Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:31:00.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Byzantium

from I - Fundamentals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2011

Robert Pasnau
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access

Summary

PHILOSOPHY IN BYZANTIUM

The Greek-speaking scholars of Byzantium – the eastern part of the Roman Empire, which was not devastated in the fifth century by barbarian invasions – have often been praised for their diligence in copying a great number of ancient philosophical texts, thus making an invaluable contribution towards the preservation and transmission of these texts for the generations to come. It is more often than not overlooked, however, that in Byzantium the works of ancient philosophers were arduously copied in order to be closely studied, commented on, and otherwise used for educational purposes. There is ample evidence that, at least from the ninth century to the fall of Constantinople in 1453, the Byzantines seriously engaged in a fervent dialogue with the different ancient philosophical traditions. This dialogue resulted in the composition of many philosophical works that belong to various genres of philosophical writing, including paraphrases, extended commentaries, commentaries in question-and-answer form, small handbooks, treatises on specific topics (sometimes in dialogue form), and letters and orations with philosophical content.

Though philosophy in Byzantium was undoubtedly influenced by ancient Greek philosophical doctrines – which, after all, provided the Byzantines with both a well-articulated theoretical framework and a sophisticated philosophical language – its character could not but also be influenced by the Christian faith in which the Byzantine thinkers were deeply immersed. For they read and criticized the ancient philosophical texts in the light of their Christian beliefs and with the purpose of either rejecting pagan views or trying to incorporate them into their Christian outlook.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, P. et al. (eds.), Philosophy Science, and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic, and Latin Commentaries (London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2004).Google Scholar
Barber, C. and Jenkins, D. (eds.) Reading Michael Psellos (Leiden: Brill, 2006).Google Scholar
Benakis, Linos, “Bibliographie internationale sur la philosophie Byzantine (1949–1990),” in Bibliographie Byzantine publié à l’occasion du XVIIIe Congrès Internationale d’études Byzantines (Athens: Comité hellénique des études byzantines, 1991).Google Scholar
Benakis, Linos, “Die theoretische und praktische Autonomie der Philosophie als Fachdisziplin in Byzanz,” in Asztalos, M. et al. (eds.) Knowledge and the Sciences in Medieval Philosophy (Helsinki: Yliopistopaino, 1990).Google Scholar
Benakis, Linos, “The Problem of General Concepts in Neoplatonism and Byzantine Thought,” in O’Meara, D. J. (ed.) Neoplatonism and Christian Thought (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Bydén, Börje, Theodore Metochites’ Stoicheiosis astronomike and the Study of Natural Philosophy and Mathematics in Early Palaiologan Byzantium (Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 2003).Google Scholar
Cacouros, Michel, “De la pensée grecque à la pensée Byzantine,” in Mattéi, J.-F (ed.) Encyclopédie philosophique universelle (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998).Google Scholar
Cacouros, Michel, “Recherches sur le commentaire inédit de Théodore Prodrome aux Analytiques postérieurs, livre II d’Aristote,” Atti della Accademia Pontaniana n.s. 38 (1990).Google Scholar
Hunger, Herbert, “Philosophie,” in Die hochsprachliche profane Literatur den Byzantiner (Munich: Beck, 1978).Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “The Byzantine Reception of Aristotle’s Categories,” Synthesis Philosophica 39 (2005).Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “John Italos on Universals,” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 18 (2007).Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “Metaphysics in the Byzantine Tradition: Eustratios of Nicaea on Universals,” Quaestio 5 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Demetrakopoulos, “Nicholas Cabasilas’ Quaestio de rationis valore: An anti-Palamite Defense of Secular Wisdom,”Byzantina 19 (1998).Google Scholar
Kapriev, Georgi, “The Modern Study of Byzantine Philosophy,” Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 48 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanolis, George, “Plethon and Scholarios on Aristotle,” in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Katerina, Ierodiakonou (ed.) Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Lemerle, Paul, Le premier humanisme byzantin (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1971).Google Scholar
Libera, Alain, La philosophie médiévale (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1993).Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C., “Neoplatonic Logic and Aristotelian Logic,” Phronesis 1 (1955–6).Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C., does in The Anatomy of Neoplatonism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Mercken, H. P. F., “The Greek Commentators on Aristotle’s Ethics,” in Sorabji, R. (ed.) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentaries and their Influence (London: Duckworth, 1990).Google Scholar
Michel, Cacouros and Congourdeau, Marie-Hélène, Philosophie et sciences à Byzance de 1204 à 1453 (Leuven: Peeters, 2006).Google Scholar
Moutafakis, N., Byzantine Philosophy (Indianapolis: pHackett, 2003).Google Scholar
Oehler, Klaus, Antike Philosophie und byzantinisches Mittelalter (Munich: Beck, 1969).Google Scholar
Podskalsky, Gerhard, Theologie und Philosophie in Byzanz (Munich: Beck, 1977).Google Scholar
Tatakis, Basil, La philosophie Byzantine (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1949).Google Scholar
Trizio, Michele, “Byzantine Philosophy as a Contemporary Historiographical Project,” Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 74 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Byzantium
  • Robert Pasnau, University of Colorado Boulder
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
  • Online publication: 28 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Byzantium
  • Robert Pasnau, University of Colorado Boulder
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
  • Online publication: 28 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Byzantium
  • Robert Pasnau, University of Colorado Boulder
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
  • Online publication: 28 May 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521762168.005
Available formats
×