Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-06T19:30:38.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of axisymmetric strain on a passive scalar field: modelling and experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

A. GYLFASON  and
Z. WARHAFT
A. GYLFASON*
Affiliation:
School of Science and Engineering, Reykjavik University, IS-103, Reykjavik, Iceland
Z. WARHAFT
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: armann@ru.is
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Homogeneous, approximately isotropic turbulence at two Taylor-scale Reynolds numbers, Rλ=50, 190, with a mean transverse temperature gradient is passed through an axisymmetric contraction. The effects of the straining on the velocity field, and on the passive scalar field, are investigated within the contraction as are the effects of releasing the strain in the post-contraction region. Components of the fluctuating velocity and scalar gradient covariance are measured in order to understand their relation to the large-scale anisotropy of the flow. The scale-dependent spectral evolution of the scalar is also determined. A tensor model is constructed to predict the evolution of the fluctuating scalar gradient covariance. The model constants are determined in the post-contraction relaxation region, where the flow geometry does not vary. The model is shown to perform well throughout the flow, even in the contraction in which the geometry varies. Rapid distortion theory is applied to the scalar field in the contraction, and its solutions are compared to the experimental results.

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 628 , 10 June 2009 , pp. 339 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ayyalasomayajula, S. & Warhaft, Z. 2006 Nonlinear interactions in strained axi-symmetric high-Reynolds-number turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 566, 273–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bilger, R. W. 2004 Some aspects of scalar dissipation. Flow Turb. Combust. 72 (2), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, M. K. & Kim, S. K. 1995 A nonlinear return-to-isotropy model with Reynolds-number and anisotropy dependency. Phys. Fluids 6, 1425–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G. & Corrsin, S. 1966 The use of a contraction to improve the isotropy of grid-generated turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 657–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimotakis, P. E. 2005 Turbulent mixing. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 329–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gylfason, A., Ayyalasomayajula, S. & Warhaft, Z. 2004 Intermittency, pressure and acceleration statistics from hot-wire measurements in wind-tunnel turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 501, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gylfason, A. & Warhaft, Z. 2004 On higher order passive scalar structure functions in grid turbulence. Phys. Fluids 16, 4012–4019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanjalic, 1994 Advanced turbulence closure models: a view of current status and future prospects. J. Heat Fluid Flow 15, 178–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Carruthers, D. J. 1990 Rapid distortion theory and the problems of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 497–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launder, B. E., Reece, G. J. & Rodi, W. 1975 Progress in development of a Reynolds-stress turbulent closure. J. Fluid Mech. 68, 537–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumley, J. L. & Newman, G. R. 1977 Return to isotropy of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 82, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makita, H. 1991 Realization of a large-scale turbulence field in a small wind tunnel. Fluid Dyn. Res. 8, 53–64.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Katz, J. 2000 Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mydlarski, L. & Warhaft, Z. 1996 On the onset of high Reynolds number grid-generated wind-tunnel turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 320, 331–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mydlarski, L. & Warhaft, Z. 1998 Passive scalar statistics in high-Péclet-number grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 358, 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, G. R., Launder, B. E. & Lumley, J. L. 1981 Return to isotropy of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 111, 135–232.Google Scholar
O'Young, F. & Bilger, R. W. 1997 Scalar gradient and related quantities in turbulent premixed flame. Combust. Flames 109 (4), 682–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, N. 1983 Local quenching due to flame stretch and non-premixed turbulent combustion. Combust. Sci. Tech. 30, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 1990 Computations of turbulent combustion: progress and challenges. In 23rd Symp. on Combustion, Pittsburg, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prandtl, L. 1933 Attaining a steady air stream in wind tunnels. TM 726, NACA.Google Scholar
Rahai, H. R. & LaRue, J. C. 1995 The distortion of passive scalar by two-dimensional objects. Phys. Fluids 7 (1), 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, W. C. & Kassinos, S. C. 1995 One-point modelling of rapidly deformed homogeneous turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 451, 87–104.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. M. 1991 The structure of a passive scalar field with a uniform mean gradient in rapidly sheared homogeneous turbulent flow. Phys. Fluids 3 (1), 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotta, J. 1951 Statistische theorie nichthomogener turbulenz. Z. Phys. 129, 547–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savill, A. M. 1987 Recent developments in rapid-distortion theory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19, 531–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirivat, A. & Warhaft, Z. 1983 The effect of a passive cross-stream temperature gradient on the evolution of temperature variance and heat flux in grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 128, 326–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1933 Turbulence in a contracting stream. Zeit. Angew. Math. Mech. 15, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warhaft, Z. 1980 An experimental study of the effect of uniform strain on thermal fluctuations in grid-generated turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 545–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warhaft, Z. 2000 Passive scalars in turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 203–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyngaard, J. C. 1988 The effects of probe-induced flow distortion on atmospheric turbulence measurements: extension to scalars. J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 3400.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar