Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Journals
  4. Content listing

Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2100811 results in Journals

Page 374 of 105041

  • LAN volume 83 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Journal:
    Language / Volume 83 / Issue 1 / March 2007
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    19 February 2026, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • Annual Report

  • Brian D. Joseph
  • Journal:
    Language / Volume 82 / Issue 2 / June 2006
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    19 February 2026, pp. 466-474
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • As one of my annual obligations as editor, I am asked, on the occasion of the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America in January, to file a report with the LSA Executive Committee in which I detail and discuss activities and issues pertaining to the running of the journal, highlight any new developments of note, and generally address any matters that either the Executive Committee or I myself consider to be important or noteworthy in some respect. Following what has become my usual procedure for fulfilling this obligation, I give below, in place of my more usual editorial comments in this section of the journal, my fourth ‘State of the Journal’ report, summing up the events of my fourth year on the job. The version given below is essentially the form in which the report was submitted to the Executive Committee in January, though I have taken the liberty of adding some informational updates in footnotes, correcting some errors, and embellishing and elaborating here and there as appropriate.

  • LAN volume 86 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Journal:
    Language / Volume 86 / Issue 1 / March 2010
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    19 February 2026, pp. b1-b9
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • Defining crosslinguistic categories: The case of nominal tense (Reply to Nordlinger and Sadler)

  • Judith Tonhauser
  • Journal:
    Language / Volume 84 / Issue 2 / June 2008
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    19 February 2026, pp. 332-342

  • Taking stock. Nordlinger & Sadler 2004 (NS04) brought nominal tense/aspect/mood (TAM) markers across languages to the attention of the linguistic community and raised many important questions about noun-phrase temporality, lexical categories, and other research areas. In the theoretical literature on noun-phrase temporality, the idea that tense might be a category of noun phrases was considered as early as Enç 1981. In her analysis of the temporal interpretation of noun phrases, Enç (1981:41–45) briefly entertains the possibility of noun phrases being interpreted by nominal tense operators that locate the time relative to which a noun phrase is interpreted (i.e. Tonhauser 2007's (T07) noun-phrase time tnp) relative to the utterance time. Enç ultimately rejects the proposal since nominal tense operators ‘do not correspond to tense morphemes’ (1981:44), that is, do not have overt morphological counterparts, but also because an analysis according to which the noun-phrase time is contextually determined is more adequate. The primary focus of subsequent literature on noun-phrase temporality was to identify structural, semantic, and pragmatic constraints on the location of the noun-phrase time (e.g. Enç 1986, Musan 1995, 1999, Demirdache 1997, Tonhauser 2002). In the context of this research, the empirical domain of which is English, German, and St‘át'imcets, that is, languages that do not have nominal temporal markers, N&S's claim that there are languages with nominal tenses is exciting because these languages would provide overt evidence for Enç‘s nominal tense operators and promise insight into the way that the noun-phrase time is located.

  • Letters to Language

  • Frederick J. Newmeyer, Colin Phillips
  • Journal:
    Language / Volume 82 / Issue 4 / December 2006
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    19 February 2026, pp. 705-708
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 374 of 105041