Abraham, R., and Robbin, J. 1967. Transversal mapping and flows. W. A. Benjamin.

Aceña, A. 2009. Convergent null data expansions at spacelike infinity of stationary vacuum solutions. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 10, 275.Google Scholar

Aceña, A., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2011. Conformal extensions for stationary spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 28, 225023.Google Scholar

Alcubierre, M. 2008. Introduction to 3+1 numerical relativity. Oxford University Press.

Ambrosetti, A., and Prodi, G. 1995. A primer of nonlinear analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, M. T. 2000. On stationary vacuum solutions to the Einstein equations. Ann. Henri Poincaré 1, 977.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. T. 2005a. Existence and stability of even dimensional asymptotically de Sitter spaces. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 6, 801.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. T. 2005b. Geometric aspects of the AdS/CFT correspondence. Page 1 of: Biquard, O. (ed), AdS/CFT correspondence: Einstein metrics and their conformal boundaries. Euro. Math. Soc. Zürich.

Anderson, M. T. 2006. On the uniqueness and global dynamics of AdS spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 23, 6935.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. T., and Chruściel, P. T. 2005. Asymptotically simple solutions of the vacuum Einstein equations in even dimensions. Comm. Math. Phys., 260, 557.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. T., Chruściel, P. T., and Delay, E. 2002. Non-trivial static, geodesically complete vacuum spacetimes with a negative cosmological constant. JHEP, 10, 6.Google Scholar

Andersson, L. 2006. On the relation between mathematical and numerical relativity. Class. Quantum Grav., 23, S307.Google Scholar

Andersson, L., and Chruściel, P. T. 1993. Hyperboloidal Cauchy data for vacuum Einstein equations and obstructions to smoothness of null infinity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 2829.Google Scholar

Andersson, L., and Chruściel, P. T. 1994. On “hyperboloidal” Cauchy data for vacuum Einstein equations and obstructions to smoothness of scri. Comm. Math. Phys., 161, 533.Google Scholar

Andersson, L., Chruściel, P. T., and Friedrich, H. 1992. On the regularity of solutions to the Yamabe equation and the existence of smooth hyperboloidal initial data for Einstein's field equations. Comm. Math. Phys., 149, 587.Google Scholar

Anguige, K., and Tod, K. P. 1999a. Isotropic cosmological singularities I. Polytropic perfect fluid spacetimes. Ann. Phys., 276, 257.Google Scholar

Anguige, K., and Tod, K. P. 1999b. Isotropic cosmological singularities II. The Einstein- Vlasov system. Ann. Phys., 276, 294.Google Scholar

Appel, W. 2007. Mathematics for physics and physicists. Princeton University Press.

Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., and Misner, C. W. 1962. The dynamics of general relativity. Page 227 of:Witten, L. (ed), Gravitation: an introduction to current research. John Wiley & Sons.

Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., and Misner, C. 2008. Reprint of: The dynamics of general relativity. Gen. Rel. Grav., 40, 1997.Google Scholar

Ashtekar, A. 1980. Asymptotic structure of the gravitational field at spatial infinity. Page 37 of: Held, A. (ed), General relativity and gravitation: one hundred years after the birth of Albert Einstein, vol. 2. Plenum Press.

Ashtekar, A. 1984. Asymptotic properties of isolated systems: recent developments. Page 37 of: Bertotti, B., Felice, de F., and Pascolini, A. (eds), General relativity and gravitation. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Ashtekar, A. 1987. Asymptotic quantization. Bibliopolis.

Ashtekar, A. 1991. Lectures on non-perturbative canonical gravity. World Scientific.

Ashtekar, A. 2014. Geometry and physis of null infinity. Page 99 of: Bieri, L., and Yau, S.-T. (eds), One hundred years of general relativity. Surveys in Differential Geometry, vol. 20. International Press.

Ashtekar, A., and Das, S. 2000. Asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes: conserved quantities. Class. Quantum Grav., 17, L17.Google Scholar

Ashtekar, A., and Dray, T. 1981. On the existence of solutions to Einstein's field equations with non-zero Bondi news. Comm. Math. Phys., 79, 581.Google Scholar

Ashtekar, A., and Hansen, R. O. 1978. A unified treatment of null and spatial infinity in general relativity. I. Universal structure, asymptotic symmetries, and conserved quantities at spatial infinity. J. Math. Phys., 19, 1542.Google Scholar

Ashtekar, A., and Magnon, A. 1984. Asymptotically anti-de Sitter space-times. Class. Quantum Grav., 1, L39.Google Scholar

Ashtekar, A., and Schmidt, B. G. 1980. Null infinity and Killing fields. J. Math. Phys., 21, 862.Google Scholar

Ashtekar, A., and Xanthopoulos, B. C. 1978. Isometries compatible with asymptotic flatness at null infinity: a complete description. J. Math. Phys., 19, 2216.Google Scholar

Ashtekar, A., Horowitz, G. T., and Magnon-Ashtekar, A. 1982. A generalization of tensor calculus and its applications to physics. Gen. Rel. Grav., 14, 411.Google Scholar

Aubin, T. 1976. équations différentielles non linéaires et le problème de Yamabe concernant la courbure scalaire. J. Math. Pures Appl., 55, 269.Google Scholar

Bäckdahl, T. 2007. Axisymmetric stationary solutions with arbitrary multipole moments. Class. Quantum Grav., 24, 2205.Google Scholar

Bäckdahl, T. 2009. Relating the Newman-Penrose constants to the Geroch-Hansen multipole moments. Class. Quantum Grav., 26, 231102.Google Scholar

Bäckdahl, T., and Herberthson, M. 2005a. Explicit multipole moments of stationary axisymmetric spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 22, 3585.Google Scholar

Bäckdahl, T., and Herberthson, M. 2005b. Static axisymmetric space-times with prescribed multipole moments. Class. Quantum Grav., 22, 1607.Google Scholar

Bäckdahl, T., and Herberthson, M. 2006. Calculations of, and bounds for, the multipole moments of stationary spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 23, 5997.Google Scholar

Bäckdahl, T., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2010a. Geometric invariant measuring the deviation from Kerr data. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 231102.Google Scholar

Bäckdahl, T., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2010b. On the construction of a geometric invariant measuring the deviation from Kerr data. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 11, 1225.Google Scholar

Bartnik, R. 1986. The mass of an asymptotically flat manifold. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 661.Google Scholar

Bartnik, R., and Isenberg, J. 2004. The constraint equations. Page 1 of: Chruściel, P. T., and Friedrich, H. (eds), The Einstein equations and the large scale behaviour of gravitational fields. Birkhauser.

Baston, R. J., and Mason, L. J. 1987. Conformal gravity, the Einstein equation and spaces of complex null geodesics. Class. Quantum Grav., 4, 815.Google Scholar

Baumgarte, T. W., and Shapiro, S. L. 2010. Numerical relativity: solving Einstein's equations on the computer. Cambridge University Press.

Beig, R. 1984. Integration of Einstein's equations near spatial infinity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 391, 295.Google Scholar

Beig, R. 1985. A remarkable property of spherical harmonics. J. Math. Phys., 26, 769.Google Scholar

Beig, R. 1991. Conformal properties of static spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 8, 263.Google Scholar

Beig, R., and Heinzle, J. M. 2005. CMC-slicings of Kottler-Schwarzschild-de Sitter Cosmologies. Comm. Math. Phys., 260, 673.Google Scholar

Beig, R., and Husa, S. 1994. Initial data for general relativity with toroidal conformal symmetry. Phys. Rev. D, 50, R7116.Google Scholar

Beig, R., and O'Murchadha, N. 1991. Trapped surfaces due to concentration of gravitational radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, 2421.Google Scholar

Beig, R., and O'Murchadha, N. 1994. Trapped surfaces in vacuum spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 11, 419.Google Scholar

Beig, R., and O'Murchadha, N. 1996. The momentum constraints of general relativity and spatial conformal isometries. Comm. Math. Phys., 176, 723.Google Scholar

Beig, R., and O'Murchadha, N. 1998. Late time behaviour of the maximal slicing of the Schwarzschild black hole. Phys. Rev. D, 57, 4728.Google Scholar

Beig, R., and Schmidt, B. G. 1982. Einstein's equation near spatial infinity. Comm. Math. Phys., 87, 65.Google Scholar

Beig, R., and Schmidt, B. G. 2000. Time-independent gravitational fields. Page 325 of: Schmidt, B. G. (ed), Einstein's field equations and their physical implications. Springer.

Beig, R., and Simon, W. 1980a. Proof of a multipole conjecture due to Geroch. Comm. Math. Phys., 75, 79.Google Scholar

Beig, R., and Simon, W. 1980b. The stationary gravitational field near spatial infinity. Gen. Rel. Grav., 12, 1003.Google Scholar

Beig, R., and Simon, W. 1981. On the multipole expansions for stationary space-times. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 376, 333.Google Scholar

Beig, R., and Szabados, L. B. 1997. On a global invariant of initial data sets. Class. Quantum Grav., 14, 3091.Google Scholar

Bekenstein, J. 1974. Exact solutions of Einstein-conformal scalar equations. Ann. Phys., 82, 535.Google Scholar

Bernal, A. N., and Sánchez, M. 2007. Globally hyperbolic spacetimes can be defined as ‘causal’ instead of strongly causal. Class. Quantum Grav., 24, 745.Google Scholar

Besse, A. L. 2008. Einstein manifolds. Springer Verlag.

Beyer, F. 2007. Asymptotics and singularities in cosmological models with positive cosmological constant. PhD thesis, University of Potsdam.

Beyer, F. 2008. Investigations of solutions of Einstein's field equations close to lambda- Taub-NUT. Class. Quantum Grav., 25, 235005.Google Scholar

Beyer, F. 2009a. Non-genericity of the Nariai solutions: I. Asymptotics and spatially homogeneous perturbations. Class. Quantum Grav., 26, 235015.Google Scholar

Beyer, F. 2009b. Non-genericity of the Nariai solutions: II. Investigations within the Gowdy class. Class. Quantum Grav., 26, 235016.Google Scholar

Beyer, F. 2009c. A spectral solver for evolution problems with spatial S3-topology. J. Comput. Phys., 228, 6496.Google Scholar

Beyer, F., Doulis, G., Frauendiener, J., and Whale, B. 2012. Numerical space-times near space-like and null infinity. The spin-2 system on Minkowski space. Class. Quantum Grav., 29, 245013.Google Scholar

Bičák, J. 2000. Selected solutions of Einstein's field equations: their role in general relativity and astrophysics. In: Schmidt, B. G. (ed), Einstein field equations and their physical implications (selected essays in honour of Juergen Ehlers). Springer Verlag.

Bičák, J., and Krtouš, P. 2001. Accelerated sources in de Sitter spacetime and the insufficiency of retarded fields. Phys. Rev. D, 64, 124020.Google Scholar

Bičák, J., and Krtouš, P. 2002. The fields of uniformly accelerated charges in de Sitter spacetime. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 211101.Google Scholar

Bičák, J., and Schmidt, B. G. 1989. Asymptotically flat radiative space-times with boost-rotation symmetry: the general structure. Phys. Rev. D, 40, 1827.Google Scholar

Bičák, J., Scholtz, M., and Tod, K. P. 2010. On asymptotically flat solutions of Einstein's equations periodic in time: II. Spacetimes with scalar-field sources. Class. Quantum Grav., 27, 175011.Google Scholar

Bizon, P. 2013. Is AdS stable? Gen. Rel. Grav., 46, 1724.Google Scholar

Bizon, P., and Friedrich, H. 2012. A remark about wave equations on the extreme Reissner-Nordström black hole exterior. Class. Quantum Grav., 30, 065001.Google Scholar

Bizon, P., and Rostworowski, A. 2011. Weakly turbulent instability of anti-de Sitter spacetime. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 031102.Google Scholar

Bondi, H., Burg, van der M. G. J., and Metzner, A. W. K. 1962. Gravitational waves in general relativity VII. Waves from axi-symmetric isolated systems. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 269, 21.Google Scholar

Brännlund, J. 2004. Conformal isometry of the Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter Black Hole. Gen. Rel. Grav., 36, 883.Google Scholar

Branson, T., Eastwood, M., and Wang, M. 2004. Conformal geometry. In www.birs.ca/workshops/2004/04w5006/report04w5006.pdf.

Brill, D.R., and Hayward, S. A. 1994. Global structure of a black hole cosmos and its extremes. Class. Quantum Grav., 11, 359.Google Scholar

Buchdahl, H. A. 1959. Reciprocal static metrics and scalar fields in the general theory of relativity. Phys. Rev., 115, 1325.Google Scholar

Butscher, A. 2002. Exploring the conformal constraint equations. Page 195 of: Frauendiener, J., and Friedrich, H. (eds), The conformal structure of spacetime: geometry, analysis, numerics. Lect. Notes. Phys. Springer.

Butscher, A. 2007. Perturbative solutions of the extended constraint equations in general relativity. Comm. Math. Phys., 272, 1.Google Scholar

Cagnac, F. 1981. Problème de Cauchy sur un conoïde caractéristique pour des equations quasi-lineaires. Ann. Mat. Pure Appl., 129, 13.Google Scholar

Carmeli, M. 1977. Group theory and general relativity: representations of the Lorentz group and their applications to the gravitational field. McGraw-Hill.

Carter, B. 1966a. The complete analytic extension of the Reissner-Nordström metric in the special case e2 = m2. Phys. Rev. Lett., 21, 423.Google Scholar

Carter, B. 1966b. Complete analytic extension of the symmetry axis of Kerr's solution of Einstein's equations. Phys. Rev., 141, 1242.Google Scholar

Carter, B. 1968. Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields. Phys. Rev., 174, 1559.Google Scholar

Carter, B. 1971. Causal structure in space-time. Gen. Rel. Grav., 1, 349.Google Scholar

Carter, B. 1973. Black hole equilibrium states. Page 61 of: DeWitt, C., and DeWitt, B.S. (eds), Black holes: les astres occlus. Gordon and Breach.

Chaljub-Simon, A. 1982. Decomposition of the space of covariant two-tensors on R3. Gen. Rel. Grav., 14, 743.Google Scholar

Chaljub-Simon, A., and Choquet-Bruhat, Y. 1980. Global solutions of the Licnerowicz equation in general relativity on an asymptotically Euclidean manifold. Gen. Rel. Grav., 12, 175.Google Scholar

Chang, S.-Y. A., Qing, J., and Yang, P. 2007. Some progress in conformal geometry. Sigma, 3, 122.Google Scholar

Choptuik, M. W. 1993. Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 9.Google Scholar

Choquet-Bruhat, I., Isenberg, J., and York, J. W. Jr. 2000. Einstein constraints on asymptotically Euclidean manifolds. Phys. Rev. D, 61, 084034.Google Scholar

Choquet-Bruhat, Y. 2007. Results and open problems in mathematical general relativity. Milan J. Math., 75, 273.Google Scholar

Choquet-Bruhat, Y. 2008. General relativity and the Einstein equations. Oxford University Press.

Choquet-Bruhat, Y., and Christodoulou, D. 1981. Existence of global solutions of the Yang-Mills, Higgs and spinor field equations in 3+1 dimensions. Ann. Sci. l'E.N.S., 14, 481.Google Scholar

Choquet-Bruhat, Y., and Geroch, R. 1969. Global aspects of the Cauchy problem in general relativity. Comm. Math. Phys., 14, 329.Google Scholar

Choquet-Bruhat, Y., and York, J. W. Jr. 1980. The Cauchy problem. In: Held, A. (ed), General relativity and gravitation, Vol. I. Plenum Press.

Choquet-Bruhat, Y., Dewitt-Morette, C., and Dillard-Bleck, M. 1982. Analysis, manifolds and physics: part I. North Holland Publishing Company.

Choquet-Bruhat, Y., Chruściel, P. T., and Martín-García, J. M. 2011. The Cauchy problem on a characteristic cone for the Einstein equations in arbitrary dimensions. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 12, 419.Google Scholar

Christodoulou, D. 1986. The problem of a self-gravitating scalar field. Comm. Math. Phys., 105, 337.Google Scholar

Christodoulou, D., and Klainerman, S. 1993. The global nonlinear stability of the Minkowski space. Princeton University Press.

Christodoulou, D., and O'Murchadha, N. 1981. The boost problem in general relativity. Comm. Math. Phys., 80, 271.Google Scholar

Chruściel, P. T. 1991. On the uniqueness in the large of solutions of Einstein's equations (“Strong Cosmic Censorship”). Centre for Mathematics and Its Applications, Australian National University.

Chruściel, P. T., and Delay, E. 2002. Existence of non-trivial, vacuum, asymptotically simple spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 19, L71.Google Scholar

Chruściel, P. T., and Delay, E. 2003. On mapping properties of the general relativistic constraint operator in weighted function spaces, with applications. Mem. Soc. Math. France, 94, 1.Google Scholar

Chruściel, P. T., and Delay, E. 2009. Gluing constructions for asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds with constant scalar curvature. Comm. Anal. Geom., 17, 343.Google Scholar

Chruściel, P. T., and Paetz, T.-T. 2012. The many ways of the characteristic Cauchy problem. Class. Quantum Grav., 29, 145006.Google Scholar

Chruściel, P. T., and Paetz, T.-T. 2013. Solutions of the vacuum Einstein equations with initial data on past null infinity. Class. Quantum Grav., 30, 235037.Google Scholar

Chruściel, P. T., MacCallum, M. A. H., and Singleton, D. B. 1995. Gravitational waves in general relativity XIV. Bondi expansions and the “polyhomogeneity” of I. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 350, 113.Google Scholar

Chruściel, P. T., ölz, C. R., and Szybka, S. J. 2012a. Space-time diagrammatics. Phys. Rev. D, 86, 124041.Google Scholar

Chruściel, P. T., and Costa, J. L., and Heusler, M. 2012b. Stationary black holes: uniqueness and beyond. Living Rev. Relativity 15, 7. URL (cited on 24 May 2016): www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2012-7.Google Scholar

Cocke, W. J. 1989. Table for constructing spin coefficients in general relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 40, 650.Google Scholar

Cook, G. B. 2000. Initial data for numerical relativity. Living Rev. Relativity, 3, 5. URL (cited on 24 May 2016): www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2000-5.Google Scholar

Corvino, J. 2000. Scalar curvature deformations and a gluing construction for the Einstein constraint equations. Comm. Math. Phys., 214, 137.Google Scholar

Corvino, J. 2007. On the existence and stability of the Penrose compactification. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 8, 597.Google Scholar

Corvino, J., and Schoen, R. 2006. On the asymptotics for the Einstein constraint vacuum equations. J. Diff. Geom., 73, 185.Google Scholar

Cotton, é. 1899. Sur les variétés à trois dimensions. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse 2e série, 1, 385.Google Scholar

Couch, W. E., and Torrence, R. J. 1984. Conformal invariance under spatial inversion of extreme Reissner-Nordström black holes. Gen. Rel. Grav., 16, 789.Google Scholar

Courant, R., and Hilbert, D. 1962. Methods of mathematical physics. Vol. II. John Wiley & Sons.

Courant, R., and John, F. 1989. Introduction to calculus and analysis II/1. Springer.

Cutler, C. 1989. Properties of spacetimes that are asymptotically flat at timelike infinity. Class. Quantum Grav., 6, 1075.Google Scholar

Cutler, C., and Wald, R. M. 1989. Existence of radiating Einstein-Maxwell solutions which are C ∞ on all of I+ and I -. Class. Quantum Grav., 6, 453.Google Scholar

Dafermos, M. 2003. Stability and instability of the Cauchy horizon for the spherically symmetric Einstein-Maxwell-scalar field equations. Ann. Math., 158, 875.Google Scholar

Dafermos, M. 2005. The interior of charged black holes and the problem of uniqueness in general relativity. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 58, 0445.Google Scholar

Dafermos, M., and Rodnianski, I. 2005. A proof of Price's law for the collapse of a self-gravitating scalar field. Invent. Math., 162, 381.Google Scholar

Dafermos, M., and Rodnianski, I. 2010. Lectures on black holes and linear waves. Page 97 of: Ellwood, D., Rodnianski, I., Staffilani, G., and Wunsch, J. (eds), Evolution equations. Clay Mathematics Proceedings, Vol. 17. American Mathematical Society-Clay Mathematics Institute.

Dain, S. 2001a. Initial data for a head-on collision of two Kerr-like black holes with close limit. Phys. Rev. D, 64, 124002.Google Scholar

Dain, S. 2001b. Initial data for stationary spacetimes near spacelike infinity. Class. Quantum Grav., 18, 4329.Google Scholar

Dain, S. 2001c. Initial data for two Kerr-like black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 121102.Google Scholar

Dain, S. 2006. Elliptic systems. Page 117 of: Frauendiener, J., Giulini, D., and Perlick, V. (eds), Analytical and numerical approaches to general relativity. Lect. Notes. Phys., vol. 692. Springer Verlag.

Dain, S., and Friedrich, H. 2001. Asymptotically flat initial data with prescribed regularity at infinity. Comm. Math. Phys., 222, 569.Google Scholar

Dain, S., and Gabach-Clement, M. E. 2011. Small deformations of extreme Kerr black hole initial data. Class. Quantum Grav., 28, 075003.Google Scholar

Damour, T., and Schmidt, B. 1990. Reliability of perturbation theory in general relativity. J. Math. Phys., 31, 2441.Google Scholar

Dossa, M. 1986. Solution globale d'un probléme de Cauchy caractéristique non linéare. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences. Series I, 303, 795.Google Scholar

Dossa, M. 1997. Espaces de Sobolev non isotropes à poids et problémes de Cauchy quasi-linéaires sur un conoïde caractéristique. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Phys. Théor., 1, 37.Google Scholar

Dossa, M. 2002. Solutions C∞ d'une classe de problèmes de Cauchy quasi-linéaires hyperboliques du second ordre sur un conoïde caractéristique. Annales de la faculté des sciences de Toulouse Sér. 6, 11, 351.Google Scholar

Eastwood, M. 1996. Notes on conformal differential geometry. Page 57 of: Slovák, J. (ed), Proceedings of the 15th Winter School “Geometry and Physics”. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico de Palermo, Serie II, vol. Supplemento No. 43. Circolo Matematico di Palermo.

Ehlers, J. 1973. Spherically symmetric spacetimes. Page 114 of: Israel, W. (ed), Relativity, astrophysics and cosmology. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Ellis, G. F. R. 1984. Relativistic cosmology: its nature, aims and problems. In: Bertotti, B., Felice, de F., and Pascolini, A. (eds), General relativity and gravitation. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Ellis, G. F. R. 2002. The state of cosmology 2001: two views and a middle way. In: Bishop, N. T., and Maharaj, S. D. (eds), General relativity and gravitation. World Scientific.

Ellis, G. F. R., and Elst, van H. 1998. Cosmological models: Cargese lectures 1998. NATO Adv. Study Inst. Ser. C. Math. Phys. Sci., 541, 1.Google Scholar

Ellis, G. F. R., Maartens, R., and MacCallum, M. A. H. 2012. Relativistic cosmology. Cambridge University Press.

Estabrook, F., Wahlquist, H., Christensen, S., DeWitt, B., Smarr, L., and Tsiang, E. 1973. Maximally slicing a black hole. Phys. Rev. D, 7, 2814.Google Scholar

Evans, L. C. 1998. Partial differential equations. American Mathematical Society.

