Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-07T03:09:32.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intraspecific space competition in Halichondria panicea (Porifera: Demospongiae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2025

Polina Manoylina Open the ORCID record for Polina Manoylina [Opens in a new window] ,
Alexander Komendantov ,
Tatiana Shaposhnikova Open the ORCID record for Tatiana Shaposhnikova [Opens in a new window]  and
Vyacvheslav Khalaman Open the ORCID record for Vyacvheslav Khalaman [Opens in a new window]
Polina Manoylina*
Affiliation:
White Sea Biological Station, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Petersburg, Russian Federation
Alexander Komendantov
Affiliation:
White Sea Biological Station, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Petersburg, Russian Federation
Tatiana Shaposhnikova
Affiliation:
Department of Cytology and Histology, Saint-Petersburg State University, Petersburg, Russian Federation
Vyacvheslav Khalaman
Affiliation:
White Sea Biological Station, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Petersburg, Russian Federation
*
Corresponding author: Polina Manoylina; Email: polinamanoilina@yandex.ru
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The spatial competition in the White Sea’s Halichondria panicea sponge was studied through a field experiment assessing growth in isogeneic and allogeneic sponge fragments of equal or different sizes. After 3 months and 1 year in seawater, growth was evaluated using ImageJ software on photographs. Intraspecific competition among allogeneic H. panicea individuals led to a decrease in relative growth, with the size of interacting individuals influencing competitive strategy. Optimal growth occurred when competitors were larger, minimal when sizes were equal, suggesting an alternative competitive strategy in the latter case. Competition between isogeneic individuals of H. panicea was weak or even absent; fusion of isogeneic fragments increased the growth intensity and substrate coverage by the sponge. Analysing the growth directions of sponges, we have found a phenomenon that may be interpreted as an attempt to ‘avoid’ physical contact with a competitor. In the neighbourhood with an allogeneic individual of larger or smaller size, the growth towards the competitor was lower than in other directions, regardless of whether the neighbouring individuals reached contact with each other or not. This may indicate that growth was redirected due to some distant communication mechanisms. The growth of allogeneic and isogeneic explants before contact occurred in a similar manner. Apparently, H. panicea cannot recognize the genetic nature of a competitor at a certain distance.

Keywords

Halichondria paniceaintraspecific competitionmarine spongemodular organismsspace competition

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 105 , 2025 , e72
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adler, PB, Smull, D, Beard, KH, Choi, RT, Furniss, T, Kulmatiski, A and Veblen, KE (2018) Competition and coexistence in plant communities: Intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. Ecology Letters 21(9), 1319–1329.10.1111/ele.13098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aerts, LAM (1998) Sponge/coral interactions in Caribbean reefs: Analysis of overgrowth patterns in relation to species identity and cover. Marine Ecology Progress Series 175, 241–249.10.3354/meps175241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althoff, K, Schütt, C, Steffen, R, Batel, R and Müller, WEG (1998) Evidence for a symbiosis between bacteria of the genus Rhodobacter and the marine sponge Halichondria panicea: Harbor also for putatively toxic bacteria? Marine Biology 130, 529–536.10.1007/s002270050273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, TL and Whiteman, HH (2015) Non‐additive effects of intra‐and interspecific competition between two larval salamanders. Journal of Animal Ecology 84(3), 765–772.10.1111/1365-2656.12335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayling, AL (1983) Growth and regeneration rates in thinly encrusting demospongiae from temperate waters. The Biological Bulletin 165(2), 343–352.10.2307/1541200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, DK and Kuklinski, P (2005) Bipolar patterns of intraspecific competition in bryozoans. Marine Ecology Progress Series 285, 75–87.10.3354/meps285075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, DK and Rothery, P (1996) Competition in encrusting Antarctic bryozoan assemblages: Outcomes, influences and implications. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 196(1–2), 267–284.10.1016/0022-0981(95)00134-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthel, D (1986) On the ecophysiology of the sponge Halichondria panicea in Kiel Bight. I. Substrate specificity, growth, and reproduction. Marine Ecology Progress Series 32(2–3), 291–298.10.3354/meps032291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthel, D and Wolfrath, B (1989) Tissue sloughing in the sponge Halichondria panicea: A fouling organism prevents being fouled. Oecologia 78, 357–360.10.1007/BF00379109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becerro, MA, Turon, X and Uriz, MJ (1995) Natural variation of toxicity in encrusting sponge Crambe crambe (Schmidt) in relation to size and environment. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21, 1931–1946.10.1007/BF02033853CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becerro, MA, Uriz, MJ and Turon, X (1994) Trends in space occupation by the encrusting sponge Crambe crambe: Variation in shape as a function of size and environment. Marine Biology 121, 301–307.10.1007/BF00346738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, V, Dahle, S, Galaktionov, K, Kosobokova, X, Naumov, A, Rat’kova, T, Savinov, V, Savinova, T (2001) White Sea. Ecology and Environmental. St. Petersburg, Tromsø: Derzavets Publisher.Google Scholar
Bone, EK and Keough, MJ (2009) Competition may mediate recovery from damage in an encrusting bryozoan. Marine Ecology 30(3), 333–343.Google Scholar
Bürger, R, Schneider, KA and Willensdorfer, M (2006) The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition. Evolution 60(11), 2185–2206.10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01857.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, LW (1979) Bryozoan overgrowth interactions – The interdependence of competition for space and food. Nature 281(5731), 475–477.10.1038/281475a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, JH and Keough, MJ (1985) Disturbance and patch dynamics of subtidal marine animals on hard substrata. In Pickett, STA and White, PS (eds), The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 125–151.Google Scholar
Connolly, SR and Muko, S (2003) Space preemption, size‐dependent competition, and the coexistence of clonal growth forms. Ecology 84(11), 2979–2988.10.1890/02-0347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalby, JE (1995) Consequences of aggregated living in the ascidian Pyura stolonifera: Evidence for non-contact intraspecific competition. Marine and Freshwater Research 46(8), 1195–1199.10.1071/MF9951195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Voogd, N, Becking, LE, Hoeksema, B, Noor, A and van Soest, R (2003) Sponge interactions with spatial competitors in the Spermonde Archipelago. Bollettino dei Musei e degli istituti Biologici dell’Università di Genova 68, 253–261.Google Scholar
Dhondt, AA (1977) Interspecific competition between great and blue tit. Nature 268(5620), 521–523.10.1038/268521a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, J, Sherman, H and Harris, LG (2007) The role of colonial ascidians in altering biodiversity in marine fouling communities. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 342(1), 169–171.10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyrynda, PEJ (1983) Modular sessile invertebrates contain larvotoxic allelochemicals. Developmental & Comparative Immunology 7(4), 621–624.10.1016/0145-305X(83)90078-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encyclopedia of Life. Breadcrumb Sponge. Halichondria (Halichondria) panicea (Pallas 1766). https://eol.org/pages/1163432 (accessed 23 October 2023).Google Scholar
Ereskovskii, AV (1994) Some peculiarities of inhabitation and distribution of sponges in the intertidal zone of Eastern Murman. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 73(4), 5–17.Google Scholar
Erpenbeck, DIRK (2004) A molecular comparison of Alaskan and North East Atlantic Halichondria panicea (Pallas 1766) (Porifera: Demospongiae) populations. BMIB-Bollettino dei Musei e degli Istituti Biologici 68, 319–325.Google Scholar
Franco, M (1986) The influence of neighbors on the growth of modular organisms with an example from trees. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 313(1159), 209–225.Google Scholar
Gaino, TLE (2005) Competition between the freshwater sponge Ephydatia fluviatilis and the zebra mussel Dreissena polymorpha in Lake Trasimeno (central Italy). Italian Journal of Zoology 72(1), 27–32.10.1080/11250000509356649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gappa, L (1989) Overgrowth competition in an assemblage of encrusting bryozoans settled on artificial substrata. Marine Ecology Progress Series. Oldendorf 51(1), 121–130.10.3354/meps051121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gastaldi, M, Firstater, FN, Romero, MA, Pereyra, PJ and Narvarte, MA (2020) Seasonality dictates changes in the ecological interactions among spatial dominants. Marine Biology 167(12), 176.10.1007/s00227-020-03791-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Rivero, M, Ferrari, R, Schönberg, CH and Mumby, PJ (2012) Impacts of macroalgal competition and parrotfish predation on the growth of a common bioeroding sponge. Marine Ecology Progress Series 444, 133–142.10.3354/meps09424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiñez, R (2005) A review on self-thinning in mussels. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 40(1), 1–6.10.4067/S0718-19572005000100001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, VR and Hughes, TP (1996) Reproductive strategies of modular organisms: Comparative studies of reef-building corals. Ecology 77(3), 950–963.10.2307/2265514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvell, CD (1986) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses in a marine bryozoan: Cues, costs, and consequences. The American Naturalist 128(6), 810–823.10.1086/284607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, R and Peattie, ME (1979) The sublittoral ecology of the Menai Strait: I. Temporal and spatial variation in the fauna and flora along a transect. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 9(6), 663–675.10.1016/S0302-3524(79)80001-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, RN and Griffiths, CL (1988) Self-thinning in barnacles and mussels: The geometry of packing. The American Naturalist 132(4), 484–491.10.1086/284866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huysecom, E (1990) The Neolithic facies of the Baoulé, Mali. Nyame Akuma-Bulletin of the Society of Africanist Archaeologists 34, 22–25.Google Scholar
