Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2015
All societies have a set of moral standards by which they require or urge their members to abide. Although those standards might be more or less exacting in the obligations they impose and more or less observed in actual compliance, they do constitute an important dimension of social life. However, descriptive efforts to map the morality of any particular society are of limited value because they will reveal little about the important question of whether such morality is worthy of approval or adoption. Accordingly, it is necessary to develop a framework within which to evaluate conduct that is claimed to be morally defensible and also to confirm or deny its acceptability. This is the focus of ethical study. At its broadest, ethics involves a meditation on what is wrong and right and, most important, on how such standards are arrived at and validated. Traditionally, the task was to elaborate and justify a set of ethical norms that provided an authoritative code that people could consult and follow in resolving difficult dilemmas. However, faith in the possibility of sketching such a body of enduring and universally valid rules has been waning. There is now the less absolutist and more skeptical acceptance that ethics is a situational practice that cannot claim objective or neutral justification in any genuinely strong or enduring way. As such, what is to count as a good moral reason is a matter of justification and persuasion, not proof and authority.
THE ETHICAL PROJECT
At bottom, ethics is about putting limits on the unhindered pursuit of self-interest. While there will be some overlap in particular instances between ethical justification and the advancement of self-interest, this is as much by coincidence as by design. The recognition and promotion of self-interest are not entirely inappropriate; people are not expected to be selfless or saintly in achieving ethical approval for all their actions. So, while people are entitled to weigh self-interest in the balance in reaching an ethically defensible line of conduct, they are not permitted to prioritize it without more. As such, an ethical schema that reduces only to the facilitation of individuals’ self-interest is really no ethics at all.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.