers to the Deployment of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies. Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Choi, H., & Anadon, L.D. (2014). “The role of the complementary sector and its relationship with network formation and government policies in emerging sectors: The case of solar photovoltaics between 2001 and 2009.” Technology Forecasting and Social Change. 82:80–94.
CNA. (2007). National Security and the Threat of Climate Change. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.Google Scholar
CNA. (2009). Powering America's Defense: Energy and the Risks to National Security. Report from the CNA's Military Advisory Board. May. Alexandria, Va.: Center for Naval Analyses.Google Scholar
Daniel, L. (2010). “New office aims to reduce military's fuel usage.” American Forces Press Service. Retrieved from (Accessed July 22, 2010).Google Scholar
Defense Science Board. (2008). More Fight – Less Fuel. Office of the Under Secretary for Acquisition Technology and Logistics. February. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Defense.Google Scholar
Deutch, J.M. (2011). The Crisis in Energy Policy, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOE. (2010a). Energy Frontier Research Centers. Main Website. Office of Science. U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from (Accessed March 3, 2014).
DOE. (2010b). Energy Innovation Hubs. Main Website. U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from (Accessed March 3, 2014).
DOE. (2011a). Department of Energy Quadrennial Technology Review Framing Document. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).Google Scholar
DOE. (2011b). Report of the Quadrennial Technology Review. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy September. Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).Google Scholar
DOE. (2012). Report on the First Quadrennial Technological Review: Technology Assessments. DOE/S-0002. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).Google Scholar
DOE. (2013a). Energy Frontier Research Centers. Main Website. Office of Science. U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).Google Scholar
DOE. (2013b). Energy Innovation Hubs. Main Website. U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).Google Scholar
DOE. (2013c). “The history of solar PV.” U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).
Easterling, W.E., Aggarwal, P.K., Batima, P., Brander, K.M., Erda, L., Howden, S.M., Kirilenko, A., Morton, J., Soussana, J.-F., Schmidhuber, J., & Tubiello, F.N. (2007). “Food, fibre and forest products.” In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., and Hanson, C.E., pp. 273–313. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
EIA. (2009). International Energy Outlook 2009 [Homepage of U.S. Energy Information Administration. Department of Energy]. Retrieved from (Accessed March 3, 2014).Google Scholar
EIA. (2013). Annual Energy Outlook, AEO2013 Early Release Overview. Energy Information Administration, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2006). World Energy Technology Outlook – 2050 (WETO – H2), Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Directorate General for Research.Google Scholar
G8+5 Academies. (2009, May). G8+5 Academies’ Joint Statement: Climate Change and the Transformation of Energy Technologies for a Low-Carbon Future. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, K.S. (2009). “Acting in Time on Climate Policy.” In Acting in Time on Energy Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, K.S., & Anadon, L.D. (2010). DOE Budget Authority for Energy Research, Development, & Demonstration Database. Retrieved from (March 3, 2014).
Ghosh, S., & Nanda, R. (2010). “Venture capital investment in the clean energy sector.” Harvard Business School Entrepreneurial Management Working Paper No. 11–020. Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).CrossRef
Griliches, Z. (1992). “The search for R&D spillovers.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94:S29–S47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruebler, A. (2012). “Grand designs: Historical patterns and future scenarios of energy technological change. Historical case studies of energy technology innovation.” Supplement to Johansson, T.B., Patwardhan, A., Nakicenovic, N., & Gomez-Cheverri, L., eds., Global Energy Assessment – Toward a Sustainable Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, and Laxenburg, Austria: The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Gruebler, A., Nakicenovic, N., & Victor, D.G. (1999). “Dynamics of energy technologies and global change.” Energy Policy, 27:247–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruebler, A., Aguayo, F., Gallagher, K., Hekkert, M., Jiang, K, Mytelka, L., Neij, L., Nemet, G., Wilson, C., et al. (2012). “Policies for the energy technology innovation system (ETIS).” In Johansson, T.B., Patwardhan, A., Nakicenovic, N., & Gomez-Cheverri, L., eds., Global Energy Assessment – Toward a Sustainable Future, pp. 1665–1744. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, and Laxenburg, Austria: The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, R.M., & Newell, R.G., eds. (2011). Accelerating Energy Innovation: Insights from Multiple Sectors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Hoppmann, J., Peters, M., Schneider, M., & Hoffmann, V.H. (2013). “The two faces of market support – How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry.” Research Policy, 42(4):989–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEA. (2009). World Energy Outlook 2009. Paris: International Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD.Google Scholar
IEA. (2010a). Energy Technology Perspectives 2010: Scenarios & Strategies to 2050. Paris: International Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD.Google Scholar
IEA. (2010c). World Energy Outlook 2010. Paris: International Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD.Google Scholar
IEA. (2012). World Energy Outlook 2012. Paris: International Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD.Google Scholar
IEA. (2013). Redrawing the Energy-Climate Map. Paris: International Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD.Google Scholar
Inhofe, J. (2012). The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Our Future. Washington, D.C.: WND Books.Google Scholar
IPCC. (2012). Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
John, A., Sarewitz, D., Weiss, C., & Bonvillian, W. (2010). “A new strategy for energy innovation.” Nature, 466:316–317.Google Scholar
Lester, R.K. (2009). “America's energy innovation problem (and how to fix it).” MIT-IPC Energy Innovation Working Paper 09–007. Cambridge, Mass.: Industrial Performance Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. November. Retrieved from (Accessed March 3, 2014).Google Scholar
Lester, R.K., & Hart, D.M. (2011). Unlocking Energy Innovation: How America Can Build a Low-Cost, Low-Carbon, Energy System. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lim, S.S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A.D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani, H., Ezzati, M., et al. (2012). “A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.” The Lancet, 380:2224–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundvall, B.A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Lutzenhiser, L. (2009). Behavioral Assumptions Underlying California Residential Sector Energy Efficiency Programs. Oakland, Calif.:California Institute for Energy and Environment.Google Scholar
Margolis, R.M., & Kammen, D.M. (1999). “Evidence of under-investment in energy R&D in the United States and the impact of federal policy.” Energy Policy, 27:575–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeown, R. (2007). “Energy myth two – the public is well informed about energy.” In Energy and American society – Thirteen myths, edited by Sovacool, B.K. & Brown, M.A., pp. 51–57. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., & Meyer, R.A., eds. (2007). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MIT. (2011). The Future of Natural Gas. An Interdisciplinary MIT Study. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Narayanamurti, V., Anadon, L.D., Breetz, H., Bunn, M., Lee, H., & Mielke, E. (2011). Transforming the Energy Economy: Options for Accelerating the Commercialization of Advanced Energy Technologies, Energy Technology Innovation Policy Group. Cambridge, Mass.: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Narayanamurti, V., Anadon, L.D., & Sagar, A. (2009). “Transforming energy Innovation.” Issues in Science and Technology, Fall: 57–64.Google Scholar
Narayanamurti, V., Odumosu, T., & Vinsel, L. (2013). “The discovery-invention cycle: Bridging the basic/applied dichotomy.” Discussion Paper 2013–02, Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program. Cambridge, Mass.: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, February 2013.
NAS. (2009). America's Energy Future: Technology and Transformation, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). National Innovation Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nemet, G.F. (2009). Interim monitoring of cost dynamics for publicly supported energy technologies. Energy Policy, 37(3):825–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times, July 13, 2011, Wald M.L. & Broder, J.M. “Utility shelves ambitious plan to limit carbon.” Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).
NSF. (2008a). “Research and development: National trends and international linkages.” In National R&D Trends. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. National Science Foundation. Retrieved from (Accessed March 3 2014).Google Scholar
NSF. (2008b). “Research and development: National trends and international linkages. business R&D.” In Science and Engineering Indicators 2008. National Science Foundation. Retrieved from (Accessed March 3, 2014).Google Scholar
NSF. (2010). Business Research and Development and Innovation Survey (BRDIS). National Science Foundation. Retrieved from (Accessed March 3, 2014).Google Scholar
OECD. (2008). Nuclear Energy Outlook. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
Ogden, P., Podesta, J., & Deutch, J. (2008). “A new strategy to spur energy innovation.” Issues in Science and Technology, Winter. Retrieved from (Accessed November 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Pacala, S., & Socolow, R. (2004, August 13). “Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies.” Science, 305:968–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PCAST. (2010). Report to the President on Accelerating the Pace of Change in Energy Technologies Through an Integrated Federal Energy Policy, President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Executive Office of the President.Google Scholar
Rehfuess, E., Corvalan, C., & Neira, M. (2006). “Indoor air pollution: 4,000 deaths a day must no longer be ignored.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(7):508–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simeone, N. (2009). Defense Department Reduces Dependence on Fossil Fuels. U.S. Department of Defense, American Forces Press Service, April 15, 2009.Google Scholar
Stavins, R. (2010). “Both are necessary, but neither is sufficient: Carbon-pricing and technology R&D initiatives in a meaningful national climate policy.” Retrieved from (Accessed March 3, 2014).
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D.K. (1974). “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.” Science, New Series, 185(4157):1124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UNDP. (2005). “Energizing the Millennium Development Goals: A guide to energy's role in reducing poverty.” New York: United Nations Development Programme.
UNEP SEFI & Bloomberg New Energy Finance. (2010). Global Trends in Sustainable Energy Investment 2010 Report. New York: United Nations Environment Programme and Bloomberg New Energy Finance.Google Scholar
Unruh, G.C. (2000). “Understanding carbon lock-in.” Energy Policy, 28:817–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). U.S. International Trade Data. Retrieved from (Accessed March 3, 2014).
Velikhov, E.P., Gagarinksi, A.Y., Subbotin, S.A., & Tsibulski, V.F. (2006). Russia in the World Energy of the XXI Century. Moscow, Russia: Izdat Nuclear Science and Engineering Publishers.Google Scholar
Weiss, C., & Bonvillian, W.B. (2009). Structuring an Energy Technology Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, T., & von Braun, J. (2013). “Climate change impacts on global food security.” Science, 341:508–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, E. (2013). “Cost of environmental damage in China growing rapidly amid industrialization.” The New York Times, March 29, 2013.
World Bank. (2012). Turn Down the Heat: Why a 4°C Warmer World Must be Avoided. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2013). Turn Down the Heat: Climate Extremes, Regional Impacts, and the Case for Resilience. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×