Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-14T08:44:44.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Internal indicia of codification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Leena Grover
Leena Grover
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In Chapter 6, an attempt was made to explain why, in order to develop a method of interpretation for crimes in the Rome Statute, the relationship between the Statute and custom must be understood. The nature of this relationship is essential to determining custom’s role as an aid to interpretation and the relationship of this aid to other interpretive aids, especially the Elements of Crimes. The codification study that follows is guided by indicia of codification identified in the previous Chapter. The goal in this and the following Chapter is to determine whether the definitions of crimes in the Rome Statute are more of a codification of custom or a progressive development of international criminal law. Codification experts disagree on the relative weight to be given to indicia of codification in the text of a treaty and those external to it (e.g., travaux préparatoires). Accordingly, all indicia will be considered. In this Chapter, consideration will be given to the provisions of the Rome Statute on the following issues and the clues they offer about the relationship between the Statute and custom: material, personal and temporal jurisdiction; legality; applicable law; the Rome Statute’s relationship to existing and developing international law; definitions of crimes; Elements of Crimes; and mental elements of crimes. In the next Chapter, indicia of codification external to the Rome Statute will be examined.

Material jurisdiction (article 5)

According to the preamble of the Rome Statute, crimes within its jurisdiction are ‘grave’ and ‘threaten the peace, security and well-being of the world’. They are the ‘most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole’ and ‘must not go unpunished’. This notion of seriousness is expressly reiterated in articles 1 and 5 of the Rome Statute and in the Elements of Crimes. Article 8(1) of the Rome Statute also emphasizes to the Court and prosecutor that their focus should be on the most egregious war crimes: ‘The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.’ What does this general gravity threshold suggest about the nature of the crimes within the Court’s jurisdiction?

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Interpreting Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court , pp. 246 - 302
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Sadat, LN and Carden, SR, ‘The New International Criminal Court: An Uneasy Revolution’ (2000) 88 Geo LJ 381, 419Google Scholar
de Guzman, MM, ‘Gravity and the Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court’ (2008) 32 Fordham Int’l LJ1400Google Scholar
Schachter, O, ‘Entangled Treaty and Custom’ in Dinstein, Y (ed.), International Law at a Time of Perplexity: Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Martinus Nijhoff 1989) 717, 735Google Scholar
Villiger, ME, Customary International Law and Treaties (Kluwer Law International 1997)Google Scholar
Filártiga v. Peña-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980)
ICJ, Reservations to the Convention on Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, Advisory Opinion [1951]
Prosecutor v. Furundžija, Judgment, ICTY-95–17/1-T, 10 December 1998
Cassese, A, International Criminal Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press 2008) 11–12Google Scholar
Kittichaisaree, K, International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press 2001) 3Google Scholar
Kreß, C, ‘International Criminal Law’ in Wolfrum, R (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2008–)
Koskenniemi, M, ‘Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission’ (4 April 2006), UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682, paras. 188–189
Cryer, R, ‘The Doctrinal Foundations of International Criminalization’ in Bassiouni, MC (ed.), International Criminal Law, vol. I, 3rd edn (Martinus Nijhoff 2008) 107Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, ICTY-94–1-AR72, 2 October 1995
Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez, Judgment, ICTY-95–14/2-A, 17 December 2004, paras. 40–46; and case law rejecting this position: Prosecutor v. Vasiljević, Judgment, ICTY-98–32-T, 29 November 2002, para. 26; Prosecutor v. Galić, Judgment, Separate and Partially Dissenting of Judge Nieto-Navia, ICTY-98–29-T, 5 December 2003, paras. 109–112
Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain) (Second Phase) [1970]
Institut de Droit International (IDI), ‘Obligations and Rights Erga Omnes in International Law’ (Krakow Session 2005) 71-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International289, article 1Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International (IDI), ‘The Protection of Human Rights and the Principle of Non-Intervention in Internal Affairs of States’ (Santiago de Compostela Session 1989) 3-II Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International341, article 1Google Scholar
Kirsch, P and Holmes, JT, ‘The Birth of the International Criminal Court: The 1998 Rome Conference’ (1998) 36 Canadian Ybk Int’l L3, 18Google Scholar
Frulli, M, ‘Jurisdiction Ratione Personae’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 527, 534–35Google Scholar
Werle, G, Principles of International Criminal Law (TMC Asser Press 2005) 21Google Scholar
The Case of the SS Lotus (France v. Turkey) (1927)
Akande, D, ‘The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits’ (2003) 1 J Int’l Crim Justice618, 621–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallant, KS, ‘Jurisdiction to Adjudicate and Jurisdiction to Prescribe in International Criminal Courts’ (2003) 48 Vill L Rev763, 821Google Scholar
Broomhall, B, ‘Article 22’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 720Google Scholar
Vienna Convention (1969)
Jennings, R and Watts, A, Oppenheim’s International Law, vol. II, 9th edn (Longman, Harlow 1992) 1260–61Google Scholar
