1 Battilani, Patrizia and Schröter, Harm G., ‘Introduction’, in Battilani, Patrizia and Schröter, Harm G., eds., The cooperative business movement, 1950 to the present, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Birchall, Johnston, The international co-operative movement, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

3 Hilson, Mary, Markkola, Pirjo, and Ostman, Ann-Catrin, eds., Co-operatives and the social question: the co-operative movement in northern and eastern Europe c. 1880–1950, Cardiff: Welsh Academic Press, 2012 Google Scholar; Hilson, Mary, ‘The consumer co-operative movement in cross-national perspective. Britain and Sweden, c. 1860–1939’, in Black, Lawrence and Robertson, Nicole, eds., Consumerism and the co-operative movement in modern British history: taking stock, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009, pp. 69–85.Google Scholar

4 Hilson, Mary, ‘Consumer co-operation and economic crisis: the 1936 Roosevelt inquiry on co-operative enterprise and the emergence of the Nordic “Middle Way”’, Contemporary European History, 22, 2, 2013, pp. 181–198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hilson, Mary, Neunsinger, Silke, and Patmore, Greg, eds., A global history of consumer co-operation since 1850, Leiden: Brill, 2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hilson, Mary, The International Co-operative Alliance and the consumer co-operative movement in northern Europe, c. 1860–1939, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2018 Google Scholar; Patmore, Greg and Balnave, Nikola, A global history of co-operative business, New York: Routledge, 2018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Ballantyne, Tony, Orientalism and race: Aryanism in the British empire, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, p. 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Pomeranz, Kenneth, The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000, p. 171 Google Scholar; Bayly, Christopher, The birth of the modern world, 1780–1914, Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004, p. 62.Google Scholar

7 Harris, Ron, Industrializing English law: entrepreneurship and business organization, 1720–1844, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Taylor, James, Creating capitalism: joint-stock enterprise in British politics and culture, 1800–1870, Woodbridge: Boydell Press for the Royal Historical Society, 2006.Google Scholar

8 Black and Robertson, Consumerism; Furlough, Ellen, Consumer cooperation in France: the politics of consumption, 1834–1930, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

9 Webster, Anthony, Wilson, John, and Vorberg-Rugh, Rachael, ‘Going global: the rise of the CWS as an international commercial and political actor, 1863–1950; scoping an agenda for further research’, in Hilson, Neunsinger, and Patmore, Global history of consumer co-operation, pp. 559–83Google Scholar.

10 Gurney, Peter, Co-operative culture and the politics of consumption in England, 1870–1930, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996, pp. 15–18.Google Scholar

11 Wilson, John, Webster, Anthony, and Vorberg-Rugh, Rachael, Building co-operation: a business history of the co-operative group, 1863–2013, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 42–98.Google Scholar

12 Webster, Wilson, and Vorberg-Rugh, ‘Going global’, pp. 565–6.

13 Birchall, International co-operative movement, pp. 12–14; see also Klein, Michael, Leben, Werk und Nachwirkung des Genossenschaftsgründers Friedrich Wilhelm Raiffeisen (1818–1888), Cologne: Rheinland-Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar

14 Christiansen, Niels Finn, ‘Denmark’s road to modernity and welfare: the co-operative way’, in Hilson, Markkola, and Ostman, Co-operatives, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar

15 Park, Albert, ‘Reclaiming the rural: modern Danish cooperative living in colonial Korea, 1925–37’, Journal of Korean Studies, 19, 1, 2014, pp. 115–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Christiansen, ‘Denmark’s road’, p. 25.

17 Birchall, International co-operative movement, p. 14.

18 Hilson, International Co-operative Alliance, p. 23.

19 Battilani and Schröter, ‘Introduction’, p. 5; Birchall, International co-operative movement, p. 134; Holmén, Hans, State, cooperatives and development in Africa, Uppsala: Scandinavian Institute of Africa Studies, 1990, p. 22 Google Scholar; Patmore and Balnave, Global history of co-operative business, pp. 103–4. Against this convention, see Hilson, Mary, ‘Co-operative history: movements and businesses’, in Hilson, Neunsinger, and Patmore, Global history of consumer co-operation, p. 35 Google Scholar, for a cursory remark on Asia–Africa connections.

20 Bloch, Marc, The historian’s craft, New York: Alfred Knopf, 1953, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar

21 For a recent discussion on the usage of the concept of circulation, see Gänger, Stefanie, ‘Circulation: reflections on circularity, entity, and liquidity in the language of global history’, Journal of Global History, 12, 3, 2017, pp. 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Birchall, Johnston, People-centered business: co-operatives, mutual and the idea of membership, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Rhodes, Rita, Empire and co-operation: how the British empire used co-operatives in its development strategies, 1900–1970, Edinburgh: Birlinn, 2012.Google Scholar

24 Hopkins, A. G., An economic history of West Africa, New York: Columbia University Press, 1973, p. 262 Google Scholar; see also Holmén, State, p. 23.

25 Rhodes, Empire and co-operation, p. 130.

26 Watkins, William, The International Co-operative Alliance, 1895–1970, London: International Co-operative Alliance, 1970, p. 86 Google Scholar; Hilson, International Co-operative Alliance, pp. 53–81.

27 Colombain, Maurice, ‘The co-operative service of the International Labour Office’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 17, 1, 1941, pp. 176–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28 Plunkett, Horace and Walter, K., eds., Agricultural co-operation, in its application to the industry, the business, and the life of the farmer in the British empire, London: George Routledge and Sons, 1925.Google Scholar

29 For example, Émile De Wildeman commented somewhat over-optimistically at the 1929 meeting of the ICI that it was for a good reason that ‘on a, en Angleterre, estimé que la création de ces associations coopératives, pouvait être considérée comme l’enseignement le plus fécond; ce principe simple revêtissant un grand nombre de formes, permettra de transformer les cultivateurs indigènes et de leur faire comprendre que l’agriculture et leur propre développement sont dépendants des forces économiques qui régissent les marchés mondiaux’. In ICI, Compte rendu de la session tenue à Bruxelles, les 24–25–26 juin 1929, Brussels: Établissements Généraux d’Imprimerie, 1929, pp. clxxvi–clxxvii.

30 Nathan, Andrew James, A history of the China International Relief Commission, Cambridge, MA: East Asian Research Center, Harvard University, 1965, p. 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 Trescot, Paul, ‘John Bernard Tayler and the development of cooperatives in China, 1917–1945’, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 64, 2, 1993, p. 211.Google Scholar

32 Strickland, Claude Francis, The co-operative movement in China, Nanking: Sino-British Cultural Association, 1935.Google Scholar

33 Siegel, Benjamin Robert, Hungry nation: food, famine, and the making of modern India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, p. 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Birchall, International co-operative movement, pp. 134–43, 166–71Google Scholar; Holmén, State, pp. 34–5; Mary Hilson, ‘Co-operative history: movements and businesses’, in Hilson, Neunsinger, and Patmore, Global history of consumer co-operation, p. 41.

35 Salazar-Xirinachs, José M. and Léautier, Frannie A., ‘Avant-propos’, in Develtere, Patrick, Pollet, Ignace, and Wanyama, Fredrick, eds., L’Afrique solidaire et entrepreneuriale: la renaissance du mouvement coopératif africain, Dar Es Salaam: OIT, 2009, pp. ix–xi.Google Scholar

36 Birchall, International co-operative movement, p. 206.

37 United Nations, ‘2012 – International Year of Cooperatives’, 2011, http://www.un.org/en/events/coopsyear/ (consulted 14 July 2018).

38 East India (Deccan Riots Commission), Copy of the report of the Commission Appointed in India to Inquire into the Causes of the Riots that Took Place in the Year 1875, in the Poona and Ahmednagar Districts of the Bombay Presidency, London: George Edward Eyre and William Spottiswoode, 1878, pp. 11–53 Google Scholar; Indian Famine Commission, Report of the Indian Famine Commission, London: George Edward Eyre and William Spottiswoode, 1880, pp. 130–1Google Scholar; Indian Famine Commission, Report of the Indian Famine Commission, 1901, Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing, 1901, pp. 106–11.Google Scholar

39 Singh, Gurdev, Performance of formal credit in India, New Delhi: Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 2009, p. 15.Google Scholar

40 Catanach, Ian, Rural credit in western India, 1875–1930: rural credit and the co-operative movement in the Bombay Presidency, Berkeley, CA, and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1970, pp. 42–5Google Scholar; Nicholson, Frederick, Report regarding the possibility of introducing land and agricultural banks into the Madras Presidency, 2 vols., Madras: Superintendent of the Government Press, 1895–7.Google Scholar

41 Nicholson, Report, vol. 1, pp. 93–224, and vol. 2.

42 Vittas, Dimitri, ‘Thrift deposit institutions in Europe and the United States’, in Caprio, Gerard Jr and Vittas, Dimitri, eds., Reforming financial systems: historical implications for policy, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 141–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Birchall, International co-operative movement, pp. 1–34.

