Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T11:53:51.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE FIRST RADIOCARBON-DATED REMAINS OF THE LEOPARD PANTHERA PARDUS (LINNAEUS, 1758) FROM THE PLEISTOCENE OF POLAND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2022

Adrian Marciszak Open the ORCID record for Adrian Marciszak [Opens in a new window] ,
Grzegorz Lipecki ,
Wiktoria Gornig ,
Lena Matyaszczyk ,
Oliwia Oszczepalińska ,
Dariusz Nowakowski  and
Sahra Talamo
Adrian Marciszak*
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeozoology, University of Wrocław, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland
Grzegorz Lipecki
Affiliation:
Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Sławkowska 17, 31-016 Kraków, Poland
Wiktoria Gornig
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeozoology, University of Wrocław, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland
Lena Matyaszczyk
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeozoology, University of Wrocław, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland
Oliwia Oszczepalińska
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeozoology, University of Wrocław, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland
Dariusz Nowakowski
Affiliation:
Division of Anthropology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Kożuchowska 5, 51-631 Wrocław, Poland
Sahra Talamo
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry Giacomo Ciamician, University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, Bologna, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: adrian.marciszak@uwr.edu.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Pleistocene history of the leopard (Panthera pardus) in Europe has been documented by the material obtained from 312 localities, with the last dated ∼1.1 Myr. The relatively small and gracile form of the leopard was very rare during the late Early and Middle Pleistocene. Only after the disappearance of the jaguar (Panthera gombaszoegensis) did P. pardus spread widely in Europe, increasing in size and ecologically substituting P. gombaszoegensis. The number of late Middle Pleistocene localities with leopard remains, younger than 300 kyr, increased considerably. The leopard reached the maximum extension of its geographical range in the Late Pleistocene. The Iberian Peninsula was the last European refuge for this cat. Six sites, the Naciekowa, Obok Wschodniej, Radochowska, and Wschodnia Caves from the Sudety Mountains and the Biśnik and Dziadowa Skała Caves from the Kraków-Częstochowa Upland, have documented the presence of the leopard in Poland between MIS 10/9 and MIS 3. These records are from rocky regions with rugged terrain and are located in the territory of Silesia (southern Poland). A newly obtained radiocarbon date (43–42 kyr) from the Radochowska Cave directly confirms the occurrence of P. pardus in the Sudety Mountains in the middle part of MIS 3.

Keywords

competitionleopardoccurrencePleistocenerelictsurvival
Type
Conference Paper
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 64 , Issue 6: 3rd Radiocarbon in the Environment Conference Gliwice, Poland, July 5–9, 2021 , December 2022 , pp. 1359 - 1372
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

INTRODUCTION

The leopard (Panthera pardus) appeared in Europe as a newcomer of African origin 1.2–1.1 Myr ago, with the oldest record known from the Vallonnet Cave (Moullé Reference Moullé1992; Turner Reference Turner2009; Michel et al. Reference Michel, Shen, Woodhead, Hu, Wu, Moullé, Khatib, Cauche, Moncel, Valensi, Chou, Gallet, Echassoux, Orange and Hd2017). O’Regan (Reference O’Regan2002) highlighted that the arrival of P. pardus in Europe might have placed pressure on the jaguar (Panthera gombaszoegensis). The leopard would have focused on smaller animals, which were at the lower end of the jaguar prey size range (Hemmer Reference Hemmer2003, Reference Hemmer, Baquedano and Rubio2004). An unanswered question is why, despite its enormous environmental and hunting adaptability, the occurrence of P. pardus in the Middle Pleistocene is limited to a few sites (von Koenigswald et al. Reference von Koenigswald, Nagel and Menger2006). At the same time, the leopard was widespread in Africa and Asia (Geraads Reference Geraads2008; Geraads et al. Reference Geraads, Raynal and Sbihi-Alaoui2010). It was present in Europe until the end of the Late Pleistocene, even during the very cold and continental climatic phase after the glaciation (Spassov and Raychev Reference Spassov and Raychev1997). O’Regan and Turner (Reference O’Regan and Turner2004) described P. pardus of the Middle Pleistocene as a relatively small cat of a gracile posture and with narrow teeth. The small size of the early leopard may have been a response to reduce competition with other large carnivores (mostly the jaguar) in the areas where these two species coexisted (Nowell and Jackson Reference Nowell and Jackson1996; Hemmer Reference Hemmer2001, Reference Hemmer, Baquedano and Rubio2004; García and Virgós Reference García and Virgós2007; Marciszak and Lipecki Reference Marciszak and Lipecki2021). Only after the disappearance of the jaguar did P. pardus spread widely in Europe, increasing in size and ecologically substituting P. gombaszoegensis (García and Virgós Reference García and Virgós2007; Marciszak and Lipecki Reference Marciszak and Lipecki2021). The number of late Middle Pleistocene localities with leopard remains, younger than 300 kyr, increased considerably (Diedrich Reference Diedrich2013; Sauqué and Cuenca-Bescós Reference Sauqué and Cuenca-Bescós2013). The leopard reached the maximum extension of its geographical range during the Late Pleistocene. The spread of P. pardus was accompanied by a trend for a size increase, when the initially relatively small and gracile leopard had become larger in size and weight. The size of the largest Late Pleistocene specimens is comparable to that of the small Middle Pleistocene jaguar, and they held the ecological niche that had been occupied by P. gombaszoegensis (Hemmer Reference Hemmer, Baquedano and Rubio2004; García and Virgós Reference García and Virgós2007).

There is a small number of direct dates of P. pardus, like that of the Radochowska Cave (Diedrich Reference Diedrich2013; Sauqué and Cuenca-Bescós Reference Sauqué and Cuenca-Bescós2013; Sauqué et al. Reference Sauqué, Sanchis and Madurell Malapeira2017). Every new date is critical to obtain a thorough understanding of the history of the evolution of a species such as the leopard, which is known from numerous sites, but usually only represented by sparse material at each site. In thus study, we have dated a leopard sample from the Radochowska Cave. Apart from the new date we have obtained, in addition to the first record of the leopard from Poland (Marciszak et al. Reference Marciszak, Krajcarz, Krajcarz and Stefaniak2011a, Reference Marciszak, Socha, Nadachowski and Stefaniak2011b), the list of Polish localities with remains of this species has recently increased to six cave sites. We briefly discus some palaeoecological aspects of this species and possible reasons for its final disappearance from the territory of Europe.

SITE

Radochowska Cave (50°21'31"N, 16°49'9"E; 460–468 m above sea level), is a karst, 265-m-long cave developed in the lenticular marble at the foot of Mount Bzowiec in the Złote Mountains (eastern Sudety Mountains, southwest Poland). Radochowska Cave was formed during the Pliocene by the leaching of water-soluble marbles in a lens of white marble, partly in contact with schist (grey-yellow, friable rock). It was formed under the erosion made by water filling the entire cross-section of its passages flowing under high pressure. The intensification of erosion of the surrounding slopes at the end of the Pliocene led to deepening of the valley. This caused the channel of a nearby flowing stream to lower (Pulina Reference Pulina1996). A decrease in the karst water level led to dehydration of the area near the cave opening and the formation of hollows. Corridors have been developed along tectonic fissures, and larger halls have been formed at their intersections. In the corridors drained in this way, the alluvial deposition process has begun. The alluvium in the site consists of weathered schist that falls from the cave ceiling and walls, rubble, precipitated calcium carbonate and organic material like animal bones deposited by water from the surface. The alluvium has almost completely filled the cave chambers and passages.

The locality has been known for more than 300 years (Kahlo Reference Kahlo1757; Ostrowicz Reference Ostrowicz1881). Shortly afterwards, it became a popular destination for spa patients from Lądek-Zdrój and tourists. From 1933 to 1947, the cave had a permanent custodian and guide, the retired miner Heinrich Peregrin. He also removed a significant part of the sediment while preparing the cave for visits and opening its corridors. Systematic excavations were carried out by J. Frenzel in 1935 and by L. Zotz in 1936. Brown and grey loams represented deposits of this cave with limestone rubble (Utescher Reference Utescher and Zotz1939). L. Zotz also found quartzite products and pine wood charcoal. In one of the niches, he also found a cave bear’s skull with the mandible and three cervical vertebrae. This gave rise to assumptions about the presence of the Paleolithic people in the cave and created a theory of a “bear cult among Paleolithic people” (Zotz Reference Zotz1937a, Reference Zotz1937b, Reference Zotz1939, Reference Zotz1951). The excavations in 1983 were taken to check the results of German studies from the 1930s, and this theory is no longer supported (Bieroński et al. Reference Bieroński, Burdukiewicz and Wiszniowska1985; Wiśniewski et al. Reference Wiśniewski, Stefaniak, Wojtal, Zych, Nadachowski, Musil, Badura and Przybylski2009; Marciszak et al. Reference Marciszak, Sobczyk, Kasprzak, Gornig, Ratajczak, Wiśniewski and Stefaniak2020). Unfortunately, most of the bone remains from the pre-Second World War studies have been lost, and thus only a small part could be re-examined. These excavations have revealed two main faunal assemblages. The older, Late Pleistocene fauna is roughly dated at MIS 3, and it contains 23 species (Table 1, Table S2). The second, younger assemblage is dated at MIS 1 and includes 30 species (Table S2; Frenzel Reference Frenzel1936, Reference Frenzel1937a, Reference Frenzel1937b; Pax Reference Pax1937; Zotz Reference Zotz1937a, Reference Zotz1937b, Reference Zotz1939, Reference Zotz1951; Kowalski Reference Kowalski1954; Bieroński et al. Reference Bieroński, Burdukiewicz and Wiszniowska1985, Reference Bieroński, Socha and Stefaniak2007, Reference Bieroński, Burdukiewicz, Socha, Stefaniak, Hercman and Nadachowski2009; Pulina Reference Pulina1996; Stefaniak and Bieroński Reference Stefaniak and Bieroński2009; Wiśniewski et al. Reference Wiśniewski, Stefaniak, Wojtal, Zych, Nadachowski, Musil, Badura and Przybylski2009; Marciszak et al. Reference Marciszak, Stefaniak and Gornig2016, Reference Marciszak, Sobczyk, Kasprzak, Gornig, Ratajczak, Wiśniewski and Stefaniak2020; 2021a, Reference Marciszak, Kropczyk and Lipecki2021b, Reference Marciszak, Lipecki, Pawłowska, Jakubowski, Ratajczak-Skrzatek and Nadachowski2021c).

SAMPLES AND METHODOLOGY

The leopard sample from the Radochowska Cave used for dating was taken from a fragment of a left mandible (JR/Pp/1), with preserved p4 alveolus and worn m1, stored in the Department of Palaeozoology, University of Wrocław (Figure 1, Table 2). The sample was pretreated at the Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (MPI-EVA), Leipzig, Germany, using the method described by Talamo and Richards (Reference Talamo and Richards2011) and Talamo et al. (Reference Talamo, Fewlass, Maria and Jaouen2021). The outer surface of bone samples is first cleaned by a shot blaster and then 500 mg of whole bone is taken. The samples are then decalcified in 0.5 M HCl at room temperature until no CO2 effervescence is observed. Then, 0.1 M NaOH is added for 30 min to remove humics. The NaOH step is followed by a final 0.5 M HCl step for 15 min. The resulting solid is gelatinized as described by Longin (Reference Longin1971) at pH 3 in a heater block at 75°C for 20 hr. The gelatine is then filtered in an Eeze-Filter™ (Elkay Laboratory Products [UK] Ltd.) to remove small (> 80 μm) particles. The gelatine is then ultrafiltered with Sartorius “VivaspinTurbo” 30 kDa ultrafilters. Prior to use, the filter is cleaned to remove carbon-containing humectants (Talamo et al. Reference Talamo, Fewlass, Maria and Jaouen2021). The samples are lyophilized for 48 hr. The date was corrected for a residual preparation background estimated from a pretreated 14C-free bone sample, kindly provided by the Mannheim laboratory and pretreated in the same way as archaeological samples (Korlević et al. Reference Korlević, Talamo and Meyer2018). To identify the quality of the collagen, the C:N ratio was also estimated. It should be between 2.9 and 3.6, and the collagen yield should not be < 1% of the weight (van Klinken Reference van Klinken1999; Talamo et al. Reference Talamo, Fewlass, Maria and Jaouen2021). Stable isotopic analysis was performed at MPI-EVA, Leipzig (Lab Code R-EVA), using a ThermiFinnigan Flash EA with a Delta V isotope ratio mass spectrometer. The sample was sent to the Curt Engelhorn Centre for Archaeometry (CEZA) in Mannheim, Germany (lab code MAMS), where it was graphitized and dated (Kromer et al. Reference Kromer, Lindauer, Synal and Wacker2013). All new dates were calibrated by using the program IntCal20, according to Reimer et al. (Reference Reimer, Austin, Bard, Bayliss, Blackwell, Bronk Ramsey, Butzin, Cheng, Edwards, Friedrich, Grootes, Guilderson, Hajdas, Heaton, Hogg, Hughen, Kromer, Manning, Muscheler, Palmer, Pearson, van der Plicht, Reimer, Scott, Southon, Turney, Wacker, Adolphi, Büntgen, Capano, Fahrni, Fogtmann-Schulz, Friedrich, Köhler, Kudsk, Miyake, Olsen, Reining, Sakamoto, Sookdeo and Talamo2020).

Figure 1 Radiocarbon dated specimen of Panthera pardus from Radochowska Cave: 1. fragment of a left mandible (JR/Pp/1, a—buccal view, b—occlusal view); 2. left m1 belonging to the same specimen (a—buccal view, b—lingual view). Scale bar 10 mm.

RESULTS

Although the dated bone fragment was relatively small, a precise date was acquired (MAMS-42394 in Table 1). The date indicates the middle part of MIS 3 (∼43–42 kyr BP). Three more dates were obtained that also fall within the range of MIS 3. The subfossil, a brightly colored and light rib of Ursus arctos arctos, was dated to the Romanian period (∼1.8–1.7 kyr BP). These dates confirmed the presence of two different faunal assemblages, dated at MIS 3 (older) and MIS 1 (younger). Both assemblages were partially mixed, although bones dated at MIS 3 are grey, brown or black; deeply mineralized; and heavy. Subfossil bones dated at MIS 1 are white or bright grey, lightly mineralized and delicate. These findings confirm the conclusions of Bieroński et al. (Reference Bieroński, Burdukiewicz and Wiszniowska1985, Reference Bieroński, Burdukiewicz, Socha, Stefaniak, Hercman and Nadachowski2009) about the mixed character of a part of the sediments in the Radochowska Cave, partial redeposition and a significant role of outside transport in the formation of cave sediments.

DISCUSSION

Polish Records of Panthera pardus Based on the European Background

A broad query revealed the presence of the leopard at 312 European sites, which cover the timespan of the last ca. 1.1 Myr (Figure 2, Table S1). The list of Polish localities with leopard remains has recently increased to six cave sites. Among them, four are located in the Sudety Mountains (the Naciekowa, Obok Wschodniej, Radochowska, and Wschodnia Caves) and two others are located in the Kraków-Częstochowa Upland (the Biśnik and Dziadowa Skała Caves). All records are from rocky regions with rugged terrain convenient for ambushes and hiding, and all of them are located on the territory of Silesia (southern Poland). There is a small number of direct dates of P. pardus, like the date we have obtained for the Radochowska Cave sample (e.g., Diedrich Reference Diedrich2013; Sauqué and Cuenca-Bescós Reference Sauqué and Cuenca-Bescós2013).

Figure 2 Distribution of the Pleistocene and the Holocene sites with Panthera pardus within Europe and southwest Asia. See Table S1 for site numbers. The greenish color indicates the areas where the leopard occurred in historical times and where the extant isolated populations currently living. (After Jacobson et al. Reference Jacobson, Gerngross, Lemeris, Schoonover, Anco, Breitenmoser-Würsten, Durant, Farhadinia, Henschel, Kamler, Laguardia, Rostro-García, Stein and Dollar2016. Please see electronic version for color figures.)

The presence of the leopard during MIS 3 at the Sudety Mountains had already been suggested (Marciszak et al. Reference Marciszak, Stefaniak and Gornig2016, Reference Marciszak, Sobczyk, Kasprzak, Gornig, Ratajczak, Wiśniewski and Stefaniak2020), but our direct dating has confirmed it. Other Polish records indicate the presence of this species since the late Middle Pleistocene, as confirmed by the study of remains from the lowermost layers 19a–d of the Biśnik Cave, dated at MIS 10/9 (Marciszak et al. Reference Marciszak, Krajcarz, Krajcarz and Stefaniak2011a, Reference Marciszak, Socha, Nadachowski and Stefaniak2011b). Between MIS 7 and MIS 3, P. pardus was probably present as a rare hunter in Poland. No younger individuals have been found, so nothing is known about the species survival or re-colonization in the Polish territory during the Late Glacial or Holocene. However, this problem with the reconstruction of the European history of P. pardus, due to the nearly complete absence of direct dates of its remains, hampers a detailed time resolution of the leopard distribution in Europe (Pacher and Rabeder Reference Pacher and Rabeder2016). The two oldest dates, 88.5 kyr (LEB-14069) and 98.4 kyr (LEB-14070), obtained directly from the remains of a leopard from the Spanish site Artazu VII and based on the amino acid racemization (AAR) method, documented the presence of the species during MIS 5b (Suárez-Bilbao et al. Reference Suárez-Bilbao, Garcia-Ibaibarriaga, Castaños, Castaños, Iriarte-Chiapusso, Arrizabalaga, Torrese, Ortize and Murelaga2016). Three other dates from Baumann’s Cave (Germany) and one from the Equi Cave (Italy) also fall into MIS 3 (Table 2). Two conventional dates from the Vraona Cave (Greece) have documented the presence of this species during the MIS 3/MIS 2 transition and MIS 2 (Nagel Reference Nagel1999). These data corroborate well with the occurrence of the Balkan refugee of the species during cool phases—for example, the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). It also corresponds well with the idea that the leopard seems to have survived up to the LGM in southern and eastern parts of Europe. The history of the last European leopards is still incomplete. The supposed Holocene survival of P. pardus in Europe is still highly unresolved and based on quite unclear records—for example, Spassov and Raychev (Reference Spassov and Raychev1997), Bartosiewicz (Reference Bartosiewicz, Buitenhuis and Prummel2001, Reference Bartosiewicz2015), and Galik et al. (Reference Galik, Horejs and Nessel2012). It is difficult to reconstruct the last occurrence and extinction of P. pardus in Europe. The two imprecisely dated records, one Mesolithic from northern Spain (Altuna Reference Altuna1972) and the second from Greece (Nagel Reference Nagel1999), are two indicators that the species could have survived there until the Holocene (Sommer and Benecke Reference Sommer and Benecke2006; Sauqué and Cuenca-Bescós Reference Sauqué and Cuenca-Bescós2013). The leopard retreated from Europe eastward and south-eastward, but this process has been poorly documented. In western Europe, the Iberian population remained detached from the rest. Multiple post-LGM records indicate their presence and eventual survival until the Middle Holocene in the Iberian Peninsula (Vega del Sella Reference Vega del Sella1930; Altuna Reference Altuna1972; Sauqué and Cuenca-Bescós Reference Sauqué and Cuenca-Bescós2013). This area seems to have been the last refuge for the European leopard, similarly to the last European dhole Cuon alpinus europaeus Bourguignat, 1868 (Pérez Ripoll et al. Reference Pérez Ripoll, Morales Pérez, Serra, Aura Tortosa and Sarrión Montañana2010; Sanchis et al. Reference Sanchis, Real, Sauqué, Núñez-Lahuerta, Égüez, Tormo, Pérez Ripoll, Carrión Marco, Duarte and la Rasilla2019, Reference Sanchis, Gómez-Olivencia, Real, Boudadi-Maligne and Mallye2020; Marciszak et al. Reference Marciszak, Kropczyk and Lipecki2021b).

Disappearance of P. pardus in Europe: a Working Hypothesis

The Polish fossil record is highly incomplete and, for this reason, the species succession history in Poland should be treated with caution. The presence of P. pardus in Poland was restricted to highland and mountain areas of Silesia. This animal probably avoided open, extensive Bohemian, Moravian, and Silesian grasslands because of the presence of other large, fast-moving and social carnivores, like the steppe wolf or the cave hyena. Both species constituted a serious threat for a solitary cat, especially when trees or other potential shelters were absent or very rare (Eaton Reference Eaton1979).

Regarding the disappearance of the leopard in Europe, the key questions are not only when but also why. First, we must clearly state that our discussion is based on hypotheses and not proven facts. Only positive evidence is reliable in palaeontology due to the incompleteness of the fossil record. The absence of leopard remains in some regions or chronological intervals does not necessarily mean that they were absent from the surroundings. It is possible that the remains were not preserved or have not yet been identified or excavated. Sudeten cave regions favor fossil bone preservation, but open, extensive Bohemian, Moravian, and Silesian grasslands do not. Hence, only knowing the geographic or chronological distribution of the localities is not enough to draw conclusions about the distribution of past populations. Second, the deductions on population replacements over time and on interspecies relationships are difficult to support by using only the fossil record. Genetics and/or isotopic dating are crucial to conclude about ecological relationships.

The leopard is an extremely adaptive carnivore: it is now able to inhabit highly urbanized areas. Unlike, for example, the lion, the progressive warming and the associated increase in afforestation should have no negative impact on the leopard population (Nagel et al. Reference Nagel, Lindenbauer, Kavcik-Graumann and Rabeder2018). On the contrary, forested areas gave it shelter and the density of potential prey—for example, deer, which was quite sufficient. P. pardus probably found a favorable ecological niche in the Sudety Mountains during the Late Pleistocene, when there were coniferous forests with some number of deciduous trees growing mostly in valleys during warmer periods. The presence of trees is an important factor for their environment, while deep snow cover is a limiting one (Heptner and Naumov Reference Heptner and Naumov1967; Jacobson et al. Reference Jacobson, Gerngross, Lemeris, Schoonover, Anco, Breitenmoser-Würsten, Durant, Farhadinia, Henschel, Kamler, Laguardia, Rostro-García, Stein and Dollar2016). However, even if the presence of trees is one of the crucial factors for this species, the ecologically extremely flexible leopard could have been adapted even for the coolest phases of the Late Pleistocene (i.e., the LGM), which was characterized by nearly treeless and rocky habitats (Nagel Reference Nagel1999). Despite the fact that P. pardus is not a typical cave dweller, recent leopards use caves to catch their prey to avoid competitors like lions and spotted hyenas in treeless regions (Brain Reference Brain1981; de Ruiter and Berger Reference de Ruiter and Berger2000, Reference de Ruiter and Berger2001; Hayward et al. Reference Hayward, Henschel, O’Brian, Hofmeyr, Balme and Kerley2006; Diedrich Reference Diedrich2013; Yang et al. Reference Yang, Zhao, Han, Wang, Mou, Ge and Feng2018). In African cave regions, up to 33% of the carcasses are dragged by leopards into deeper cave parts to avoid conflicts with lions and hyenas. Simultaneously, only 7% of prey remains were pulled up into trees, which were located more than 500 m from those caves. In cases where trees grow near the entrances, 83% of carcasses were stored in caves and only 17% in trees (de Ruiter and Berger Reference de Ruiter and Berger2001; Diedrich Reference Diedrich2013). Leopards drag even larger carcasses very deeply into caves, especially to avoid stealing by hyenas, which cannot climb slopes within those caves (de Ruiter and Berger Reference de Ruiter and Berger2001; Diedrich Reference Diedrich2013). If possible, they usually preferred small rock shelters with narrow entrances that made them less accessible to lions. In that context, the area of the Sudety Mountains, full of such small rock shelters, can be regarded as a potential preferable habitat for the leopard.

