Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T14:51:29.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The rise of the modern state: II. The autonomy of military power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Michael Mann
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

Chapter 11 shows that military activities dominated state functions in 1760 and still absorbed half of state resources in 1910. Militarism remained central to the modern state through 1914 – indeed, on into the twentieth century. Yet the unusual period of geopolitical and social peace dominating the West since World War II has led sociology to neglect the importance of military organization for modern society. This chapter shows the general relevance of three key issues of military power: who controlled the military, how it was internally organized, and what functions it served.

  1. The control issue can be posed in terms derived from the main theories of the state discussed in Chapter 3. Were the armed forces controlled by the dominant classes, by pluralist party democracy, or by an autonomous state elite? Alternatively, were they institutionally autonomous from all external control as a “military caste”? A single answer might not suffice for all the diverse times, places, and regimes covered here.

  2. Military organization comprised the interaction of two hierarchies – relations between officers and men and their external relations with social classes – and two modernizing processes – bureaucratization and professionalization. It is often argued that the rise of “citizen armies” weakened both hierarchies (e.g., Best 1982). Yet military organization is essentially “concentrated-coercive.” Soldiers need coercive discipline to risk their lives and take the lives of others in battle. Most armed forces are disciplined hierarchies.

  3. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albertini, L. 1952. The Origins of the War of 1914, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. 1988. War and Society in the Europe of the Old Regime. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Annuaire Statistique de la France. 1913.
Axtmann, R. 1991. Geopolitics and Internal Power Structures: The State, Police and Public Order in Austria and Ireland in the Late Eighteenth Century. Ph.D. diss., London School of Economics and Political Science.
Berryman, S. 1988. Who Serves? The Persistent Myth of the Underclass Army. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Best, G. 1982. War and Society in Revolutionary Europe: 1770-1870. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Bond, B. 1972. The Victorian Army and the Staff College, 1854-1914. London: Eyre & Methuen.Google Scholar
Bond, B. 1984. War and Society in Europe, 1870–1970. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Bosworth, R. 1983. Italy and the Approach of War. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, J. 1989. The Sinews of Power. London: Unwin Hyman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodsky, G. W. S. 1988. Gentlemen of the Blade: A Social and Literary History of the British Army Since 1660. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Cecil, L. 1976. The German Diplomatic Service, 1871–1914. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, D. 1966. The Campaigns of Napoleon. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Charle, C. 1980a. Les hauts fonctionnaires en France au XIXième siècle. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Charle, C. 1980b. Le recrutement des hauts fonctionnaires en 1901. Annales, Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations, no. 2.Google Scholar
Corvisier, A. 1964. L'armée française de la fin du XVIIième siècle au ministère de Choiseul: Le soldat. 2 vols. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Craig, G. 1955. The Politics of the Prussian Army, 1640–1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dandeker, C. 1989. Surveillance, Power and Modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Deak, I. 1990. Beyond Nationalism: A Social and Political History of the Habsburg Officer Corps, 1848–1918. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Demeter, K. 1965. The German Officer Corps in Society and State, 1650–1945. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Dupuy, R. E. 1971. The National Guard: A Compact History. New York: Hawthorn Books.Google Scholar
Elias, N. 1983. The Court Society. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Emsley, C. 1983. Policing and Its Context, 1750–1870. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floud, R., et al. 1990. Height, Health and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1985. The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Girardet, R. 1953. La société militaire dans la France contemporaine, 1815–1939. Paris: Pion.Google Scholar
Goldstein, R. J. 1978. Political Repression in Modem America. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman.Google Scholar
Goldstein, R. J. 1983. Political Repression in Nineteenth Century Europe. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Gooch, J. 1980. Armies in Europe. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Gurr, T. R., et al. 1977. The Politics of Crime and Conflict: A Comparative History of Four Cities. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hall, R. H. 19631964. The concept of bureaucracy: an empirical assessment. American Journal of Sociology 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, N. 1959. La Marine de l'an II: Mobilisation de la flotte de l'Océan, 1793–4. Paris: M. Rivière.Google Scholar
Harries-Jenkins, G. 1977. The Army in Victorian SocietyLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Herwig, H. 1973. The German Naval Officer Corps. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hilderbrand, R. C. 1981. Power and the People: Executive Management of Public Opinion in Foreign Affairs, 1897–1921. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hill, J. D. 1964. The Minute Man in Peace and War. A History of the National Guard. Harrisburg, Pa.: Stackpole.Google Scholar
