Initial Data and the Einstein Constraint Equations

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139583961.012

8 - Initial Data and the Einstein Constraint Equations

from Part Three - Gravity is Geometry, after all

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2015

Gregory J. Galloway ,

Pengzi Miao and

Edited by

James Isenberg and

Gregory J. Galloway: Affiliation:
University of Miami
Pengzi Miao: Affiliation:
University of Miami
Richard Schoen: Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of California
Abhay Ashtekar: Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Beverly K. Berger: Affiliation:
Formerly Program Director for Gravitational Physics, National Science Foundation
James Isenberg: Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Malcolm MacCallum: Affiliation:
University of Bristol

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Solutions of the Einstein equations evolve from initial data given on a three-dimensional manifold M. The initial position and velocity of the gravitational field are given by a Riemannian metric g and a symmetric (0, 2) tensor K. The metric g will be the metric induced on M as a spacelike hypersurface in the spacetime S which evolves from the data, and the tensor K will be the second fundamental form of M in S. Thus an initial data set is given by a triple (M, g, K). There is currently interest in higher-dimensional gravity in the physics community, so when convenient we will discuss initial data on an n-dimensional manifold Mn which will evolve to an (n + 1)-dimensional spacetime Sn + 1 (n ≥ 3).

A basic fact of life for the Einstein equations is that the initial data g and K cannot be freely specified, but must satisfy a system of n + 1 nonlinear partial differential equations. These are called the constraint equations, and Section 8.2 deals with recent progress on solving this set of equations. On the one hand the constraint equations present a complication in the study of the initial value problem since it is a difficult (and as yet unsolved) problem to fully analyze their solutions. On the other hand, it is because of the constraint equations that physical notions of energy and momentum can be defined. It is also because of them that geometric and topological restrictions hold in certain cases on the initial manifold M, and for black holes in Σ.

We do not have the space here to give a comprehensive survey of the initial value problem, so instead we have focused on several questions on which there has been recent progress and which are currently active areas of investigation. We have chosen to give brief outlines of the main ideas involved in the study of these specific questions rather than to attempt to touch on all aspects of the field.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: General Relativity and Gravitation
A Centennial Perspective
, pp. 412 - 448

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583961.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] P. T., Allen, A., Clausen, and J., Isenberg, Near-constant mean curvature solutions of the Einstein constraint equations with non-negative Yamabe metrics, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008), 075009, 15 pp.Google Scholar

[2] L., Andersson, M., Eichmair, and J., Metzger, Jang's equation and its applications to marginally trapped surfaces, in: Complex analysis and dynamical systems IV: part 2. general relativity, geometry and PDE, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 554, (AMS and Bar-Ilan), 2011.

[3] L., Andersson, M., Mars, and W., Simon, Local existence of dynamical and trapping horizons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005), 111102.Google Scholar

[4] L., Andersson, M., Mars, and W., Simon, Stability of marginally outer trapped surfaces and existence of marginally outer trapped tubes, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 12 (2008), no. 4, 853–888.Google Scholar

[5] L., Andersson and J., Metzger, The area of horizons and the trapped region, Commun. Math. Phys. 290(2009), no. 3, 941–972.Google Scholar

[6] S., Alexakis, A. D., Ionescu, and S., Klainerman, Uniqueness of smooth stationary black holes in vacuum: small perturbations of the Kerr spaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 299(2010), no. 1, 89–127.Google Scholar

[7] R., Arnowitt, S., Deser, and C. W., Misner, Coordinate invariance and energy expressions in general relativity, Phys. Rev. 122, (1961), 997–1006.Google Scholar

[8] R., Arnowitt, S., Deser, and C. W., Misner, The dynamics of general relativity, in Gravitation: an introduction to current research, 1962, pp. 227–265Wiley, New York. arXiv:gr-qc/0405109Google Scholar

[9] M., Anderson, Local existence and uniqueness for exterior static vacuum Einstein metrics, arXiv:1308.3642.

