Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:13:49.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adolescent age moderates genetic and environmental influences on parent–adolescent positivity and negativity: Implications for genotype–environment correlation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Kristine Marceau ,
Valerie S. Knopik ,
Jenae M. Neiderhiser ,
Paul Lichtenstein ,
Erica L. Spotts ,
Jody M. Ganiban  and
David Reiss
Kristine Marceau*
Affiliation:
Brown University Rhode Island Hospital
Valerie S. Knopik
Affiliation:
Brown University Rhode Island Hospital
Jenae M. Neiderhiser*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Paul Lichtenstein
Affiliation:
Karolinska Institute
Erica L. Spotts
Affiliation:
NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
Jody M. Ganiban
Affiliation:
George Washington University
David Reiss
Affiliation:
Yale University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kristine Marceau, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, G-S121-4, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912; E-mail: Kristine_marceau@brown.edu
Jenae M. Neiderhiser, 141 Moore Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; E-mail: jenaemn@psu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examined how genotype–environment correlation processes differ as a function of adolescent age. We tested whether adolescent age moderates genetic and environmental influences on positivity and negativity in mother–adolescent and father–adolescent relationships using parallel samples of twin parents from the Twin and Offspring Study in Sweden and twin/sibling adolescents from the Nonshared Environment in Adolescent Development Study. We inferred differences in the role of passive and nonpassive genotype–environment correlation based on biometric moderation findings. The findings indicated that nonpassive gene–environment correlation played a stronger role for positivity in mother– and father–adolescent relationships in families with older adolescents than in families with younger adolescents, and that passive gene–environment correlation played a stronger role for positivity in the mother–adolescent relationship in families with younger adolescents than in families with older adolescents. Implications of these findings for the timing and targeting of interventions on family relationships are discussed.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 149 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avinun, R., & Knafo, A. (2014). Parenting as a reaction evoked by children's genotype: A meta-analysis of children-as-twins studies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 87–102.Google Scholar
Bank, L., Duncan, T., Patterson, G., & Reid, J. (1993). Parent and teacher ratings in the assessment and prediction of antisocial and delinquent behaviors. Journal of Personality, 61, 693–709.Google Scholar
Boker, S., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick, T. R., et al. (2010). OpenMx: Multipurpose software for statistical modeling. R package version [Computer software]. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
Burt, S. A., McGue, M., Krueger, R. F., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). How are parent–child conflict and childhood externalizing symptoms related over time? Results from a genetically informative cross-lagged study. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, M., Neiderhiser, J., Howe, G., & Hetherington, E. M. (2001). Adolescent, parent, and observer perceptions of parenting: Genetic and environmental influences on shared and distinct perceptions. Child Development, 72, 1266–1284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, C. B., Catalano, R. F., Haggerty, K. P., & Abbott, R. D. (2010). Relationships between level and change in family, school, and peer factors during two periods of adolescence and problem behavior at age 19. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 670–682.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, H. H. (1991). A zygosity questionnaire for young twins: A research note. Behavior Genetics, 21, 257–269.Google Scholar
Harold, G. T., Leve, L. D., Elam, K. K., Thapar, A., Neiderhiser, J. M, Natsuaki, M. N., et al. (2013). The nature of nurture: Disentangling passive genotype–environment correlation from family relationship influences on children's externalizing problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 12–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Herrenkohl, T. I., Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., & Mason, W. A. (2009). Effects of growth in family conflict in adolescence on adult depressive symptoms mediating and moderating effects of stress and school bonding. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44, 146–152.Google Scholar
Hetherington, E. M., & Clingempeel, W. G. (1992). Coping with marital transitions: A family systems perspective. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57, 1–238.Google Scholar
Horwitz, B., Marceau, K., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2011). Family relationship influences on development: What can we learn from genetic research? In Kendler, K., Jaffee, S., & Romer, D. (Eds.), The dynamic genome and mental health: The role of genes and environments in youth development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (1996). Parenting: A genetic–epidemiologic perspective. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 11–20.Google Scholar
Klahr, A. M., & Burt, S. A. (2014). Elucidating the etiology of individual differences in parenting: A meta-analysis of behavioral genetic research. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 544–586.Google Scholar
