Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-qmkzp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-11T19:20:52.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overseas Credit Claiming and Domestic Support for Foreign Aid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2019

Simone Dietrich ,
Susan D. Hyde Open the ORCID record for Susan D. Hyde [Opens in a new window]  and
Matthew S. Winters Open the ORCID record for Matthew S. Winters [Opens in a new window]
Simone Dietrich
Affiliation:
University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Susan D. Hyde*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Matthew S. Winters
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: susanhyde@berkeley.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many foreign aid donors brand development interventions. How do citizens in the donor country react to seeing this branding in action? We test the proposition that citizens will express higher levels of support for foreign aid when they see a branded foreign aid project relative to seeing the same project without branding. We present results from a survey-based laboratory experiment conducted in the United Kingdom where subjects learned about a typical foreign aid project and received a randomized UK branding treatment. Our results suggest that the branding treatments increase the likelihood that donor country respondents believe that aid recipients can identify the source of the foreign aid. Only among conservative respondents, however, does the evidence imply that branding increases support for foreign aid. “UK aid” branding increases conservative opinion that aid dollars are well spent and increases support among this group for the expansion of foreign aid.

Keywords

Foreign aidbrandingsurvey experimentdonor public opinion

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , Winter 2019 , pp. 159 - 170
Copyright
© The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

A previous version of this paper was presented at the “Public Opinion and Foreign Aid: Methodology and Policy Perspectives” workshop held at the University of Essex. Thanks to Joachim Beijmo, Gabriella Montinola, and Dan Nielson for comments and to Lula Chen for multiple useful conversations about multiple comparisons. Kristina Enger and Harsh Pappu provided excellent research assistance. This research was determined exempt from human subjects monitoring by institutional review boards at the University of Essex (where Dietrich was a professor when the research was conducted), the University of Illinois (IRB Protocol Number 16619), and Yale University (1602017262) (where Hyde was a professor when the research was conducted). The study was preregistered in the EGAP registry (ID 20160327AA, available at http://egap.org/registration/1789). The data and code required to replicate all analyses in this article are available at the Journal of Experimental Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network, at doi: 10.7910/DVN/3EDO2Y. The authors acknowledge no conflicts of interest.

References

Burdick, Eugene and Lederer, William J.. 1958. The Ugly American. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Cain, Daylian M., Dana, Jason, and Newman, George E.. 2014. Giving Versus Giving In. Academy of Management Annals 8(1):505–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Jennifer, Canevello, Amy, and Brown, Ashley A.. 2017. Social Motivation: Costs and Benefits of Selfishness and Otherishness. Annual Review of Psychology 68(1):299–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, Simone, Milner, Helen, and Slapin, Jonathan. 2019. From Text to Political Party Positions on Foreign Aid: Analysis of Aid Mentions in Party Manifestos from 1960 to 2015. In Paper Presented at the Political Economy of International Organization Conference, Salzburg, Feb 7–9, 2019.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Simone, Mahmud, Minhaj, and Winters, Matthew S.. 2018. Foreign Aid, Foreign Policy, and Domestic Government Legitimacy: Experimental Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Politics 80(1):133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, Simone, Milner, Helen V., and Slapin, Jonathan. 2018. From Text to Political Positions on Foreign Aid: Analysis of Aid Mentions in Party Manifestos from 1960 to 2015. In Annual Development Economics and Policy Conference of the Research Group on Development Economics.Google Scholar
Fleck, Robert K. and Kilby, Christopher. 2006. How Do Political Changes Influence US Bilateral Aid Allocations? Evidence from Panel Data. Review of Development Economics 10(2):210–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, Justin, Messing, Solomon, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2012. How Words and Money Cultivate a Personal Vote: The Effect of Legislator Credit Claiming on Constituent Credit Allocation. American Political Science Review 106(4):703–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, Reuben, Tidwell, Taylor, and Hawkins, Darren. 2017. Down the Rathole? Public Support for US Foreign Aid. International Studies Quarterly 61(2):442–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, Carol. 2007. Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mawdsley, Emma. 2017. National Interests and the Paradox of Foreign Aid under Austerity: Conservative Governments and the Domestic Politics of International Development since 2010. The Geographical Journal 183(3):223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V. and Tingley, Dustin H.. 2011. Who Supports Global Economic Engagement? The Sources of Preferences in American Foreign Economic Policy. International Organization 65(1):37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V. and Tingley, Dustin H.. 2013. Public Opinion and Foreign Aid: A Review Essay. International Interactions 39(3):389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans. 1962. A Political Theory of Foreign Aid. American Political Science Review 56(2):301–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, Gautam. 2018. Misperceptions of Relative Affluence and Support for International Redistribution. Journal of Politics 80(3):815–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela and Knack, Stephen. 2012. Individual and Country-Level Factors Affecting Support for Foreign Aid. International Political Science Review 33(2):171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prather, Lauren. 2016. Values at the Water’s Edge: Social Welfare Values and Foreign Aid. University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Scotto, Thomas, Reifler, Jason, Hudson, David, and VanHeerde-Hudson, Jennifer. 2017. We Spend How Much? Misperceptions, Innumeracy, and Support for the Foreign Aid in the United States and Great Britain. Journal of Experimental Political Science 4(2):119–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Henson, Lindstrom, Johanna, Haddad, Lawrence, and Mulmi, Rajendra. 2011. Public Perceptions of International Development and Support for Aid in the UK: Results of a Qualitative Enquiry. IDS Working Papers 2010(353):01–67.Google Scholar
Stein, Robert M. and Bickers, Kenneth N.. 1994. Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel. The Journal of Politics 56(2):377–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tendler, Judith. 1975. Inside Foreign Aid. First Edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
van Heerde, Jennifer and Hudson, David. 2010. The Righteous Considereth the Cause of the Poor’? Public Attitudes Towards Poverty in Developing Countries. Political Studies 58(3):389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojtowicz, Lily and Hanania, Dina. 2017. Americans Support Foreign Aid, but Oppose Paying for It. Chicago: Chicago Council on Global Affairs.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Dietrich et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Dietrich et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 217.3 KB