Roxburgh, RF, International Conventions and Third States (Longmans, Green and Co. 1917) 112Google Scholar
Vienna Convention (1969); Free Zones Case (France v. Switzerland) (1929) PCIJ Series A, No. 22, 17–18
de Wet, E, ‘The Security Council as a Law Maker: The Adoption of (Quasi)-Judicial Decisions’ in Wolfrum, R and Röben, V (eds.), Developments in International Law in Treaty Making (Springer 2005) 183, 198–99Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Delalić and Others, Judgment, ICTY-96–21-T, 16 November 1998
Zimmermann, A, ‘Article 5’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 129, 136–37Google Scholar
Fernández de Gurmendi, SA, ‘The Process of Negotiations’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (Kluwer Law International 1999) 217Google Scholar
Barriga, S, Danspeckgruber, W and Wenaweser, C (eds.), The Princeton Process on the Crime of Aggression: Materials of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression, 2003–2009 (Princeton University: Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination, 2009)
Barriga, S and Kreß, C, The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression (Cambridge University Press 2012)Google Scholar
Barriga, S and Grover, L, ‘A Historic Breakthrough on the Crime of Aggression’ (2011) 105 AJIL517, fn. 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgon, S, ‘Jurisdiction Ratione Temporis’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. I (Oxford University Press 2002) 545Google Scholar
White, N and Cryer, R, ‘The ICC and the Security Council: An Uncomfortable Relationship’ in Doria, J, Gasser, H-P and Bassiouni, MC (eds.), The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko (Martinus Nijhoff 2009) 455, 463–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, A, ‘Article 124’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 1767, 1769Google Scholar
Baxter, RR, ‘Multilateral Treaties as Evidence of Customary International Law’ (1965–1966) 41 British Ybk Int’l L274, 280Google Scholar
UNSC, ‘Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Security Council Resolution 808’ (1993), UN Doc. S/25704, para. 34
Prosecutor v. Delalić and Others, Judgment, ICTY-96–21-T, 16 November 1998, para. 417; Prosecutor v. Jelisić, Judgment, ICTY-95–10-T, 14 December 1999, para. 61
Waldock, H, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’ (1964) II Ybk of the ILC5, 43Google Scholar
Vienna Convention (1969)
von Hebel, H and Robinson, D, ‘Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (Kluwer Law International 1999) 79, 122Google Scholar
Gallant, KS, The Principle of Legality in International Comparative Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press 2008) 339–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitti, G, ‘Article 21 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Treatment of Sources of Law in the Jurisprudence of the ICC’ in Stahn, C and Sluiter, G (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Brill 2008) 285, 295Google Scholar
Summers, RS and Taruffo, M, ‘Interpretation and Comparative Analysis’ in MacCormick, DN and Summers, RS (eds.), Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (Ashgate 1991) 461, 475–76Google Scholar
Schabas, WA, The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute (Oxford University Press 2010) 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triffterer, O, ‘Article 10’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 531, 533Google Scholar
Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) [1986]
Schabas, WA, An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press 2004) 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vienna Convention (1969)
Cryer, R, Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime (Cambridge University Press 2005) 174–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreß, C, ‘War Crimes Committed in Non-International Armed Conflict and the Emerging System of International Criminal Justice’ (2000) 30 Israel Ybk Human Rights103Google Scholar
Prosecutor v. Tadić, Judgment, ICTY-94–1-A, 15 July 1999, para. 223. See also Prosecutor v. Kupreškić and Others, Judgment, ICTY-95–16-T, 14 January 2000, para. 580
Vienna Convention (1969)
Kreß, C, ‘Harmony and Dissonance in International Law’ (2011) 105 ASIL Proceedings160, 161Google Scholar
Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain) (Second Phase) [1970]
Boot, M, Dixon, R and Hall, CK(revised by CK Hall), ‘Article 7’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 159, 170Google Scholar
Villiger, ME, Customary International Law and Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff 1985) 216–17Google Scholar
Vienna Convention (1969)
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) [2005]
Heller, KJ, ‘Retreat from Nuremberg – the Leadership Requirement in the Crime of Aggression’ (2007) 18 EJIL477, 479–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coalition for the International Criminal Court, Report of the CICC Team on the Crime of Aggression (2005) 30–31
Kreß, C, ‘Time for Decision: Some Thoughts on the Immediate Future of the Crime of Aggression: A Reply to Andreas Paulus’ (2009) 20 EJIL1139, 1139–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Advisory Opinion [1951] ICJ Rep. 15, 23
Danilenko, GM, ‘The Statute of the International Criminal Court and Third States’ (1999–2000) 21 Mich J Int’l L445, 482Google Scholar
UNSC, ‘Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to Paragraph 5 of Security Council Resolution 955’ (1994), UN Doc. S/1995/134, para. 45
Robinson, D, ‘The Elements of Crimes Against Humanity’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) 58Google Scholar
Danilenko, GM, ‘ICC Statute and Third States’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. II (Oxford University Press 2002) 1871Google Scholar
Byers, M, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules (Cambridge University Press 1999) 186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion [1996]
Cottier, M, ‘Article 8’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 275Google Scholar
Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its Annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land 32 Stat. 1803, 1 Bevans 247, 187 TS 429
Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 75 UNTS 135; Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 75 UNTS 287 (all adopted 12 August 1949, all entered into force 2 October 1950)
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (first Additional Protocol), 1125 UNTS 3; Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (second Additional Protocol) 1125
Dörmann, K, ‘Article 8’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 275, 301Google Scholar
Additional Protocol (1977)
Additional Protocols (1977)
Additional Protocol (1977), and 142 had ratified the second Additional Protocol (1977)
Additional Protocol (1977)
Geneva Conventions (1949)
Additional Protocol (1977), six on other provisions of it or the Geneva Conventions (1949)
Zimmermann, A, ‘Article 8’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 275, 477Google Scholar
Cassese, A, ‘The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Reflections’ (1999) 10 EJIL144, 152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geneva Conventions (1949)
Additional Protocols (1977)
Cottier, M, ‘Article 8’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 275Google Scholar
Additional Protocol (1977)
Additional Protocol (1977)
Prosecutor v. Norman, Decision on Preliminary Motion Based on Lack of Jurisdiction (Child Recruitment), Dissenting Opinion of Judge Robertson, SCSL-2004–14-AR72(E), 31 May 2004
Meron, T, ‘Crimes under the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court’ in von Hebel, H, Lammers, JG and Schukking, J (eds.), Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Adriaan Bos (TMC Asser Press 1999) 47, 48–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henckaerts, JM, ‘The ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law – An Assessment’ in Maybee, L and Chakka, B (eds.), Custom as a Source of International Humanitarian Law (International Committee of the Red Cross 2006) 43, 49–50Google Scholar
von Hebel, and Robinson, , ‘Reflections on the Elements of Crimes’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute (Kluwer Law International 1999) 219, 220Google Scholar
Ambos, K, ‘Some Preliminary Reflections on the Mens Rea Requirements of the Crimes in the ICC Statute and the Elements of Crimes’ in Vohrah, LC and Others (eds.), Man’s Inhumanity to Man: Essays on International Law in Honour of Antonio Cassese (Kluwer Law International 2003) 11Google Scholar
Triffterer, O, ‘Can the “Elements of Crimes” Narrow or Broaden Responsibility for Criminal Behaviour defined in the Rome Statute?’ in Stahn, C and Sluiter, G (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court (Martinus Nijhoff 2009) 381, 386Google Scholar
von Hebel, H, ‘The Decision to Include Elements of Crimes in the Rome Statute’ in Lee, RS and Others (eds.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) 3, 8Google Scholar
Bassiouni, MC, The Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court, vol. 1 (Transnational 2005) 163Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Applicable Law’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. II (Oxford University Press 2002) 1051Google Scholar
Clark, RS, ‘Article 9’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 505, 528Google Scholar
Akehurst, M ‘The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law’ (1974–1975) 47 British Ybk Int’l L273Google Scholar
Higgins, R, ‘The Relationship between the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice’ in von Hebel, H, Lammers, JG and Schukking, J (eds.), Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Adriaan Bos (TMC Asser Press 1999) 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, RS, ‘Introduction’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) lvGoogle Scholar
Geneva Conventions (1949)
Torture Convention (1984)
Prosecutor v. Lubanga Dyilo, Decision on Confirmation of Charges, ICC-01/04–01/06–803, 29 January 2007
Piragoff, DK and Robinson, D, ‘Article 30’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2nd edn (CH Beck/Hart/Nomos 2008) 849Google Scholar
Triffterer, O, ‘The New International Criminal Law – its General Principles Establishing Individual Criminal Responsibility’ (2003) 32 Thesaurus Acroasium633, 699Google Scholar
Triffterer, O, ‘Command Responsibility, Article 28 Rome Statute, an Extension of Individual Criminal Responsibility for Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court – Compatible with Article 22, Nullum Crimen Sine Lege?’ in Triffterer, O (ed.), Gedächtnisschrift für Theo Vogler (CF Müller 2004) 213Google Scholar
Kelt, M and von Hebel, H, ‘General Principles of Criminal Law and Elements of Crimes’ in Lee, RS (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence (Transnational 2001) 19Google Scholar
Politi, M, ‘Elements of Crimes’ in Cassese, A and Others (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press 2002) 443, 461Google Scholar
Werle, G and Jessberger, F, ‘Unless Otherwise Provided: Article 30 of the ICC Statute and the Mental Element of Crimes under International Criminal Law’ (2005) 3 J Int’l Crim Justice35, 45–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreß, C, ‘The Crime of Genocide under International Law’ (2006) 6 Int’l Comp L Rev461, 485Google Scholar
Heller, KJ, ‘Mistake of Legal Element, the Common Law, and Article 32 of the Rome Statute: A Critical Analysis’ (2008) 6 J Int’l Crim Justice419, 435–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Internal indicia of codification
  • Leena Grover, Universität Zürich
  • Book: Interpreting Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107705586.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Internal indicia of codification
  • Leena Grover, Universität Zürich
  • Book: Interpreting Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107705586.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Internal indicia of codification
  • Leena Grover, Universität Zürich
  • Book: Interpreting Crimes in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
  • Online publication: 05 November 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107705586.008
Available formats
×