Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-12T04:19:39.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consequences of a low litter birth weight phenotype for postnatal lean growth performance and neonatal testicular morphology in the pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2013

M. N. Smit ,
J. D. Spencer ,
F. R. C. L. Almeida ,
J. L. Patterson ,
H. Chiarini-Garcia ,
M. K. Dyck  and
G. R. Foxcroft
M. N. Smit*
Affiliation:
Swine Reproduction – Development Program, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada
J. D. Spencer
Affiliation:
JBS United Inc., Sheridan, IN, 46069, USA
F. R. C. L. Almeida
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Structural Biology and Reproduction, Department of Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil
J. L. Patterson
Affiliation:
Swine Reproduction – Development Program, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada
H. Chiarini-Garcia
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Structural Biology and Reproduction, Department of Morphology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 31270-901, Brazil
M. K. Dyck
Affiliation:
Swine Reproduction – Development Program, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada
G. R. Foxcroft
Affiliation:
Swine Reproduction – Development Program, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada
*
†E-mail: mnsmit@ualberta.ca
Get access

Abstract

The consequences of a low litter average birth weight phenotype for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality of all progeny, and testicular development in male offspring, were investigated. Using data from 25 sows with one, and 223 sows with two consecutive farrowing events, individual birth weight (BW) was measured and each litter between 9 and 16 total pigs born was classified as low (LBW), medium (MBW) or high (HBW) birth weight: low and high BW being defined as >1 standard deviation below or above, respectively, the population mean for each litter size. Litter average BW was repeatable within sows. At castration, testicular tissue was collected from 40 male pigs in LBW and HBW litters with individual BW close to their litter average BW and used for histomorphometric analysis. LBW piglets had a lower absolute number of germ cells, Sertoli cells and Leydig cells in their testes and a higher brain : testis weight ratio than HBW piglets. Overall, LBW litters had lower placental weight and higher brain : liver, brain : intestine and brain : Semitendinosus muscle weight ratios than MBW and HBW litters. In the nursery and grow–finish (GF) phase, pigs were kept in pens by BW classification (9 HBW, 17 MBW and 10 LBW pens) with 13 males and 13 females per pen. Average daily gain tended to be lower in LBW than HBW litters in lactation (P = 0.06) and throughout the nursery and GF phases (P < 0.01), resulting in an increasing difference in body weight between LBW, MBW and HBW litters (P < 0.05). Average daily feed intake was lower (P < 0.001) in LBW than HBW litters in the nursery and GF phases. Feed utilization efficiency (feed/gain) was similar for LBW and HBW litters in the nursery, but was lower (P < 0.001) in HBW than LBW litters in the GF phase. By design, slaughter weight was similar between BW classifications; however, LBW litters needed 9 more days to reach the same slaughter weight than HBW litters (P < 0.001). BW classification did not affect carcass composition traits. In conclusion, LBW litters showed benchmarks of intrauterine growth retardation, LBW had a negative impact on testicular development and germ and somatic cell populations, and was associated with decreased postnatal growth during all phases of production; however, no measurable effect on carcass composition traits was established.

Keywords

swinelitter birth weightpostnatal growthtestis

Information

Type
Physiology and functional biology of systems
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 10 , October 2013 , pp. 1681 - 1689
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alvarenga, ALN, Chiarini-Garcia, H, Cardeal, PC, Moreira, LP, Foxcroft, GR, Fontes, DO, Almeida, FRCL 2013. Intra-uterine growth retardation affects birthweight and postnatal development in pigs, impairing muscle accretion, duodenal mucosa morphology and carcass traits. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 25, 387–395.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, AD, Shea, J, Gillis, D 2010a. Development of diets for low birth-weight piglets to improve post-weaning growth performance and optimize net returns to the producer. Prairie Swine Centre Annual Report 2010, 52–55.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, AD, Aalhus, JL, Williams, NH, Patience, JF 2010b. Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2767–2778.Google Scholar
Bérard, J, Pardo, CE, Béthaz, S, Kreuzer, M, Bee, G 2010. Intra-uterine crowding decreases average birth weight and affects muscle fiber hyperplasia in piglets. Journal of Animal Science 88, 3242–3250.Google Scholar
Chiarini-Garcia, H, Parreira, GG, Almeida, FRCL 2011. Glycol methacrylate embedding for improved morphological, morphometrical and immunohistochemical investigations under light microscopy: testes as a model. In Light microscopy: methods and protocols (ed. H Chiarini-Garcia and RCN Melo), pp. 3–18. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
Cooke, PS, Porcelli, J, Hess, RA 1992. Induction of increased testis growth and sperm production in adult rats by neonatal administration of the goitrogen propylthiouracil (PTU): the critical period. Biology of Reproduction 46, 146–154.Google Scholar
Deen, J 1997. Making grow/finish work. Advances in Pork Production 8, 19–30.Google Scholar
Dedecker, JM 2002. Effects of space allowance in a wean-to-finish system and pig removal strategies at market on the growth performance and variation in performance of pigs. Master Thesis, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
D'Inca, R, Gras-Le Guen, C, Che, L, Sangild, PT, Le Huërou-Luron, I 2011. Intrauterine growth restriction delays feeding-induced gut adaptation in term newborn pigs. Neonatology 99, 208–216.Google Scholar
Drumond, AL, Mistrich, M, Chiarini-Garcia, H 2011. Spermatogonial morphology and kinetics during testis development in mice: a high-resolution light microscopy approach. Reproduction 142, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fix, JS, Cassady, JP, Herring, WO, Holl, JW, Culbertson, MS, See, MT 2010. Effect of piglet brith weight on body weight, growth, backfat, and longissimus muscle area of commercial market swine. Livestock Science 127, 51–59.Google Scholar
Flowers, WL 2008. New opportunities for reproductive management. In Proceedings of the 8th London Swine Conference: Facing the New Reality, 1-2 April 2008, London, Ontario, Canada, 31–41pp.Google Scholar
Foxcroft, GR, Dixon, WT, Dyck, MK, Novak, S, Harding, JCS, Almeida, FCRL 2009. Prenatal programming of postnatal development in the pig. In Control of pig reproduction VIII (ed. H Rodriguez-Martinez, JL Vallet and AJ Ziecik), pp. 213–231. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Foxcroft, G, Bee, G, Dixon, W, Hahn, M, Harding, J, Patterson, J, Putman, T, Sarmento, S, Smit, M, Tse, W-Y, Town, S 2007. Consequences of selection for litter size on piglet development. In Paradigms of pig science (ed. JWiseman, MA Varley, S McOrist and B Kemp), pp. 207–229. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
França, LR, Chiarini-Garcia, H 2005. Célula de Sertoli. In Células, uma abordagem multidisciplinary (ed. HF Carvalho and CB Collares-Buzato), pp. 302–324. Editora Manole, Barueri, SP, Brazil.Google Scholar
França, LR, Silva, VA Jr, Chiarini-Garcia, H, Garcia, SK, Debeljnk, L 2000. Cell proliferation and hormonal changes during postnatal development of the testis in the pig. Biology of Reproduction 63, 1629–1636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gondret, F, Lefaucheur, L, Juin, H, Louveau, I, Lebret, B 2006. Low birth weight is associated with enlarged muscle fiber area and impaired meat tenderness of the longissimus muscle in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 93–103.Google Scholar
Hess, RA, Cooke, PS, Bunick, D, Kirby, JD 1993. Adult testicular enlargement induced by neonatal hypothyroidism is accompanied by increased Sertoli and germ cell numbers. Endocrinology 132, 2607–2613.Google Scholar
McCoard, SA, Wise, TH, Ford, JJ 2002. Expression levels of müllerian-inhibiting substance, GATA-4 and 17α-hydroxylase/17, 20-lyase cytochrome P450 during embryonic gonadal development in two diverse breeds of swine. Journal of Endocrinology 175, 365–374.Google Scholar
McCoard, SA, Wise, TH, Lunstra, DD, Ford, JJ 2003. Stereological evaluation of sertoli cell ontogeny during fetal and neonatal life in two diverse breeds of swine. Journal of Endocrinology 178, 395–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (NRC) 1998. Nutrients requirements of swine, 10th edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
O'Connell, NE, Beattie, VE, Watt, D 2005. Influence of regrouping strategy on performance, behavior and carcass parameters in pigs. Livestock Production Science 97, 107–115.Google Scholar
O'Quinn, PR, Dritz, SS, Goodband, RD, Toakch, MD, Swanson, JC, Nelssen, JL, Musser, RE 2001. Sorting growing-finishing pigs by weight fails to improve growth performance or weight variation. Journal of Swine Health and Production 9, 11–16.Google Scholar
Quiniou, N, Dagorn, J, Gaudré, D 2002. Variation of piglets’ birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance. Livestock Production Science 78, 63–70.Google Scholar
Rehfeldt, C, Kuhn, G 2006. Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis. Journal of Animal Science 84 (suppl. E.), E113–E123.Google Scholar
Schinckel, AP, Ferrel, J, Einstein, ME, Pearce, SM, Boyd, RD 2004. Analysis of pig growth from birth to sixty days of age. The Professional Animal Scientist 20, 79–86.Google Scholar
Schinckel, AP, Einstein, ME, Jungst, S, Booher, C, Newman, S 2010. Evaluation of the impact of pig birth weight on grow-finish performance, backfat depth, and loin depth. The Professional Animal Scientist 26, 51–69.Google Scholar
Sinha Hikim, AP, Bartke, A, Russel, LD 1988. Morphometric studies on hamster testes in gonadally active and inactive states? Light microscope findings. Biology of Reproduction 39, 1225–1237.Google Scholar
Smit, MN 2007. Study of fetal programming, sex ratio and maternal parity in pigs in a multigenerational field dataset. Master Thesis, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
Swanlund, DJ, N'Diaye, MR, Loseth, KJ, Pryor, JL, Crabo, BG 1995. Diverse testicular responses to exogenous growth hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in prepubertal boars. Biology of Reproduction 53, 749–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tokach, M 2004. Dealing with variation in market weight. Advances in Pork Production 15, 281–290.Google Scholar
Town, SC, Putman, CT, Turchinksy, NJ, Dixon, WT, Foxcroft, GR 2004. Number of conceptuses in utero affects porcine fetal muscle development. Reproduction 128, 443–454.Google Scholar
Vonnahme, KA, Wilson, ME, Foxcroft, GR, Ford, SP 2002. Impacts on conceptus survival in a commercial swine herd. Journal of Animal Science 80, 553–559.Google Scholar
Wu, G, Bazer, FW, Wallace, JM, Spencer, TE 2006. Board-invited review: intrauterine growth retardation: implications for the animal sciences. Journal of Animal Science 84, 2316–2337.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Smit Supplementary Material

Figures S1-S4 and Tables S1-S4

Download Smit Supplementary Material(File)
File 307.7 KB