Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:11:41.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Randomised Controlled Trial of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy for Generalised Anxiety Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2014

Elbina Avdagic ,
Shirley A. Morrissey  and
Mark J. Boschen
Elbina Avdagic
Affiliation:
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Shirley A. Morrissey*
Affiliation:
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Mark J. Boschen
Affiliation:
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Associate Professor Shirley Morrissey, School of Applied Psychology and Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast QLD 4222, Australia. Email: s.morrissey@griffith.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

The study examined the relative efficacy of group acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) compared to group cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT). Fifty-one individuals with GAD were randomly allocated to a 6-week intervention, either ACT or CBT. Participants were assessed at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up on symptom measures, quality of life, and process measures. Data from 38 participants (19 in each group) were available at post-assessment, indicating significant improvements on all measures for both treatment conditions. Treatment gains were maintained at follow-up, with significant further improvements in anxiety, depression and stress symptoms for both groups. While no between-group differences were found at treatment completion, a significant interaction indicating steeper reduction in worrying symptoms (d = .79) from pre- to post-assessment was found for the ACT group compared to the CBT group. Furthermore, in relation to worrying, at treatment completion 78.9% of participants in the ACT group achieved reliable change compared to 47.4% of participants in the CBT group. However, both groups showed equivalent reliable change rates of 60% at the follow-up assessment. The results suggest that group ACT was as efficacious as group CBT. While participants in the ACT group maintained treatment gains at follow-up, participants in the CBT group continued to improve between post-assessment and follow-up.

Keywords

ACTCBTRCTGADworryinganxiety
Type
Standard Papers
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 110 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Academic Press Pty Ltd 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arch, J.J., Eifert, G.H., Davies, C., Vilardaga, J.C.P., Rose, R.D., & Craske, M.G. (2012). Randomized clinical trial of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) versus acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for mixed anxiety disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80 (5), 750–765. doi:10.1037/a0028310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Americal Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
Ballenger, J.C., Davidson, J.R.T., Lecrubier, Y., Nutt, D.J., Borkovec, T.D., Rickels, K., . . . Wittchen, H.-U. (2001). Consensus statement on generalized anxiety disorder from the International Consesus Group on Depression and Anxiety. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62(Suppl. 11), 53–58.Google Scholar
Bond, F.W., & Bunce, D. (2003). The role of acceptance and job control in mental health, job satisfaction, and work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (6), 1057–1067. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borkovec, T.D., & Ruscio, A.M. (2001). Psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62(Suppl. 11), 37–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Boschen, M.J. (2008). Publication trends in individual anxiety disorders: 1980–2015. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 570–575. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.04.004Google Scholar
Brown, T.A., & Barlow, D.H. (1992). Coromobidity among anxiety disorders: implications for treatment and DSM-IV. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 835–844.Google Scholar
Brown, T.A., Barlow, D.H., & Liebowitz, M.R. (1994). The empirical basis of generalized anxiety disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 151 (9), 1272–1280.Google Scholar
Brown, T.A., Di Nardo, P.A., Lehman, C.L., & Campbell, L.A. (2001). Reliability of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: Implications for the classification of emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110 (1), 49–58.Google Scholar
Buhr, K., & Dugas, M.J. (2002). The intolerance of uncertainty scale: Psychometric properties of the English version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40 (8), 931–945. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00092-4Google Scholar
Covin, R., Ouimet, A.J., Seeds, P.M., & Dozois, D.J.A. (2008). A meta-analysis of CBT for pathological worry among clients with GAD. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22 (1), 108–116. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.01.002Google Scholar
Devilly, G.J. (2004). The Effect Size Generator for Windows: Version 2.3 [computer program]. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Neuropsychology, Swinburne University.Google Scholar
Di Nardo, P.A., Brown, T.A., & Barlow, D.H. (1994). Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV (ADIS-IV). New York: Graywind.Google Scholar
Eifert, G.H., & Forsyth, J.P. (2005). Acceptance and commitment therapy for anxiety disorders: A practitioner's treatment guide to using mindfulness, acceptance, and values-based behavior change strategies. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
Erickson, T.M., & Newman, M.G. (2005). Cognitive behavioral psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder: A primer. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 5, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forman, E.M., Herbert, J.D., Moitra, E., Yeomans, P.D., & Geller, P.A. (2007). A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive therapy for anxiety and depression. Behavior Modification, 31 (6), 772–799. doi:10.1177/0145445507302 202Google Scholar
Forman, E.M., Shaw, J.A., Goetter, E.M., Herbert, J.D., Park, J.A., & Yuen, E.K. (2012). Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing acceptance and commitment therapy and standard cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety and depression. Behavior Therapy, 43 (4), 801–811. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2012.04.004Google Scholar
Forsyth, J.P., & Eifert, G.H. (2007). The mindfulness and acceptance workbook for anxiety: A guide to breaking free from anxiety, phobias and worry using acceptance and commitment therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
Frish, M.B. (1994). Manual and treatment guide for the Quality of Life Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
Frish, M.B., Cornwell, J., Villanueva, M., & Retzlaff, P.J. (1992). Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory: A measure of life satisfaction of use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychological Assessment 4 (1), 92–101.Google Scholar
Glaser, N.M., Blackledge, J.T., Shepherd, L.M., & Deane, F.P. (2009). Brief group ACT for anxiety. In Blackledge, J.T., Ciarrochi, J., & Deane, F.P. (Eds.), Acceptance and commitment therapy: Contemporary theory research and practice (pp. 175–200). Brisbane, Australia: Australian Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gould, R.A., Safren, S.A., Washington, D.O., & Otto, M.W. (2004). A meta-analytic review of cognitive-behavioral treatments. In Heimberg, R.G., Turk, C.A., & Mennin, D.S. (Eds.), Generalized anxiety disorder: Advances in research and practice (pp. 248–264). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, S.C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35 (4), 639–665. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80013-3Google Scholar
Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, S., & Wilson, K. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavioural change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, S., Wilson, K.G., Bissett, R.T., Pistorelo, J., Toarmino, D., . . . McCurry, S.M. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54 (4), 553–578.Google Scholar
Hayes-Skelton, S.A., Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S.M. (2013). A randomized clinical trial comapring an acceptance-based behavior therapy to applied relaxation for generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 761–773. doi:10.1037/a0032871Google Scholar
Herbert, J.D., & Forman, E.M. (2013). Caution: The differences between CT and ACT may be larger (and smaller) than they appear. Behavior Therapy, 44, 218–223. doi:/10.1016/j.beth.2009.09.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holowka, D.W., Dugas, M.J., Francis, K., & Laugesen, N. (2000, November). Measuring beliefs about worry: A psychometric evaluation of the Why Worry-II Questionnaire. Poster session presented at the annual convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Jacobson, N.S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59 (1), 12–19. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazdin, A. (2002). Research design in clinical psychology (4th ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Kessler, R.C., Walters, E.E., & Wittchen, H.U. (2004). Epidemiology. In Heimberg, R.G., Turk, C.L., & Mennin, D.S. (Eds.), Generalized anxiety disorder: Advances in research and practice (pp. 29–50). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Lovibond, S.H., & Lovibond, P.F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Psychology Foundation.Google Scholar
McGrath, K.B., Forman, E.M., del Mar Cabiya, M., Hoffman, K.L., Marques, K., Moitra, E., & Zabell, J.A. (2005, November). Development and validation of the Drexel University ACT/CBT Therapist Adherence Rating Scale. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior and Cognitive Therapies. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Meyer, T.J., Miller, M.L., Metzger, R.L., & Borkovec, T.D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28 (6), 487–495.Google Scholar
Moher, D., Schulz, K.F., & Douglas, A. (2001). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. The Journal of American Medical Association, 285 (15), 1981–1991. doi:10.1001/jama.285.15.1987Google Scholar
Molina, S., & Borkovec, T.D. (1994). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and associated characteristics. In Davey, G. & Tallis, F. (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 265–283). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Newman, M.G., Castonguay, L.G., Borkovec, T.D., Fisher, A.J., & Nordberg, S.S. (2008). An open trial of integrative therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 45 (2), 135–147. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.45.2.135Google Scholar
Öst, L-.G. (2008). Efficacy of the third wave of behavioral therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 296–321. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.12.005Google Scholar
Powers, M.B., Zum Vörde Sive Vörding, M.A., & Emmelkamp, P.M. G. (2009). Acceptance and commitment therapy: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78 (2), 73–80. doi:10.1159/000190790CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S.M. (2005). An acceptance-based behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. In Orsillo, S.M. & Roemer, L. (Eds.), Acceptance and mindfulness based approaches to anxiety: Conceptuallization and treatment (pp. 213–240). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.Google Scholar
Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S.M. (2007). An open trial of an acceptance-based behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Behavior Therapy, 38 (1), 72–85. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2006.04.004Google Scholar
Roemer, L., Orsillo, S.M., & Salters-Pedneault, K. (2008). Efficacy of an acceptance-based behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: Evaluation in a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76 (6), 1083–1089. doi:10.1037/a0012720Google Scholar
Sexton, K.A., & Dugas, M.J. (2008). The Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire: Validation of the English translation. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22 (3), 355–370. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.04.00Google Scholar
Westen, D., & Morrison, K. (2001). A multidimensional meta-analysis of treatment for depression, panic, and generalized anxiety disorder: An empirical exemination of the status of empiricaly supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 875–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, J.L., Liu, L., Patterson, T.L., Afari, N., Ayers, C.R., Thorp, S.R., . . . Petkus, A.J. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy for generalized anxiety disorder in older adults: A preliminary report. Behavior Therapy, 42 (1), 127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.07.002Google Scholar
Wittchen, H.-U., & Hoyer, J. (2001). Generalized anxiety disorder: Nature and course.Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62, 15–19.Google Scholar
Yonkers, K.A., Warshaw, M.G., Massion, A.O., & Keller, M.B. (1996). Phenomenology and course of generalised anxiety disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 308–313.Google Scholar
Zinbarg, R.E., Craske, M.G., Barlow, D.H., & O’Leary, T. (1993). Mastery of your anxiety and worry, therapist guide. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar