Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-2tv5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-14T10:05:05.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

6 - Identity Formations: Age and ‘Character’

Helen Yallop
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Defining exactly what was meant by a ‘person’ in an eighteenth-century context has fascinated historians and philosophers alike, and has spawned an impressive historiography. The same conundrum was fascinating for our eighteenth-century forebears. As Felicity Nussbaum explains, ‘in eighteenth century England, “identity”, “self”, “soul” and “person” were dangerous and disputed formations’ that spawned ‘heated rhetorical battles … about the mystery of human identity’. This chapter explores this mystery from one particular angle – an age perspective – and considers a few specific and previously unexplored questions: How did eighteenth-century writers conceive age to affect the notion of the ‘person’ and the ‘character’ of that person? Did changes in character that occurred throughout life and the life cycle mean that people were said to experience multiple identities throughout life? Were these sorts of changes inherently destabilizing to the unit of the individual? By asking these questions, we engage with a key historical debate about formations of identity in eighteenth-century England – the rise of the individual agent, or making of the modern ‘self’. Using age as a lens for investigating the nature of personhood, I argue, challenges the hegemonic historical narrative and draws attention to alternative identity formations still alive in the eighteenth-century imagination.

By using age as a heuristic device, we draw attention to two particular aspects of personhood that scholars have been prone to overlook: the body-centric aspect and the longitudinal, changeable aspect. Nowadays we tend to want to locate personhood and character in mental activity, above the physical caprice of the body. Yet eighteenth-century notions of personhood, as this chapter will demonstrate, continued to be very dependent on the physical self: on configurations flesh and blood. In the eighteenth century, the terms ‘person’ and ‘character’ had physiological meanings quite distinct from the kind of mental conundrums that we associate with them today.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×