Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T12:14:47.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

10 - Re-composing Schubert

James Wishart
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Music at the University of Liverpool, where he is Head of Composition and Director of the Electro-Acoustic Studio
Get access

Summary

Approaches to Existing Works

It should almost be self-evident that the integrity of a musical work is something of supreme concern to composers. This can sometimes result in extreme over-reaction if a composer suspects that his or her artistic vision is in jeopardy. Perhaps, in this regard, the behaviour of Kaikhosru Sorabji in withdrawing his works from performance for decades, because he could not trust any interpreter to perform them as he wished, can be partially understood. Other composers have prefaced scores, or instructed publishers, with specific prohibitions against unauthorised ‘tampering’ with their works. The more purist generation of composers in the twentieth century might be expected to be more clearly antagonistic towards the business of arrangement and transcription of their scores. Paradoxical as it may seem, this is not completely so, for not only have several composers wished to set out their own works in multiple forms – Ravel's orchestrations of his own piano music constitute one example here, and a more extreme manifestation would perhaps be the type of musical democratisation evident in the multiple dispositions of Percy Grainger's works – but composers have also continued to take up works of others, usually of previous generations, in order to produce new compositions.

Before embarking on the scrutiny of one short operatic excerpt and two self-contained works that are all in some way ‘based’ on pre-existent music of Schubert, I want to spend a short time addressing selectively the variety of approaches and methodologies that some twentieth-century composers have adopted when confronting a musical work by another composer.

The Sympathetic Completion?

Poor Mozart, poor Schubert: if only they had had more time, what other masterpieces they could have composed! Such uncritical nonsense is sometimes heard from commentators, providing a context in which the compulsive score-finisher can flourish. There are limitless temptations in this musical world: the intriguing torso of the final Contrapunctus of Bach's Art of Fugue ; several works of Mozart (including the thorny issue of the Requiem); certain operas (Puccini's Turandot and Berg's Lulu, to name but two); and, eponymously, Schubert's‘Unfinished’ Symphony.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Musical Work
Reality or Invention?
, pp. 205 - 230
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Re-composing Schubert
    • By James Wishart, Lecturer in Music at the University of Liverpool, where he is Head of Composition and Director of the Electro-Acoustic Studio
  • Edited by Michael Talbot
  • Book: The Musical Work
  • Online publication: 28 July 2017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Re-composing Schubert
    • By James Wishart, Lecturer in Music at the University of Liverpool, where he is Head of Composition and Director of the Electro-Acoustic Studio
  • Edited by Michael Talbot
  • Book: The Musical Work
  • Online publication: 28 July 2017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Re-composing Schubert
    • By James Wishart, Lecturer in Music at the University of Liverpool, where he is Head of Composition and Director of the Electro-Acoustic Studio
  • Edited by Michael Talbot
  • Book: The Musical Work
  • Online publication: 28 July 2017
Available formats
×