Klahr, A. M., McGue, M., Iacono, W. G., & Burt, S. A. (2011). The association between parent-child conflict and adolescent conduct problems over time: Results from a longitudinal adoption study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 46–56.Google Scholar
Marsiglio, W., Amato, P., Day, R. D., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Scholarship on fatherhood in the 1990s and beyond. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1173–1191.Google Scholar
McAdams, T. A., Neiderhiser, J. M., Rijsdijk, F. V., Narusyte, J., Lichtenstein, P., & Eley, T. C. (2014). Accounting for genetic and environmental confounds in associations between parent and child characteristics: A systematic review of children-of-twins studies. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1138– 1173.Google Scholar
McGue, M., Elkins, I., Walden, B., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). Perceptions of the parent–adolescent relationship: A longitudinal investigation. Developmental Psychology, 41, 971–984.Google Scholar
McGuire, S. (2003). The heritability of parenting. Parenting: Science and Practice, 3, 73–94.Google Scholar
Montemayor, R. (1983). Parents and adolescents in conflict: All families some of the time and some families most of the time. Journal of Early Adolescence, 3, 83–103.Google Scholar
Narusyte, J., Andershed, A.-K., Neiderhiser, J. M., & Lichtenstein, P. (2007). Aggression as a mediator of genetic contributions to the association between negative parent–child relationships and adolescent antisocial behavior. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 16, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narusyte, J., Neiderhiser, J. M., Andershed, A. K., D'Onofrio, B. M., Reiss, D., Spotts, E., et al. (2011). Parental criticism and externalizing behavior problems in adolescents: The role of environment and genotype–environment correlation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Advance online publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narusyte, J., Neiderhiser, J. M., D'Onofrio, B., Reiss, D., Spotts, E. L., Ganiban, J., et al. (2008). Testing different types of genotype–environment correlation: An extended children-of-twins model. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1591–1603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neiderhiser, J. M., & Lichtenstein, P. (2008). The twin and offspring study in Sweden: Advancing our understanding of genotype–environment interplay by studying twins and their families. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40, 1116–1123.Google Scholar
Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., & Hetherington, E. M. (2007). The Nonshared Environment in Adolescent Development (NEAD) project: A longitudinal family study of twins and siblings from adolescence to young adulthood. Twin Research on Human Genetic, 10, 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Hetherington, E., & Plomin, R. (1999). Relationships between parenting and adolescent adjustment over time: Genetic and environmental contributions. Developmental Psychology, 35, 680–692.Google Scholar
Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Lichtenstein, P., Spotts, E. L., & Ganiban, J. (2007). Father–adolescent relationships and the role of genotype–environment correlation. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 560–571.Google Scholar
Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Pedersen, N. L., Lichtenstein, P., Spotts, E. L., Hansson, K., et al. (2004). Genetic and environmental influences on mothering of adolescents: A comparison of two samples. Developmental Psychology, 40, 335–351.Google Scholar
Nichols, R. C., & Bilbro, W. C. Jr. (1966). The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genetica, 16, 265–275.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Connor, T. G., Deater-Deckard, K., Fulker, D., Rutter, M., & Plomin, R. (1998). Genotype–environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: Antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting. Developmental Psychology, 34, 970–981.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & Loehlin, J. C. (1977). Genotype–environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 309–322.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., Pedersen, J. R., Nesselroade, J. R., & Bergeman, C. S. (1989). Genetic influence on adults' ratings of their current family environment. Journal of Marriage of Family, 51, 791–803.Google Scholar
Reiss, D. (1995). Genetic influence on family systems: Implications for development. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 543–560.Google Scholar
Reiss, D., Neiderhiser, J. M., Hetherington, E. M., & Plomin, R. (2000). The relationship code: Deciphering genetic and social influences on adolescent development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype–environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424–435.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review Psychology, 52, 83–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Towers, H., Spotts, E. L., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on parenting and marital relationships: Current findings and future directions. Marriage & Family Review, 33, 11–29.Google Scholar
Ulbricht, J. A., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2009). Genotype–environment correlation and family relationships. In Yong-Kyu, K. (Ed.), Handbook of behavior genetics (pp. 209–221). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
van der Sluis, S., Posthuma, D., & Dolan, C. V. (2012). A note on false positives and power in G × E modelling of twin data. Behavior Genetics, 42, 170–186.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Marceau supplementary material

Table S1-S3

Download Marceau supplementary material(File)
File 189.4 KB