According to Diedrich (Reference Diedrich2013: 189), this ibex/chamois/deer prey–adapted felid is extremely rare in lowlands. The remains of P. pardus have not been found in any of the open-air faunal assemblages in Poland (Wolsan Reference Wolsan1989; Marciszak et al. Reference Marciszak, Kotowski, Przybylski, Badura, Wiśniewski and Stefaniak2019). This scenario has already been discussed for Balkan sites, where the situation is similar to those in Silesia and the Sudety Mountains (Spassov and Raychev Reference Spassov and Raychev1997). This cat also preferred rocky regions with a rugged terrain that are convenient for ambushes and hiding (Heptner and Sludskij Reference Heptner and Sludskij1972; Spassov and Raychev Reference Spassov and Raychev1997; Jacobson et al. Reference Jacobson, Gerngross, Lemeris, Schoonover, Anco, Breitenmoser-Würsten, Durant, Farhadinia, Henschel, Kamler, Laguardia, Rostro-García, Stein and Dollar2016). The leopard lived in relatively low densities while the density of the wolf population is high (Heptner and Sludskij Reference Heptner and Sludskij1972; Sludskij Reference Sludskij1976; Spassov and Raychev Reference Spassov and Raychev1997). The lowlands surrounding the Sudety Mountains (Bohemian, Moravian, and Silesian) were overwhelmed by packs of robust steppe wolves, whose remains have been recorded regularly from open-air sites (Herr Reference Herr1924; Kowalski Reference Kowalski1959; Wiśniewski et al. Reference Wiśniewski, Stefaniak, Wojtal, Zych, Nadachowski, Musil, Badura and Przybylski2009; Marciszak et al. Reference Marciszak, Kotowski, Przybylski, Badura, Wiśniewski and Stefaniak2019, Reference Marciszak, Sobczyk, Kasprzak, Gornig, Ratajczak, Wiśniewski and Stefaniak2020). In addition, the presence of wolves might be a limiting factor, because as a solitary hunter, the leopard usually avoided aggressive competitions with large dogs (Heptner and Sludskij Reference Heptner and Sludskij1972; Eaton Reference Eaton1979; Spassov and Raychev Reference Spassov and Raychev1997; Miquelle et al. Reference Miquelle, Stephens, Smirnov, Goodrich, Zaumyslova, Myslenkov, Ray, Berger, Redford and Steneck2005). Given the similar size of wolves and leopards, in a one-on-one confrontation, the leopard has an advantage, but the confrontation of a solitary cat with a pack of wolves is a different story (Figure 3). In this regard, we agree with the hypothesis proposed by Spassov and Raychev (Reference Spassov and Raychev1997) that a set of different factors caused the species not to form vital populations after the LGM (GS-2.1a interval, 17.5–14.7 kyr), when intensive deglaciation processes started. Among them, there are a lack of sufficient food sources combined with a relatively small number of adequate rocky shelters, the high density of the wolf population, and intense human pressure. Isolated, relict populations such as those in the Iberian Peninsula, which survived without probable contact with the North African populations, were probably exterminated by humans at a fairly early date. Eastern re-colonization, in turn, was probably hindered or even prevented by a strip of wide, almost treeless plains that effectively cut off central and western Europe from the eastern populations of P. pardus, where the leopard has survived (Bartosiewicz Reference Bartosiewicz, Buitenhuis and Prummel2001).

Figure 3 Scenes showing conflict between the leopard Panthera pardus with one of his main competitors during the Late Pleistocene, cave wolves Canis lupus spelaeus near the Radochowska Cave. (Drawing by W. Gornig.)

CONCLUSIONS

A critical revision of all available literature sources shows the presence of P. pardus at 312 European sites, with the last documented ∼1.1 Myr. Among them, there are six Polish records (five of which are new), including four sites located in the Sudety Mountains (the Naciekowa, Obok Wschodniej, Radochowska and Wschodnia Caves), as well as two localities in the Polish Jura (the Biśnik and Dziadowa Skała Caves). All records are from rocky regions with rugged terrain convenient for ambushes and hiding, located in the territory of Silesia (southern Poland). These records document the probable presence of the species in Poland between MIS 10/9 and MIS 3. In addition, a newly obtained radiocarbon date of 43–42 kyr from the Radochowska Cave directly confirms the occurrence of P. pardus in the Sudety Mountains in the middle part of MIS 3. Together with other AMS dates from this site, we can confirm the presence of two faunal assemblages, one of which is older (MIS 3), and another that is younger (MIS 1). The post-LGM history of P. pardus in Europe has been poorly defined. Only the Iberian Peninsula, with numerous records of P. pardus dated in the range of 17–11 kyr or even later, can be regarded as a reliable documentation of the last European refugium for this cat. Eastern or southern European records are usually based on imprecisely dated records, and it is still full of ambiguities. A set of different factors probably underscored the inability of the species to establish vital populations after the LGM, including a lack of sufficient food sources combined with a relatively small number of adequate rocky shelters, a high density of the wolf population and human pressure. Isolated relict populations were probably exterminated by humans at a fairly early date. Eastern re-colonization, in turn, was probably hindered or even prevented by a strip of wide, almost treeless plains that effectively cut off central and western Europe from eastern populations of P. pardus, where the leopard has survived.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2022.33.

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 3rd Radiocarbon in the Environment Conference, Gliwice, Poland, 5–9 July 2021

This article has been corrected since its original publication. For more information, see https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2022.46.

References

REFERENCES

Altuna, J. 1972. Fauna de mamíferos de los yacimientos prehistóricos de Guipúzcoa, con catalogo de los mamíferos cuaternarios del Cantábrico y del Pirineo occidental [Mammalian fauna of the prehistoric sites of Guipúzcoa, with a catalog of the quaternary mammals of the Cantabrian Sea and the western Pyrenees]. Munibe 24:1–464. In Spanish.Google Scholar
Altuna-Etxabe, J, Mariezkurrena-Gastearena, K. 2013. Cráneos de pantera en Allekoaitze (Ataun) y Aintzulo (Errezil) (Gipuzkoa) [Panther skull in Allekoaitze (Ataun) and Aintzulo (Errezil) (Gipuzkoa)]. Kobie, Paleoantropología 32:29–37. In Spanish.Google Scholar
Bartosiewicz, L. 2001. A leopard (Panthera pardus L. 1758) find from the late Middle Ages in Hungary. In: Buitenhuis, H, Prummel, W, editors. Animals and man in the past ARC-Publicatie, Groningen 41:151–160.Google Scholar
Bartosiewicz, L. 2015. Every skin teeth ain’t a laugh: medieval leopard find from Hungary. E-Journal 2015:1–8.Google Scholar
Bieroński, J, Burdukiewicz, JM, Socha, P, Stefaniak, K, Hercman, H, Nadachowski, A. 2009. Palaeogeographical, archeological and palaeozoological studies in the Radochowska Cave. Studies of the Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia 56:455–475.Google Scholar
Bieroński, J, Burdukiewicz, JM, Wiszniowska, T. 1985. Wyniki nowych badań Jaskini Radochowskiej [Results of new research of the Radochowska Cave]. Śląskie Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 26:5–18. In Polish.Google Scholar
Bieroński, J, Socha, P, Stefaniak, K. 2007. Deposits and fauna of the Sudetic caves—the state of research. Studies of the Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia 45:183–201.Google Scholar
Brain, CK. 1981. The hunters or the hunted? An introduction to African cave taphonomy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 365 p.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, DJ, Berger, LR. 2000. Leopards as taphonomic agents in dolomitic caves—implications for bone accumulations in the hominid-bearing deposits of South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science London 27:665–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ruiter, DJ, Berger, LR. 2001. Leopard (Panthera pardus Linnaeus) cave caching related to anti-theft behaviour in the John Nash Nature Reserve, South Africa. African Journal of Ecology 39:396–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diedrich, CG. 2013. Late Pleistocene leopards across Europe—northernmost European German population, highest elevated records in the Swiss Alps, complete skeletons in the Bosnia Herzegowina Dinarids and comparison to the Ice Age cave art. Quaternary Science Reviews 76:167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, RL. 1979. Interference competition among carnivores a model for the evolution of social behavior. Carnivore 2(1–2):9–16.Google Scholar
Frenzel, J. 1936. Knochenfunde in der Reyersdorfer Tropfsteinhöhle [Bone finds in the Reyersdorf Stalactite Cave]. Beiträge zur Biologie des Glatzer Schneeberges 2:121–134. In German.Google Scholar
Frenzel, J. 1937a. Die Reyersdorfer Tropfsteinhöhle, ein schlesisches Naturdenkmal [The Reyersdorf Stalactite Cave, a Silesian natural monument]. Schlesische Heimat 1:6–11. In German.Google Scholar
Frenzel, J. 1937b. Die Apterygotenfauna des Glatzer Schneeberges [The apterygote fauna of the Glatzer Schneeberg]. Beiträge zur Biologie des Glatzer Schneeberges 3:249–321. In German.Google Scholar
Galik, A, Horejs, B, Nessel, B. 2012. Der nächtliche Jäger als Beute. Studien zur prähistorischen Leopardenjagd [The nocturnal hunter as prey. Studies in prehistoric leopard hunting]. Prähistorische Zeitschrift 87(2):261–307. In German.Google Scholar
García, N, Virgós, E. 2007. Evolution of community composition in several carnivore palaeoguilds from the European Pleistocene: the role of interspecific competition. Lethaia 40:33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geraads, D. 2008. Plio-Pleistocene Carnivora of northwestern Africa: a short review. Comptes Rendus Paleovol 7:591–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geraads, D, Raynal, J-P, Sbihi-Alaoui, F-Z. 2010. Mammalian faunas from the Pliocene and Pleistocene of Casablanca (Morocco). Historical Biology 22:275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghezzo, E. 2014. The Late Pleistocene site of Equi (Massa, Apuane Alps): revaluation of historical data and new discoveries [PhD thesis]. Firenza: Universite Firenza.Google Scholar
Hayward, MW, Henschel, O, O’Brian, J, Hofmeyr, M, Balme, G, Kerley, GHI. 2006. Prey preferences of the leopard (Panthera pardus). Journal of Zoology 270:298–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmer, H. 2001. Die Feliden aus dem Epivillafranchium von Untermaßfeld bei Meiningen (Thüringen) [The felids from the Epivillafranchian of Untermassfeld near Meiningen (Thuringia)]. Monographien des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz 40:699–782. In German.Google Scholar
Hemmer, H. 2003. Pleistozäne Katzen Europas—eine Übersicht. Cranium 20:6–22.Google Scholar
Hemmer, H. 2004. Notes on the ecological role of European cats (Mammalia: Felidae) of the last two million years. In: Baquedano, E, Rubio, Jara S, editors. Zona Arqueológica 4. Miscelánea en homenaje a Emiliano Aguirre. Paleontología 2:214–232.Google Scholar
Heptner, VG, Naumov, NP (1967) Mlekopitayushchiye Sovetskogo Soyuza. Tom II, Chast 2. Plotoyadnyye (giyeny i koshki) [Mammals of the Soviet Union. Volume II, Part 2. Carnivora (hyenas and cats)]. Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow. In Russian.Google Scholar
Heptner, VH, Sludskij, AA. 1972. Mlekopitaiushchie Sovetskogo Soiuza. Vol. 3. Carnivores (Feloidea) [Mammals of the Soviet Union. Vol. 3. Carnivores (Feloidea)]. Vyssha Shokola, Moscow. 784 p. In Russian.Google Scholar
Herr, O. 1924. Diluviale und altalluviale Säugetierreste aus der Oberlausitz [Diluvial and old alluvial mammalian remains from Upper Lusatia]. Abhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Görlitz 29:92–101.Google Scholar
Jacobson, AP, Gerngross, P, Lemeris, JR Jr, Schoonover, RF, Anco, C, Breitenmoser-Würsten, C, Durant, SM, Farhadinia, MS, Henschel, P, Kamler, JF, Laguardia, A, Rostro-García, SR, Stein, AB, Dollar, L. 2016. Leopard (Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts across its range. PeerJ 4:1974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahlo, JG. 1757. Denkwürkdigkeiten der Königlichen preussischen souverainen Grafschaft Glatz. Berlin und Leipzig. 228 p.Google Scholar
Korlević, P, Talamo, S, Meyer, M. 2018. A combined method for DNA analysis and radiocarbon dating from a single sample. Scientific Reports 8(1):4127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowalski, K. 1954. Jaskinie Polski, tom 3 [Caves of Poland, volume 3]. Wiedza Powszechna: Warszawa. In Polish.Google Scholar
Kowalski, K. 1959. Katalog ssaków plejstocenu Polski [Catalog of mammals of the Pleistocene of Poland]. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa. In Polish.Google Scholar