Jackson, JBC (1977) Competition on marine hard substrata: The adaptive significance of solitary and colonial strategies. The American Naturalist 111(980), 743–767.10.1086/283203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, JBC (1979a) Morphological strategies of sessile animals. In Rosen, B and Larwood, G (eds), Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms. London: Academic Press, pp. 499–555.Google Scholar
Jackson, JBC and Coates, AG (1986) Life cycles and evolution of clonal (modular) animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 313(1159), 7–22.Google Scholar
Karande, AA and Swami, BS (1988). Overgrowth competitions amongst encrusting cheilostomes. Proceedings: Animal Sciences 97, 141–149.Google Scholar
Khalaman, VV, Belyaeva, DV and Flyachinskaya, LP (2008) Effect of excretory-secretory products of some fouling organisms on settling and metamorphosis of the larvae of Styela rustica (Ascidiae). Russian Journal of Marine Biology 34, 170–173.10.1134/S106307400803005XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalaman, VV and Komendantov, AY (2011) Structure of fouling communities formed by Halichondria panicea (Porifera: Demospongiae) in the White Sea. Russian Journal of Ecology 42, 493–501.10.1134/S1067413611050080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalaman, VV and Komendantov, AY (2016) Experimental study of the ability of the sponge Halichondria panicea (Porifera: Demospongiae) to compete for a substrate in shallow-water fouling communities of the White Sea. Biology Bulletin 43, 69–74.10.1134/S1062359015060059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalaman, VV, Korchagina, NM and Komendantov, AY (2014) The impact of waterborne cues from conspecifics and other species on the larvae of Halichondria panacea Pallas, 1766 (Porifera: Demospongiae). Russian Journal of Marine Biology 40, 36–42.10.1134/S1063074014010064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalaman, VV, Sharov, AN, Kholodkevich, SV, Komendantov, AY and Kuznetsova, TV (2017) Influence of the White Sea sponge Halichondria panicea (Pallas, 1766) on physiological state of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis (Linnaeus, 1758), as evaluated by heart rate characteristics. Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology 53, 225–232.10.1134/S0022093017030073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khodakovskaya, AV (2005) Fauna of sponges (Porifera) of Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Marine Biology 31(4), 251–255. In Russian.Google Scholar
Kleunen, MV, Fischer, M and Schmid, B (2001) Effects of intraspecific competition on size variation and reproductive allocation in a clonal plant. Oikos 94(3), 515–524.10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.940313.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowlton, AL and Highsmith, RC (2000) Convergence in the time-space continuum: A predator-prey interaction. Marine Ecology Progress Series 197, 285–291.10.3354/meps197285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konar, B and Iken, K (2005) Competitive dominance among sessile marine organisms in a high Arctic Boulder community. Polar Biology 29, 61–64.10.1007/s00300-005-0055-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauer, TE and Spacie, A (2004) Space as a limiting resource in freshwater systems: Competition between zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and freshwater sponges (Porifera). Hydrobiologia 517, 137–145.10.1023/B:HYDR.0000027342.31716.9aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leichter, JJ and Witman, JD (1997) Water flow over subtidal rock walls: Relation to distributions and growth rates of sessile suspension feeders in the Gulf of Maine Water flow and growth rates. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 209(1–2), 293–307.10.1016/S0022-0981(96)02702-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liess, M and Foit, K (2010) Intraspecific competition delays recovery of population structure. Aquatic Toxicology 97(1), 15–22.10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.11.018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marfenin, NN (1997). Adaptation capabilities of marine modular organisms. In Interactions and Adaptation Strategies of Marine Organisms: Proceedings of the 31st European Marine Biology Symposium, held in St. Petersburg, Russia, 9–13 September 1996, pp. 153–158. Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-017-1907-0_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Márquez, JC, Zea, S and López-Victoria, M (2006) Is competition for space between the encrusting excavating sponge Cliona tenuis and corals influenced by higher-than-normal temperatures? Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras-Invemar 35(1), 259–265.Google Scholar
Maughan, BC and Barnes, DK (2000) Seasonality of competition in early development of subtidal encrusting communities. Marine Ecology 21(3–4), 205–220.10.1046/j.1439-0485.2000.00703.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinig, DW and Jackson, JB (1979) The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, PE (1990) Space versus other limiting resources for a colonial tunicate, Botrylloides leachii (Savigny), on fouling plates. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 141(1), 47–52.10.1016/0022-0981(90)90156-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, RT (1984) Ecological determinism in the competition for space: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture. Ecology 65(5), 1339–1348.10.2307/1939114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pansini, M and Pronzato, R (1990) Observations on the dynamics of a Mediterranean sponge community. In: Rutzler, K. (ed.), New Perspectives in Sponge Biology. Smithsonian Institute Press: London, 404–415.Google Scholar
Pawlik, JR, Chanas, B, Toonen, RJ and Fenical, W (1995) Defenses of Caribbean sponges against predatory reef fish. I. Chemical deterrency. Marine Ecology Progress Series 127, 183–194.10.3354/meps127183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, JW and Targett, NM (1988) Allelochemical interactions between sponges and corals. The Biological Bulletin 175(2), 230–239.10.2307/1541563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proksch, P (1994) Defensive roles for secondary metabolites from marine sponges and sponge-feeding nudibranchs. Toxicon 32(6), 639–655.10.1016/0041-0101(94)90334-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purushottama, GB, Venkateshvaran, K, Pani Prasad, K and Nalini, P (2009) Bioactivities of extracts from the marine sponge Halichondria panicea. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases 15, 444–459.10.1590/S1678-91992009000300007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, S and Snyder, MJ (2001) Competition for space among sessile marine invertebrates: Changes in HSP70 expression in two Pacific cnidarians. The Biological Bulletin 201(3), 385–393.10.2307/1543616CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russ, GR (1982) Overgrowth in a marine epifaumal community: Competitive hierarchies and competitive networks. Oecologia 53, 12–19.10.1007/BF00377130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rützler, K (1970) Spatial competition among Porifera: Solution by epizoism. Oecologia 5(2), 85–95.10.1007/BF00347624CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saito, Y (2013) Self and nonself recognition in a marine sponge. Halichondria Japonica (Demospongiae). Zoological Science 30(8), 651–657.Google Scholar
Schneemann, I, Nagel, K, Kajahn, I, Labes, A, Wiese, J and Imhoff, JF (2010) Comprehensive investigation of marine Actinobacteria associated with the sponge Halichondria panicea. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76(11), 3702–3714.10.1128/AEM.00780-10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoener, TW (1973) Population growth regulated by intraspecific competition for energy or time: Some simple representations. Theoretical Population Biology 4(1), 56–84.10.1016/0040-5809(73)90006-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebens, KP (1986) Spatial relationships among encrusting marine organisms in the New England subtidal zone. Ecology Monographs 56, 73–96.10.2307/2937271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shenk, MA (1991) Allorecognition in the colonial marine hydroid Hydractinia (Cnidaria/Hydrozoa). American Zoologist 31(3), 549–557. doi:10.1093/icb/31.3.549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A and Thakur, NL (2015) Field and laboratory investigations of budding in the tetillid sponge Cinachyrella cavernosa. Invertebrate Biology 134(1), 19–30.10.1111/ivb.12074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, TW (1979) Intraspecific competition and population structure in rotifers. Ecology 60(3), 494–502.10.2307/1936069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbing, ARD (1973) Competition for space between the epiphytes of Fucus serratus L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 53(2), 247–261.10.1017/S0025315400022244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, LJ (1991) Effects of size and shape of colony on rates of fission, fusion, growth and mortality in a subtidal invertebrate. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 149(2), 161–175.10.1016/0022-0981(91)90043-VCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swearingen, DC III and Pawlik, JR (1998) Variability in the chemical defense of the sponge Chondrilla nucula against predatory reef fishes. Marine Biology 131, 619–627.10.1007/s002270050354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomassen, S and Riisgård, HU (1995) Growth and energetics of the sponge Halichondria panicea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 128, 239–246.10.3354/meps128239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turon, X (1990) Distribution and abundance of ascidians from a locality on the Northeast Coast of Spain. Marine Ecology 11(4), 291–308.10.1111/j.1439-0485.1990.tb00385.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turon, X and Becerro, MA (1992) Growth and survival of several ascidian species from the northwestern Mediterranean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 82, 235–247.10.3354/meps082235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turon, X, Becerro, MA and Uriz, MJ (1996) Seasonal patterns of toxicity in benthic invertebrates: The encrusting sponge Crambe crambe (Poecilosclerida). Oikos 75, 33–40.10.2307/3546318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, JL (2005) Trade‐offs in resistance to competitors and predators, and their effects on the diversity of tropical marine sponges. Journal of Animal Ecology 74(2), 313–321.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00925.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobel, M, Öpik, M, Moora, M and Pärtel, M (2006) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: It is time for dispersal experiments. Journal of Vegetation Science 17(4), 543–547.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02477.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar