Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- PART I PIONEERS AND PROTOFEMINISM
- PART II CREATING A FEMINIST LITERARY CRITICISM
- Introduction to Part II
- 6 Literary representations of women
- 7 A history of women's writing
- 8 Autobiography and personal criticism
- 9 Black feminist criticism
- 10 Lesbian feminist criticism
- 11 Men and feminist criticism
- PART III POSTSTRUCTURALISM AND BEYOND
- Postscript: flaming feminism?
- Index
- References
11 - Men and feminist criticism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Notes on contributors
- Introduction
- PART I PIONEERS AND PROTOFEMINISM
- PART II CREATING A FEMINIST LITERARY CRITICISM
- Introduction to Part II
- 6 Literary representations of women
- 7 A history of women's writing
- 8 Autobiography and personal criticism
- 9 Black feminist criticism
- 10 Lesbian feminist criticism
- 11 Men and feminist criticism
- PART III POSTSTRUCTURALISM AND BEYOND
- Postscript: flaming feminism?
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION: AT THE MERCY OF LANGUAGE
If ‘men and feminism’ share a complicated history, the complications may be thought to arise from the sheer impossibility of the relationship itself. After all, when Stephen Heath kicks off his contribution to Men in Feminism by stating that ‘Men's relation to feminism is an impossible one’ (1987: 1), the assertion seems transparent. For while feminism must by definition desire the end of systemic male dominance, domination apparently remains the largest part of ‘what it means to be a man’. As Heath points out, ‘no matter how “sincere,” “sympathetic” or whatever, we [men] are always also in a male position which brings with it all the implications of domination and appropriation, everything precisely that is being challenged, that has to be altered’ (1987: 1). Or, as John Stoltenberg puts it, ‘under patriarchy, the cultural norm of male identity consists in power, prestige, privilege, and prerogative as over and against the gender class women. That's what masculinity is. It isn't something else’ (1974/2004: 41). Hence the impossibility, the deadlock.
To foreground this deadlock is to begin on an unpromising note, and there's a certain bleak irony in thus commencing my account. For historical narration, at least in its modern sense, usually involves some notion of promise, some modicum of faith in progress, some hope for the ameliorative transformation of a social reality deemed inadequate in relation to some animating ideal of freedom, justice or equality.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A History of Feminist Literary Criticism , pp. 187 - 208Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
- 2
- Cited by