Kromer, B, Lindauer, S, Synal, H-A, Wacker, L. 2013. MAMS—a new AMS facility at the Kurt-Engelhorn-Zentre for archaeometry, Mannheim, Germany. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 294:11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230:241–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marciszak, A, Gornig, W, Kropczyk, A. 2021a. Radochowska Cave (Sudety Mts, SW Poland)— one of the European caves with bear cult? In: Döppes, D, Friedland, SN, Roendahl, W, editors. Abstract Book of the 26th International Cave Bear Symposium 2021, Reiss-Engelhorn-Museen, Mannheim, Germany, 30th September–3rd October 2021. p. 25–26.Google Scholar
Marciszak, A, Kotowski, A, Przybylski, B, Badura, J, Wiśniewski, A, Stefaniak, K. 2019. Large mammals from historical collections of open-air sites of Silesia (southern Poland) with special reference to carnivores and rhinoceros. Historical Biology 31(6):696–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marciszak, A, Krajcarz, MT, Krajcarz, M, Stefaniak, K. 2011a. The first record of leopard Panthera pardus Linnaeus, 1758 from the Pleistocene of Poland. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 54A(1–2):39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marciszak, A, Kropczyk, A, Lipecki, G. 2021b. The first record of Cuon alpinus (Pallas, 1811) from Poland and the possible impact of other large canids on the evolution of the species. Journal of Quaternary Science 36(6):1101–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marciszak, A, Lipecki, G. 2021. Panthera gombaszoegensis (Kretzoi, 1938) from Poland in the scope of the species evolution. Quaternary International. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2021.07.002.Google Scholar
Marciszak, A, Lipecki, G, Pawłowska, K, Jakubowski, G, Ratajczak-Skrzatek, U, Nadachowski, A. 2021c. The Pleistocene lion Panthera spelaea (Goldfuss, 1810) from Poland—a review. Quaternary International 605–606:213–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marciszak, A, Sobczyk, A, Kasprzak, M, Gornig, W, Ratajczak, U, Wiśniewski, A, Stefaniak, K. 2020. Taphonomic and paleoecological aspects of large mammals from Sudety Mts (Silesia, SW Poland), with particular interest to the carnivores. Quaternary International 546:42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marciszak, A, Socha, P, Nadachowski, A, Stefaniak, K. 2011b. Carnivores from Biśnik Cave. Quaternaire. Hors-serie 4:101–106.Google Scholar
Marciszak, A, Stefaniak, K, Gornig, W. 2016. Fossil theriofauna from the Sudety Mts (SW Poland). The state of research. Cranium 33(1):31–41.Google Scholar
Michel, V, Shen, CC, Woodhead, J, Hu, H-M, Wu, CC, Moullé, PE, Khatib, S, Cauche, D, Moncel, MH, Valensi, P, Chou, YM, Gallet, S, Echassoux, A, Orange, F, Hd, Lumley. 2017. New dating evidence of the early presence of hominins in Southern Europe. Scientific Reports 7:10074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miquelle, DG, Stephens, PA, Smirnov, EN, Goodrich, JM, Zaumyslova, OY, Myslenkov, AE. 2005. Tigers and wolves in the Russian Far East: competitive exclusion, functional redundancy and conservation implications. In: Ray, JC, Berger, J, Redford, KH, Steneck, R, editors. Large carnivores and the conservation of biodiversity. Washington, DC: Island Press. p. 179–207.Google Scholar
Moullé, PE. 1992. Les grands mammifères du Pléistocène inférieur de la grotte du Vallonnet (Roquebrunne-Cap Martín-Alpes Maritimes). Etude paléontologique des Carnivores, Equidé, Suidé et Bovidés [The large mammals of the Lower Pleistocene from Vallonnet cave (Roquebrunne-Cap Martín-Alpes Maritimes). Paleontological study of Carnivores, Equidae, Suidae and Bovidae] (PhD thesis). Paris: Muséum National d’Historie Naturelle. In French.Google Scholar
Nagel, D. 1999. Panthera pardus vraonensis n. ssp., a new leopard from the Pleistocene of Vraona/Greece. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Palaontologie Monatshefte 1999:129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, D, Lindenbauer, J, Kavcik-Graumann, N, Rabeder, G. 2018. Subtropical steppe inhabitants in the Late Pleistocene cave faunas of eastern Middle Europe. Slovenský kras 56(1):99–110.Google Scholar
Nowell, K, Jackson, P. 1996. Wild cats-status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN: Gland.Google Scholar
O’Regan, HJ. 2002. A phylogenetic and palaeoecological review of the Pleistocene felid Panthera gombaszoegensis [PhD thesis]. Liverpool (UK): Liverpool John Moores University.Google Scholar
O’Regan, HJ, Turner, A. 2004. Biostratigraphic and palaeoecological implications of new fossil material from the Plio-Pleistocene site of Tegelen, The Netherlands. Palaeontology 47:1181–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrowicz, A. 1881. Landek w hrabstwie Kłodzkim na Śląsku [Landek in the Kłodzko County in Silesia]. Nakładem autora, Poznań. In Polish.Google Scholar
Pacher, M, Rabeder, G. 2016. The leopard (Panthera pardus), the rare hunter of the Alpine area during the Upper Pleistocene. Cranium 33(1):42–50.Google Scholar
Paijmans, JLA, Axel Barlow, A, Förster, DW, Henneberger, K, Meyer, M, Nickel, B, Nagel, D, Havmøller, RV, Baryshnikov, GF, Joger, U, Rosendahl, W, Hofreiter, M. 2018. Historical biogeography of the leopard (Panthera pardus) and its extinct Eurasian populations. BMC Evolutionary Biology 18:156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pax, F. 1937. Die Höhlenfauna des Glatzer Schneeberges. 10. Wandlungen des Tierlebens in der Wolmsdorfer Tropfsteinhöhle [The cave fauna of the Glatzer Schneeberg. 10. Changes in animal life in the Wolmsdorf Stalactite cave]. Beiträge zur Biologie des Glatzer Schneeberges 3:289–293. In German.Google Scholar
Pérez Ripoll, M, Morales Pérez, JV, Serra, AS, Aura Tortosa, JE, Sarrión Montañana, I. 2010. Presence of the genus Cuon in Upper Pleistocene and initial Holocene sites of the Iberian Peninsula: new remains identified in archaeological contexts of the Mediterranean region. Journal of Archaeological Science 37:437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulina, M. 1996. Jaskinie Sudetów [Caves of the Sudetes]. Polskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk o Ziemi, Warszawa. In Polish.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Austin, WEN, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Butzin, M, Cheng, H, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Muscheler, R, Palmer, JG, Pearson, C, van der Plicht, J, Reimer, RW, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Turney, CSM, Wacker, L, Adolphi, F, Büntgen, U, Capano, M, Fahrni, S, Fogtmann-Schulz, A, Friedrich, R, Köhler, P, Kudsk, S, Miyake, F, Olsen, J, Reining, F, Sakamoto, M, Sookdeo, A, Talamo, S. 2020. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62(4):725–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchis, A, Gómez-Olivencia, A, Real, C et al. 2020. Pleistocene dhole (genus Cuon) populations from the Iberian Peninsula: morphometry, taxonomy and evolution. Colloque Hommes-Canidés, Monographies Ausonius. In: Boudadi-Maligne, M, Mallye, J-B, editors. Relations hommes—canidés de la Préhistoire aux périodes modernes, Ausonius Éditions, Bordeaux. p. 135–152.Google Scholar
Sanchis, A, Real, C, Sauqué, V, Núñez-Lahuerta, C, Égüez, N, Tormo, C, Pérez Ripoll, M, Carrión Marco, Y, Duarte, E, la Rasilla, M. 2019. Neanderthal and carnivore activities at Llonin Cave, Asturias, northern Iberian Peninsula: faunal study of Mousterian levels (MIS 3)—general palaeontology, systematics, and evolution (taphonomy and fossilization). Comptes Rendus Palevol 18:113–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauqué, V, Cuenca-Bescós, G. 2013. The Iberian Peninsula, the last European refugium of Panthera pardus Linnaeus 1758 during the Upper Pleistocene. Quaternaire 24:35–48.Google Scholar
Sauqué, V, Sanchis, A. 2017. Leopards as taphonomic agents in the Iberian Pleistocene, the case of Racó del Duc (Valencia, Spain). Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 472:67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauqué, V, Sanchis, A, Madurell Malapeira, J. 2017. Late Pleistocene leopards as a bone accumulator: taphonomic results from S’Espasa cave and other Iberian key sites. Historical Biology 30(2):821–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sludskij, A. 1976. Leopard. In: Large carnivore. Forest Newspaper 14:58–81.Google Scholar
Sommer, RS, Benecke, N. 2006. Late Pleistocene and Holocene development of the felid fauna (Felidae) of Europe: a review. Journal of Zoology 269(1):7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spassov, N, Raychev, D. 1997. Late Wurm Panthera pardus remains from Bulgaria: the European fossil leopards and the question of the probable species survival until the Holocene on the Balkans. Historia naturalis Bulgarica 7:71–96.Google Scholar
Stefaniak, K, Bieroński, J. 2009. Caves and rock shelters of the Eastern Sudetes-catalogue of important speleological features. Studies of the Faculty of Earth Sciences University of Silesia 56:515–534.Google Scholar
Suárez-Bilbao, A, Garcia-Ibaibarriaga, N, Castaños, J, Castaños, P, Iriarte-Chiapusso, M-J, Arrizabalaga, A, Torrese, T, Ortize, JE, Murelaga, X. 2016. A new Late Pleistocene non-anthropogenic vertebrate assemblage from the northern Iberian Peninsula: Artazu VII (Arrasate, Basque Country). Comptes Rendus Palevol 15:950–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talamo, S, Fewlass, H, Maria, R, Jaouen, K 2021. “Here we go again”: the inspection of collagen extraction protocols for 14C dating and palaeodietary analysis. STAR 7(1):62–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talamo, S, Richards, M. 2011. A comparison of bone pretreatment methods for AMS dating of samples>30, 000 BP. Radiocarbon 53:443–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A. 2009. The evolution of the guild of large Carnivora of the British Isles during the Middle and Late Pleistocene. Journal of Quaternary Science 24:991–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Klinken, GJ. 1999. Bone collagen quality indicators for palaeodietary and radiocarbon measurements. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:687–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utescher, K. 1939. Die Entstehung schlesischer Höhlenlehme nach ihrer chemischen Untersuchung [The formation of Silesian cave clay according to its chemical analysis]. In: Zotz, L, editor. Die Altsteinzeit in Niederschlesien. Kabitsch Verlag, Lepzig. p. 122–142. In German.Google Scholar
Yang, H, Zhao, X, Han, B, Wang, T, Mou, P, Ge, J, Feng, L. 2018. Spatiotemporal patterns of Amur leopards in northeast China: influence of tigers, prey, and humans. Mammalian Biology 92:120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vega del Sella, R. 1930. Las cuevas de la Riera y Balmori (Asturias) [The caves of La Riera and Balmori (Asturias)]. Memoria Comisión de Investigaciones Paleontológicas y Prehistóricas 13:1–116. In Spanish.Google Scholar
von Koenigswald, W, Nagel, D, Menger, F. 2006. Ein jungpleistozäner Leopardenkiefer von Geinsheim (nördliche Oberheinebene, Deutschland) und die stratigraphische und ökologische Verbreitung von Panthera pardus [A Late Pleistocene leopard pine from Geinsheim (Northern Upper Hein Plain, Germany) and the stratigraphic and ecological distribution of Panthera pardus]. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 2006:277–297. In German.Google Scholar
Wiśniewski, A, Stefaniak, K, Wojtal, P, Zych, J, Nadachowski, A, Musil, R, Badura, J, Przybylski, B. 2009. Archaeofauna or palaeontological record? Remarks on Pleistocene fauna from Silesia. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 61:1–62.Google Scholar
Wolsan, M. 1989. Drapieżne [Carnivora]. Folia Quaternaria 59–60:177–197. In Polish.Google Scholar
Zotz, LF. 1937a. Die schlesischen Höhlen und ihre eiszeitlichen Bewohner [The Silesian Caves and their Ice Age inhabitants]. Wilhelm Gottlieb Korn Verlag, Breslau, 38 pp. In German.Google Scholar
Zotz, LF. 1937b. Altsteinzeitlicher Bärenkult in den Sudeten [Palaeolithic bear cult in the Sudetes]. Altschlesische Blätter 1–2:4–7. In German.Google Scholar
Zotz, LF. 1939. Die Altsteinzeit in Niederschlesien [The Paleolithic in Lower Silesia]. Kabitsch Verlag, Leipzig. In German.Google Scholar
Zotz, LF. 1951. Altsteinzeitkunde Mitteleuropas [The Paleolithic in Lower Silesia]. F. Enke Verlag, Stuttgart. In German.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 AMS radiocarbon results dating of carnivores from Radochowska Cave. The newly obtained date of Panthera pardus is in bold. All dates were calibrated using the program IntCal20, according to Reimer et al. (2020).

Figure 1

Figure 1 Radiocarbon dated specimen of Panthera pardus from Radochowska Cave: 1. fragment of a left mandible (JR/Pp/1, a—buccal view, b—occlusal view); 2. left m1 belonging to the same specimen (a—buccal view, b—lingual view). Scale bar 10 mm.

Figure 2

Table 2 Radiocarbon results dating of Panthera pardus from Europe. All dates were calibrated using the program IntCal20, according to Reimer et al. (2020).

Figure 3

Figure 2 Distribution of the Pleistocene and the Holocene sites with Panthera pardus within Europe and southwest Asia. See Table S1 for site numbers. The greenish color indicates the areas where the leopard occurred in historical times and where the extant isolated populations currently living. (After Jacobson et al. 2016. Please see electronic version for color figures.)

Figure 4

Figure 3 Scenes showing conflict between the leopard Panthera pardus with one of his main competitors during the Late Pleistocene, cave wolves Canis lupus spelaeus near the Radochowska Cave. (Drawing by W. Gornig.)

Supplementary material: File

Marciszak et al. supplementary material

Marciszak et al. supplementary material
Download Marciszak et al. supplementary material(File)
File 545.3 KB