To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
By the 1980s, the practice of appointing special prayers and services for general use in the established churches of England and Scotland had become diffuse, as is explained in volume 3, pp. 687–90. It is straightforward to record special services and prayers for royal events: these are continued below, for the last years of the reign of Elizabeth II and the coronation of Charles III. For more general national and international events, the provision became complex and difficult to define. Church leaders were now more conscious that in practice calls to prayer had meaning only for regular churchgoers, rather than for the nation as a whole. Together with the ease of modern communications, this made them less discriminating than in the past about the type of event for which they issued calls to prayer, with the result that these became much more frequent. Now, too, appeals for prayers were often not accompanied by texts of special services or prayers; and when texts were suggested these commonly consisted of selections from the liturgical resources of Common worship, rather than the provision of new prayers. As these calls to prayer were now rarely reported in national newspapers (and recent records of church leaders are not yet open for research), the evidence is often elusive.
Consequently, for the period from the 1980s to 2014 only a few of these occasions were briefly noted.
Margaret Watson was the last person to be formally accused of witchcraft in Shetland, and one of the last in Scotland as a whole. Her name came up several times in the Shetland presbytery minutes: in 1708, 1724 and 1725. She was first brought before the presbytery at the same time as the Ratter family in 1708 (the previous case edited in the present volume), but her case was not followed up. She was discussed by the presbytery again in 1724 and 1725, accused of cursing and being a deluder of the people.
Watson was a vagabond, living in the neighbouring parishes of Sandness and Walls. She apparently came into conflict with people and cursed them when she was refused lodgings or food. When brought before the presbytery in 1708, she was suspected of witchcraft and deluding the people, and accused of gross and continual cursing. She denied all accusations of witchcraft, and asked how she could be a witch and not know it. However, she admitted that she did curse and would continue to do so if wronged. Her case in 1708 ended with the presbytery asking the heads of the local families about Watson's life, and they all declared that she was a great curser.
In September 1724, the presbytery received a reference from Sandness about Watson. She was mentioned as an ‘alledg’d witch’ whose case should be laid before the civil magistrate (secular criminal court) by George Duncan, the minister of Sandness and Walls. Her case came up again four times at the presbytery in 1725. In March there was a complaint about her from Walls, and in May there were complaints from both Walls and Sandness.
“Our horses are facing Zimbabwe:” Katlehong Township, mid-July 2021
Katlehong is a sprawling township southeast of Johannesburg. Typical of South Africa's urban townships, it is a mixture of formal housing, backyard rooms, hostels, and informal shack settlements. It merges, to the east and the west with two neighbouring townships, Thokoza and Vosloorus. Collectively the fused townships are known as Kathorus. Not that anyone would say that they hail from Kathorus. Rather, with local identities salient, they will tell you which townships they live in and, likely, which section. The census of 2011 records 737,000 people in Kathorus, of which 98.7 per cent were African. This racial homogeneity, a defining characteristic of South Africa's townships, is an enduring historical legacy. Africans, coloureds, and Indians with rights to reside – permanently or temporarily – in urban areas could only do so in separate, racially designated townships.
It's a forty-five-minute drive from my home in the Johannesburg suburb of Westdene to Katlehong. As you enter the township passing Huntersfield Stadium there is a sign greeting visitors: “Welcome to Katlehong.” It could be welcoming you to another country, another world.
Late on Saturday afternoon, I drive with friends down Sontonga Road to Tsietsi Section at the southern tip of the township, a good 12 kilometres from Huntersfield. For the last week, Kwazulu-Natal and Gauteng provinces have been convulsed by looting. A political struggle within the ruling ANC morphed into an insurrection triggered by the imprisonment of former president Jacob Zuma. The insurrection then turned into an orgy of looting by the poor, and the not so poor, who stormed shopping malls and warehouses.
Navigating Landscapes of Dalcroze Practice investigates the music and movement teaching originated by the Swiss composer Émile Jaques-Dalcroze (1865–1950) as an embodied, diverse, interdisciplinary, transnational, and living practice. The fourteen chapters that follow provide new perspectives on the development, application, and adaptation of this work since its beginnings in early twentieth-century Geneva. Our book is the first collection of Dalcroze histories to focus on practice itself, showing how it has moved among – and been shaped by – people, disciplines, performance practices, and contexts from music education and music therapy to dance, theatre, and physical education. Dalcroze practice today involves participants from babies to seniors on six continents, stimulating research in neuroscience, somatics, and well-being as never before. The literature surrounding it is growing exponentially, with many qualitative and quantitative studies appearing in the last decade alone. We note that the explosion of scientific writing is happening in parallel with increased attention from historians.
The authors of this book reveal aspects of the global expansion of Dalcroze practice by successions of teachers, students, and supporters. However, rather than presenting the teaching as a unified and static method, the book demonstrates the heterogeneity of Dalcroze practice and the multiple identities of those engaged with it. While the role of well-established institutions and training centers is acknowledged throughout, the chapters also bring to light lesser-known people and paths through which the teaching has been channeled and adapted to meet specific artistic, pedagogical, and therapeutic needs.
This chapter reviews the history and recent developments regarding the study of rural settlement, with a focus on Roman Italy, the northwestern provinces, and North Africa, stressing the diversity of regional settlement patterns and trajectories. The chapter discusses the analytical and methodological move from questions of site identification and classification (villa, farm, village) to the reconstruction of integrated landscapes of activity and micro-ecologies. And it presents the challenges and opportunities in developing a truly social archaeology of the Roman rural world that sees not only sites and settlements but also people and their social relations.
The documents transcribed below comprise the pre-trial interrogations and trial records of four women and one man from the presbytery of Dalkeith, to the south and east of Edinburgh. This area suffered from severe witch-hunts in 1649–50 and in 1661–2. These five witches all received death sentences on the same day, 29 July 1661. They were Janet Daill in the parish of Inveresk, and David Johnstone, Agnes Loch, Janet Lyle and Margaret Ramage, all in the parish of Newton. Early interrogations were carried out at Woolmet and Edmonstone in Newton parish, but after a while the suspects were imprisoned in the tolbooth of Musselburgh, where they were all eventually tried together.
The judges included not only the veteran Alexander Colville, but also George Mackenzie, beginning a legal career that would lead him in 1678 to the post of lord advocate and a role in discouraging witchcraft prosecutions in Scotland. Mackenzie may well have learned his scepticism about harsh legal procedures from these trials. In the witchcraft chapter of his book Laws and Customs of Scotland in Matters Criminal (1678), Mackenzie wrote of having interviewed a condemned witch who told him that she had confessed, not because she was guilty, but because the prosecution had destroyed her reputation and livelihood, so that she wished to be out of the world. Anna Cordey, who has conducted a detailed study of the Dalkeith prosecutions, has argued that this woman was Janet Daill.
The five accused witches in this group formed only a small part of the panic as a whole.
To understand their properties, networks can be compared with those randomly generated from one or more network models. The network models introduced in this chapter, many of which are discussed at greater length later in the book, include the Bernoulli random graph, Erdős–Rényi mixture models, Chung–Lu graphs, small world networks, the configuration model, random geometric graphs, preferential attachment models, exponential random graph models, stochastic blockmodels, latent space models, random intersection graphs, graphon models, models for directed graphs and duplication–divergence models. Some basic properties of the models are considered, such as the distribution of the degree of a randomly chosen vertex and typical values of the clustering coefficient.
Knighted by Charles I in 1640, and active on the king's behalf in the ensuing troubles, Sir Nicholas Crispe (1599–1666) wanted posterity to remember him as ‘a loyal sharer in the sufferings of his late and present majesty’, who ‘first discovered and settled the trade of gold in Africa and built there the castle of Cormantine, by which he lost out of purse above £100,000 above all returns from thence’. Mourners at his funeral in 1666 could read a paper to that effect, and a more permanent version was inscribed on his marble monument at Hammersmith, surmounted by a bust of Charles I. He was confident, Crispe wrote in his will, that ‘my nation, when I am dead, will make compensation or amends to my family for so great a service done to my country at my so great loss, which will be better understood in the future’. There was much more to Crispe than bluster, but he would face eternity as a royalist, a slaver, and an unrewarded benefactor to his nation. His career stands out among the speculators and investors who dominated London's African and Atlantic trade in the age of Charles I.
Concerned for his legacy, and eager for posthumous recognition, Crispe instructed his executors ‘to collect my papers together of my doing and proceeding in that business in Africa, and deliver them to my cousin Andrew Crispe, who at his convenience I desire to draw such a narrative as he and my executors shall think fit to be put in print and published’. Alas, no such history materialized. Cousin Andrew, a fellow of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, failed to deliver, died in 1669, and Crispe's papers disappeared.
A number of methods of estimation are introduced, and are applied in the context of networks. Maximum likelihood estimation is applied to Bernoulli random graphs and to Erdős–Rényi mixture graphs. The EM algorithm, used later in fitting stochastic blockmodels, is also introduced. Both maximum likelihood and the (generalized) method of moments are used in the context of estimating the exponent of power law decay in degree distributions. Bayesian methods are presented, and the choice of prior discussed; they are applied to Erdős–Rényi mixture graphs and to their Poissonized variants. Further general methods introduced include Approximate Bayesian Computation, as well as Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, for which both the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm and the Gibbs sampler are presented. Some specific models are given special attention. In exponential random graph models, MCMC methods offer an approach, though convergence to equilibrium can be very slow. The estimation of latent space models is discussed both from a frequentist and from a Bayesian point of view. Estimating the underlying dimension of a random geometric graph is also touched upon.
Alexander Drummond was an elderly man, aged eighty-one, living in the parish of Auchterarder in Perthshire. He was a healer with a large number of clients, including gentlemen and even ministers, and had a reputation for having practised healing for about fifty years. He charged money for healing, and was respected for his knowledge. He was transported to Edinburgh for investigation and trial. Numerous clients, in various localities throughout east-central Scotland, were questioned about his practices; the dossier edited here includes some correspondence about how ministers organised this investigation. The full minutes of Drummond's trial do not survive, but there is a list of assize members, and a summons to the assize. He was evidently tried and executed in 1629.
Most of the documents preserved in the dossier are records of this process of pre-trial interrogation. From 28 September 1628 until 8 July 1629, Drummond was questioned about his performance of healing and about his clients. He cured both physical and mental illness, and adults as well as children. He recited two charms that he used for healing, and the scribe carefully wrote down the words, placing the records in a middle position between written and oral. He also knew some words that he would not repeat during interrogation.
Otherwise, the clerk departed from Drummond's own way of describing his practice. The written record stated that he had long been suspected of witchcraft; he was suspected and challenged for sorcery and witchcraft; suspected of unlawful and supernatural healing, and devilish practice, and abusing his majesty's lieges; ‘ane witch and sorcerer’; ‘crymis of sorcerie witchcraft and divilish chearmingis’; ‘curing be diabolical and unlawful meanis’. The depositions are marked ‘Alexander Drummond Warlock’. The word ‘witchcraft’ was frequently used by the interrogators to describe how an unexpected illness came to afflict a person.