Abramovitz, M. (1956). Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. American Economic Review, vol. 46, no. 2, 5–23.Google Scholar

Abramovitz, M. (1989). Thinking about growth and other essays on economic growth and welfare. Cambridge & New York, Cambridge University Press.

Adam, B. (1990). Time and social theory. Oxford, Polity.

Adas, M. (1989). Machines as the measure of men: science, technology, and ideologies of Western dominance. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.

Adrien, J.L., Ornitz, E., Barthelemy, C., Sauvage, D. & Lelord, G.. (1987). The presence or absence of certain behaviors associated with infantile autism in severely retarded autistic and nonautistic retarded children and very young normal children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 17, no. 3, 407–416.Google Scholar

Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In Shaping technology/building society, ed. Bijker, J., 205–224. London, MIT Press.

Allison, A., Currall, J., Moss, M. & Stuart, S.. (2005). Digital identity matters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 56, no. 4, 364–372.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G.E.M. (1971). Causality and determination: an inaugural lecture. London, Cambridge University Press.

Antonelli, C. (2008). The economics of innovation: critical concepts in economics. London & New York, Routledge.

Appadurai, A. (2001). Globalization. Durham, NC & London, Duke University Press.

Archer, M.S. (1995). Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge & New York, Cambridge University Press.

Arrow, K.J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, vol. 29, no. 80, 155–173.Google Scholar

Arrow, K.J. (1969). Classificatory notes on production and transmission of technological knowledge. American Economic Review, vol. 59, no. 2, 29–35.Google Scholar

Arthur, W.B. (2009). The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves. New York, Free Press.

Åsberg, C. & Lykke, N.. (2010). Feminist technoscience studies. European Journal of Women's Studies, vol. 17, no. 4, 299–305.Google Scholar

Ayres, C.E. (1978 [1944]). The theory of economic progress. Kalamazoo, MI, New Issues Press.

Baber, Z. (1996). The science of empire: scientific knowledge, civilization, and colonial rule in India. Albany, State University of New York Press.

Bacon, F. (1909). New Atlantis. Cambridge, The University Press.

Baltaxe, C.A.M. (1977). Pragmatic deficits in the language of autistic adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, vol. 2, no. 4, 176–180.Google Scholar

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, vol. 28, no. 3 (2003): 801–831.Google Scholar

Barnbaum, D.R. (2008). The ethics of autism: among them, but not of them. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

Barnes, B. (1983). Social life as bootstrapped induction. Sociology, vol. 17, no. 4, 524–545.Google Scholar

Barnes, B. (1988). The nature of power. Cambridge, Polity Press.

Baron, R.M. & Boudreau, L.A.. (1987). An ecological perspective on integrating personality and social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 53, 1222–1228.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (2004). The essential difference: male and female brains and the truth about autism. New York, Basic Books.

Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). Autism: the empathizing-systemizing (E-S) theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, vol. 1156, 68–80.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (2016). Autism, maths, and sex: the special triangle. The Lancet Psychiatry, vol. 2, no. 9, 790–791.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Auyeung, B., Nørgaard-Pedersen, B., Hougaard, D.M., Abdallah, M.W., Melgaard, L., Cohen, A.S., Chakrabarti, B., Ruta, L. & Lombardo, M.V.. (2015). Elevated fetal steroidogenic activity in autism. Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 20, no. 3, 369–376.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A.M. & Frith, U.. (1985). Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition, vol. 21, no. 1, 37–46.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M.V., Auyeung, B., Ashwin, E., Chakrabarti, B. & Knickmeyer, R.. (2011). Why are autism spectrum conditions more prevalent in males? PLOS Biology, vol. 9, no. 6, e1001081.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Lawson, J., Griffin, R. & Hill, J.. (2002). The exact mind: empathising and systemising in autism spectrum conditions. In Handbook of cognitive development, ed. Goswami, U., 491–508, Oxford, Blackwell.

Bauman, M.L. & Kemper, T.L.. (2005). The neurobiology of autism. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bellini, S. & Akullian, J.. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, vol. 73, no. 3, 264–287.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham, NC, Duke University Press.

Bernard-Opitz, V., Chen, A., Kok, A.J. & Sriram, N.. (2000). Analysis of pragmatic aspects of communication behavior of verbal and nonverbal autistic children. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr, vol. 49, no. 2, 97–108.Google Scholar

Bernard-Opitz, V., Sriram, N. & Nakhoda-Sapuan, S.. (2001). Enhancing social problem solving in children with autism and normal children through computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Autism and Development Disorders, vol. 31, no. 4, 377–384.Google Scholar

Berry, D.M. (2011). The philosophy of software: code and mediation in the digital age. Basingstoke, Hampshire & New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Brighton, Harvester.

Bhaskar, R. (1986). Scientific realism and human emancipation. London, Verso.

Bhaskar, R. (1989). The possibility of naturalism. Brighton, Harvester.

Bijker, W.E. (1987). The social construction of Bakelite: towards a theory of invention. In The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology, eds. Bijker, W., Pinch, T. & Hughes, T.. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Bijker, W.E. (1995). Of bicycles, Bakelites, and bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Bijker, W., Pinch, T. & Hughes, T.. (1987). The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Bimber, B. (1996). The three faces of technological determinism. In Does technology drive history?, eds. Smith, M. & Marx, L., 79–100. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Binford, L.R. (1962). Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity, vol. 28, no. 2, 217–225.Google Scholar

Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London, Routledge.

Bloor, D. (1997). Wittgenstein, rules and institutions. London, Psychology Press.

Bloor, D. (2001). Wittgenstein and the priority of practice. In The practice turn in contemporary theory, eds. Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K. & Savigny, E. von, 95–106. London, Routledge.

Böhme, G. (2012). Invasive technification: critical essays in the philosophy of technology. London, Bloomsbury Publishing.

Boon, M. (2004). Technological instruments in scientific experimentation. International studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 18, no. 2–3, 221–230.Google Scholar

Boon, M. (2015). The scientific use of technological instruments. In The role of technology in science: philosophical perspectives, ed. Hansson, S.O., 55–79. Dordrecht, Springer.

Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Bosch, G. (1970). Infantile autism. New York, Springer-Verlag.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.

Brassier, R., Grant, I.H., Harman, G. & Meillassoux, Q.. (2007). Speculative realism. Collapse, vol. 3, 306–449.Google Scholar

Braverman, H. (1975). Labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York, Monthly Review Press.

Brey, P. (1997). Social constructivism for philosophers of technology: a shopper's guide. Techné: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, vol. 2, 56–78.Google Scholar

Brey, P. (2000). Theories of technology as extension of the human body. In Research in philosophy and technology, vol. 19, ed. Mitcham, C., 59–78. New York, JAI Press.

Brinkman, R. (1997). Toward a culture-conception of technology. Journal of economic issues, vol. 31, no. 4, 1027–1038.Google Scholar

Bronet, F. & Layne, L.L.. (2010). Teaching feminist technology design. In Feminist technology: women, gender, and technology, eds. Layne, L.L., Vostral, S.L. & Boyer, K., 197–202. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.

Bryant, L.R. (2011). The democracy of objects. Ann Arbor, Open Humanities Press.

Bryant, L.R. (2012). Posthuman technologies. Umbr(A), vol. 1, 25–41.Google Scholar

Bryant, L.R. (2014). Onto-cartography: an ontology of machines and media. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

Bunge, M. (1966). Technology as applied science. Technology and Culture, vol. 7, no. 3, 329–347.Google Scholar

Burkhardt, H. & Smith, B.. (1991). Handbook of metaphysics and ontology. Munich & Philadelphia, Philosophia Verlag.

Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In New directions in the sociology and history of technology, eds. Bijker, W., Pinch, T. & Hughes, T.. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world: a study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge & New York, Cambridge University Press.

Chapin, P.S. (1928). Cultural change. New York, The Century Co.

Cockburn, C. & Ormrod, S.. (1993). Gender and technology in the making. London & Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

Colby, K.M. (1973). Rationale for computer-based treatment of language difficulties in nonspeaking autistic children. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, vol. 3, no. 3, 254–260.Google Scholar

Collier, A. (2003). In defence of objectivity and other essays: on realism, existentialism and politics. London & New York, Routledge.

Collins, H.M. (1985). Changing order: replication and induction in scientific practice. Beverly Hills, California, Sage.

Collins, H.M. (2001). What is tacit knowledge? In The practice turn in contemporary theory, eds. Schatzki, T, Knorr-Cetina, K. & Savigny, E. von, 107–119. London, Routledge.

Connolly, W.E. (2013a). The fragility of things: self-organizing processes, neoliberal fantasies, and democratic activism, Durham, Duke University Press.

Connolly, W.E. (2013b). The ‘new materialism’ and the fragility of things. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, vol. 41, no. 3, 399–412.Google Scholar

Constant, E.W. (1984). Communities and hierarchies: structure in the practice of science and technology. In The nature of technological knowledge. Are models of scientific change relevant?, 27–46. Netherlands, Springer.

Coole, D. (2013). Agentic capacities and capacious historical materialism: thinking with new materialisms in the political sciences. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 41, no. 3, 451–469.Google Scholar

Coole, D.H. & Frost, S.. (2010). New materialisms: ontology, agency, and politics. Durham NC & London, Duke University Press.

Cooper, R.A., Plaisted-Grant, K.C., Baron-Cohen, S. & Simons, J.S.. (2016). Reality monitoring and metamemory in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 46, no. 6, 2186–2198.Google Scholar

Corneliussen, H.G. (2014). Making the invisible become visible: recognizing women's relationship with technology. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, 209–222.Google Scholar

Courchesne, E., Mouton, P.R., Calhoun, M.E., Semendeferi, K., Ahrens-Barbeau, C., Hallet, M.J., Barnes, C.C. & Pierce, K.. (2011). Neuron number and size in prefrontal cortex of children with autism. JAMA, vol. 306, no. 18, 2001–2010.Google Scholar

Cowan, R.S. (1976). The Industrial Revolution in the home: household technology and social change in 20th century. Technology and Culture, vol. 17, no. 1, 1–23.Google Scholar

Dautenhahn, K. (2003). Roles and functions of robots in human society: implications from research in autism therapy. Robotica, vol. 21, 443–452.Google Scholar

DeMyer, M.K., Hingtgen, J.N. & Jackson, R.K.. (1981). Infantile autism reviewed: a decade of research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 7, no. 3, 388–451.Google Scholar

DeSanctis, G. & Poole, M.S.. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization science, vol. 5, no. 2, 121–147.Google Scholar

Dosi, G. & Grazzi, M.. (2010). On the nature of technologies: knowledge, procedures, artifacts and production inputs. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, 173–184.Google Scholar

Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of technology: an introduction. Malden, MA & Oxford, Blackwell Pub.

Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999). Cyber-Marx: cycles and circuits of struggle in high technology capitalism. University of Illinois Press.

Ekbia, H.R. (2009). Digital artifacts as quasi-objects: Qualification, mediation, and materiality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 60, no. 12, 2554–2566.Google Scholar

Elder-Vass, D. (2007). For emergence: refining Archer's account of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 37, no. 1, 25–44.Google Scholar

Elder-Vass, D. (2010). The emergence of culture. Albert, G. & Sigmund, S., eds. Sociological Theory Controversial, 50th Special Edition of the Cologne Journal of Sociology and Social Psychology, 351–363.

Ellis, B.D. (2001). Scientific essentialism. Cambridge & New York, Cambridge University Press.

Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York, Knopf.

Ellul, J. (1980). The technological system. New York, Continuum.

Ennis, P. (2011). Continental realism. Zero Books.

Fatemi, S.H. (2016). The molecular basis of autism. London, Springer.

Faulkner, P., Lawson, C. & Runde, J.. (2010). Theorising technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no. 1.Google Scholar

Faulkner, P. & Runde, J.. (2009). On the identity of technological objects and user innovations in function. Academy of Management Review, vol. 34, no. 3, 442–462.Google Scholar

Faulkner, P. & Runde, J.. (2013). Technological objects, social positions, and the transformational model of social activity. MIS Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 3, 803–818.Google Scholar

Feenberg, A. (2000). Questioning technology. New York, Routledge.

Feenberg, A. (2001). Democratizing technology: interests, codes, rights. The Journal of Ethics, vol. 5, no. 2, 177–195.Google Scholar

Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: a critical theory revisited. New York, Oxford University Press.

Feenberg, A. (2010). Between reason and experience: essays in technology and modernity. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Feenberg, A. (2014). The philosophy of praxis: Marx, Lukács, and the Frankfurt school. London, Verso.

Feibleman, J.K. (1979). Technology and human nature. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 10, no. 1, 35–41.Google Scholar

Fine, A. (1986). The shaky game: Einstein, realism, and the quantum theory. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Floris, D.L., Lai, M.-C., Auer, T., Lombardo, M.V., Ecker, C., Chakrabarti, B., Wheelwright, S.J., Bullmore, E.T., Murphy, D.G.M., Baron-Cohen, S. & Suckling, J.. (2016). Atypically rightward cerebral asymmetry in male adults with autism stratifies individuals with and without language delay. Human Brain Mapping, vol. 37, no. 1, 230–253.Google Scholar

Forman, P. (2007). The primacy of science in modernity, of technology in postmodernity, and of ideology in the history of technology. History and Technology, vol. 23, no. 1–2, 1–152.Google Scholar

Franssen, M.E., Kroes, P.E., Reydon, T.A.C.E. & Vermaas, P.E.E.. (2014). Artefact kinds: ontology and the human-made world. Switzerland, Springer.

Freeman, B.J., Ritvo, E.R. & Schroth, P.C.. (1984). Behavior assessment of the syndrome of autism – behavior observation system. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 23, no. 5, 588–594.Google Scholar

Frith, U. (1989). A new look at language and communication in autism. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, vol. 24, no. 2, 123–150.Google Scholar

Frith, U. (2003). Autism: explaining the enigma. Malden, MA; Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.

Frith, U. & Happé, F.. (1994). Autism: beyond ‘theory of mind’. Cognition, vol. 50, no. 1–3, 115–132.

Fullbrook, E. (2009). Ontology and economics: Tony Lawson and his critics. New York, Routledge.

Gehlen, A. (1980). Man in the age of technology. New York, Columbia University Press.

Geschwind, D.H. (2008). Autism: many genes, common pathways? Cell, vol. 135, no. 3, 391–395.Google Scholar

Geschwind, D.H. & Levitt, P.. (2007). Autism spectrum disorders: developmental disconnection syndromes. Current opinion in neurobiology, vol. 17, no. 1, 103–111.Google Scholar

Gibson, J.J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology, eds. Shaw, R. & Bransford, J.. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gibson, E.J. & Pick, A.D.. (1979). Perception and its development: a tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson. New York, L. Erlbaum Associates.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK, Polity Press.

Giddens, A. & Pierson, C.. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: making sense of modernity. Stanford University, Stanford University Press.

Gilfillan, S.C. (1935a). Inventing the ship. Chicago, IL, Follett Publishing Company.

Gilfillan, S.C. (1935b). The sociology of invention; an essay in the social causes of technic invention and some of its social results. Chicago, IL, Follett Publishing Company.

Gillberg, C., Ehlers, S., Schaumann, H., Jakobsson, G., Dahlgren, S.O., Lindblom, R., Bagenholm, A., Tjuus, T. & Blidner, E.. (1990). Autism under age 3 years – a clinical-study of 28 cases referred for autistic symptoms in infancy. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, vol. 31, no. 6, 921–934.Google Scholar

Gillespie, C.C. (1960). The edge of objectivity. An Essay in the History of Scientific Ideas. Princeton, vol. 52, no. 3, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

Gispen, K. (1989). New profession, old order: engineers and German society, 1815–1914. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Gleick, J. (1999). Faster: the acceleration of just about everything. New York, Pantheon Books.

Gluer, K. & Pagin, P.. (2003). Meaning theory and autistic speakers. Mind & Language, vol. 18, no. 1, 23–51.Google Scholar

Godin, B. (2010). Innovation without the word: William F. Ogburn's contribution to the study of technological innovation. Minerva, vol. 48, no. 3, 277–307.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, T.R. & LeBlanc, L.A.. (2004). Use of technology in interventions for children with autism. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, vol. 1, no. 2, 166–178.Google Scholar

Graham-Rowe, D. (2002). My best friend's a robot. New Scientist, vol. 176, 30–33.Google Scholar

Grandin, T. (2006). Thinking in pictures, expanded edition: my life with autism. New York, Vintage Books.

Green, E. & Adam, A.. (1998). On‐line leisure: gender, and ICTs in the home. Information Communication & Society, vol. 1, no. 3, 291–312.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1970). Towards a rational society. Boston, Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Boston, Beacon.

Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge & New York, Cambridge University Press.

Hansen, A.H. (1921). The technological interpretation of history. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 36. no 1, November, 72–83.Google Scholar

Happé, F. (2000). Parts and wholes, meaning and minds: central coherence and its relation to theory of mind. In understanding other minds: perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience, eds. Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H. & Cohen, D.J., 203–221. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Haraway, D. (1985). A manifesto for cyborgs – science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, no. 80, 65–107.Google Scholar

Harding, S.G. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.

Harman, G. (2009). Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Melbourne, Australia, Re.press.

Harman, G. (2011). The quadruple object. Windchester, UK, Zero Books.

Harman, G. (2013). An outline of object-oriented philosophy. Science Progress, vol. 96, no. 2, 187–199.Google Scholar

Harré, R. & Madden, E.. (1975). Causal powers. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA, Blackwell.

Harvey, D. (2006). The limits to capital. London; New York, Verso.

Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Heersmink, R. (2012). Defending extension theory: A response to Kiran and Verbeek. Philosophy & Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, 121–128.Google Scholar

Heft, H. (1989). Affordances and the body: an intentional analysis of Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 19, no. 1, 1–30.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Malden, MA, Blackwell (1978).

Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays. New York, Harper & Row.