Holsti, K. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S. 1957. The Soldier and the State. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ilchman, W. 1961. Professional Diplomacy in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Janowitz, M. 1960. The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jany, C. 1967. Geschichte den Preussischen Armee, 4 vols. Osnabruck: Biblio Verlag.Google Scholar
Kann, R. 1979. The social prestige of the officer corps in the Habsburg Empire from the eighteenth century to 1918. In War and Society and East Central Europe, Vol. I, ed. B., Kiraly and G., Rothenberg. New York: Brooklyn College Press.Google Scholar
Karsten, P. 1972. Naval Aristocracy: The Golden Age of Annapolis and the Emergence of Modern American Navalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Karsten, P. 1980. Father's occupation of West Point cadets and Annapolis midshipmen. In The Military in America: From the Colonial Era to the Present, ed. P., Karsten. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kennan, G. 1984. The Fateful Alliance: France, Russia and the Coming of the First World War. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. 1985. The Realities Behind Diplomacy. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
LaFeber, W. 1987. The Constitution and United States foreign policy: an interpretation. Journal of American History 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langsam, W. C. 1930. The Napoleonic Wars and German Nationalism in Austria. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, G. 1969. Napoleon: From 18 Brumaire to Tilsit, 1799–1807. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ludtke, A. 1989. Police and State in Prussia, 1815–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynn, J. 1984. The Bayonets of the Republic. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Macartney, C. A. 1971. The Habsburg Empire, 1790–1918. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
McNeill, W. 1983. The Pursuit of Power. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Martel, G. 1985. Imperial Diplomacy. Rosebery and the Failure of Foreign Policy. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. 1983. The Chancelleries of Europe. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1964. The professions and social structure. In his Essays in Sociological Theory, rev. ed. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Poggi, G. 1990. The State. Its Nature, Development and Prospects. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Porch, D. 1974. Army and Revolution. France, 1815–1848. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Porch, D. 1981. The March to the Marne: The French Army, 1871–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preradovich, N. von. 1955. Die Führungsschichten in Osterreich und Preussen, 1804–1918. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Razzell, P. E. 1963. Social origins of officers in the Indian and British home army: 1758–1962. British Journal of Sociology 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riste, O. 1965. The Neutral Ally: Norway's Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Ritter, G. 1969. The Sword and the Sceptre. Vol. I: The Prussian Tradition, 1740–1890. Coral Gables, Fla.: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, K. G. 1977a. The foreign secretary, the cabinet, parliament and the parties, and
Robbins, K. G. 1977b. Public opinion, the press and pressure groups. Both In British Foreign Policy Under Sir Edward Grey, ed. F. H., Hinsley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodger, N. 1986. The Wooden World, London: Collins.Google Scholar
Röhl, J. 1967. Higher civil servants in Germany, 1890–1900. Journal of Contemporary History 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, G. 1976. The Army of Francis Joseph. West Lafayette, Ind.: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, G. 1978. The Art of Warfare in the Age of Napoleon. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, G. 1982. Napoleon's Great Adversaries: The Archduke Charles and the Austrian Army, 1792–1814. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Runciman, W. G. 1987. The Old Question. London Review of Books, February 19.Google Scholar
Scott, S. 1978. The Response of the Royal Army to the French Revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Serman, S. 1978. Le corps des officiers francais sous la Deuxième République et la Second Empire. Thesis, University of Lille III.
Skelton, W. 1980. Officers and politicians: the origins of army politics in the United States before the Civil War. In The Military in America: From the Colonial Era to the Present, ed. P., Karsten. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, Z. 1969. The Foreign Office and Foreign Policy, 1898–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, Z., and V., Cromwell. 1972. The Foreign Office before 1914: a study in resistance. In Studies in the Growth of Nineteenth Century Government, ed. G., Sutherland. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. 1989. Democratic transition and breakdown in Western Europe, 1870–1939. American Journal of Sociology 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strachan, H. 1983. European Armies and the Conduct of War. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Strachan, H. 1984. Wellington's Legacy: The Reform of the British Army, 1830–54. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Teitler, G. 1977. The Genesis of the Professional Officers Corps. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 1982. Proletarianization and rural collective action in East Anglia and elsewhere, 1500–1900. Peasant Studies 10.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 1986. The Contentious French. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C. 1990. Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990–1990. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tilly, R. 1971. Popular disorders in nineteenth-century Germany: a preliminary survey. Journal of Social History 4.Google Scholar
Vagts, A. 1959. A History of Militarism. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wildman, A. 1980. The End of the Imperial Russian Army. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, V. 1972. Le conseil d'état sous le Second Empire. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×