[10] M., Anderson, and M., Khuri, On the Bartnik extension problem for the static vacuum Einstein equations, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, (2013), 125005.Google Scholar

[11] R., Bartnik, New definition of quasilocal mass, Phys. Rev. Lett., 62, (1989), 2346–2348.Google Scholar

[12] R., Bartnik, Energy in general relativity, Lecture Notes at National Tsing Hua Univeristy, Hsinchu, Taiwan, July 1992.

[13] R., Bartnik, Quasi-spherical metrics and prescribed scalar curvature, J. Diff. Geom. 37(1993), 31–71.Google Scholar

[14] R., Bartnik, Phase space for the Einstein equations, Commun. Anal. Geom. 13, (2005), no. 5, 845–885.Google Scholar

[15] R., Bartnik and J., Isenberg, The constraint equations, in The Einstein equations and the large scale behavior of gravitational fields, 1–38, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2004.

[16] R., Beig, and P. T., Chruściel, Killing vectors in asymptotically flat space-times. I. Asymptot-ically translational Killing vectors and the rigid positive energy theorem, J. Math. Phys. 37(1996), no. 4, 1939–1961.Google Scholar

[17] H., Bray, Proof of the Riemannian Penrose inequality using the positive mass theorem, J. Diff. Geom. 59(2001), no. 2, 177–267.Google Scholar

[18] H., Bray, S., Hayward, M., Mars, and W., Simon, Generalized inverse mean curvature flows in space-time, Commun. Math. Phys. 272 (2007), no. 1, 119–138.Google Scholar

[19] H., Bray, and J. L., Jauregui, Time flat surfaces and the monotonicity of the spacetime Hawking mass, arXiv:1310.8638.

[20] S., Brendle, and M.-T., Wang, A Gibbons-Penrose inequality for surfaces in Schwarzschild spacetime, to appear in Commun. Math. Phys., arXiv:1303.1863.

[21] S., Brendle, P.-K., Hung, and M.-T., Wang, A Minkowski-type inequality for hypersurfaces in the Anti-deSitter-Schwarzschild manifold, arXiv:1209.0669.

[22] J. D., Brown, and J. W., York, Jr., Quasilocal energy in general relativity, in Mathematical aspects of classical field theory (Seattle, WA, 1991), volume 132 of Contemporary Mathematics, pages 129–142. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1992.Google Scholar

[23] J. D., Brown, and J. W., York, Jr., Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action, Phys. Rev. D(3), 47(1993), no. 4, 1407–1419.Google Scholar

[24] I. S., Booth, and R. B., Mann, Moving observers, nonorthogonal boundaries, and quasilocal energy, Phys. Rev. D(3), 59(1999), no. 6, 064021.Google Scholar

[25] M., Cantor, The existence of non-trivial asymptotically flat initial data for vacuum spacetimes, Commun. Math. Phys. 57(1977), 83–96.Google Scholar

[26] P.-N., Chen, M.-T., Wang, M.-T. and Y.-K., Wang, Rigidity of time-flat surfaces in the Minkowski spacetime, arXiv:1310.6081.

[27] P.-N., Chen, M.-T., Wang, and S.-T., Yau, Evaluating quasilocal energy and solving optimal embedding equation at null infinity, Commun. Math. Phys. 308(2011), no. 3, 845–863.Google Scholar

[28] P.-N., Chen, M.-T., Wang, and S.-T., Yau, Minimizing properties of critical points of quasi-local energy, to appear in Commun. Math. Phys., arXiv:1302.5321.

[29] P.-N., Chen, M.-T., Wang, and S.-T., Yau, Quasilocal angular momentum and center of mass in general relativity, arXiv:1312.0990.

[30] P.-N., Chen, M.-T., Wang, and S.-T., Yau, Conserved quantities in general relativity: from the quasi-local level to spatial infinity, arXiv:1312.0985.

[31] Y., Choquet-Bruhat and J. W., York, The Cauchy problem, General relativity and gravitation, Vol. 1, Plenum, New York, 1980, 99–172.

[32] P. T., ChruścielJ., Corvino, and J., Isenberg, Construction of N-body initial data sets in general relativity, Commun. Math. Phys. 304(2011), 637–647.Google Scholar

[33] P. T., Chruściel and E., Delay, Existence of non-trivial, vacuum, asymptotically simple spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav. 19(2002), L71–L79.Google Scholar

[34] P. T., Chrussciel and E., Delay, On mapping properties of the general relativistic constraints operator in weighted function spaces, with applications, Mém. Soc. Math. Fr. (N. S.) No. 94 (2003), vi + 103 pp.Google Scholar

[35] P. T., Chruściel, G. J., Galloway, and D., Solis, Topological censorship for Kaluza–Klein space-times, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 10(2009), no. 5, 893–912.Google Scholar

[36] J., Corvino, Scalar curvature deformation and a gluing construction for the Einstein constraint equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 214(2000), 137–189.Google Scholar

[37] J., Corvino, On the existence and stability of the Penrose compactification, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 8 (2007), 597–620.Google Scholar

[38] J., Corvino and D., Pollack, Scalar curvature and the Einstein constraint equations, in Surveys in geometric analysis and relativity, 145–188, Advanced Lectures in Mathathematics (ALM), 20, International Press, Somerville, MA, 2011.

[39] J., Corvino and R., Schoen, On the asymptotics for the vacuum Einstein constraint equations, J. Diff. Geom. 73(2006), 185–217.Google Scholar

[40] M., Dahl, R., Gicquaud, and E., Humbert, A limit equation associated to the solvability of the vacuum Einstein constraint equations by using the conformal method, Duke Math. J. 161 (2012), 2669–2697.Google Scholar

[41] M., Eichmair, The Plateau problem for marginally outer trapped surfaces, J. Diff. Geom. 83(2009), no. 3, 551–583.Google Scholar

[42]M., Eichmair, Existence, regularity, and properties of generalized apparent horizons, Commun. Math. Phys. 294(2010), no. 3, 745–760.Google Scholar

[43] M., Eichmair, G. J., Galloway, and D., Pollack, Topological censorship from the initial data point of view, J. Diff. Geom. 95(2013), no. 3, 389–405.Google Scholar

[44] M., Eichmair, L.-H., Huang, D. A., Lee, and R., Schoen, The spacetime positive mass theorem in dimensions less than eight, 2011, arXiv:1110.2087v1.

[45] M., Eichmair and J., Metzger, Jenkins–Serrin type results for the Jang equation, 2012, arXiv:1205.4301.

[46] R., Emparan and H. S., Reall, A rotating black ring solution in five dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(2002), no. 10, 101101, 4.Google Scholar

[47] R. J., Epp, Angular momentum and an invariant quasilocal energy in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000), no. 12. 124108.Google Scholar

[48] J. L., Friedman, K., Schleich, and D. M., Witt, Topological censorship, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993), no. 10, 1486–1489.Google Scholar

[49] G. J., Galloway, On the topology of the domain of outer communication, Class. Quant. Grav. 12 (1995), no. 10, L99–L101.Google Scholar

[50] M., Eichmair, Rigidity of marginally trapped surfaces and the topology of black holes, Commun. Anal. Geom. 16 (2008), no. 1, 217–229.Google Scholar

[51] G. J., Galloway, K., Schleich, D. M., Witt, and E., Woolgar, Topological censorship and higher genus black holes, Phys. Rev. D(3) 60(1999), no. 10, 104039, 11.Google Scholar

[52] G. J., Galloway and R., Schoen, A generalization of Hawking's black hole topology theorem to higher dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 266(2006), no. 2, 571–576.Google Scholar

[53] R., Geroch, Energy extraction, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 224 (1973), 108–117.Google Scholar

[54] G. W., Gibbons, Collapsing shells and the isoperimetric inequality for black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997), 2905–2915.Google Scholar

[55] M., Gromov and H. B., Lawson, Jr., Positive scalar curvature and the Dirac operator on complete Riemannian manifolds, Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. (1983), no. 58, 83–196 (1984).Google Scholar