Heilbroner, R.L. (1967). Do machines make history? Technology and Culture, vol. 8, 335–345.Google Scholar

Hennessy, J.R. (2014) 22 July. The tech utopia nobody wants: why the world nerds are creating will be awful. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/22/the-tech-utopia-nobody-wants-why-the-world-nerds-are-creating-will-be-awful.

Hermelin, B. (1970). Psychological experiments with autistic children, by B. Hermelin and N. O'Connor. Oxford, New York, Pergamon Press.

Higgs, E., Light, A. & Strong, D.. (2000). Technology and the good life? Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Hobson, R.P. (1993). The emotional origins of social understanding. Philosophical Psychology, vol. 6, no. 3, 227–249.Google Scholar

Houkes, W., Kroes, P., Meijers, A. & Vermaas, P.E.. (2011). Dual-nature and collectivist frameworks for technical artefacts: a constructive comparison. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol. 42, no. 1, 198–205.Google Scholar

Houkes, W. & Vermaas, P.E.. (2010). Technical functions: on the use and design of artefacts. Dordrecht, Springer.

Hughes, T. (1983). Networks of power: electrification in Western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore and London, John Hopkins University Press.

Hume, D., Green, T.H. & Grose, T.H.. (2001). Of commerce. University of Virginia Library.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Ihde, D. (1983). The historical-ontological priority of technology over science. In Philosophy and Technology, eds. Durbin, P. & Rapp, F., 235–252. Netherlands, Springer.

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: from garden to earth. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

Ihde, D. (1991). Instrumental realism: the interface between philosophy of science and philosophy of technology. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

Ihde, D. (1998). Expanding hermeneutics: visualism in science. Evanston. Northwestern University Press.

Ihde, D. (2009). Technology and science. In A companion to the philosophy of technology, eds. Olsen, J.-K.B., Pedersen, S.A. & Hendricks, V.F., 49–60. Chichester, UK & Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell.

Illych, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. New York, Harper and Row.

Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London & New York, Routledge.

Introna, L.D. (2009). Ethics and the speaking of things. Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 26, no. 4, 25–46.Google Scholar

Jessop, B. (2009). The spatiotemporal dynamics of globalizing capital and their impact on state power and democracy. In High-speed society: social acceleration, power, and modernity, eds. Rosa, H. & Scheuerman, W.E., 135–160. University Park, PA, Pennsylvania State University Press.

Johnson, D. (2010). Sorting out the questions of feminist technology. In Feminist technology: women, gender, and technology, eds. Layne, L.L., Vostral, S.L. & Boyer, K., 197–202. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.

Jones, M.R. & Karsten, H.. (2008). Giddens's structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 1, 127–157.Google Scholar

Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A. & Marton, A.. (2010). A theory of digital objects. First Monday. http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3033/2564

Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, vol. 2, 217–250.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1784). Idea for a universal history from a cosmopolitan point of view. www.marxists.org/reference/subject/ethics/kant/universal-history.htm.

Kant, I. & Smith, N.K.. (2003). Critique of pure reason. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire & New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: methodology for behavioural science. San Francisco, Chandler Publishing.

Kaplan, D.M. (2009). Readings in the philosophy of technology. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Kapp, E. (1877). Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Tecknik. Braunmschwieg, Germany, Westermann.

Kiran, A. & Verbeek, P.-P.. (2010). Trusting ourselves to technology. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, vol. 23, no. 3, 409–427.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, G. (2008). Technology and social power. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Kirkup, G. (2000). The gendered cyborg: a reader. London & New York, Routledge in association with the Open University.

Kline, R. (1995). Construing technology as applied science – public rhetoric of scientists and engineers in the United-States, 1880–1945. Isis, vol. 86, no. 2, 194–221.Google Scholar

Kling, R. (1991). Computerization and social transformations. Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 16, no. 3, 342–367.Google Scholar

Koffka, C. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. Kegan Paul & Co.: London.

Koselleck, R. (1985). Futures past: on the semantics of historical time. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures past: on the semantics of historical time. New York & Chichester, Columbia University Press.

Kraybill, D.B., Johnson-Weiner, K.M. & Nolt, S.M.. (2013). The Amish. JHU Press.

Kroeber, A.L. (1948). Anthropology: race. language, culture, psychology, pre-history. New York, Harcourt.

Kroes, P. (2010). Engineering and the dual nature of technical artefacts. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, 51–62.Google Scholar

Kroes, P. (2012). Technical artefacts: creations of mind and matter a philosophy of engineering design. Dordrecht, Springer.

Kroes, P. & Meijers, A.. (2006). The dual nature of technical artefacts – introduction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 37, no. 1, 1–4.Google Scholar

Kroes, P.A. & Meijers, A.W.M.. (2000). Introduction. In The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology, eds. Kroes, P.A. & Meijers, A.W.M.. Amsterdam, JAI/ Elsevier.

Kusch, M. (1997). The sociophilosophy of folk psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol. 28, no. 1, 1–25.Google Scholar

Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C.. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. London & New York, Verso.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. New York; London, Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Latour, B. (1994). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change, eds. Bijker, W.E. & Law, J., 225–258. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Latour, B. (1999). For David Bloor … and beyond: A reply to David Bloor's’ anti-Latour. Studies in history and philosophy of science, vol. 30, 113–130.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor network theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Latour, B. (2009). The science of passionate interests: an introduction to Gabriel Tarde's economic anthropology. Chicago, IL, Prickly Paradigm Press.

Latour, B. (2015). An inquiry into modes of existence: an anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Latsis, J., Lawson, C. & Martins, N.. (2007). Contributions to social ontology. London, Routledge.

Laudan, R. (1984). Cognitive change in technology and science. Netherlands, Springer.

Law, J. (2004). After method: mess in social science research. London, Routledge.

Lawson, C. (1996). Holism and collectivism in the work of J.R. Commons. Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 30, no. 4, 1–18.Google Scholar

Lawson, C. (2007). Technology, technological determinism and the transformational model of technical activity. In Contributions to social ontology, eds. Lawson, C., Latsis, J. & Martins, N., 32–49. London, Routledge.

