from 8 - Corporation and Communities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2017
Introduction
One evening in the summer of 2006, I sat in the back of an auto-rickshaw with a smartly dressed industrial manager named Ashok, who claimed that the iconic Indian corporation that he worked for was run by murderers. Ashok's home town of Jamshedpur in eastern India is the site of the Tata Steel plant, which was built in 1907 by the industrialist Jamshed Tata, after whom the city is named (Fraser, 1919; Pillai, 1923; Bahl, 1995). Today, the Tata corporation also has major global interests in telecommunications and the manufacture of automobiles. As a successful Indian-owned enterprise founded during the colonial era, both the Tata company and the city it administers occupy an important place in the national consciousness. Tata is popularly renowned for its high levels of corporate social responsibility and Jamshedpur is a prosperous industrial city of 1.3 million people, many of whom are descendants of labour migrants that arrived during the first half of the twentieth century (Weiner, 1978: 161). However, the erosion of permanent employment since the 1990s has prompted a radical reconfiguration of the relationship between the corporation and its town, and is the subject of a popular local discourse about elite criminality
This essay considers the political role of the corporation within modern company towns, where the decline of paternalistic employment regimes is associated with an increasingly antagonistic class politics. Based upon ethnographic fieldwork in Jamshedpur, I discuss why workers in one of India's oldest industrial firms believe that the decline of their employment security in the previous two decades is facilitated by cooperative criminality in trade unions, corporations and the state. Drawing upon research conducted among managers and the casualized workforce of Jamshedpur's Tata Motors plant, I argue that urban industrial workers use languages of corruption to speak critically about the processes by which power is distributed in India. By situating popular corruption discourses in Jamshedpur against the operation of local labour politics and business enterprise, I describe how practices of corruption and criminality consolidate class power and the reliance of modern corporations upon those practices. The essay suggests a systemic corruption concept rooted in entrepreneurial negotiations between industrial corporations, political representatives, entrepreneurs and violent enforcers.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.