Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6c7dr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-16T09:27:38.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 34 - The Normative Contents of Engineering Formation

Engineering Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

By
Gary Lee Downey
Edited by
Aditya Johri  and
Barbara M. Olds
Gary Lee Downey
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech
Aditya Johri
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Barbara M. Olds
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Engineering educators will be persuaded to alter pedagogy and curricula only when presented with rigorous research demonstrating better learning outcomes through alternative practices. So goes one justification for the recent rise of engineering education research (EER) as an arena of scholarship (Borrego, 2007; Lohmann, 2005). It builds on the view that engineering educators will be influenced most by educational research that best emulates the high value they place on rational, rigorous, especially quantitative, approaches to their own research. Rigorous EER will increase the frequency through which engineering educators adopt curricular innovations. Although engineering educators of the 1980s and 1990s showed themselves to not be influenced by the many calls for change that lacked supporting evidence, and no one advocates bad educational research, overemphasizing the assumption that engineering educators are rational actors who are most responsive to rational argument may prove, however, to be self-limiting. It fails in particular to place sufficient emphasis on the normative contents of engineering practice and, hence, the normative commitments in engineering teaching and learning. EER must critically examine not only what engineering educators do and how they do it but also why they do it.

What is engineering for? What are engineers for? Engineering knowledge and practices always have normative contents. That is, engineers work in relation to or on behalf of a multitude of broader sociomaterial projects, that is, projects whose participants and implications extend beyond engineers and engineering. Because the education and training of would-be engineers seeks to prepare them for engineering work, a key issue for engineering education researchers to consider is the normative contents of engineering formation. I use the European term “formation” because it helpfully refers and calls attention to both formal education and informal training.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research , pp. 693 - 712
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agassi, J. (1966, Summer). The confusion between science and technology in the standard philosophies of science. Technology and Culture, 7, 348–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alder, K. (1997). Engineering the revolution: Arms and enlightenment in France, 1763–1815. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderl, R., Gong, K., Cai Li, N, Kaminski, P., Netto, M., Kimura, F.,…Widdig, B. (2006). In search of global engineering excellence: Educating the next generation of engineers for the global workplace. Hanover, Germany: Continental AG.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., Courter, S. S., McGlamery, T., Nathans-Kelly, T., & Nicometo, C. G. (2010). Understanding engineering work and identity: A cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avila, J. C., & Arias, M. J. (2007). Current problems in engineering historically rooted in the search for status as a profession. In Christensen, S. H., Delahousse, B., & Meganck, M. (Eds.), Philosophy in engineering (pp. 369–390). Copenhagen: Academica.Google Scholar
Belhoste, B., & Chatzis, K. (2007). From technical corps to technocratic power: French state engineers and their professional and cultural universe in the first-half of the 19th century. History and Technology, 23(3), 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bomke, W. (2009). A historical perspective of engineering design. In Hyldgaard Christensen, S., Delahousse, B., & Meganck, M. (Eds.), Engineering in context (pp. 245–262). Aarhus, Denmark: Academica.Google Scholar
Borrego, M. (2007). Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. K. (2000). Design plans, working drawing, national styles. Technology and Culture, 41, 195–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. K., Downey, G. L., & Diogo, M. P. (2009). The normativities of engineers: Engineering education and history of technology. Technology and Culture, 50(4), 737–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. A. (1989). The engineers: A history of the engineering profession in Britain 1750–1914. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Bunge, M. (1966, Summer). Technology as applied science. Technology and Culture, 7, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, W. H. (1893, July 31). The ideal engineering education. Paper presented at the Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Calhoun, D. H. (1960). The American civil engineer: Origins and conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1980). The state and technical innovation: A case study of the electric vehicle in France. Research Policy, 9, 358–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, M. A. (1967). The mechanical engineer in America: Professional cultures in conflict. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Campagnolo, G. M., & Fele, G. (2010). From software specifics to software-specific vagueness: System engineering and the enterprise architecture software market. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, B. (1988). Academic entrepreneurship and engineering education: Dugald C. Jackson and the MIT-GE Cooperative Engineering course, 1907–1932. Technology and Culture, 29, 536–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cech, E., & Waidzunas, T. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatzis, K. (2007). Introduction: National identities of engineers. History and Technology, 23(3), 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatzis, K. (2009). Coping with the Second Industrial Revolution: Fragmentation of the French engineering education system, 1870s to the present. Engineering Studies, 1(2), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, S. H., Delahousse, B., & Meganck, M. (2007). Philosophy in engineering (1st ed.). Copenhagen: Academica.Google Scholar