Exton, A. R., Newman, E. T., and Penrose, R. 1969. Conserved quantites in the Einstein-Maxwell theory. J. Math. Phys., 10, 1566.Google Scholar

Fefferman, C., and Graham, C. R. 1985. Conformal invariants. Page 95 of: Élie Cartan et les mathématiques d'aujord'hui. The mathematical heritage of Élie Cartan, Sémin. Lyon 1984. Astérisque, No. Hors Sér.

Fefferman, C., and Graham, C. R. 2012. The ambient metric. Annals of Mathematical Studies, vol. 178. Princeton University Press.

Fischer, A. E., and Marsden, J. E. 1972. The Einstein evolution equations as a firstorder quasi-linear symmetric hyperbolic system. I. Comm. Math. Phys., 28, 1.Google Scholar

Fourès-Bruhat, Y. 1952. Théorème d'existence pour certains systèmes d'équations aux derivées partielles non linéaires. Acta Mathematica, 88, 141.Google Scholar

Frances, C. 2005. The conformal boundary of anti de Sitter spacetimes. Page 205 of: Biquard, O. (ed), AdS/CFT correspondence: Einstein metrics and their conformal boundaries. Euro. Math. Soc. Zürich.

Frankel, T. 2003. The geometry of physics. Cambridge University Press.

Frauendiener, J. 1998a. Numerical treatment of the hyperboloidal initial value problem for the vacuum Einstein equations. I. The conformal field equations. Phys. Rev. D, 58, 064002.Google Scholar

Frauendiener, J. 1998b. Numerical treatment of the hyperboloidal initial value problem for the vacuum Einstein equations. II. The evolution equations. Phys. Rev. D, 58, 064003.Google Scholar

Frauendiener, J. 2002. Some aspects of the numerical treatment of the conformal field equations. Page 261 of: Frauendiener, J., and Friedrich, H. (eds), The conformal structure of space-time: geometry, analysis, numerics. Springer.

Frauendiener, J. 2004. Conformal infinity. Living Rev. Relativity, 7, 1. URL (cited on 24 May 2016): www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2004-1.Google Scholar

Frauendiener, J., and Hein, M. 2002. Numerical evolution of axisymmetric, isolated systems in general relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 66, 124004.Google Scholar

Frauendiener, J., and Hennig, J. 2014. Fully pseudospectral solution of the conformally invariant wave equation near the cylinder at spacelike infinity. Class. Quantum Grav., 31, 085010.Google Scholar

Frauendiener, J., and Sparling, G. A. 2000. Local twistors and the conformal field equations. J. Math. Phys., 41, 437.Google Scholar

Frauendiener, J., and Szabados, L. B. 2001. The kernel of the edth operators on highergenus spacelike 2-surfaces. Class. Quantum Grav., 18, 1003.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1981a. The asymptotic characteristic initial value problem for Einstein's vacuum field equations as an initial value problem for a first-order quasilinear symmetric hyperbolic system. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 378, 401.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1981b. On the regular and the asymptotic characteristic initial value problem for Einstein's vacuum field equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 375, 169.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1982. On the existence of analytic null asymptotically flat solutions of Einstein's vacuum field equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 381, 361.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1983. Cauchy problems for the conformal vacuum field equations in General Relativity. Comm. Math. Phys., 91, 445.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1984. Some (con-)formal properties of Einstein's field equations and consequences. In: Flaherty, F. J. (ed), Asymptotic behaviour of mass and spacetime geometry. Lecture notes in physics 202. Springer Verlag.

Friedrich, H. 1985. On the hyperbolicity of Einstein's and other gauge field equations. Comm. Math. Phys., 100, 525.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1986a. Existence and structure of past asymptotically simple solutions of Einstein's field equations with positive cosmological constant. J. Geom. Phys., 3, 101.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1986b. On the existence of n-geodesically complete or future complete solutions of Einstein's field equations with smooth asymptotic structure. Comm. Math. Phys., 107, 587.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1986c. On purely radiative space-times. Comm. Math. Phys., 103, 35.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1988. On static and radiative space-times. Comm. Math. Phys., 119, 51.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1991. On the global existence and the asymptotic behaviour of solutions to the Einstein-Maxwell-Yang-Mills equations. J. Diff. Geom., 34, 275.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1992. Asymptotic structure of space-time. Page 147 of: Janis, A. I., and Porter, J. R. (eds), Recent advances in general relativity. Einstein Studies, vol. 4. Birkhauser.

Friedrich, H. 1995. Einstein equations and conformal structure: existence of anti-de Sitter-type space-times. J. Geom. Phys., 17, 125.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1996. Hyperbolic reductions for Einstein's equations. Class. Quantum Grav., 13, 1451.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1998a. Einstein's equation and geometric asymptotics. Page 153 of: Dadhich, N., and Narlinkar, J. (eds), Proceedings of the GR-15 conference. Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Friedrich, H. 1998b. Evolution equations for gravitating ideal fluid bodies in general relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 57, 2317.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1998c. Gravitational fields near space-like and null infinity. J. Geom. Phys., 24, 83.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 1999. Einstein's equation and conformal structure. Page 81 of: Huggett, S. A., Mason, L. J., Tod, K. P., Tsou, S. T., and Woodhouse, N. M. J. (eds), The geometric universe: science, geometry and the work of Roger Penrose. Oxford University Press.

Friedrich, H. 2002. Conformal Einstein evolution. Page 1 of: Frauendiener, J., and Friedrich, H. (eds), The conformal structure of spacetime: geometry, analysis, numerics. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer.

Friedrich, H. 2003a. Conformal geodesics on vacuum spacetimes. Comm. Math. Phys., 235, 513.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 2003b. Spin-2 fields on Minkowski space near space-like and null infinity. Class. Quantum Grav., 20, 101.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 2004. Smoothness at null infinity and the structure of initial data. In: Chruściel, P. T., and Friedrich, H. (eds), 50 years of the Cauchy problem in general relativity. Birkhausser.

Friedrich, H. 2005. On the non-linearity of the subsidiary systems. Class. Quantum Grav., 22, L77.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 2007. Static vacuum solutions from convergent null data expansions at space-like infinity. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 8, 817.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 2008a. Conformal classes of asymptotically flat, static vacuum data. Class. Quantum Grav., 25, 065012.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 2008b. One-parameter families of conformally related asymptotically flat, static vacuum data. Class. Quantum Grav., 25, 135012.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 2009. Initial boundary value problems for Einstein's field equations and geometric uniqueness. Gen. Rel. Grav., 41, 1947.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 2011. Yamabe numbers and the Brill-Cantor criterion. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, 12, 1019.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 2013. Conformal structure of static vacuum data. Comm. Math. Phys., 321, 419.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 2014a. On the AdS stability problem. Class. Quantum Grav., 31, 105001.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 2014b. The Taylor expansion at past time-like infinity. Comm. Math. Phys., 324, 263.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H. 2015a. Geometric asymptotics and beyond. Page 37 of: Bieri, L., and Yau, S.-T. (eds), One hundred years of general relativity. Surveys in Differential Geometry, vol. 20. International Press.

Friedrich, H. 2015b. Smooth non-zero rest-mass evolution across time-like infinity. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 16, 2215.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H., and Kánnár, J. 2000a. Bondi-type systems near space-like infinity and the calculation of the NP-constants. J. Math. Phys., 41, 2195.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H., and Kánnár, J. 2000b. Calculating asymptotic quantities near space-like infinity and null infinity from Cauchy data. Annalen Phys., 9, 321.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H., and Nagy, G. 1999. The initial boundary value problem for Einstein's vacuum field equation. Comm. Math. Phys., 201, 619.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H., and Rendall, A. D. 2000. The Cauchy problem for the Einstein equations. Lect. Notes. Phys., 540, 127.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H., and Schmidt, B.G. 1987. Conformal geodesics in general relativity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 414, 171.Google Scholar

Friedrich, H., and Stewart, J. 1983. Characteristic initial data and wavefront singularities in general relativity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 385, 345.Google Scholar

Garabedian, P. R. 1986. Partial differential equations. AMS Chelsea Publishing.

García, A. A., Hehl, F. W., Heinicke, C., and Macias, A. 2004. The Cotton tensor in Riemannian spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 21, 1099.Google Scholar

García-Parrado, A., Gasperín, E., and Valiente Kroon, J.A. 2014. Conformal geodesics in the Schwarzshild-de Sitter and Schwarzschild anti-de Sitter spacetimes. In preparation.

Gasperín, E., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2015. Spinorial wave equations and the stability of the Milne universe. Class. Quantum Grav., 32, 185021.Google Scholar

Geroch, R. 1968. Spinor structure of spacetimes in general relativity I. J. Math. Phys., 9, 1739.Google Scholar

Geroch, R. 1970a. Multipole moments. I. Flat space. J. Math. Phys., 11, 1955.Google Scholar

Geroch, R. 1970b. Multipole moments. II. Curved space. J. Math. Phys., 11, 2580.Google Scholar

Geroch, R. 1970c. Spinor structure of spacetimes in general relativity II. J. Math. Phys., 11, 343.Google Scholar

Geroch, R. 1971a. A method for generating new solutions of Einstein's equations. J. Math. Phys., 12, 918.Google Scholar

Geroch, R. 1971b. Space-time structure from a global view point. Page 71 of: Sachs, R. K. (ed), General relativity and cosmology. Proceedings of the International School in Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Course 48. Academic Press.

Geroch, R. 1972a. A method for generating new solutions of Einstein's equations. II. J. Math. Phys., 13, 394.Google Scholar

Geroch, R. 1972b. Structure of the gravitational field at spatial infinity. J. Math. Phys., 13, 956.Google Scholar

Geroch, R. 1976. Asymptotic structure of space-time. In: Esposito, E. P., and Witten, L. (eds), Asymptotic structure of spacetime. Plenum Press.

Geroch, R., Held, A., and Penrose, R. 1973. A space-time calculus based on pairs of null directions. J. Math. Phys., 14, 874.Google Scholar

Gourgoulhon, E. 2012. 3 + 1 Formalism in general relativity: bases of numerical relativity. Lect. Notes. Phys. 846. Springer Verlag.

Gowers, T. (ed). 2008. The Princeton companion to mathematics. Princeton University Press.

Graham, C. R., and Hirachi, K. 2005. The ambient obstruction tensor and Q-curvature. Page 59 of: AdS/CFT correspondence: Einstein metrics and their conformal boundaries. IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys., vol. 8. Eur. Math. Soc. Zürich.

Griffiths, J. B., and Podolský, J. 2009. Exact space-times in Einstein's general relativity. Cambridge University Press.

Guès, O. 1990. Problème mixte hyperbolique quasi-linéaire caracteristique. Comm. Part. Diff. Eqns., 15, 595.Google Scholar

Gundlach, C., and Martín-García, J. M. 2007. Critical phenomena in gravitational collapse. Living Rev. Relativity, 10, 5. URL (cited on 24 May 2016): www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2007-5.Google Scholar

Günther, P. 1975. Spinorkalkül und Normalkoordinaten. Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 55, 205.Google Scholar

Guven, J., and O'Murchadha, N. 1995. Constraints in spherically symmetric classical general relativity. I. Optical scalars, foliations, bounds on the configuration space variables, and the positivity of the quasilocal mass. Phys. Rev. D, 52, 758.Google Scholar

Hamilton, R. 1982. The inverse function theorem of Nash and Moser. Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 7, 65.Google Scholar

Hansen, R. O. 1974. Multipole moments of stationary spacetimes. J. Math. Phys., 15, 46.Google Scholar

Hartman, P. 1987. Ordinary differential equations. SIAM.

Hawking, S. W., and Ellis, G. F. R. 1973. The large scale structure of space-time. Cambridge University Press.

Henneaux, M., and Teitelboim, C. 1985. Asymptotically anti-de Sitter spaces. Comm. Math. Phys., 98, 391.Google Scholar

Hennig, J., and Ansorg, M. 2009. A fully pseudospectral scheme for solving singular hyperbolic equations. J. Hyp. Diff. Eqns., 6, 161.Google Scholar

Herberthson, H. 2009. Static spacetimes with prescribed multipole moments: a proof of a conjecture by Geroch. Class. Quantum Grav., 26, 215009.Google Scholar

Herberthson, M., and Ludwig, G. 1994. Time-like infinity and direction-dependent metrics. Class. Quantum Grav., 11, 187.Google Scholar

Holst, M., Nagy, G., and Tsogtgerel, G. 2008a. Far-from-constant mean curvature solutions of Einstein's contraint equations with positive Yamabe metrics. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 161101.Google Scholar

Holst, M., Nagy, G., and Tsogtgerel, G. 2008b. Rough solutions of the Einstein constraints on closed manifolds without near-CMC conditions. Comm. Math. Phys., 288, 547.Google Scholar

Hübner, P. 1995. General relativistic scalar-field models and asymptotic flatness. Class. Quantum Grav., 12, 791.Google Scholar

Hübner, P. 1999a. How to avoid artificial boundaries in the numerical calculation of black hole spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 16, 2145.Google Scholar

Hübner, P. 1999b. A scheme to numerically evolve data for the conformal Einstein equation. Class. Quantum Grav., 16, 2823.Google Scholar

Hübner, P. 2001a. From now to timelike infinity on a finite grid. Class. Quantum Grav., 18, 1871.Google Scholar

Hübner, P. 2001b. Numerical calculation of conformally smooth hyperboloidal data. Class. Quantum Grav., 18, 1421.Google Scholar

Hughes, T. J. R., Kato, T., and Marsden, J. E. 1977. Well-posed quasi-linear secondorder hyperbolic systems with applications to nonlinear elastodynamics and general relativity. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 63, 273.Google Scholar

Husa, S. 2002. Problems and successes in the numerical approach to the conformal field equations. Page 239 of: Frauendiener, J., and Friedrich, H. (eds), The conformal structure of space-time: geometry, analysis, numerics. Springer.

Ionescu, A. D., and Klainerman, S. 2009a. On the uniqueness of smooth, stationary black holes in vacuum. Inventiones mathematicae, 175, 35.Google Scholar

Ionescu, A. D., and Klainerman, S. 2009b. Uniqueness results for ill-posed characteristic problems in curved spacetimes. Comm. Math. Phys., 285, 873.Google Scholar

Isenberg, J. 1995. Constant mean curvature solutions of the Einstein constraint equations on closed manifolds. Class. Quantum Grav., 12, 2249.Google Scholar

Isenberg, J. 2013. Initial value problem in general relativity. In: Ashtekar, A., and Petkov, V. (eds), The Springer handbook of spacetime. Springer Verlag.

Ishibashi, A., and Wald, R. M. 2004. Dynamics in non-globally-hyperbolic spacetimes III: anti de Sitter spacetime. Class. Quantum Grav., 21, 2981.Google Scholar

Jaramillo, J. L., Valiente, Kroon, J.A., and Gourgoulhon, E. 2008. From geometry to numerics: interdisciplinary aspects in mathematical and numerical relativity. Class. Quantum Grav., 25, 093001.Google Scholar

Kánnár, J. 1996a. Hyperboloidal initial data for the vacuum field equations with cosmological constant. Class. Quantum Grav., 13, 3075.Google Scholar

Kánnár, J. 1996b. On the existence of C ∞ solutions to the asymptotic characteristic initial value problem in general relativity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 452, 945.Google Scholar

Kato, T. 1975a. The Cauchy problem for quasi-linear symmetric hyperbolic systems. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 58, 181.Google Scholar

Kato, T. 1975b. Quasi-linear equations of evolution, with applications to partial differential equations. Lect. Notes Math., 448, 25.Google Scholar

Kennefick, D. 2007. Traveling at the speed of thought: Einstein and the quest for gravitational waves. Princeton University Press.

Kennefick, D., and O'Murchadha, N. 1995. Weakly decaying asymptotically flat static and stationary solutions to the Einstein equations. Class. Quantum Grav., 12, 149.Google Scholar

Klainerman, S. 1984. The null condition and global existence to nonlinear wave equations. Lect. Appl. Math. 23, 293.Google Scholar

Klainerman, S. 2008. Partial differential equations. Page 455 of: Gowers, T., Barrow-Green, J., and Leader, I. (eds), The Princeton companion to mathematics. Princeton University Press.

Kobayashi, S. 1995. Transformation groups in differential geometry. Springer Verlag.

Kobayashi, S., and Nomizu, K. 2009. Foundations of differential geometry. Vol. 1. Wiley.

Kodaira, K. 1986. Complex manifolds and deformation of complex structures. Springer Verlag.

Kozameh, C., Newman, E. T., and Tod, K. P. 1985. Conformal Einstein spaces. Gen. Rel. Grav., 17, 343.Google Scholar

Krantz, S. G. 2006. Geometric function theory. Birkhäuser.

Kreiss, H.-O., and Lorenz, J. 1998. Stability for time-dependent differential equations. Acta Numerica, 7(203).Google Scholar

Kreiss, H.-O., Reula, O., Sarbach, O., and Winicour, J. 2009. Boundary conditions for coupled quasilinear wave equations with applications to isolated systems. Comm. Math. Phys., 289, 1099.Google Scholar

Kulkarni, R. S., and Pinkall, U. (eds). 1988. Conformal geometry. Aspects of Mathematics. Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn.

Kundu, P. 1981. On the analyticity of stationary gravitational fields at spacial infinity. J. Math. Phys., 22, 2006.Google Scholar

Künzle, H. P. 1967. Construction of singularity free spherically symmetric spacetime manifolds. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 297, 244.Google Scholar

Lee, J. M. 1997. Riemannian manifolds: an introduction to curvature. Springer Verlag.

Lee, J. M. 2000. Introduction to topological manifolds. Springer Verlag.

Lee, J. M. 2002. Introduction to smooth manifolds. Springer Verlag.

Lee, J. M., and Parker, T. H. 1987. The Yamabe problem. Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 17, 37.Google Scholar

Lehner, L., and Pretorious, F. 2014. Numerical relativity and astrophysics. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 52, 661.Google Scholar

Lübbe, C. 2014. Conformal scalar fields, isotropic singularities and conformal cyclic cosmologies. In arXIv:1312.2059.

Lübbe, C., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2009. On de Sitter-like and Minkowski-like spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 26, 145012.Google Scholar

Lübbe, C., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2010. A stability result for purely radiative spacetimes. J. Hyp. Diff. Eqns., 7, 545.Google Scholar

Lübbe, C., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2012. The extended conformal Einstein field equations with matter: the Einstein-Maxwell system. J. Geom. Phys., 62, 1548.Google Scholar

Lübbe, C., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2013a. A class of conformal curves in the Reissner- Nordström spacetime. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 15, 1327.Google Scholar

Lübbe, C., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2013b. A conformal approach for the analysis of the non-linear stability of pure radiation cosmologies. Ann. Phys., 328, 1.Google Scholar

Lübbe, C., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2014. On the conformal structure of the extremal Reissner-Nordström spacetime. Class. Quantum Grav., 31, 175015.Google Scholar

Ludvigsen, M., and Vickers, J. A. G. 1981. The positivity of the Bondi mass. J. Phys. A, 14, L389.Google Scholar

Ludvigsen, M., and Vickers, J. A. G. 1982. A simple proof of the positivity of the Bondi mass. J. Phys. A, 15, L67.Google Scholar

Macedo, R. P., and Ansorg, M. 2014. Axisymmetric fully spectral code for hyperbolic equations. In arXiv:1402.7343.

Machado, M. P., and Vickers, J. A. G. 1995. A space-time calculus invariant under null rotations. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 450, 1.Google Scholar

Machado, M. P., and Vickers, J. A. G. 1996. Invariant differential operators and the Karlhede classification of type N vacuum solutions. Class. Quantum Grav., 13, 1589.Google Scholar

Maldacena, J. 1998. The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 231.Google Scholar

Maliborski, M., and Rostworowski, A. 2013. Lecture notes on turbulent instability of anti-de Sitter spacetime. J. Mod. Phys. A, 28, 1340020.Google Scholar

Martín-García, J. M. 2014. www.xact.es.

Mason, L. J. 1986. The conformal Einstein equations. Twistor Newsletter, 22, 41.Google Scholar

Mason, L. J. 1995. The vacuum and Bach equations in terms of light cone cuts. J. Math. Phys., 36, 3704.Google Scholar

Miao, P. 2003. On the existence of static metric extensions in general relativity. Comm. Math. Phys., 241, 27.Google Scholar

Misner, C. W., Thorne, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. 1973. Gravitation. W. H. Freeman.

Morrey, C. B. 1958. On the analyticity of the solutions of analytic non-linear elliptic systems of partial differential equations. Am. J. Math., 80, 198.Google Scholar

Morris, M. S., and Thorne, K. S. 1988. Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: a tool for teaching general relativity. Am. J. Phys., 56, 395.Google Scholar

Müller, zu Hagen H. 1970. On the analyticity of stationary vacuum solutions of Einstein's equation. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 68, 199.Google Scholar

Müller, zu Hagen H., and Seifert, H.-J. 1977. On characteristic initial-value and mixed problems. Gen. Rel. Grav., 8, 259.Google Scholar

Newman, E. T., and Penrose, R. 1962. An approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients. J. Math. Phys., 3, 566.Google Scholar

Newman, E. T., and Penrose, R. 1963. Errata: an approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients. J. Math. Phys., 4, 998.Google Scholar

Newman, E. T., and Penrose, R. 1965. 10 exact gravitationally-conserved quantities. Phys. Rev. Lett., 15, 231.Google Scholar

Newman, E. T., and Penrose, R. 1966. Note on the Bondi-Metzner-Sachs group. J. Math. Phys., 7, 863.Google Scholar

Newman, E. T., and Penrose, R. 1968. New conservation laws for zero rest-mass fields in asymptotically flat space-time. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 305, 175.Google Scholar

Newman, E. T., and Tod, K. P. 1980. Asymptotically flat space-times. In: Held, A. (ed), General relativity and gravitation: one hundred years after the birth of Albert Einstein. Plenum.

Newman, R. P. A. C. 1989. The global structure of simple space-times. Comm. Math. Phys., 123, 17.Google Scholar

Nicolas, J.-P. 2015. The conformal approach to asymptotic analysis. In arXiv:1508.02592.

O'Donnell, P. 2003. Introduction to 2-spinors in general relativity. World Scientific.

Ogiue,, K. 1967. Theory of conformal connections. Kodai Math. Sem. Rep., 19, 193.Google Scholar

O'Murchadha, N. 1988. The Yamabe problem and general relativity. Proc. Centre Math. Anal. (A.N.U.), 19(137).Google Scholar

O'Neill, B. 1983. Semi-Riemannian geometry with applications to relativity. Academic Press.

O'Neill, B. 1995. The geometry of Kerr black holes. A. K. Peters.

Paetz, T.-T. 2015. Conformally covariant systems of wave equations and their equivalence to Einstein's field equations. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 16, 2059.Google Scholar

Penrose, R. 1960. A spinor approach to general relativity. Ann. Phys. (New York), 10, 171.Google Scholar

Penrose, R. 1963. Asymptotic properties of fields and space-times. Phys. Rev. Lett., 10, 66.Google Scholar

Penrose, R. 1964. Conformal approach to infinity. In: DeWitt, B. S., and DeWitt, C. M. (eds), Relativity, groups and topology: the 1963 Les Houches lectures. Gordon and Breach.

Penrose, R. 1965. Zero rest-mass fields including gravitation: asymptotic behaviour. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 284, 159.Google Scholar

Penrose, R. 1967. Structure of space-time. Page 121 of: DeWitt, C. M., and Wheeler, J. A. (eds), Battelle rencontres: 1967 lectures in mathematics and physics. W. A. Benjamin.

Penrose, R. 1969. Gravitational collapse: the role of general relativity. Rev. Nuovo Cimento, I, 257.Google Scholar

Penrose, R. 1979. Singularities and time asymmetry. Page 581 of: Hawking, S. W., and Israel, W. (eds), General relativity: an Einstein centenary survey. Cambridge University Press.

Penrose, R. 1980. Null hypersurface initial data for classical fields of arbitrary spin and for general relativity. Gen. Rel. Grav., 12, 225.Google Scholar

Penrose, R. 1983. Spinors and torsion in general relativity. Found. Phys., 13, 325.Google Scholar

Penrose, R. 2002. Gravitational collapse: the role of general relativity. Gen. Rel. Grav., 34, 1141.Google Scholar

Penrose, R. 2011. Reprint of: Conformal treatment of infinity. Gen. Rel. Grav., 43, 901.Google Scholar

Penrose, R., and Rindler, W. 1984. Spinors and space-time. Vol. 1: Two-spinor calculus and relativistic fields. Cambridge University Press.

Penrose, R., and Rindler, W. 1986. Spinors and space-time. Vol. 2: Spinor and twistor methods in space-time geometry. Cambridge University Press.

Persides, S. 1979. A definition of asymptotically Minkowskian space-times. J. Math. Phys., 20, 1731.Google Scholar

Persides, S. 1980. Structure of the gravitational field at spatial infinity. II. Asymptotically Minkowski spaces. J. Math. Phys., 21, 142.Google Scholar

Persides, S. 1982a. Timelike infinity. J. Math. Phys., 23, 283.Google Scholar

Persides, S. 1982b. A unified formulation of timelike, null and spatial infinity. J. Math. Phys., 23, 289.Google Scholar

Petersen, P. 1991. Riemannian geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 171. Springer.

Poisson, E., and Will, C. M. 2015. Gravity: Newtonian, post-Newtonian, relativistic. Cambridge University Press.

Porrill, J. 1982. The structure of timelike infinity for isolated systems. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 381, 323.Google Scholar

Pretorious, F. 2009. Binary black hole coalescence. Page 305 of: Colpi, M., Casella, P., Gorini, V., Moschella, U., and Possenti, A. (eds), Physics of relativistic objects in compact binaries: from birth to coalescence. Springer.

Pugliese, D., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2012. On the evolution equations for ideal magnetohydrodynamics in curved spacetime. Gen. Rel. Grav., 44, 2785.Google Scholar

Pugliese, D., and Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2013. On the evolution equations for a selfgravitating charged scalar field. Gen. Rel. Grav., 45, 1247.Google Scholar

Quevedo, H. 1990. Multipole moments in general relativity: static and stationary vacuum solutions. Fortsch. der Physik, 38, 733002E Google Scholar

Reinhart, B. L. 1973. Maximal foliations of extended Schwarzschild space. J. Math. Phys., 14, 719.Google Scholar

Reiris, M. 2014a. Stationary solutions and asymptotic flatness I. Class. Quantum Grav., 31, 155012.Google Scholar

Reiris, M. 2014b. Stationary solutions and asymptotic flatness II. Class. Quantum Grav., 31, 155013.Google Scholar

Rendall, A. D. 1990. Reduction of the characteristic initial value problem to the Cauchy problem and its application to the Einstein equations. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 427, 221.Google Scholar

Rendall, A. D. 2005. Theorems on existence and global dynamics for the Einstein equations. Living Rev. Relativity, 8, 6. URL (cited on 24 May 2016): www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2005-6.Google Scholar

Rendall, A. D. 2008. Partial differential equations in general relativity. Oxford University Press.

Reula, O. 1989. On existence and behaviour of asymptotically flat solutions to the stationary Einstein equations. Comm. Math. Phys., 122, 615.Google Scholar

Reula, O. 1998. Hyperbolic methods for Einstein's equations. Living Rev. Rel., 3, 1.Google Scholar

Ringström, H. 2009. The Cauchy problem in general relativity. Eur. Math. Soc. Zürich.

Rinne, O. 2010. An axisymmetric evolution code for the Einstein equations on hyperboloidal slices. Class. Quantum Grav., 27, 035014.Google Scholar

Rinne, O. 2014. Formation and decay of Einstein-Yang-Mills black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 90, 124084.Google Scholar

Rinne, O., and Moncrief, V. 2013. Hyperboloidal Einstein-matter evolution and tails for scalar and Yang–Mills fields. Class. Quantum Grav., 30, 095009.Google Scholar

Rodnianski, I., and Speck, J. 2013. The nonlinear future-stability of the FLRW family of solutions to the Euler-Einstein system with a positive cosmological constant. J. Eur. Math. Soc., 15, 2369.Google Scholar

Sachs, R. K. 1962a. Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory. Phys. Rev., 128, 2851.Google Scholar

Sachs, R. K. 1962b. Gravitational waves in general relativity VIII. Waves in asymptotically flat space-time. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 270, 103.Google Scholar

Sachs, R. K. 1962c. On the characteristic initial value problem in gravitational theory. J. Math. Phys., 3, 908.Google Scholar

Sbierski, J. 2013. On the existence of a maximal Cauchy development for the Einstein equations: a dezornification. Ann. Henri Poincaré: Online First.

Schmidt, B., Walker, M., and Sommers, P. 1975. A characterization of the Bondi- Metzner-Sachs group. Gen. Rel. Grav., 5, 489.Google Scholar

Schmidt, B. G. 1978. Asymptotic structure of isolated systems. Page 11 of: Ehlers, J. (ed), Isolated systems in general relativity, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Course 67. North Holland Publishing Company.

Schmidt, B. G. 1981. The decay of the gravitational field. Comm. Math. Phys., 78, 447.Google Scholar

Schmidt, B. G. 1986. Conformal geodesics. Lect. Notes. Phys., 261, 135.Google Scholar

Schmidt, B. G. 1987. Gravitational radiation near spatial and null infinity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 410, 201.Google Scholar

Schmidt, B. G. 1996. Vacuum space-times with toroidal null infinities. Class. Quantum Grav., 13, 2811.Google Scholar

Schmidt, B. G., and Walker, M. 1983. Analytic conformal extensions of asymptotically flat spacetimes. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 16, 2187.Google Scholar

Schoen, R. 1984. Conformal deformation of a Riemannian metric to constant scalar curvature. J. Diff. Geom., 20, 479.Google Scholar

Schoen, R., and Yau, S. T. 1979. On the proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity. Comm. Math. Phys., 65, 45.Google Scholar

Schouten, J. A. 1921. Ǖber die konforme Abbildung n-dimensionaler Mannigfaltigkeiten mit quadratischer Massbestimmung auf eine Mannigfaltigkeit mit euklidischer Massbestimmung. Math. Zeitschrift, 11, 58.Google Scholar

Schwarzschild, K. 1916. Ǖber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie. Sitz. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 7, 189–196.Google Scholar

Schwarzschild, K. 2003. “Golden oldie”: on the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein's theory. Gen. Rel. Grav., 35, 951.Google Scholar

Sen, A. 1981. On the existence of neutrino “zero-modes” in vacuum spacetimes. J. Math. Phys., 22, 1781.Google Scholar

Sexl, R. U., and Urbantke, H. K. 2000. Relativity, groups, particles: special relativity and relativistic symmetry in field and particle physics. Springer.

Shapiro, I. 1999. A century of relativity. Rev. Mod. Phys., 71, S41.Google Scholar

Shinbrot, M., and Welland, R. R. 1976. The Cauchy-Kowaleskaya. J. Math. An. App., 55, 757.Google Scholar

Simon, W. 1992. Radiative Einstein-Maxwell spacetimes and “no-hair” theorems. Class. Quantum Grav., 9, 241.Google Scholar

Sommers, P. 1980. Space spinors. J. Math. Phys., 21, 2567.Google Scholar

Speck, J. 2012. The nonlinear future-stability of the FLRW family of solutions to the Euler-Einstein system with a positive cosmological constant. Selecta Mathematica, 18, 633.Google Scholar

Spivak, M. 1970. A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry. Vol. I. Publish or Perish.

Stephani, H., Kramer, D., MacCallum, M. A. H., Hoenselaers, C., and Herlt, E. 2003. Exact solutions of Einstein's field equations, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.

Stewart, J. 1991. Advanced general relativity. Cambridge University Press.

Synge, J. L. 1960. Relativity: the general theory. North Holland Publishing Company.

Szabados, L. B. 1994. Two-dimensional Sen connections in general relativity. Class. Quantum Grav., 11, 1833.Google Scholar

Szabados, L. B. 2009. Quasi-local energy-momentum and angular momentum in General Relativity. Living Rev. Relativity, 12, 4. URL (cited on 24 May 2016): www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2009-4.Google Scholar

Szegö, G. 1978. Orthogonal polynomials. AMS Colloq. Pub., vol. 23. AMS.

Szekeres, P. 1965. The gravitational compass. J. Math. Phys., 6, 1387.Google Scholar

Tataru, D. 2004. The wave maps equation. Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 41, 185.Google Scholar

Taubes, C. H. 2011. Differential geometry. Oxford University Press.

Taylor, M. E. 1996a. Partial differential equations I: basic theory. Springer Verlag.

Taylor, M. E. 1996b. Partial differential equations II: qualitative studies of linear equations. Springer Verlag.

Taylor, M. E. 1996c. Partial differential equations III: nonlinear equations. Springer Verlag.

Tod, K. P. 1984. Three-surface twistors and conformal embedding. Gen. Rel. Grav., 16, 435.Google Scholar

Tod, K. P. 2002. Isotropic cosmological singularities. Page 123 of: Frauendiener, J., and Friedrich, H. (eds), The conformal structure of space-time: geometry, analysis, numerics. Lect. Notes. Phys. 604 Springer.

Tod, K. P. 2003. Isotropic cosmological singularities: other matter models. Class. Quantum Grav., 20, 251.Google Scholar

Tod, K. P. 2012. Some examples of the behaviour of conformal geodesics. J. Geom. Phys., 62, 1778.Google Scholar

Torres, del Castillo, G. F. 2003. 3-D spinors, spin-weighted functions and their applications. Birkhäuser.

Trautman, A. 1958. Radiation and boundary conditions in the theory of gravitation. Bull. Academ. Pol. Sciences: Series des Sciences Math. Astron. Phys., 6, 407.Google Scholar

Trudinger, N. 1968. Remarks concerning the conformal deformation of Riemannian structures on compact manifolds. Ann. Sc. Norm. Sup. Pisa, 22, 265.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 1998. Conserved quantities for polyhomogeneous spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 15, 2479.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 1999a. A comment on the outgoing radiation condition and the peeling theorem. Gen. Rel. Grav., 31, 1219.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 1999b. Logarithmic Newman-Penrose constants for arbitrary polyhomogeneous spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav., 16, 1653.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2002. Polyhomogeneous expansions close to null and spatial infinity. Page 135 of: Frauendiner, J., and Friedrich, H. (eds), The conformal structure of spacetimes: geometry, numerics, analysis. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer.

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2003. Early radiative properties of the developments of time symmetric conformally flat initial data. Class. Quantum Grav., 20, L53.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2004a. Does asymptotic simplicity allow for radiation near spatial infinity? Comm. Math. Phys., 251, 211.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2004b. A new class of obstructions to the smoothness of null infinity. Comm. Math. Phys., 244, 133.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2004c. Time asymmetric spacetimes near null and spatial infinity. I. Expansions of developments of conformally flat data. Class. Quantum Grav., 23, 5457.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2005. Time asymmetric spacetimes near null and spatial infinity. II. Expansions of developments of initial data sets with non-smooth conformal metrics. Class. Quantum Grav., 22, 1683.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2007a. Asymptotic properties of the development of conformally flat data near spatial infinity. Class. Quantum Grav., 24, 3037.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2007b. The Maxwell field on the Schwarzschild spacetime: behaviour near spatial infinity. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 463, 2609.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2009. Estimates for the Maxwell field near the spatial and null infinity of the Schwarzschild spacetime. J. Hyp. Diff. Eqns., 6, 229.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2010. A rigidity property of asymptotically simple spacetimes arising from conformally flat data. Comm. Math. Phys., 298, 673.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2011. Asymptotic simplicity and static data. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 13, 363.Google Scholar

Valiente Kroon, J. A. 2012. Global evaluations of static black hole spacetimes. In preparation.

Wald, R. M. 1983. Asymptotic behaviour of homogeneous cosmological models in the presence of a positive cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. D, 28, 2118.Google Scholar

Wald, R. M. 1984. General relativity. University of Chicago Press.

Walker, M. 1970. Block diagrams and the extension of timelike two-surfaces. J. Math. Phys., 11, 2280.Google Scholar

Weyl, H. 1918. Reine Infinitesimalgeometrie. Math. Zeitschrift, 2, 404.Google Scholar

Weyl, H. 1968. Zur Infinitesimal Geometrie: Einordnung der projektiven und der konformen Auffassung. Page 195 of: Gesammelte Abhandlungen., vol. II. Springer Verlag.

Will, C. M. 2014. The confrontation between general relativity and experiment. Living. Rev. Relativity, 17.Google Scholar

Willmore, T. J. 1993. Riemannian geometry. Oxford University Press.

Winicour, J. 2012. Characteristic evolution and matching. Living. Rev. Relativity, 14.Google Scholar

Witten, E. 1998. Anti de Sitter space and holography. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 253.Google Scholar

Witten, E., and Yau, S.-T. 1999. Connectedness of the boundary in the AdS/CFT correspondence. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 1635.Google Scholar

Wong, W. W.-Y. 2013. A comment on the construction of the maximal globally hyperbolic Cauchy development. J. Math. Phys., 54, 113511.Google Scholar

Yamabe, H. 1960. On a deformation of Riemannian structures on compact manifolds. Osaka J. Mathematics, 12, 6126.Google Scholar

York, J. W. Jr. 1971. Gravitational degrees of freedom and the initial-value problem. Phys. Rev. Lett., 26, 1656.Google Scholar

York, J. W. Jr. 1972. Role of conformal three-geometry in the dynamics of gravitation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 28, 1082.Google Scholar

York, J. W. Jr. 1973. Conformally covariant orthogonal decomposition of symmetric tensor on Riemannian manifolds and the initial value problem of general relativity. J. Math. Phys., 14, 456.Google Scholar

Zenginoglu, A. 2006. A conformal approach to numerical calculations of asymptotically flat spacetimes. PhD thesis, Max-Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (AEI) and University of Potsdam.

Zenginoglu, A. 2007. Numerical calculations near spatial infinity. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 66, 012027.Google Scholar

Zenginoglu, A. 2008. A hyperboloidal study of tail decay rates for scalar and Yang-Mills fields. Class. Quantum Grav., 25, 195025.Google Scholar

Zenginoglu, A. 2011a. A geometric framework for black hole perturbations. Phys. Rev. D, 83, 127502.Google Scholar

Zenginoglu, A. 2011b. Hyperboloidal layers for hyperbolic equations on unbounded domains. J. Comput. Phys., 230, 2286.Google Scholar

Zenginoglu, A., and Kidder, L. E. 2010. Hyperboloidal evolution of test fields in three spatial dimensions. Phys. Rev. D, 81, 124010.

Zhiren, J. 1988. A counterexample to the Yamabe problem for complete non-compact manifolds. Lect. Notes Math., 1306, 93.Google Scholar