[56] S. W., Hawking, Gravitational radiation in an expanding universe, J. Math. Phys. 9(1968), 598–604.Google Scholar

[57] S. W., Hawking and G. F. R., Ellis, The large scale structure of space-time, Cambridge University Press, London, 1973, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, No. 1.Google Scholar

[58] S. W., Hawking, and G. T., Horowitz, The gravitational Hamiltonian, action, entropy and surface terms, Class. Quant. Grav. 13(1996) (6), 1487–1498.Google Scholar

[59] J., Hempel, Residual finiteness for 3-manifolds, in Combinatorial group theory and topology (Alta, Utah, 1984), Ann. of Math. Stud., vol. 111, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1987, pp. 379–396.

[60] M., Holst, G., Nagy, and G., Tsogtgerel, Rough solutions of the Einstein constraints on closed manifolds without near-CMC conditions, Commun. Math. Phys. 288(2009), 547–613.Google Scholar

[61] G., Horowitz (ed.), Black holes in higher dimensions, Cambridge University Press, London, 2012.

[62] G., Huisken, and T., Ilmanen, The inverse mean curvature flow and the Riemannian Penrose inequality, J. Diff. Geom. 59(2001), no. 3, 353–437.Google Scholar

[63] J., Isenberg, Constant mean curvature solutions of the Einstein constraint equations on closed manifolds, Class. Quant. Grav. 12(1995), 2249–2274.Google Scholar

[64] J., Isenberg and V., Moncrief, Some results on nonconstant mean curvature solutions of the Einstein constraint equations, in Physics on manifolds (Paris 1992), Mathematical Physics Studies, vol. 15, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994, 295–302.Google Scholar

[65] J., Isenberg, R., Mazzeo, and D., Pollack, On the topology of vacuum spacetimes, Ann. Henri Poincaré 4(2003), no. 2, 369–383.Google Scholar

[66] J., Isenberg and N. Ó, Murchadha, Non-CMC conformal data sets which do not produce solutions of the Einstein constraint equations, Class. Quant. Grav. 21(2004), S233–S241, A spacetime safari: essays in honor of Vincent Moncrief.Google Scholar

[67] P. S., Jang, On the positivity of energy in general relativity, J. Math. Phys. 19(1978), no. 5, 1152–1155.Google Scholar

[68] P. S., Jang, and R., Wald, The positive energy conjecture and the cosmic censor hypothesis, J. Math. Phys. 18(1977), 41–44.Google Scholar

[69] J., Kijowski, A simple derivation of canonical structure and quasi-local Hamiltonians in general relativity, Gen. Rel. Grav. 29(1997), no. 3, 307–343.Google Scholar

[70] A., Lichnerowicz, L'intégration des equations de la gravitation relativiste et le problème des n corps, J. Math. Pures Appl. 23(1944), 37–63.Google Scholar

[71] C.-C. M., Liu, and S.-T., Yau, Positivity of quasilocal mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(2003) no. 23, 231102Google Scholar

[72] C.-C. M., Liu, and S.-T., Yau, Positivity of quasilocal mass II, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 19(2006) 181–204.Google Scholar

[73] E., Malec, M., Mars, and W., Simon, On the Penrose inequality for general horizons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(2002), no. 12, 121102.Google Scholar

[74] M., Mars, Present status of the Penrose inequality, Class. Quant. Grav. 26(2009), 193001.Google Scholar

[75] M., Mars, and A., Soria, On the Penrose inequality for dust null shells in the Minkowski spacetime of arbitrary dimension, Class. Quant. Grav. 29(2012), 135005 (2012).Google Scholar

[76] D., Maxwell, A class of solutions of the vacuum Einstein constraint equations with freely specified mean curvature, Math. Res. Lett. 16(2009), 627–645.Google Scholar

[77] D., Maxwell, A model problem for conformal parametrizations of the Einstein constraint equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 302(2011), 697–736.Google Scholar

[78] P., Miao, On existence of static metric extensions in General Relativity, Commun. Math. Phys. 241(2003), 27–46.Google Scholar