Christensen, S. H., Delahousse, B., & Meganck, M. (2009). Engineering in context. Aarhus, Denmark: Academica.Google Scholar
Comité d’Études sur les Formations d’Ingénieurs (CEFI). (2010). Etre ingénieur. Retrieved from
Coyle, E., Murphy, M., & Grimson, W. (2007). Engineering science as opposed to applied science and natural science. In Hyldgaard Christensen, S., Meganck, M., & Delahousse, B. (Eds.), Philosophy in engineering (1st ed., pp. 139–160). Aarhus, Denmark: Academica.Google Scholar
Davis, M. (1996). Defining “engineer”: How to do it and why it matters. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(2), 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. (2010). Distinguishing architects from engineers: A pilot study in differences between engineers and other technologists. In van de Poel, I. & Goldberg, D. E. (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 15–30). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Delahousse, B. (2007). Industry requirements for the new engineer. In Christensen, S. H., Delahousse, B., & Meganck, M. (Eds.), Engineering in context (pp. 315–338). Copenhagen: Academica.Google Scholar
de Matos, A. C., Diogo, M. P., Gouzévitch, I., & Grelon, A. (Eds.). (2009). Les enjeux identitaires des ingénieurs: Entre la formation et l'action/The quest for a professional identity: engineers between training and action. Lisbon: Colibri.Google Scholar
Divall, C. (1990). A measure of agreement: Employers and engineering studies in the universities of England and Wales, 1897–1939. Social Studies of Science, 20(1), 65–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divall, C., & Johnston, S. F. (2000). Scaling up: The institution of chemical engineers and the rise of a new profession. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, G. L. (1998). The machine in me: An anthropologist sits among computer engineers. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Downey, G. L. (2005). Keynote address: Are engineers losing control of technology?: From “problem solving” to “problem definition and solution” in engineering education. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 83(A8), 1–12.Google Scholar
Downey, G. L. (2007). Low cost, mass use: American engineers and the metrics of progress. History and Technology, 22(3), 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, G. L. (2009). What is engineering studies for? Dominant practices and scalable scholarship. Engineering Studies: Journal of the International Network for Engineering Studies, 1(1), 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, G. L. (2011). Epilogue: Beyond global competence: Implications for engineering pedagogy. In Downey, G. L. & Beddoes, K. (Eds.), What is global engineering education for?: The making of international educators (pp. 415–432). San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar
Downey, G. L. (2012a). Technicians of progress: Dominant images of engineers (unpublished manuscript).
Downey, G. L. (2012b). Normative holism in engineering formation. In Christensen, S. H., Mitcham, C., Bocong, L., & An, Y. (Eds.), Engineering, development and philosophy: Chinese, American, and European perspectives. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Downey, G. L., Donovan, A., & Elliott, T. J. (1989). The invisible engineer: How engineering ceased to be a problem in science and technology studies. Knowledge and Society 8, 189–216.Google Scholar
Downey, G. L., & Lucena, J. C. (1994). Engineering studies. In Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Petersen, J. & Pinch, T. (Eds.), Handbook of science, technology, and society. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Downey, G. L., & Lucena, J. (2004). Knowledge and professional identity in engineering: Code-switching and the metrics of progress. History and Technology, 20(4), 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durbin, P. T. (1978). Toward a social philosophy of technology. In Durbin, P. T. (Ed.), Research in philosophy and technology: Annual compilation of research (Vol. 1, pp. 67–97). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Edgerton, D. (1996). Science, technology and the British industrial ‘decline,’ 1870–1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engineering for the Americas. (2010). About EFTA. Retrieved from
European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). (2005). SEFI Mission Statement 16.09.05 Retrieved from
Faulkner, W. (2007). ‘Nuts and bolts and people’: Gender-troubled engineering identities. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, W. (2009). Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures II: Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility paradoxEngineering Studies, 1(3), 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujino, T. (1963). Edo Bakufu. In Ienaga, S. (Ed.), Kinsei 2 [Early Modern 2] (Vol. 10, pp. 1–55). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Gainsburg, J., Rodriguez-Lluesma, C., & Bailey, D. E. (2010). A ‘‘knowledge profile’’ of an engineering occupation: Temporal patterns in the use of engineering knowledge. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasparetto, A. (2007). The status of the engineer in Europe in view of social changes. In Christensen, S. H., Delahousse, B., & Meganck, M. (Eds.), Philosophy in engineering (pp. 339–352). Copenhagen: Academica.Google Scholar
