Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T02:19:02.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Generic absoluteness for Σ1 formulas and the continuum problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Zoé Chatzidakis
Affiliation:
Université de Paris VII (Denis Diderot)
Peter Koepke
Affiliation:
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Wolfram Pohlers
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] D., Asperó, Bounded Forcing Axioms and the Continuum, Ph.D. thesis, U. Barcelona, Barcelona, 2000.
[2] D., Asperó, A maximal bounded forcing axiom, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 67 (2002), no. 1, pp. 130–142.Google Scholar
[3] D., Asperó, Bounded forcing axioms and the size of the continuum, Logic Colloquium 2000, Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 19, ASL, Urbana, IL, 2005, pp. 211–227.
[4] D., Asperó, On a convenient property for [γ] ℵ0, Submitted.
[5] D., Asperó, and J., Bagaria, Bounded forcing axioms and the continuum, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 109 (2001), no. 3, pp. 179–203.
[6] D., Asperó and P., Welch, Bounded Martin's maximum, weak Erdʺos cardinals, and ψAC, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 67 (2002), no. 3, pp. 1141–1152.Google Scholar
[7] J., Bagaria, Bounded forcing axioms as principles of generic absoluteness, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 39 (2000), no. 6, pp. 393–401.Google Scholar
[8] J., Baumgartner and A., Taylor, Saturation properties of ideals in generic extensions. I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 270 (1982), no. 2, pp. 557–574.Google Scholar
[9] M., Bekkali, Topics in Set Theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1476, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
[10] O., Deiser and H. D., Donder, Canonical functions, non-regular ultrafilters and Ulam's problem on ω1,The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 68 (2003), no. 3, pp. 713–739.Google Scholar
[11] K. J., Devlin and S., Shelah, A weak version of ♣ which follows from 2ℵ0 2 ℵ1, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 29 (1978), no. 2-3, pp. 239–247.Google Scholar
[12] Q., Feng and T., Jech, Projective stationary sets and a strong reflection principle Journal of the London Mathematical Society. Second Series, vol. 58 (1998), no. 2, pp. 271–283.
[13] M., Foreman, M., Magidor, and S., Shelah, Martin's maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. I Annals of Mathematics. Second Series, vol. 127 (1988), no. 1, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
[14] S., Fuchino, On potential embedding and versions of Martin's axiom Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 33 (1992), no. 4, pp. 481–492.
[15] F., Galvin, T., Jech, and M., Magidor, An ideal game The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 43 (1978), no. 2, pp. 284–292.
[16] M., Gitik, Nonsplitting subset of Pκ (κ+), The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 50 (1985), no. 4, pp. 881–894.Google Scholar
[17] M., Goldstern and S., Shelah, The bounded proper forcing axiom The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 60 (1995), no. 1, pp. 58–73.
[18] J. D., Hamkins, A simple maximality principle The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 68 (2003), no. 2, pp. 527–550.
[19] T., Jech, Set Theory, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
[20] T., Jech and S., Shelah, A note on canonical functions Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 68 (1989), no. 3, pp. 376–380.
[21] D., Kueker, Countable approximations and Löwenheim-Skolem theorems Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 11 (1977), no. 1, pp. 57–103.
[22] K., Kunen, Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 102, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1980.
[23] P., Larson, The size of T Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 39 (2000), no. 7, pp. 541–568.
[24] D., Martin and R., Solovay, Internal Cohen extensions Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 2 (1970), no. 2, pp. 143–178.
[25] T., Miyamoto, A note on weak segments of PFA Proceedings of the Sixth Asian Logic Conference (Beijing, 1996), World Sci. Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 1998, pp. 175–197.
[26] R., Schindler, Coding into K by reasonable forcing Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 353 (2001), no. 2, pp. 479–489.
[27] S., Shelah, Semiproper forcing axiom implies Martin maximum but not PFA+, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 52 (1987), no. 2, pp. 360–367.
[28] S., Shelah Forcing axiom failure for ƛ ℵ1, [Sh 784], Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/math.LO/0112286.
[29] J., Stavi and J., Väänänen, Reflection principles for the continuum Logic and Algebra, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 302, AMS, Providence, RI, 2002, pp. 59–84.Google Scholar
[30] S., Todorčevič, Oscillations of real numbers Logic Colloquium '86 (Hull, 1986), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 124, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988, pp. 325–331.
[31] S., Todorčevič, Partition Problems in Topology, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 84, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1989.Google Scholar
[32] S., Todorčevič, Generic absoluteness and the continuum Mathematical Research Letters, vol. 9 (2002), no. 4, pp. 465–471.
[33] S., Todorčevič, Localized reflection and fragments of PFA Set Theory (Piscataway, NJ, 1999), Dimacs Series, vol. 58, AMS, Providence, RI, 2002, pp. 135–148.
[34] B., Veli čkovič, Forcing axioms and stationary sets Advances in Mathematics, vol. 94 (1992), no. 2, pp. 256–284.
[35] P. D., Welch, On unfoldable cardinals, ω-closed cardinals, and the beginning of the inner model hierarchy Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 43 (2004), no. 4, pp. 443–458.
[36] H., Woodin, The Axiom of Determinacy, Forcing Axioms, and the Nonstationary Ideal, de Gruyter Series in Logic and its Applications, vol. 1, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1999.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×