Logic and language: Traditional logic

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521251044.008

6 - Logic and language: Traditional logic

from PART 2 - PHILOSOPHY AND ITS PARTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Edited by

Eckhard Kessler and

Get access

Summary

LOGIC 1350–1600

The study of Aristotle

The Organon of Aristotle played a central role throughout the period, at least in principle. During the medieval period, the Organon was divided into two parts. The Categories and the De interpretatione along with Porphyry's Isagoge formed the Logica vetus, which was already known in the twelfth century. The Prior and Posterior Analytics, the Topics and the Sophistici elenchi formed the Logica nova, which became known only during the twelfth century. Both the Logica vetus and the Logica nova were firmly embedded in the university curriculum, with the single exception of the Topics. It was not included in the list of books prescribed by the Vienna statutes of 1389 or in the list of books read at Erfurt in 1420, and at Greifswald in 1456 it was to be lectured on only for the master's degree, although at all these places the other books of the Organon were specifically mentioned as part of the undergraduate course. In many places, including Paris, only four books of the Topics were to be read; and it was sometimes specified that these books were to be I, II, VI and VIII. An obvious result of humanist influence in the sixteenth century was the renewed attention paid to the Topics, though this interest was not to last.

There were several waves of commentaries during the period after 1350. Some of these were on individual books from the Organon, such as the commentary on the Prior Analytics by Marsilius of Inghen, which was published in Venice in 1516, and the commentary on the Posterior Analytics by Paul of Venice, which had been published seven times by 1518, nearly always in Venice.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy , pp. 139 - 172

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521251044.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ailly, Pierre d' (1980). Concepts and Insolubles: An Annotated Translation, ed. Spade, P. V., Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Ailly, Pierre d' (1522). Perutilis logica, Venice (repr. Hildesheim, 1974).Google Scholar

Angelelli, I. (1970). ‘The techniques of disputation in the history of logic’, The Journal of Philosophy, 67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1516–17). Dialectica cum quinque vocibus Porphyrii, trans. Argyropulos, J., comment. Eck, J., 2 vols., Augsburg.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1597). Organum, ed. and trans. Pace, G., Frankfurt (repr. Hildesheim, 1967).Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1973a). ‘Andreas Kesler and the later theory of consequences’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 14.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1973b). ‘The doctrine of exponibilia in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries’, Vivarium, 11.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1974a). Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period, Dordrecht–Boston.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1976). ‘Agostino Nifo's reinterpretation of medieval logic’, Rivista critica di storia della filosofia, 31.Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1977). ‘Thomas Bricot (d. 1516) and the liar paradox’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 15.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1978a). ‘A note on Paul of Venice and the Oxford Logica of 1483’, Medioevo, 4.Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1978b). ‘Multiple qualification and the use of special qualifiers in early sixteenth-century logic’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1978c). ‘Theories of proposition: some early sixteenth-century discussions’, Franciscan Studies, 38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1979a). ‘The Libelli sophistarum and the use of medieval logic texts at Oxford and Cambridge in the early sixteenth century’, Vivarium, 17.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1979b). ‘A note on an early printed logic text in Edinburgh University Library’, The Innes Review, 30.Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1981a).‘“Do words signify ideas or things?” The scholastic sources of Locke's theory of language’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1982). ‘The structure of mental language: some problems discussed by early sixteenth-century logicians’, Vivarium, 20.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1984). ‘Locke on language’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 14.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1985). ‘English Obligationes texts after Roger Swyneshed: the tracts beginning “Obligatio est quaedam ars”’, in The Rise of British Logic, ed. Lewry, P. O., Toronto.Google Scholar

Ashworth, E. J. (1986). ‘Renaissance man as logician: Josse Clichtove (1472–1543) on disputations’, History and Philosophy of Logic, 7.CrossRef Google Scholar

Augustine, (1975). De dialectica, ed. Pinborg, J., trans. Jackson, B. D., Dordrecht–Boston.Google Scholar

Boethius, of Dacia (1960–). Opera (Corpus philosophorum Danicorum medii aevi), Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Bottin, F. (1981). ‘Alcune correzioni ed aggiunte al censimento dei codici di Paolo Veneto’, Quaderni per la storia dell' Università di Padova, 14.Google Scholar

Brerewood, Edward (1619). Elementa logicae, London.Google Scholar

Breytkopf, Gregorius (1507). Parvorum logicalium opusculum, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Broadie, A. (1983). George Lokert: Late-Scholastic Logician, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Brockliss, L. W. B. (1981a). ‘Philosophical teaching in France, 1600–1740’, History of Universities, 1.Google Scholar