Lawson, C. (2008). An ontology of technology: artefacts, relations and functions. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, vol. 12, no. 1. 48–64.Google Scholar

Lawson, C. (2009). Ayres, technology and technical objects. Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 43, no. 3, 641–659.Google Scholar

Lawson, C. (2010). Technology and the extension of human capabilities. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 40, no. 2, 207–223.Google Scholar

Lawson, C. (2017). Feenberg, Rationality and Isolation. In Theory and Practice – Critical Theory and the Thought of Andrew Feenberg, eds. Arnold, D. & Andreas, M.. Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan.

Lawson, J. (2003). Depth accessibility difficulties: An alternative conceptualisation of autism spectrum conditions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 33, no. 2, 189–202.Google Scholar

Lawson, J. (2013). Economics and autism: why the drive towards closure? In Contributions to social ontology, eds. Lawson, C., Latsis, J.S. & Martins, N.. Abingdon, Routledge.

Lawson, J., Baron-Cohen, S. & Wheelwright, S.. (2004). Empathising and systemising in adults with and without Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 34, no. 3, 301–310.Google Scholar

Lawson, T. (1992). Abstraction, tendencies and stylized facts. In Real-life economics: Understanding wealth creation, eds. Ekins, P. & Max-Neef, M.. London & New York, Routledge.

Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and Reality. London, Routledge.

Lawson, T. (2012). Ontology and the study of social reality: emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 2, 345–385.Google Scholar

Lawson, T. (2013). Emergence and morphogenesis: causal reduction and downward causation? In Social morphogenesis, ed. Archer, M.S., 61–84. Netherlands, Springer.

Lawson, T. (2015). A conception of social ontology. In Social Ontology and Modern Economics, ed. Pratten, S., 19–52. Abingdon, Oxford, Routledge.

Lawson, T. (2016). Social positioning and the nature of money. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. Forthcoming.

Layne, L.L., Vostral, S.L. & Boyer, K.. (2010). Feminist technology. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.

Layton, E.T. (1974). Technology as knowledge. Technology and culture, 31–41.CrossRef

Leslie, A.M. (1987). Pretense and representation – the origins of theory of mind. Psychological Review, vol. 94, no. 4, 412–426.Google Scholar

Libby, S., Powell, S., Messer, D. & Jordan, R.. (1998). Spontaneous play in children with autism: a reappraisal. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 28, no. 6, 487–497.Google Scholar

Lohan, M. & Faulkner, W.. (2004). Masculinities and technologies. Men and Masculinities, vol. 6, no. 4, 319–329.Google Scholar

Lord, C., Merrin, D.J., Vest, L.O. & Kelly, K.M.. (1983). Communicative behavior of adults with an autistic 4-year-old boy and his nonhandicapped twin brother. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 13, no. 1, 1–17.Google Scholar

Lotka, A. (1956). Elements of mathematical biology. New York, Dover.

Loveland, K.A. (1991). Social affordances and interaction II: autism and the affordances of the human environment. Ecological Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, 99–119.Google Scholar

Loveland, K.A., Mcevoy, R.E., Tunali, B. & Kelley, M.L.. (1990). Narrative story telling in autism and Down's syndrome. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, vol. 8, 9–23.Google Scholar

Loveland, K.A. & Tunali, B.. (1991). Social scripts for conversational interactions in autism and down-syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 21, no. 2, 177–186.Google Scholar

Lubbe, H. (1994). Keeping pace with time, on curtailed presence in the present. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 4, 94–107.Google Scholar

Lubbe, H. (2009). The contraction of the present. In High-speed society: social acceleration, power, and modernity, eds. Rosa, H. & Scheuerman, W.E., vi, 313. University Park, PA, Pennsylvania State University Press.

Lukács, G. (1971). History and class consciousness; studies in Marxist dialectics. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Lykke, N. (2010). Feminist studies: a guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. New York, Routledge.

Lynch, M. (1992). Going full circle in the sociology of knowledge: comment on Lynch and Furman. Science, Technology and Human Values, vol. 17, 228–233.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, D. (1984). Marx and the machine. Technology and Culture, vol. 25, no. 3, 473–502.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D.A. & Wajcman, J.. (1985a). Introduction. In The social shaping of technology, eds. MacKenzie, D.A. & Wajcman, J., 2–27.Buckingham, Philadelphia, Open University Press.

MacKenzie, D.A. & Wajcman, J.. (1985b). The social shaping of technology. eds. MacKenzie, D.A. & Wajcman, J.. Buckingham, Philadelphia, Open University Press.

Mandel, E. (1975). Late capitalism. London, Humanities Press.

Manovich, L. (2002). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York; London, Bloomsbury.

Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man. Boston, Beacon Press.

Margolis, E. & Laurence, S.. (2007). Creations of the mind: theories of artifacts and their representation. Oxford & New York, Oxford University Press.

Markus, M.L. & Robey, D.. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, vol. 34, no. 5, 583–598.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1955 [1900]). The poverty of philosophy. Moscow, Progress Publishers.

Marx, K. (1956). The poverty of philosophy. Digireads. com Publishing.

Marx, K. (1972 [1859]). A contribution to the critique of political economy. London, Lawrence and Wishart.

Marx, L. (2010). Technology: The emergence of a hazardous concept. Technology and Culture, vol. 51, no. 3, 561–577.Google Scholar

Marx, L. & Mazlish, B.. (1996). Progress: fact or illusion? Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.

Marx, L. & Smith, M.R.. (1994). Does technology drive history?: the dilemma of technological determinism. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Max, M.L. & Burke, J.C.. (1997). Virtual reality for autism communication and education, with lessons for medical training simulators. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 39, 46–53.Google Scholar

McArthur, L.Z. & Baron, R.M.. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, vol. 90, 215–238.Google Scholar

McLaughlin, P. (2001). What functions explain: functional explanation and self-reproducing systems. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: the extensions of man. New York, McGraw-Hill.

Meijers, A. (2009). Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences. General Introduction. Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, vol. 9, 1–19.Google Scholar

Merchant, C. (1989). The death of nature: women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York, Harper & Row.