[79] P., Miao, Y.-G., Shi, and L.-F., Tam, On geometric problems related to Brown-York and Liu-Yau quasilocal mass, Commun. Math. Phys. 298, (2010), no. 2, 437–459.Google Scholar

[80] P., Miao, and L.-F., Tam, On second variation of Wang–Yau quasi-local energy, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, onlinefirst, (2013), DOI: 10.1007/s00023-013-0279-zGoogle Scholar

[81] P., Miao, L.-F., Tam, and N.-Q., Xie, Critical points of Wang–Yau quasi-local energy, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, 12(2011), no. 5, 987–1017.Google Scholar

[82] R. C., Myers and M. J., Perry, Black holes in higher-dimensional space-times, Annals of Physics 172(1986), no. 2, 304–347.Google Scholar

[83] L., Nirenberg, The Weyl and Minkowski problems in differential geometry in the large, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 6(1953), 337–394.Google Scholar

[84] N. Ó, Murchadha, L. B., Szabados, and K. P., Tod, Comment on “Positivity of quasilocal mass”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(2004), 259001.Google Scholar

[85] B., O'Neill, Semi-Riemannian geometry, Academic Press, New York, 1983.Google Scholar

[86] R., Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14(1965), 57–59.Google Scholar

[87] R., Penrose, Naked singularities, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 224(1973), 125–134Google Scholar

[88] R., Penrose, Some unsolved problems in classical general relativity, Seminar on differential geometry, Ann. of Math. Stud., 102(1982), 631–668, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

[89] A. V., Pogorelov, Regularity of a convex surface with given Gaussian curvature, Mat. Sbornik N.S., 31(73), (1952), 88–103.Google Scholar

[90] R., Schoen, Mean curvature in Riemannian geometry and general relativity, Global theory of minimal surfaces, Clay Math. Proc., vol. 2, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2005, pp. 113–136.Google Scholar

[91] R., Schoen and S.-T., Yau, On the proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity, Commun. Math. Phys. 65(1979), no. 1, 45–76.Google Scholar

[92] R., Schoen and S.-T., Yau, On the structure of manifolds with positive scalar curvature, Manuscripta Math. 28(1979), no. 1–3, 159–183.Google Scholar

[93] R., Schoen and S.-T., Yau, Positivity of the total mass of a general spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43(1979), 1457–1459.Google Scholar

[94] R., Schoen and S.-T., Yau, Proof of the positive mass theorem. II, Commun. Math. Phys. 79(1981), no. 2, 231–260.Google Scholar

[95] Y.-G., Shi, and L.-F., Tam, Positive mass theorem and the boundary behaviors of compact manifolds with nonnegative scalar curvature, J. Diff. Geom. 62(2002), 79–125.Google Scholar

[96] B., Smith, and G., Weinstein, Quasiconvex foliations and asymptotically flat metrics of non-negative scalar curvature, Commun. Anal. Geom. 12(2004), no. 3, 511–551.Google Scholar

[97] L. B., Szabados, Quasi-local energy-momentum and angular momentum in GR: a review article, Living Rev. Rel., 12(2009) no. 4, URL: relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2009-4Google Scholar

[98] R. M., Wald, General relativity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1984.Google Scholar

[99] M.-T., Wang, Quasilocal mass and surface Hamiltonian in spacetime, arXiv:1211.1407.

[100] M.-T., Wang, and S.-T., Yau, Quasilocal mass in general relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009), no. 2, no. 021101, 4 pp.Google Scholar

[101] M.-T., Wang, and S.-T., Yau, Isometric embeddings into the Minkowski space and new quasi-local mass, Com-mun. Math. Phys. 288(2009), no. 3, 919–942.Google Scholar

[102]M.-T., Wang, and S.-T., Yau, Limit of quasilocal mass at spatial infinity, Commun. Math. Phys. 296(2010), no. 1, 271–283.Google Scholar

[103] E., Witten, A new proof of the positive energy theorem, Commun. Math. Phys. 80(1981), 381–402.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.