Buonamici, Francesco (1637). Institutionum logicarum libri duo, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Burana, Johannes Franciscus (1539). Aristotelis Priora resolutoria, Paris.Google Scholar

Buridan, Jean (1499). Compendium totius logicae, Venice (repr. Frankfurt a. M., 1965).Google Scholar

Buridan, Jean (1976). Tractatus de consequentiis, ed. Hubien, H., Louvain–Paris.Google Scholar

Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy (1982). ed. Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J., Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Case, John (1584). Summa veterum interpretum in universam dialecticam Aristotelis …, London.Google Scholar

Collegium, Conimbricense (1607). In universam dialecticam, Cologne (repr. Hildesheim, 1976).Google Scholar

Cornelius, P. (1965). Languages in Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Century Imaginary Voyages, Geneva.Google Scholar

Cranz, F. E. (1978). ‘The publishing history of the Aristotle commentaries of Thomas Aquinas’, Traditio, 34.Google Scholar

Dolz, Johannes (1511). Syllogismi, Paris.Google Scholar

Du Trieu, Philip (1662). Manuductio ad logicam, Oxford.Google Scholar

English Logic in Italy (1982). ed. Maierù, A., Naples.Google Scholar

Enzinas, Fernando (1528). Tractatus de compositione propositions mentalis, Lyons.Google Scholar

Fletcher, J. M. (1981). ‘Change and resistance to change: a consideration of the development of English and German universities during the sixteenth century’, History of Universities, I.Google Scholar

Fonseca, Pedro da (1615–29). Commentarii in libros metaphysicorum, Cologne (repr. Hildesheim, 1964).Google Scholar

Gansiniec, R. (1960). Metrijicale Marka z Opatowca i traktaty gramatyczne XIV i XV wieku, Wroclaw.Google Scholar

Gebwiler, Johannes (1511). Magistralis totius parvuli artis logices compilatio, Basle.Google Scholar

George, of Brussels (1491a). Expositio super Summulis magistri Petri Hyspani, Paris.Google Scholar

Grazia, M. (1980). ‘The secularization of language in the seventeenth century’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 41.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heath, T. (1971). ‘Logical grammar, grammatical logic and humanism in three German universities’, Studies in the Renaissance, 18.CrossRef Google Scholar

Henry, of Ghent (1520). Summae quaestionum ordinarium II, Paris (repr. St Bona venture, N.Y., 1953).Google Scholar

Hubien, H. (1975). ‘John Buridan on the fourth figure of the syllogism’, Revue internationale de philosophie, 113.Google Scholar

Hunnaeus, Augustinus (1584). Prodidagmata de dialecticis, Antwerp.Google Scholar

IJsewijn, J. (1971). ‘Alexander Hegius (†1498): Invectiva in modos significandi’, Forum for Modern Language Studies, 7.CrossRef Google Scholar

Johannes, Magistris (1487). Quaestiones super totum cur sum logicae, Venice.Google Scholar

John, of St Thomas (1930). Cursus philosophicus Thomisticus, 1: Ars togica, Turin–Rome.Google Scholar

Knowlson, J. (1975). Universal Language Schemes in England and France, 1600–1800, Toronto–Buffalo.Google Scholar

Lefèvre d'Étaples, Jacques (1520). Artificiales nonnulle introductiones, ed. Clichtove, J., Paris.Google Scholar

Lhotsky, A. (1965). Die Wiener Artistenfakultät 1365–1497, Graz–Vienna–Cologne.Google Scholar

Maierù, A. (1969). ‘Lo Speculum puerorum sive terminus est in quern di Riccardo Billingham’, Studi medievali, ser. III, 10.Google Scholar

Maierù, A. (1972). Terminologia logica della tarda scolastica, Rome.Google Scholar

Maiolus, Laurentius (1497). Epiphyllides in dialecticis, Venice.Google Scholar

Markowski, M. (1971). Buridanizm w Polsce w Okresie Przedkopernikanskim, Wrocław, etc.Google Scholar

Marsilius, of Inghen (1516). Quaestiones super libros Priorum analyticorum, Venice (repr. Frankfurt, 1968).Google Scholar

Martinich, A. (1981). Thomas Hobbes: Computatio sive logica, New York.Google Scholar

McConica, J. K. (1979). ‘Humanism and Aristotle in Tudor Oxford’, English Historical Review, 94.Google Scholar

Melanchthon, Philipp (1834–60). Opera quae super sunt omnia, ed. Bretschneider, C. G. and Bindseil, H. E., 28 vols., Halle–Braunschweig.Google Scholar

Monumenta Germaniae paedagogica (1887). ed. Kehrbach, K., V, Berlin.Google Scholar

Muñoz Delgado, V. (1972). ‘Lógica hispano-portuguesa hasta 1600 (notas bibliográfico-doctrinales)’, Repertorio de historia de las ciencias eclesiásticas en España, 4.Google Scholar

Nifo, Agostino (1521b). Dialectica ludicra, Venice.Google Scholar

Nuchelmans, G. (1980). Late Scholastic and Humanist Theories of the Proposition, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Oliver, Thomas (1604). De sophismatum praestigiis cavendis admonitio, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ott, H. and Fletcher, J. M. (1964). The Medieval Statutes of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Freiburg im Breisgau, Notre Dame.Google Scholar

Padley, G. A. (1976). Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700: The Latin Tradition, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Paul, of Pergula (1961). Logica and Tractatus de sensu composito et diviso, ed. Brown, M. A., St Bonaventure–Louvain–Paderborn.Google Scholar

Peter, of Spain (1972). Tractatus Called Afterwards Summule Logicales, ed. Rijk, L. M., Assen.Google Scholar

Philoponus, Joannes (1544c). In libros Priorum resolutivorum, Venice.Google Scholar

Pinborg, J. (1967). Die Entwicklung der Sprachtheorie im Mittelalter, Münster.Google Scholar

Pratus, Alphonsus (1530). Quaestiones dialecticae supra libros Peri hermenias, Alcalá.Google Scholar

Raulin, Johannes (1500). In logicam Aristotelis, Paris.Google Scholar

Rijk, L. M. (1975). ‘Logica Cantahrigiensis: a fifteenth-century Cambridge manual of logic’, Revue internationale de philosophie, 29.Google Scholar

Rijk, L. M. (1977). ‘Logica Oxoniensis: an attempt to reconstruct a fifteenth-century Oxford manual of logic’, Medioevo, 3.Google Scholar

Risse, W. (1965). Bibliographia logica, 1: 1472–1800, Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Sanchez, Francisco (1587). Minerva, Salamanca.Google Scholar

Sanderson, Robert (1618). Logicae artis compendium, Oxford.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. B. (1981). Studies in Renaissance Philosophy and Science, London.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. B. (1983a). Aristotle and the Renaissance, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. B. (1984). The Aristotelian Tradition and Renaissance Universities, London.Google Scholar

Seifert, A. (1976). Cognitio historica: Die Geschichte als Namengeberin der frühneuzeitlichen Empirie, Berlin.Google Scholar

Seton, John (1545). Dialectica, London.Google Scholar

Slaughter, M. M. (1982). Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Smiglecius, Martinus (1658). Logica, Oxford.Google Scholar

Some Fourteenth-Century Tracts on the Probationes terminorum (1982). ed. Rijk, L. M., Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Soto, Domingo (1529). Introductiones dialectice, Burgos.Google Scholar

Soto, Domingo (1554). Summulae, Salamanca (repr. Hildesheim–New York, 1980).Google Scholar

Statuti delle università e dei collegi dello Studio bolognese (1888). ed. Malagola, C., Bologna.Google Scholar

Tartaretus, Petrus (1503a). Expositio super textu logices Aristotelis, Venice.Google Scholar

Thomas, Aquinas (1964). In Aristotelis libros Peri hermenias et Posteriorum analyticorum, Rome–Turin.Google Scholar

Thomas, of Erfurt (1972). Grammatica speculativa, ed. Bursill-Hall, G. L., London.Google Scholar

Thomas, I. (1964). ‘Medieval aftermath: Oxford logic and logicians in the seventeenth century’, in Oxford Studies Presented to Daniel Callus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Thomas, I. (1965). ‘The written liar and Thomas Oliver’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 6.CrossRef Google Scholar

Toletus, Franciscus (1596). Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in universam Aristotelis logicam, Cologne.Google Scholar

Toletus, Franciscus (1587). Introductio in dialecticam Aristotelis, Venice.Google Scholar

Trentman, J. A. (1976). ‘The study of logic and language in England in the early 17th century’, Historiographia Linguistica, 3.CrossRef Google Scholar

University Records and Life in the Middle Ages (1944). ed. Thorndike, L., New York.Google Scholar

Vives, Juan Luis (1979a). Against the Pseudodialecticians: A Humanist Attack on Medieval Logic, ed. and trans. Guerlac, R., Dordrecht–Boston.Google Scholar

Weiler, A. G. (1962). Heinrich von Gorkum († 1431): Seine Stellung in der Philosophie und der Theologie des Spätmittelalters, Hilversum–Einsiedeln.Google Scholar

Zabarella, Francesco (1655). De felicitate libri tres.Padua.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.