Law and science in the Western way of war

Stephanie Carvin; Michael John Williams

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107589704.003

1 - Law and science in the Western way of war

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2014

Stephanie Carvin and

Michael John Williams

Show author details

Stephanie Carvin: Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Michael John Williams: Affiliation:
New York University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The Greeks, I have learned, are accustomed to wage wars in the most stupid fashion due to their silliness and folly. For once they have declared war against each other, they search out the finest and most level plain and fight it out. The result is that even the victors come away with great losses; and of the defeated, I say only they are utterly annihilated.

Mardonius explaining the Greeks to the Persian king Xerxes as recorded by Herodotus in The Histories (7.9.2)

Nevertheless, as civilization has advanced during the last centuries, so has likewise steadily advanced, especially in war on land, the distinction between the private individual belonging to a hostile country and the hostile country itself, with its men in arms. The principle has been more and more acknowledged that the unarmed citizen is to be spared in person, property, and honor as much as the exigencies of war will admit.

US Union Army, General Orders 100, Article 22, 1863

A visitor from foreign lands to the American capital city of Washington D. C. is immediately struck by the classical design of the city and its monuments. From the ionic columns of the Jefferson Memorial set on the Tidal Basin, to the thirty-six fluted Doric columns of the Lincoln Memorial perched upon high ground overlooking the reflecting pool and the singular column of the Washington Monument, the architecture of America’s capital city reflects a bygone era. The city recalls a vision of Imperial Rome, itself a copy of the magnificent Greek city-states of the fourth and fifth centuries BC. While the architecture of the US capital recalls these ancient civilizations, the very idea that Washington embodies – democracy – is a more important link to these ancient civilizations. The members of the US House and Senate, duly elected by free citizens, to create laws to order society, laws that in turn are upheld by an independent judicial system, act in a cultural fashion shaped first by the ancient Greeks and later by ancient Rome.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Law, Science, Liberalism and the American Way of Warfare
The Quest for Humanity in Conflict
, pp. 21 - 54

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589704.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Lebow, Richard Ned, The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRef Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles, “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime,” in Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich and Skocpol, Theda (eds.), Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 169–185.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wette, Wolfram, The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Bundage, Burt, The Fifth Sun: Aztec Gods, Aztec World (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1979)Google Scholar

Sustelle, Jacques, The Daily Life of the Aztecs (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Cleary, Thomas (trans.), The Essential Tao: An Initiation into the Heart of Taoism through the Authentic Tao Te Ching and the Inner Teachings of Chuang Tzu (New York: Castle Books, 1992).Google Scholar

Coker, Christopher, Waging War without Warriors (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002), p. 129.Google Scholar

Sawyer, Ralph, The Seven Military Classics of Ancient China (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993), p. 33.Google Scholar

Fairbank, John K. and Kierman, Frank A. (eds.), Chinese Ways in Warfare (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974)

Graff, David A., Medieval Chinese Warfare, 300–900 (London: Routledge, 2002)CrossRef Google Scholar

Lewis, Mark Edward, Sanctioned Violence in Early China (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Graham, A., “The Place of Reason in China’s Philosophical Traditions,” in Dawson, R. (ed.), The Legacy of China (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964), p. 30.Google Scholar

Mufti, Malik, “Jihad as Statecraft: Ibn Khaldun on the Conduct of War and Empire,” History of Political Thought, Vol. 30, No. 3 (2009), 385–410.Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest, Muslim Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), p. 36.Google Scholar

Abler, Thomas S., “Scalping, Torture, Cannibalism and Rape: An Ethnohistorical Analysis of Conflicting Cultural Values in War,” Anthropologica, Vol. 34, No. 1 (1992), 3–20CrossRef Google Scholar

Lee, Wayne E., “Early American Ways of War: A New Renaissance, 1600–1815,” The Historical Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1 (March 2001), 269–289CrossRef Google Scholar

Richter, Daniel K., “War and Culture: The Iroquois Experience,” The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 4 (October 1983), 528–529CrossRef Google Scholar

Starkey, Armstrong, European and Native American Warfare 1675–1815 (London: UCL Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Hanson, Victor Davis, Why the West Has Won: Nine Landmark Battles in the Brutal History of Western Victory (New York: Faber and Faber, 2001), p. 5.Google Scholar

Landes, David S., The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy, European Warfare: 1660–1815 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

France, John, Perilous Glory: The Rise of Western Military Power (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Lorge, Peter A., The Asian Military Revolution: From Gunpowder to the Bomb (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRef Google Scholar

Wheeler, Everett L., Stratagem and the Vocabulary of Military Trickery (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1988)Google Scholar

Mayor, Adrienne, Greek Fire, Poison Arrows and Scorpion Bombs: Biological and Chemical Warfare in the Ancient World (New York: Overlook, 2003)Google Scholar

Strauss, Barry, Salamis: The Naval Battle that Saved Ancient Greece (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2005).Google Scholar

