To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
When the readers at the Colegio Jesuita de Zaragoza (Jesuit College of Zaragoza) highlighted the most striking passages in their reading of Jaume Roig's misogynist Catalan work, the Espill (The Mirror, ca. 1460), the miracle of the profaned Host was sure to figure among them (vv. 3502–3816, pp. 171–175). Set in the city of Zaragoza itself, the story recounts the prodigious transformation of the sacred Host (the bread or wafer consecrated in the Eucharist) into a human baby and the baby's return to their original form. In the Espill, the episode's entire chain of events begins when a domestically abused Christian woman seeks the help of a Muslim sage to increase her abusive husband's love. The sage agrees to help, but on the condition that the woman pay him and bring him the sacred Host. The woman complies but, upon delivering the Host to the sage, they find that the Host had miraculously transformed into a baby. The woman tries to kill the child by immolation, thus confirming her evil nature for nonmodern audiences. After a series of subsequent events, the woman dies in the end, miraculously struck and killed by a bolt of lightning, although nothing is said about the fate of the Muslim sage.
This book draws on my long-term involvement with South African townships. Townships are from the perspective of the suburb, which I use as shorthand for the wealthiest fraction of the country's population, the “other” South Africa. Getting to know the lives of township residents has meant crossing boundaries. I am not alone in crossing from suburb to township, but, tellingly in a deeply divided country, we are few.
I started to visit townships after arriving in South Africa in January 1994. I wanted to know what life was like for people there. Curiosity is an important academic attribute, and without it I would not have collected much of the material in this book. But it does not explain why my engagement with townships now stretches to decades. This has been sustained not only by curiosity, but also by political belief and moral conviction, and because the township has become a home and people within it friends.
The book only partially answers what life is like in townships. The menyetla or opportunities described and analysed are only one facet of township life, but an important one. It illustrates the lex lokasi, or law of the township, that is the book's focus. It is, however, an uncomfortable topic to be delving into; mud raking in the lives of township residents, most of whom are poor. Reviewers of the manuscript have stressed the need for contextualisation. Paraphrasing, their concern is that describing how people hustle to make ends meet creates a picture of township residents as law breakers. In turn, this produces a racialised narrative that obscures the larger framework of South Africa's structural violence, historical and current.
During 1718, Spanish ambitions to recover former Habsburg territories in the Mediterranean area led to the creation of a quadruple alliance of Britain, France, Austria and the United Provinces, and in August to the defeat of a Spanish fleet by British forces at the battle of Cape Passaro. In retaliation, the Spanish government decided to support the Jacobites and mount an invasion of Britain. In March 1719, one force led by the 2nd duke of Ormond aimed to land in the south-west of England, and a second diversionary force led by George Keith sailed to Scotland.
The government and other authorities in London were aware of the danger by 10 March. Archbishop Wake evidently suggested to the earl of Sunderland, first lord of the treasury, that there should be some religious response: he may have suggested a fast day. On 16 March, Sunderland reported that the king considered that it would be ‘sufficient to have some Prayers appointed to be said on the litany days’ (Sunday, Wednesday and Friday), in the same style as the three prayers issued for the earlier Jacobite rebellion (1715–E). Sunderland enclosed a copy of this form of prayer with his own proposed amendments, and enquired about the correct manner of signifying the king's order for the issue and use of the prayers.
This chapter is on the triangular relation between romance, tragedy, and decolonization as both themes and tropes in African fiction. The primary concern in the chapter is the work of the novel in the late colonial period and first decade of independence in Africa when the genre was tied closely to the politics of cultural nationalism. A key premise in the chapter is that the turn to the novel among African elites was bifurcated. On one hand, the genre attracted African elites in the late colonial period because they assumed that the genre would best register the tragedy of colonization, notably its cultural deracination, its destruction of subjects, and its denial of African agency. On the other hand, the novel was often asked to help African subjects imagine a future beyond colonialism. The novel in Africa came to be structured by the need to develop a language in which the tragedy that was seen as a defining characteristic of colonial history and the lived experience of colonized subjects, would be countered by the romance of a future that the novel as a genre was imagining and willing into being.
Michael Erskine, a miller at Newbyres Mill in Newbattle, was accused of witchcraft and sodomy and investigated by the presbytery of Dalkeith. He was arrested at some point after 15 October 1629 in response to an order that had also named two other men and two women. On this occasion, the presbytery referred to a warrant for arrest which had previously been issued by the privy council. The later documents write of Erskine alone, so it is not clear what happened to the other four suspects.
Erskine was kept in prison in Newbattle for six weeks. He seems to have been tortured with sleep deprivation until he confessed to all the crimes. Then, on 17 December, the presbytery petitioned the privy council, asking for him to be transferred to Edinburgh tolbooth because people in the parish refused to continue guarding him, and the house in which he was imprisoned was insecure. He was then moved to the tolbooth of Edinburgh.
More than three months later, on 2 April 1630, Erskine's trial came up in the central court of justiciary in Edinburgh. The prosecutor was Joseph Miller, substitute to the king's advocate. Dittays from 31 March 1630, based on depositions before the ‘Lord Justice’ (Alexander Colville, justice depute, who was the judge in charge of the trial), and likewise from the presbytery, were read in the presence of the assize. Erskine denied the crimes. The assize unanimously found him guilty, with the exception of witchcraft committed against Robert Hogg. Whether this was the only witchcraft charge, or whether there were other witchcraft charges of which he was found guilty, was not specified. He was sentenced to be strangled and burned in Newbattle.
An early leader in the girls’ Young Christian Workers (YCW) in England, Lancastrian Mary Lyons recalled in old age how the Movement had shaped her life, including her choice of husband and how they celebrated their wedding in 1942. She married a fellow YCW, Austin Lyons, and at their wedding, she wrote, ‘We sang “Rouse Up” and had the YCW badge as decoration on the wedding cake’. “Rouse Up” was the rallying song of the Movement, shared by both boys and girls, but the girls also had their own songbook. ‘Be proud to be a worker girl, like Christ your worker King; for carry on the world could not, save you your labour bring’ ran the chorus of one of the songs, set to the tune ‘Boys of Wexford’. Another began ‘What's that badge, what's that badge, O my brave Jocist girl’, and ended with a call to action typical of the YCW spirit:
So march on, march along,
Sing our conquering song,
With shoulder to shoulder, girls advance!
Till the whole of our land is more Christian, more grand,
The future is ours, Girls Advance!
Whilst sentiments of this kind were not unusual in the defensive and somewhat triumphalist culture of the English Catholic community in the 1940s and 1950s, the specific depiction of the status, dignity and mission of girls, and particularly of worker girls, was distinctive and rare.
At Swim-Two-Birds is not only a labyrinth: it is a discussion of the many ways to conceive of the Irish novel and a repertory of exercises in prose and verse which illustrate or parody all the styles of Ireland.
—Jorge Luis Borges, ‘When Fiction Lives in Fiction’ (1939)
This conjunction of great music and a poor, almost worthless, literature leads us to suspect that every age has only one expression of itself, that those ages which have had their fullest expression in one art do not find it in another. We then understand that it is not a paradox but a normal fact that the great music of Johann Sebastian Bach was contemporary to the poor literature in Germany at that time.
—Jorge Luis Borges, ‘German Literature in the Age of Bach’ (1953)
To begin indirectly: any Irish person of my generation (I was born in 1958) who has read even a fraction of the commission reports and commentaries that have issued from Ireland in the past fifteen years on the record of pervasive child sexual abuse (much of it perpetrated by priests and religious and lay teachers), on the complicity between the Irish State and the Roman Catholic Church in the confinement and forced labour of young women and girls, on the systematic humiliation and punishment of unmarried mothers within institutions in which their children either died as infants or were forcibly taken from them as a matter of course, or on the incarceration of children within the vast and terrifying apparatus of industrial schools, will realise that the Irish story has been hollowed out. We are not as we once seemed to be.
1.1Como la comunidad de Pisa, toda Italia y casi todo el mundo os consideran extraordinario, invencible y victorioso señor Alfonso, rey por la gracia de Dios de Castilla, Toledo, León, Galicia, Sevilla, Murcia y Jaén, como el más distinguido de todos los reyes que viven o que vale la pena recordar […] y además saben que Vos amáis sobre todo la paz, la verdad, la piedad y la justicia, que vos sois el más cristiano y más fiel […] sabiendo que descendéis de la sangre de los duques de Suabia, una casa a la que pertenece el Imperio con derecho y dignidad por decisión de los príncipes y por entrega de los papas de la Iglesia […] Bandino di Lanzia's speech
Once the prize had been condemned, the agents were responsible for applying for the Bounty or Head Money due to their clients. They had to provide copies of the necessary documents:
• The proof of condemnation
• The proof of the number of men involved in the prize
• The Power of Attorney from both crews
• The certified muster lists from both crews
• A reminder of the Act by which Bounty was to be paid
• A statement by Samuel Seddon, the Admiralty's Solicitor, that the documentation was complete
• The Treasury confirming that no flag officer had claimed a share within the fifteen days’ grace allowed
• The deposition by the master of L’Heureuse that there had been seventysix men on board at the time of the capture
[On the cover of the little parcel of papers] Received the 22nd April 1757 No 395 extra William Redstone, James Bensley, Charles Brett and Philip Stephens Bounty to the Tartar and Happy sloop for taking the Heureux a French privateer £380 0s 0d
The state of the case of William Redstone, James Bensley, Charles Brett and Philip Stephens Esq claiming payment of Bounty Money at £5 per head for 76 men taken in the L’Heureuse a French privateer by his Majesty's ship the Tartar Captain John Lockhart Commander and the Happy sloop Captain Thomas Burnett Commander on 16th September 1756.
To have any hope of being released from French imprisonment, the American merchant seaman held as a prisoner of war had to be able to prove two things: that he was truly American and not British, and that he had not been working for the British at the time of capture. This is only partially analogous to the plight of the impressed American in the Royal Navy, who had to prove only his nationality, although most of the prisoners in France did not understand that.
There is a substantial amount in the historiography of impressment, of the impressment of Americans by a British institution, and of how that led to the creation of a document designed to prevent it, which in turn influenced the development of a modern understanding of citizenship. The 1924 publication, Impressment of American Seamen by James Fulton Zimmerman, remains the foremost study of the British practice as it was used against Americans. Denver Brunsman, in his article “Subjects vs. Citizens” defines its application as a sort of “forced migration”, while Jean Choate termed it “involuntary servitude”; but J. Ross Dancy, in opposition to such views, wrote “though impressment was not the tyrannical and evil implement that history has depicted, on some level it did physically deny men their freedom”, seeming not to perceive that that denial of freedom was the point of contention or that it required tyrannical and evil behaviour on the part of Royal Navy officers to enforce. Dancy's apology brought disputing responses from other historians, particularly Isaac Land. Because so few of the American seamen who ended up as prisoners of war in France had also been impressed by the Royal Navy, impressment is not the real concern of this chapter.
Meta-analysis of previous VAR studies shows that QE multipliers can differ by a factor of 100. But it is unknown if this wide dispersion arises from the use of different QE measures or different VAR modelling approaches. This chapter examines this question
This appendix records the evidence for forms of prayer used by the main nonconforming denominations in Britain on the occasions of special worship appointed by the state or the established churches. In Scotland, the use of set forms was opposed by the established church until the early twentieth century, but congregations of the Episcopal Church adopted the use of the BCP and special forms of prayer from the early eighteenth century. In England and Wales, the position was reversed. In contrast to the Church of England's prolific production of special forms, the dissenter chapels and later the nonconformist and the free church denominations did not publish forms of prayer until the early twentieth century. It should, however, be noted that some dissenters undertook occasional conformity with the Church of England in order to qualify for public office, and so would sometimes be present at church services which used the BCP and perhaps special forms of prayer.
The Episcopal Church in Scotland
As explained in volume 2, pp. lxxvii–lxxviii, cxxiii–cxxiv, an act of toleration in 1712 (10 Anne c. 7) legalized use of the BCP in Scotland, and protected the worship of those members of the Episcopal Church in Scotland who took oaths of loyalty to the crown. From 1714, the always small number of these ‘qualified’ chapels received further official recognition, in being specified together with the Church of Scotland in the orders in council that were issued for alteration of names in prayers for the royal family.
From a sixteenth-century Republic of Letters confined mostly to Europe and centered on practices associated with the recovery, study, and wider use of Greco-Roman antiquity, eighteenth-century learned culture acquired a more global geography, expanding its remit to include critical scholarship about a greater variety of subjects: civic virtue, sentiment, commerce and political economy, natural philosophy, natural rights, and the normative sphere of equality. In ways that are of increasing interest to eighteenth-century intellectual and cultural historians, as well as to historians of early modern cultures’ scholarly practice, aspects of late humanism remained vital as the midwife of the eighteenth-century scholarly culture that begat the Enlightenment. But exactly how the culture of late humanism evolved into one that produced the spectrum of Enlightenment practices and reformist imaginaries remains a fruitful and understudied avenue of inquiry. As I argue in what follows, the articulation of the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth century learned cultures emerges into sharpened focus when the origins of the ‘secular Enlightenment’ – and indeed, the full spectrum of Enlightenment practices and reformist imaginaries that flourished by the middle eighteenth century – are historicized as contingent outcomes of a longer-term process by which participants in the expanding early modern republic of letters injected humanist methods and textual erudition into confessionally- driven religious debates, and extended their application to the study of non- European textual traditions.
Chapter 8 synthesizes the book’s theoretical and empirical findings, arguing that partisan inclusion is a critical, but often overlooked, mechanism for building de facto autonomy in electoral management bodies. The conclusion reflects on how Mexico, Ghana, Venezuela, and Kenya illuminate different pathways through which consultation, transparency, and institutional design shape electoral integrity and democratic stability. It outlines the broader implications for policymakers, international organizations, and scholars seeking to strengthen election administration worldwide. The chapter also identifies future research avenues, including the role of technology, decentralization, and evolving party systems. Ultimately, it highlights the importance of designing electoral management bodies that balance independence with engagement, ensuring institutions that can withstand political pressure and earn public trust.