43 Nicholson, Report, vol. 1, p. 145; see also Wolff, Henri William, People’s banks: a record of social and economic success, 2nd edn, London: P. S. King & Son, 1896, pp. 116–18.Google Scholar

44 Nicholson, Report, vol. 1, p. 15.

45 National Archives of India, New Delhi, Legislative Department (henceforth NAI, LD), Progs., Nos. 846, 1901.

46 The unit of the ryotwari or raiyatwari system was the individual plot of land, the landholder or tenant being the direct payer of revenue. The system was gradually established in western India in the nineteenth century. In contrast, in the zamindari system, the zamindar (large landowner) would collect revenue for the government. In colonial times the latter system was practised in Bengal and parts of the United Provinces. The unit for the mahalwari system was the mahal, a set of plots taxed collectively. See Stokes, Eric, Chaudhuri, B., Fukazawa, H., and Kumar, Dharma, ‘Agrarian relations’, in Kumar, Dharma and Desai, Meghnad, eds., The Cambridge economic history of India: volume 2: c. 1757–c. 1970, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp. 36–241.Google Scholar

47 Chaudhuri, Binay Bhusan, ‘Rural credit relations in Bengal, 1859–1885’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 6, 3, 1969, pp. 203–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Bose, Sugata, ed., Credit, markets, and the agrarian economy of colonial India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1994 Google Scholar; Hardiman, David, Feeding the Baniya: peasants and usurers in western India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

48 NAI, LD, Progs., Nos. 59–108, 1904. For western India, see also Fukazawa, Hiroshi, ‘Agrarian relations: western India’, in Kumar and Desai, Economic history, pp. 199–200.Google Scholar

49 Reserve Bank of India, Review of the co-operative movement, Bombay: Reserve Bank of India, 1950, p. 4.Google Scholar

50 Anand Chandavarkar, ‘Money and credit, 1858–1947’, in Kumar and Desai, Economic history, p. 802.

51 See, for example, Islam, Mufakharul, Bengal agriculture, 1920–1946: a quantitative study, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 164–6Google Scholar; Iqbal, Iftekhar, ‘Cooperative credit in colonial Bengal: an exploration in development and decline, 1905–1947’, Indian Economic & Social History Review, 54, 2, 2017, pp. 221–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

52 Catanach, Rural credit, p. 224.

53 Whitcomb, Elizabeth, Agrarian conditions in northern India: volume I, the United Provinces under British rule, 1860–1900, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1972, p. 165 Google Scholar; Stokes, Eric, The peasant and the Raj: studies in agrarian society and peasant rebellion in colonial India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 248–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Baker, Christopher, An Indian rural economy, 1880–1955: the Tamilnad countryside, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, p. 155 Google Scholar; Charlesworth, Neil, Peasants and imperial rule: agriculture and agrarian society in the Bombay Presidency, 1850–1935, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 84–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hardiman, Feeding the Baniya, pp. 118–28. For lending for the purpose of securing the marketing of the produce, see Neeladri Battttacharya, ‘Lenders and debtors: Punjab and countryside, 1880–1940’, in Bose, Credit, pp. 197–247.

54 Hill, Polly, Development economics on trial: the anthropological case for a prosecution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55 Austin, Gareth and Sugihara, Kaoru, ‘Introduction’, in Austin, Gareth and Sugihara, Kaoru, eds., Local suppliers of credit in the Third World, 1750–1960, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1993, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56 Freitag, Ulrike and Clarence-Smith, William, Hadhrami traders, scholars and statesmen in the Indian Ocean, 1750s to 1960s, Leiden: Brill, 1997 Google Scholar; Brown, Rajeswary Ampalavanar, Capital and entrepreneurship in South-East Asia, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1994, pp. 173–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Akyempong, Emmanuel, ‘Africans in diaspora’: the diaspora in Africa, African Affairs, 99, 395, 2000, pp. 183–215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Akyempong, Emmanuel, ‘Race, identity and citizenship in Black Africa: the case of the Lebanese in Ghana’, Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 76, 3, 2006, pp. 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57 Catanach, Rural credit, p. 224.

58 Mohapatra, Prabhu, ‘Land and credit market in Chotanagpur, 1880–1950’, Studies in History, 6, 2, 1990, pp. 163–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59 Darling, Malcolm, The Punjab peasant in prosperity and debt, London: Oxford University Press, 1925, pp. 20, 271.Google Scholar

60 Iqbal, Farrukh, ‘The determinants of moneylender interest rates: evidence from rural India’, Journal of Development Studies, 24, 3, 1988, pp. 364–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

61 Royal Commission on Agriculture, Report, Bombay: Government Central Press, 1928, p. 450.Google Scholar

62 MacPherson, Ian, ‘Globalisation in another time: the impact of early Indian co-operative legislation on North America’, in Münkner, Hans-H., ed., 100 years Co-operative Credit Societies Act, India 1904: a worldwide applied model of co-operative legislation, New Delhi: International Cooperative Alliance, Asia and Pacific, 2005, pp. 76–94 Google Scholar. For a cursory reference to the influence on Africa, see Windel, Aaron, ‘Mass education, cooperation and the “African mind”’, in Bloom, Peter, Miescher, Stephan F., and Manuh, Takyiwaa, eds., Modernization as spectacle in Africa, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2014, pp. 100–22.Google Scholar

63 Fabian Colonial Bureau, Co-operation in the colonies: a report from a special committee to the Fabian Colonial Bureau, Edinburgh: Riverside Press, 1945, p. 33.Google Scholar

64 Established in 1918 by the prominent Irish advocate of cooperation Sir Horace Plunkett, the foundation soon became a hub for gathering and disseminating information on the development of cooperatives around the world.

65 Dewey, Clive, Anglo-Indian attitudes: the mind of the Indian civil service, London: Hambledon Press, 1993, pp. 101–98Google Scholar. See also Zachariah, Benjamin, Developing India: an intellectual history, c. 1930–50, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 80–155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sultan, Atiyab, ‘Malcolm Darling and developmentalism in colonial Punjab’, Modern Asian Studies, 51, 6, 2017, pp. 1891–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

66 Plunkett Foundation Archive, Woodstock, UK, ‘Festschrift in honour of C. F. Strickland’, unpaginated.

67 Darling, Malcolm, Some aspects of co-operation in Germany, Italy and Ireland (a report), Lahore: Superintendent Government Printing, 1922 Google Scholar; Strickland, Claude, Studies in European co-operation, Lahore: Superintendent Government Printing, 1922.Google Scholar

68 Darling, Punjab peasant, 1925; Darling, Malcolm, Rusticus loquitur or the old light and the new in the Punjab village, London: Oxford University Press, 1930 Google Scholar; Darling, Malcolm, Wisdom and waste in the Punjab village, London: Oxford University Press, 1934 Google Scholar. Ironically, in reference to Rusticus loquitur in our case, it could be noted that the cooperative expert often spoke louder than the dedicated agriculturalist.

69 Cambridge South Asian Archive, University of Cambridge, Darling Papers (henceforth CSAA, DP), 25.17.

70 CSAA, DP, 1:1.

71 Weston Library, Commonwealth and African Collections (formerly held at Rhodes House, Oxford; henceforth WL, CAC), MSS Lugard, 9/5, p. 2 (handwritten).

72 Ibid ., p. 5.

73 Ibid ., p. 9.

74 Ibid ., p. 17.

75 Ibid .

76 Strickland, Claude, Co-operation for Africa, London: Oxford University Press, 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

77 The National Archives, Kew, UK (henceforth TNA), CO 323/1151/6; TNA, CO 618/49/9.

78 TNA, CO 691/118/10, p. 2.

79 TNA, CO 96/688/16.

80 TNA, CO 554/93/9.

81 Strickland, Claude, Report on the introduction of co-operative societies into Nigeria, Lagos: Government Printer, 1934, p. 1.Google Scholar

82 TNA, CO 96/688/16, Enclosure 4 in Gold Coast No. 534 of 10 July 1929.

83 Ibid ., Proposed Amendments to the Co-operative Societies Bill, 1929.

84 Ibid ., Comments on the Memorandum from the Horace Plunkett Foundation.

85 Ibid ., Enclosure 6 in Gold Coast No. 534 of 10 July 1929.

86 Hill, Polly, Dry grain farming families: Hausaland (Nigeria) and Karnataka (India) compared, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, p. 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

87 Dewey, Clive and Hopkins, A. G., eds., The imperial impact: studies in the economic history of Africa and India, London: Athlone Press for the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, 1978.Google Scholar

88 Daviron, Benoit, ‘Mobilizing labour in African agriculture: the role of the International Colonial Institute in the elaboration of a standard of colonial administration, 1895–1930’, Journal of Global History, 5, 3, 2010, pp. 479–501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barth, Volker and Cvetkovski, Roland, eds., Imperial co-operation and transfer, 1870–1930: empires and encounters, London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar

89 Hodge, Joseph, Triumph of the expert: agrarian doctrines of development and the legacies of British colonialism, Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2007 Google Scholar; Forclaz, Amalia Ribi ‘Agriculture, American expertise, and the quest for global data: Leon Estabrook and the First World Agricultural Census of 1930’, Journal of Global History, 11, 1, 2016, pp. 44–65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a most recent survey of the literature, see Fischer-Tiné, Harald, ‘The YMCA and low-modernist rural development In South Asia, c. 1922–1957’, Past & Present, 240, 1, 2018, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar

90 Cooper, Frederick, ‘Reconstructing empire in British and French Africa’, Past & Present, 210, supplement 6, 2011, pp. 196–210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cooper, Frederick, ‘Modernizing bureaucrats, backward Africans, and the development concept’, in Cooper, Frederick, ed., International development and the social sciences: essays on the history and politics of knowledge, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997, pp. 64–92.Google Scholar

91 van Zanden, Jan Luiten, ‘Credit and the colonial state: the reform of capital markets on Java, 1900–30’, in Henley, David and Boomgaard, Peter, eds., Credit and debt in Indonesia, 860–1930: from peonage to pawnshop, from Kongsi to cooperative, Singapore: ISEAS, 2009, pp. 160–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Strickland, Co-operation for Africa, pp. 13–14, 23–7, where he criticizes the Dutch authorities in Java for not embracing initially (up to 1927) the ‘true’ co-operative model as applied in India.

92 For a classic example of this tradition as well as a celebration of empire, see Rhodes, Empire and co-operation.

93 Austin, Gareth, ‘Vent for surplus or productivity breakthrough? The Ghanaian cocoa take-off, c. 1890–1936’, Economic History Review, 67, 4, 2014, pp. 1035–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

94 Ross, Corey, ‘The plantation paradigm: colonial agronomy, African farmers, and the global cocoa boom, 1870s–1940s’, Journal of Global History, 9, 1, 2014, pp. 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

95 Shephard, C. Y., Report on the economics of peasant agriculture in the Gold Coast, Accra: Government Printing Dept, 1936, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

96 Austin, Gareth, ‘The emergence of capitalist relations in South Asante cocoa-farming c. 1916–33’, Journal of African History, 28, 2, 1987, pp. 259–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

97 Shephard, Report, p. 9.

98 Austin, Gareth, Labour, land and capital in Ghana: from slavery to free labour in Asante, 1807–1956, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2005, pp. 278–303 Google Scholar. See also Akyempong, ‘Africans in diaspora’, esp. pp. 200–3; and Akyempong, ‘Race’, esp. pp. 307–11.

99 Shephard, Report, p. 41.

100 Nowell, William et al., eds., Report of the commission on the marketing of West African cocoa, London: HMSO, 1938, p. 18.Google Scholar

101 TNA, CO 96/688/16, Sub-Enclosure to Enclosure 5 in Gold Coast No. 534 of 10 July 1929, model bye-laws for Co-operative Society for the Marketing of Cacao (with unlimited liability).

102 Cazzuffi, Chiara and Moradi, Alexander, ‘Membership size and cooperative performance: evidence from Ghanaian cocoa producers’ societies, 1930–36’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 27, 1, 2012, p. 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

103 TNA, CO 96/688/16, unpaginated.

104 ‘Governments and co-operation’, West Africa: A Weekly Newspaper, 647, 13, June 1929, p. 1.Google Scholar

105 TNA, CO 96/698/16, Enclosure 4, ‘Memorandum giving reasons for non-acceptance of certain of the suggestions put forward by Mr. C. F. Strickland in his note of 29.9.30, in S. S. 991/30’.

106 Ibid .

107 Department of Agriculture Gold Coast, Monthly News-Letter (henceforth DAGC, MNL), 35, 1 April 1931, p. 6, emphasis added.

108 DAGC, MNL, 37, 15 June 1931, p. 4.

109 DAGC, MNL, 39, 15 August 1931, p. 8.

110 DAGC, MNL, 35, 1 April 1931, p. 5.

111 Public Records and Administration Department, Accra (henceforth PRAAD), CSO8/1/41.

112 Nowell et al., Report, p. 40.

113 Shephard, Report, p. 45.

114 Ibid ., pp. 46–7.

115 Ibid ., p. 53.

116 Nowell et al., Report, p. 44.

117 John Miles, ‘Cocoa marketing in the Gold Coast and the African producer, 1919–1939 – with special reference to the holdup movements’, PhD thesis, University of London School of Oriental and African Studies, 1977; Alence, Rod, ‘The 1937–1938 Gold Coast cocoa crisis: the political economy of commercial stalemate’, African Economic History, 19, 1990–1, pp. 77–104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Austin, Gareth, ‘Capitalists and chiefs in the cocoa hold-ups in South Asante, 1927–1938’, International Journal of African Historical Studies, 21, 1, 1988, pp. 63–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

118 PRAAD, RG4/2/34, K. K. Apeadu (Assistant Registrar), ‘Notes on the history of the Gold Coast co-operative movement’, 1955.

119 Alence, Rod, ‘Colonial government, social conflict and state involvement in Africa’s open economies: the origins of the Ghana Cocoa Marketing Board, 1939–46’, Journal of African History, 42, 3, 2001, pp. 397–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

120 PRAAD, RG4/2/4, Gold Coast Cooperative Societies, Annual Audit Report 1941–42, p. 2. In Nigeria, cooperatives were not even classed as a ‘B’ shipper initially. They did, however, receive a premium paid by the firms for their shipments until 1942, and later directly by the Nigerian government, in effect similar to the Gold Coast case, boosting the cooperative movement. See Deutsch, Jan-Georg, Educating the middlemen: a political and economic history of statutory cocoa marketing in Nigeria, 1936–1947, Berlin: Verlag das Arabische Buch, 1995, esp. pp. 158–60, 254–5.Google Scholar

121 Apeadu, ‘Notes’, p. 7.

122 Ibid ., p. 9.

123 Ibid .

124 Beckman, Björn, Organising the farmers: cocoa politics and national development in Ghana, Upsala: Scandinavian Institute of African Studies, 1976, pp. 91–107.Google Scholar

125 Nicholson, Report, vol. 1, pp. 242–73.

126 Strickland, Claude, ‘The cooperative movement in the East’, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 11, 6, 1932, p. 820.Google Scholar

127 Auchinleck, G. G., ‘Co-operative societies in the Gold Coast’, Journal of Gold Coast Agricultural and Commercial Society, 6, 2, 1927, p. 114.Google Scholar

128 Neuensinger, Silke, ‘Challenges to democracy: state intervention’, in Hilson, Neunsinger, and Patmore, Global history of consumer co-operation, pp. 229–42.Google Scholar

129 Jossa, Bruno, ‘Marx, Marxism and the cooperative movement’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 1, 2005, pp. 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

130 Webster, Anthony, Brown, Alyson, Stewart, David, Walton, John, and Show, Linda, eds., The hidden alternative: co-operative values, past, present and future, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

131 Lalwani, Mala, ‘Sugar co-operatives in Maharashtra: a political economy perspective’, Journal of Development Studies, 44, 10, 2008, pp. 1474–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

132 Webster, Wilson, and Vorberg-Rugh, ‘Going global’.

133 PRAAD, RG4/2/35, Copies of the Board press release on the ‘Co-operative Wholesale Society’.

134 PRAAD, RG4/2/5, Trade Enquiries.

135 Ibid .

136 Ibid .

137 Pigou, Alfred Cecil, The economics of welfare, London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd., 1920, pp. 284–5.Google Scholar