Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures and tables
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- Table of cases
- 1 International trade and the law of the WTO
- 2 Rules on non-discrimination
- 3 Rules on market access
- 4 Trade liberalization and other societal values and interests
- 5 Rules on unfair trade
- 6 Rules regarding harmonization of national regulation
- 7 The institutional aspects of the WTO
- 8 The WTO dispute settlement system
- Online resources
- Index
- References
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
6 - Rules regarding harmonization of national regulation
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures and tables
- Preface
- List of abbreviations
- Table of cases
- 1 International trade and the law of the WTO
- 2 Rules on non-discrimination
- 3 Rules on market access
- 4 Trade liberalization and other societal values and interests
- 5 Rules on unfair trade
- 6 Rules regarding harmonization of national regulation
- 7 The institutional aspects of the WTO
- 8 The WTO dispute settlement system
- Online resources
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
As customs duties and quotas decrease in importance as barriers to trade in goods, regulatory barriers to trade gain steadily in significance. Technical regulations and standards, as well as sanitary and phytosanitary measures, can pose significant obstacles to trade and may be misused to protect domestic products against competition from imported products. The TBT Agreement and the SPS Agreement aim to prevent such misuse and to minimize the trade-restrictive impact of legitimate regulation. Also, the lack of protection of intellectual property (IP) rights negatively affects trade in goods and services. Therefore, the TRIPS Agreement aims to ensure that the relevant regulations of WTO Members provide a minimum level of effective protection of IP rights.
The three WTO agreements mentioned here, the TBT Agreement, the SPS Agreement and the TRIPS Agreement, have an important aspect in common. Their obligations regarding national regulation go beyond the general rules of the GATT 1994 applicable to non-tariff barriers to trade, which address such measures primarily by prohibiting them (as is the case for quantitative restrictions; see Section 3.4) or by requiring their non-discriminatory application (as is the case for internal taxes and regulations; see Sections 2.2 and 2.4). The TBT Agreement, the SPS Agreement, and the TRIPS Agreement go further than this and promote the harmonization of national regulation on the basis of international standards or rules.
The TBT Agreement
WTO Members have many regulatory requirements in place regarding products that are traded in their territories; for instance, on the composition, quality, safety, production process, packaging and labelling of these products. Such requirements are commonly aimed at achieving legitimate public policy objectives, such as the protection of public health, the environment, consumers or public morals. However, because these regulatory requirements often differ from country to country, and products not meeting the specific requirements of the domestic market are banned, they may constitute formidable barriers to trade. They are also vulnerable to misuse for protectionist purposes. The TBT Agreement imposes disciplines on these technical requirements.
Scope of application
The TBT Agreement applies to:
• technical regulations;
• standards; and
• conformity assessment procedures.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Essentials of WTO Law , pp. 178 - 231Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
, and (2014) ‘Do you mind if I do not smoke? Products, purpose and indeterminacy in US – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes
’, World Trade Review
13 (2) 357–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2014) ‘A comment on the Appellate Body Report in EC-Seal Products in the context of the trade and environment debate’, Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law
23(3) 318–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2015) ‘EC–Seal Products: seals and sensibilities (TBT aspects of the panel and Appellate Body reports)’, World Trade Review
14(2) 337–379.Google Scholar
, and (2013) ‘Improving regulatory governance: international standards and the WTO TBT Agreement’, Journal of World Trade
47(5) 1013–1046.Google Scholar
(2008) ‘Public opinion and the interpretation of the World Trade Organization's Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures’, Journal of International Economic Law
11(2) 427–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2010) ‘A precautionary approach to decision making: the evolving jurisprudence on Article 5.7 of the SPS Agreement’, Trade Law and Development
2(2) 195–223.Google Scholar
, and (2012) ‘Private food standards and the World Trade Organization: some legal considerations’ World Trade Review
11
479–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009) ‘Some consequences of misinterpreting the TRIPS Agreement’, The W.I.P.O. Journal
1(1) 35–42.Google Scholar
(2014) ‘Good faith and the TRIPS Agreement: putting flesh on the bones of the TRIPS “objectives”’, International And Comparative Law Quarterly
63(2) 353–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009) ‘The global intellectual property order and its undetermined future’, The W.I.P.O. Journal
1(1) 1–15.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.