Gerstl, J. E., & Perrucci, R. (1969). Profession without community. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M., Scott, P., Nowotny, H., Limoges, C., Schwartzmann, S., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Gilbert, A.-F. (2009). Disciplinary cultures in mechanical engineering and materials science: Gendered/gendering practices?Equal Opportunities International, 28, 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, S. L. (1984). The Techne of philosophy and the philosophy of technology. In Durbin, P. T. (Ed.), Research in philosophy and technology: Annual compilation of research (Vol. 7, pp. 115–144). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Gouzevitch, I., & Inkster, I. (2007). Introduction: Identifying engineers in history. History of Technology, 27, 101–106.Google Scholar
Grelon, A. (Ed.). (1986). Les ingénieurs de la crise: Titre et profession entre les deux guerres. Paris: L’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Grelon, A. (1993). The training and career structures of engineers in France, 1880–1939. In Fox, R. & Guagnini, A. (Eds.), Education, technology and industrial performance in Europe, 1850–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grelon, A. (2007). French engineers: Between unity and heterogeneity. History of Technology, 27, 107–123.Google Scholar
Indian Society for Technical Education. (2010). President's message. Retrieved from
International Federation of Engineering Education Societies (Producer). (2010). IFEES members value propositions. Retrieved from
Japan Accreditation Board for Engineering Education. (2010). About JABEE Retrieved from
Jasanoff, S. (1996). Beyond epistemology: Relativism and engagement in the politics of science. Special issue: The politics of SSK: Neutrality, commitment and beyond. Social Studies of Science, 26(2), 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.CrossRef
Koshland, C. P. (2010). Liberal arts and engineering. In Grasso, D. & Brown Burkins, M. (Eds.), Holistic engineering education: Beyond tech-nology (pp. 53–67). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranakis, E. (1997). Constructing a bridge: An exploration of engineering culture, design, and research in nineteenth-century France and America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Law, J., & Callon, M. (1988). Engineering and sociology in a military aircraft project: A network analysis of technological change. Social Problems, 35, 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, E. T. (1986). The revolt of the engineers: Social responsibility and the American engineering profession. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
LeBold, W. K., Perrucci, R., & Howland, W. (1966, March). The engineer in industry and government. Journal of Engineering Education, 56, 237–273.Google Scholar
Lenk, H. (1984). Toward a pragmatic social philosophy of technology and the technological intelligentsia. In Durbin, P. T. (Ed.), Research in philosophy and technology: Annual compilation of research (Vol. 7, pp. 23–58). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, J. R. (2005). Building a community of scholars: The role of the Journal of Engineering Education as a research journal. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucena, J. (2005). Defending the nation: U.S. policymaking to create scientists and engineers from Sputnik to the ‘War Against Terrorism’. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Lucena, J. C. (2007). De criollos a Mexicanos: Engineers’ identity and the construction of Mexico. History and Technology, 23(3), 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucena, J. (2009). Imagining nation, envisioning progress: Emperor, agricultural elites, and imperial ministers in search of engineers in 19th century Brazil. Engineering Studies, 1(3), 24–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundgreen, P. (1990). Engineering education in Europe and the U.S.A., 1750–1930: The rise to dominance of school culture and the engineering profession. Annals of Science, 47, 33–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, D. G. (1972). The great bridge. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. M. (1984). The making of a profession: A century of electrical engineering in America. New York, NY: IEEE Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiksins, P. (1988). “The revolt of the engineers” reconsidered. Technology and Culture, 29(2), 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiksins, P., & Smith, C. (1996). Engineers and convergence. In Meiksins, P. & Smith, C. (Eds.), Engineering labour: Technical workers in comparative perspective (pp. 256–285). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Moses, J. (2010). Architecting engineering systems. In van de Poel, I. & Goldberg, D. E. (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 275–284). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Mutanen, A. (2007). Methodology of engineering science as a combination of epistemic, ethical and aesthetic aspects. In Hyldgaard Christensen, S., Meganck, M., & Delahousse, B. (Eds.), Philosophy in engineering (1st ed., pp. 123–138). Aarhus, Denmark: Academica.Google Scholar
National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Neeley, K. (2003). Liberal studies and the integrated engineering education of ABET 2000. In Reports from a planning conference at the University of Virginia, April 4–6, 2002. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Newberry, B. (2009). The dialectics of engineering. In Hyldgaard Christensen, S., Delahousse, B., & Meganck, M. (Eds.), Engineering in context (1st ed., pp. 33–47). Aarhus, Denmark: Academica.Google Scholar