Metcalfe, J.S. (2010). Technology and economic theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, 153–171.Google Scholar

Mill, J.S. (1840). M. de Toqueville on Democracy in America. Edinburg Review, vol. 2, October.Google Scholar

Misa, T. (2009). Defining technology. In A companion to the philosophy of technology, eds. Olsen, J.-K.B., Pedersen, S.A. & Hendricks, V.F., 8–12. Chichester, UK & Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell.

Mitcham, C. (1979). Philosophy and the history of technology. In The history and philosophy of technology, eds. Bugliarello, G. & Doner, D.B.. Urbana, IL & London, University of Illinois Press.

Mitcham, C. (1990). Three ways of being-with technology. In From artifact to habitat: studies in the critical engagement of technology, Research in technology studies, ed. Ormiston, G.L., 221. Bethlehem & London, Lehigh University Press & Associated University Presses.

Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: the path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago, IL & London, University of Chicago Press.

Mokyr, J. (2000). Knowledge, technology, and economic growth during the industrial revolution. In Productivity, technology and economic growth, 253–292. New York, Springer.

Mokyr, J. (2002). The gifts of Athena: historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

Moore, M. & Calvert, S.. (2000). Brief report: vocabulary acquisition for children with autism: teacher or computer instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 30, no. 4, 359–62.Google Scholar

Mundy, P., Sigman, M., Ungerer, J. & Sherman, T.. (1986). Defining the social deficits of autism: the contribution of non-verbal communication measures. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, vol. 27, no. 5, 657–669.Google Scholar

Munkirs, J.R. (1988). The dichotomy: views of a fifth generation institutionalist. Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 22, no. 4, 1035–1044.Google Scholar

Murray, S. (2011). Autism. London, Routledge.

Neuhaus, E., Beauchaine, T.P. & Bernier, R.. (2010). Neurobiological correlates of social functioning in autism. Clinical psychology review, vol. 30, no. 6, 733–748.Google Scholar

Newman, M. G. (2004). Technology in psychotherapy: An introduction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 60, 141–145.

Nichols, S. & Stich, S.. (2000). A cognitive theory of pretense. Cognition, vol. 74, no. 2, 115–147.Google Scholar

Noble, D.F. (1984). Forces of production: a social history of industrial automation. New York, Knopf.

Noys, B. (2014). Malign velocities: accelerationism and capitalism. John Hunt Publishing.

O'Loughlin, C. & Thagard, P.. (2000). Autism and coherence: A computational model. Mind & Language, vol. 15, no. 4, 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ogburn, W.F. (1922). Social change with respect to culture and original nature. New York, B.W. Huebsch, Inc.

Ogburn, W.F. (1933). Living with machines. Chicago, IL, American Library Association.

Ogburn, W.F. (1938). Machines and tomorrow's world. New York, Public Affairs Committee, Inc.

Oldenziel, R. (1999). Making technology masculine: men, women and modern machines in America, 1870–1945. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.

Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, vol. 3, no. 3, 398–427.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W.J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, vol. 28, no. 9, 1435–1448.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W.J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, 125–141.Google Scholar

Pels, D. (1996). The Politics of symmetry. Social Studies of Science, vol. 26, 277–304.Google Scholar

Perner, J. & Lang, B.. (2000). Theory of mind and executive function: is there a developmental relationship? In Understanding other minds: perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience, eds. Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H. & Cohen, D. J., 150–181. New York, Oxford University Press.

Perner, J., Lang, B. & Kloo, D.. (2002). Theory of mind and self-control: more than a common problem of inhibition. Child Development, vol. 73, no. 3, 752–767.Google Scholar

Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of practice: time agency and science. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Pinch, T. & Bijker, W.. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit from each other. In The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology, eds. Pinch, T., Bijker, W. & Hughes, T.. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Pitt, J.C. (2000). Thinking about technology. New York, Seven Bridges Press.

Plant, S. (1997). Zeroes + ones: digital women + the new technoculture. New York, Doubleday.

Pleasants, N. (1996). Nothing is concealed: de‐centring tacit knowledge and rules from social theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 26, no. 3, 233–255.Google Scholar

Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Boston, Beacon Press.

Porpora, D.V. (1989). Four concepts of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 19, no. 2, 195–211.Google Scholar

Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: the surrender of culture to technology. New York, Vintage Books.

Pratten, S. (2013). Critical realism and the process account of emergence. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 43, no. 3, 251–279.Google Scholar

Pratten, S. (2014). Social ontology and modern economics. Abingdon, Routledge.

Pratten, S. (2015). Social ontology and modern economics. Abingdon, Routledge.

Preston, B. (1998). Why is a wing like a spoon? A pluralist theory of function. The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 95, no. 5, 215–254.Google Scholar

Preston, B. (2003). Of Marigold Beer – a reply to Vermaas and Houkes. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 54, 601–612.Google Scholar

Quine, W.V. (1953). From a logical point of view: 9 logico-philosophical essays. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Rathje, W.L. & Schiffer, M.B.. (1982). Archaeology. San Diego, Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.

Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 5, no. 2, 243–263.Google Scholar

Reed, E. (1988). James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. New Haven, Yale University Press.

Rifkin, J. (1987). Time wars: the primary conflict in human history. New York, H. Holt.

Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Ferrari, E., Kronreif, G., Prazak-Aram, B., Marti, P., Iacono, I., Gelderblom, G.J., Bernd, T. & Caprino, F.. (2012). Scenarios of robot-assisted play for children with cognitive and physical disabilities. Interaction Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, 189–234.Google Scholar

Robinson, J.P. & Godbey, G.. (1999). Time for life: the surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park, PA, Pennsylvania State University Press.

Roelfsema, M.T., Hoekstra, R.A., Allison, C., Wheelwright, S., Brayne, C., Matthews, F.E. & Baron-Cohen, S.. (2012). Are autism spectrum conditions more prevalent in an information-technology region? A school-based study of three regions in the Netherlands. J Autism Dev Disord, vol. 42, no. 5, 734–739.Google Scholar

Rogers, S.J. & Dilalla, D.L.. (1991). A comparative study of the effects of a developmentally based instructional model on young children with autism and young children with other disorders of behavior and development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, vol. 11, no. 2, 29–47.Google Scholar

Rosa, H. (2009). Social acceleration: ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high-speed society. In High-speed society: social acceleration, power, and modernity, eds. Rosa, H. & Scheuerman, W.E., 78–111. University Park, PA, Pennsylvania State University Press.

Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: a new theory of modernity. New York, Columbia University Press.

Rosa, H. & Scheuerman, W.E.. (2009). High-speed society: social acceleration, power, and modernity. University Park, PA, Pennsylvania State University Press.

Rosenberg, N. (1976). Marx as a student of technology. Monthly Review, vol. 28, no. 3, 56–77.Google Scholar

Rothenberg, D. (1993). Hand's end: technology and the limits of nature. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1992). Discourse on the sciences and arts: (first discourse) and polemics. Hanover, Dartmouth College.

Rubinstein, D. (2013). Marx and Wittgenstein: Social praxis and social explanation. London, Routledge.

Rutherford, M. (2011). The institutionalist movement in American economics, 1918–1947: science and social control. Victoria, Cambridge University Press.

Rynkiewicz, A., Schuller, B., Marchi, E., Piana, S., Camurri, A., Lassalle, A. & Baron-Cohen, S.. (2016). An investigation of the ‘female camouflage effect’ in autism using a computerized ADOS-2 and a test of sex/gender differences. Molecular Autism, vol. 7, no. 1, 1–8.Google Scholar

Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge & New York, Cambridge University Press.

Sayer, A. (1997). Essentialism, social constructionism, and beyond. Sociological Review, vol. 45, no. 3, 453–487.Google Scholar

Scharff, R. & Dusek, V.. (2003). Philosophy of technology: the technological condition, an anthology. London, Blackwell Publishing.

Schatzberg, E. (2006). Technik comes to America: changing meanings of technology before 1930. Technology and Culture, vol. 47, no. 3, 486–512.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T.R. (1996). Social practices: a Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. New York, Cambridge University Press.

Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K. & Savigny, E.V.. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York, Routledge.

Schiffer, M.B. (1992). Technological perspectives on behavioural change. Tucson, University of Arizona Press.

Schyfter, P. (2009). The bootstrapped artefact: a collectivist account of technological ontology, functions, and normativity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol. 40, no. 1, 102–111.Google Scholar

Scott, S. (2001). Metarepresentation in philosophy and psychology. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, 910–916.

Searle, J.R. (1995). The construction of social reality. London, Penguin Books.

Searle, J.R. (2010). Making the social world: the structure of human civilization. Oxford; New York, Oxford University Press.

Secord, P. (1986). Explanation in the social sciences and in life situations. In Metatheory in social science, eds. Fiske, D.W. & Schwartz, R.A.. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Shalom, D.B. (2009). The medial prefrontal cortex and integration in autism. The Neuroscientist, vol. 15, no. 6, 589–598.Google Scholar

Shapin, S. (1982). History of science and its sociological reconstructions. History of Science, vol. 20, no. 1982, 157–211.Google Scholar

Shaw, W.H. (1979). ‘The handmill gives you the feudal lord’: Marx's technological determinism. History and Theory, vol. 18, no. 2, 155–176.Google Scholar

Shove, E., Pantzar, M. & Watson, M.. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: everyday life and how it changes. Los Angeles, Sage.

Sigman, M. & Mundy, P.. (1989). Social attachments in autistic children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 28, no. 1, 74–81.Google Scholar

Sigman, M., Ungerer, J.A. & Russell, A.. (1983). Moral judgment in relation to behavioral and cognitive disorders in adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, vol. 11, no. 4, 503–511.Google Scholar

Sigman, M.D., Kasari, C., Kwon, J.H. & Yirmiya, N.. (1992). Responses to the negative emotions of others by autistic, mentally retarded, and normal children. Child Development, vol. 63, no. 4, 796–807.Google Scholar

Silberman, S. (2000). The Geek syndrome. Wired. www.wired.com/2001/12/aspergers/.

Silberman, S. (2015). Neurotribes: the legacy of autism and the future of neurodiversity. New York, Penguin.

Simmel, G. (1991). Money in modern culture. Theory Culture & Society, vol. 8, no. 3, 17–31.Google Scholar

Simmel, G. (2004). The philosophy of money. London, Routledge.

Simon, H.A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Simondon, G. (1964). L'individu et sa genèse physico-biologique; l'individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d'information. Paris, Presses universitaires de France.

Simondon, G. (1980). On the mode of existence of technical objects. London, Ontario, University of Ontario Press.

Sismondo, S. (2004). An introduction to science and technology studies. Malden, MA, Blackwell Pub.

Skolimowski, H. (1966). The structure of thinking in technology. Technology and Culture, vol. 7, no. 3, 371–383.Google Scholar

Smil, V. (2005). Creating the twentieth century: technical innovations of 1867–1914 and their lasting impact. Oxford; New York, Oxford University Press.

Smith, B. (2003). Ontology. In Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information, ed. Floridi, L., 155–166. Oxford, Blackwell.

Smith, B. & Searle, J.. (2003). An illuminating exchange the construction of social reality. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 62, no. 1, 285–309.Google Scholar

Smith, D.L. & Ginsburg, G.P.. (1989). The social perception process: reconsidering the role of social stimulation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, vol. 19, no. 1, 31–45.Google Scholar

Smith, I.M. & Bryson, S.E.. (1994). Imitation and action in autism: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 116, no. 2, 259–273.Google Scholar

Snyder, A.W. (1998). Breaking mindset. Mind & Language, vol. 13, no. 1, 1–10.Google Scholar

Solow, R.M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 39, no. 3, 312–320.Google Scholar

Soltanzadeh, S. (2015). Humanist and nonhumanist aspects of technologies as problem solving physical instruments. Philosophy & Technology, vol. 28, no. 1, 139–156.Google Scholar

Soltanzadeh, S. (2016). Questioning two assumptions in the metaphysics of technological objects. Philosophy & Technology, vol. 29, no. 2, 127–135.Google Scholar

Stanley, A. (1995). Mothers and daughters of invention: notes for a revised history of technology. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press.