Porter, Patrick, Military Orientalism: Eastern War through Western Eyes (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Williams, M. J., “Implications for British Defense Dependency on Foreign and Security Policy,” in Operations in Libya, Ninth Report of Session 2011–2012Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas, The Rights of Man, Common Sense and Other Political Writings, ed. Philp, Mark. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, P. A. L., Early Greek Warfare: Horsemen and Chariots in the Homeric and Archaic Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Hanson, Victor Davis, Wars of the Ancient Greeks (New York: Harper, 2006)Google Scholar

Hoplites: The Classic Greek Battle Experience (London: Routledge, 1993)

Souza, Philip, The Greeks at War: From Athens to Alexander (Oxford: Osprey Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar

van Wees, Hans, Greek Warfare: Myths and Reality (Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Lynn, John A., Battle: A History of Combat and Culture (New York: Basic Books, 2004), p. 4.Google Scholar

Ancient History Sourcebook: Josephus (37–after 93 CE): The Roman Army in the First Century CE. Available at: (accessed June 30, 2014).

Bishop, M. C. and Coulston, J. C. N., Roman Military Equipment (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2011)Google Scholar

Cowan, Ross, Roman Battle Tactics (Oxford: Osprey Publishing, 2007)Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, Adrian, The Complete Roman Army (London: Thames & Hudson, 2003)Google Scholar

Roman Warfare (New York: Smithsonian Books, 2005)

The Conquest of Gaul, Handford, S. A. (trans.) revised with a new introduction by Gardner, Jane P. (New York: Penguin, 1982)Google Scholar

Southern, Pat and Dixon, Karen R., The Late Roman Army (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

von Clausewitz, Carl, On War (Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter, trans.) (London: Everyman, 1993), p. 710.Google Scholar

Parker, Geoffrey, The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 16.Google Scholar

Rogers, Clifford J., “By Fire and Sword: Bellum Hostile and ‘Civilians’ in the Hundred Years’ War,” in Grimsley, Mark and Rogers, Clifford J. (eds.), Civilians in the Path of War (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2002), p. 37.Google Scholar

Gillingham, John and Holt, J. C. (eds.), War and Government in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), p. 84.

Stacey, Robert, “The Age of Chivalry,” in Howard, Michael, Andreopoulos, George J. and Schuman, Mark R. (eds.), The Laws of War: Constraints on Warfare in the Western World (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994), pp. 34–35.Google Scholar

Parker, Geoffrey, The Thirty Years’ War (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar

Gat, Azar, A History of Military Thought: From the Enlightenment to the Cold War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 30.Google Scholar

Arnold, Thomas, The Renaissance at War (London: Cassell, 2001), p. 60.Google Scholar

Bousquet, Antoine, The Scientific Way of Warfare: Order and Chaos on the Battlefields of Modernity (London: Hurst, 2009), p. 46.Google Scholar

Clark, Christopher, Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia, 1600–1947 (New York: Penguin, 2006), pp. 30–31.Google Scholar

Palmer, R. R., “Frederick the Great, Guibert, von Bulow: From Dynastic to National War,” in Paret, Peter (ed.), Makers of Modern Strategy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986), p. 103.Google Scholar

de Crisse, Turpin, The Art of War (London, 1761)Google Scholar

Gat, Azar, The Origins of Military Thought: From the Enlightenment to Clausewitz (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), p. 37.Google Scholar

Lynn, John A., Battle: A History of Combat and Culture (New York: Basic Books, 2004), p. 126.Google Scholar

Kleinschmidt, Harald, “‘Using the Gun’: Manual Drill and the Proliferation of Portable Firearms,” The Journal of Military History, Vol. 63, No. 3 (July 1999), 612.CrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, M. J., The Good War: NATO and the Liberal Conscience in Afghanistan (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2011), p. 66.CrossRef Google Scholar

van Creveld, Martin, Command in War (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987), p. 61.Google Scholar

Heuser, Beatrice, Reading Clausewitz (London: Pimlico, 2002), p. 122.Google Scholar

Junger, Ernst, Der Kampf als Inneres Erlebnis (Berlin: E. S. Mittler & Son, 1926), p. 14.Google Scholar

van Creveld, Martin, “The Clausewitzian Universe and the Law of War,” Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 26, No. 3/4 (1991), 422CrossRef Google Scholar

Morgan, Edmund M., “The Background of the Uniform Code of Military Justice,” Military Law Review, Vol. 28 (April 1965), 17–35.Google Scholar

Higgenbotham, Don, “The Early American Way of Warfare,” The William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd Ser., Vol. 44, No. 2 (April 1987), 230–273, p. 254.CrossRef Google Scholar

Flory, , Prisoners of War: A Study in the Development of International Law (Washington D.C.: American Council on Public Affairs, 1942), p. 18.Google Scholar

Halleck, H. W., International Law, or, Rules Regulating the Intercourse of States in Peace and War (New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1861).Google Scholar

Fritz, David L., “‘Before the Howling Wilderness’: The Military Career of Jacob Hurd Smith, 1862–1902,” Military Affairs, Vol. 43, No. 4 (December 1979), 186–190.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maguire, Peter, Law and War: An American Story (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001), p. 63.Google Scholar

Best, Geoffrey, “Restraints on War by Land before 1945,” in Howard, Michael (ed.), Restraints on War: Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 17–37.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.