Noble, D. (1977). America by design: Science, technology, and the rise of corporate capitalism. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Ollis, D. F., Neeley, K. A., & Luegenbiehl, H. (Eds.). (2004). Liberal education in twenty-first century engineering: Responses to ABET/EC 2000 criteria. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Ottens, M. M. (2010). Limits to systems engineering. In van de Poel, I. & Goldberg, D. E. (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 109–122). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Perrucci, R. (1971, March/April). Engineering: Professional servant of power. American Behavioral Scientist, 14, 492–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picon, A. (1992). French architects and engineers in the age of enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Picon, A. (2007). French engineers and social thought, 18th–20th centuries. History and Technology, 23(3), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picon, A. (2009). The engineer as judge: Engineering analysis and political economy in 18th century France. Engineering Studies, 1(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reader, W. J. (1987). A history of the institution of electrical engineers, 1871–1971. London: Peregrinus on behalf of the Institution of Electrical Engineers.Google Scholar
Reynolds, T. S. (1983). 75 Years of progress: A history of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1908–1983. New York, NY: American Institute of Chemical Engineers.Google Scholar
Robison, W. (2010). Design problems and ethics. In van de Poel, I. & Goldberg, D. E. (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda (pp. 205–214). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Rothstein, W. (1968, October). The American Association of Engineers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 22, 48–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, M. (1999). Education and economic decline in Britain, 1870s to the 1990s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmiede, R., & Will-Zocholl, M. C. (2011). Engineers’ work on the move: Challenges in automobile engineering in a globalized world. Engineering Studies, 3(2), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seron, C., & Silbey, S. (2009). The dialectic between expertise knowledge and professional discretion: Accreditation, social control, and the limits of instrumental logic. Engineering Studies, 1(2), 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, B., & Hull, J. P. (1980). A centennial history of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1880–1980. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, G., & Tilston, W. V. (1982). The relationship of technology to engineering. In Durbin, P. T. (Ed.), Research in philosophy and technology: Annual compilation of research (Vol. 5, pp. 87–97). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Skolimowski, H. (1966, Summer). The structure of thinking in technology. Technology and Culture, 7, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaton, A. (2010). Race, rigor and selectivity in U.S. engineering: The History of an occupational color line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (1987). Technical workers: Class, labour and trade unionism. Basingstoke, U.K.: Macmillan Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steneck, N., Olds, B., & Neeley, K. A. (2002). Recommendations for liberal education in engineering: A white paper from the Liberal Education Division of the American Society for Engineering Education (endorsed by the Liberal Education Division of ASEE). In Neeley, K. A. (Ed.), Liberal studies and the integrated engineering education of ABET 2000. Charlottesville, VA: Liberal Education Division of the American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
Tonso, K. (2007). On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender and power via engineering practice. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
Valderrama, A., Mejía, I., Mejía, A., Lleras, E., Garcia, A., & Camargo, J. (2009). Engineers’ identity and engineering education in Colombia, 1887–1972. Technology and Culture, 50(4), 811–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Poel, I., & van Gorp, A. C. (2006). The need for ethical reflection in engineering design: The relevance of type of design and design hierarchy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(3), 333–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Poel, I., & Goldberg, D. E. (Eds.). (2010). Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRef
Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Vinck, D. (2011). Taking intermediary objects and equipping work into account in the study of engineering practices. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinck, D., & Blanco, E. (2003). Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design and innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Whalley, P. (1986). The social production of technical work. Albany, NY: The State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, M. J. (1981). English culture and the decline of the industrial spirit, 1850–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, R. H. (2002). Retooling: A historian confronts technological change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wisnioski, M. (2009a). How engineers contextualize themselves. In Christensen, Steen H., Delahousse, B., & Meganck, M. (Eds.), Engineering in context (pp. 403–416). Aarhus, Denmark: Academica.Google Scholar
Wisnioski, M. (2009b). “Liberal education has failed”: Reading like an engineer in 1960s America. Technology and Culture, 50(4), 753–782.Google Scholar
Wisnioski, M. (2012). Engineers for change: Competing vision of technology in 1960s America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zussman, R. (1985). Mechanics of the middle class. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×