Staudenmaier, J. (1995). Problematic stimulation: historians and sociologists constructing technology studies. In Research in philosophy and technology, social and philosophical constructions of technology, vol. 15, ed. Carl, M.. Greenwich, Connecticut, JAI Press.

Steinert, S. (2015). Taking stock of extension theory of technology. Philosophy & Technology, vol. 29, no. 1, 61–78.Google Scholar

Stewart Millar, M. (1998). Cracking the gender code: who rules the wired world? Toronto, Second Story Press.

Stodgell, C.J., Ingram, J.L. & Hyman, S.L.. (2001). The role of candidate genes in unraveling the genetics of autism. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, vol. 23, 57–81.Google Scholar

Strassmann, W.P. (1974). Technology: a culture trait, a logical category, or virtue itself. Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 8(4), 671–687.Google Scholar

Sturmey, P. (2003). Video technology and persons with autism and other developmental disabilities: an emerging technology for PBS. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, vol. 5, no. 1, 3–4.Google Scholar

Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Suchman, L. (2008). Feminist STS and the sciences of the artificial. In The handbook of science and technology studies, eds. Hackett, E., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M. & Wacjman, J.. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Swallow Richards, E. (1911). The elevation of applied science to an equal rank with the so-called learned professions. In Technology and industrial efficiency: a series of papers presented at the Congress of Technology, 124–128. New York, McGraw Hill.

Taylor, B.A., Hughes, C.E., Richard, E., Hoch, H. & Coello, A. Rodriquez. (2004). Teaching teenagers with autism to seek assistance when lost. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, vol. 37, no. 1, 79–82.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. The review of metaphysics, 3–51.

Turkle, S. (2005). The second self: computers and the human spirit. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

Uddin, L.Q. (2011). The self in autism: an emerging view from neuroimaging. Neurocase, vol. 17, no. 3, 201–208.Google Scholar

Ullman, E. (1997). Close to the machine: technophilia and its discontents: a memoir. San Francisco, City Lights Books.

Vaccari, A. (2013). Artifact dualism, materiality, and the hard problem of ontology: some critical remarks on the dual nature of technical artifacts program. Philosophy & Technology, vol. 26, no. 1, 7–29.Google Scholar

Valenti, S.S. & Gold, J.M.M.. (1991). Social affordances and interaction: introduction. Ecological Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, 77–98.Google Scholar

Vargas, D.L., Nascimbene, C., Krishnan, C., Zimmerman, A.W. & Pardo, C.A.. (2005). Neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism. Annals of neurology, vol. 57, no. 1, 67–81.Google Scholar

Veblen, T. (1908). On the nature of capital (part 1). Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 22, 517–542.Google Scholar

Veblen, T. (1921). The engineers and the price system. New York, B. W. Huebsch.

Vermaas, P.E. & Houkes, W.. (2006). Technical functions: A drawbridge between the intentional and structural natures of technical artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol. 37, no. 1, 5–18.Google Scholar

Vermeulen, P. (2012). Autism as context blindness. Shawnee Mission, Kan., AAPC Pub.

Vincenti, W.G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.

Virilio, P. (2006). Speed and politics. Los Angeles, CA, Semiotext(e).

Vostral, S.L. & McDonough, D.. (2010). A feminist Inventor's Studio. In Feminist technology: women, gender, and technology, eds. Layne, L.L., Vostral, S.L. & Boyer, K., 197–202. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.

Wainer, A.L. & Ingersoll, B.R.. (2011). The use of innovative computer technology for teaching social communication to individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, vol. 5, no. 1, 96–107.Google Scholar

Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. University Park, PA, Pennsylvania State University Press.

Wajcman, J. (2004). TechnoFeminism. Cambridge; Malden, MA, Polity.

Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, 143–152.Google Scholar

Waller, W.T. (1982). The evolution of the Veblenian dichotomy: Vablen, Hamilton, Ayres and Foster. Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 16, no. 3, 757–771.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant work ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York, Scribners.

Weeks, S.J. & Hobson, R.P.. (1987). The salience of facial expression for autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, vol. 28, no. 1, 137–152.Google Scholar

Weitzman, M.L. (1996). Hybridizing growth theory. American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 2, 207–212.Google Scholar

Weitzman, M.L. (1998). Recombinant growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 113, no. 2, 331–360.Google Scholar

Wheelwright, S. & Baron-Cohen, S.. (2001). The link between autism and skills such as engineering, maths, physics and computing: A reply to Jarrold and Routh, Autism, 1998, vol. 2, no. 3, 281–289. Autism, vol. 5, no. 2, 223–227.Google Scholar

Williams, E., Costall, A. & Reddy, V.. (1999). Children with autism experience problems with both objects and people. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 29, no. 5, 367–378.Google Scholar

Williams, R. (1976). Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. London, Croom Helm.

Wing, L. (1974). Children apart: autistic children and their families. Washington, DC, National Society for Children with Adults with Autism.

Winner, L. (1978). Autonomous technology. Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, vol. 109, no. 1, 121–136.Google Scholar

Winner, L. (1983). Technologies as forms of life. In Epistemology, methodology, and the social sciences, eds. Cohen, R. & Wartofsky, M., 249–263. Netherlands, Springer.

Winner, L. (1991). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. In The technology of discovery and discovery of technology, eds. Pitt, J. & Lugo, E.. Blacksburg, VA, Society for the Philosophy of Technology.

Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: the very idea. Chichester, UK, Ellis Horwood.

Woolgar, S. (1991). The turn to technology in social studies of science. Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 16, 20–50.Google Scholar

Von Wright, G.H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. London, Routledge & K. Paul.

Wulff, S.B. (1985). The symbolic and object play of children with autism: a review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 15, no. 2, 139–148.Google Scholar

Young, A.M.H., Chakrabarti, B., Roberts, D., Lai, M.-C., Suckling, J. & Baron-Cohen, S.. (2016). From molecules to neural morphology: understanding neuroinflammation in autism spectrum condition. Molecular Autism, vol. 7, no. 1, 1–8.Google Scholar

Zabel, R.H. & Zabel, M.K.. (1982). Factors in burnout among teachers of exceptional children. Exceptional Children, vol. 49, no. 3, 261–263.Google Scholar