To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This article proposes a feature-geometric analysis of the interpretable features of Infl, using minimalist syntax and distributed morphology. A small universal set of monovalent interpretable features and a set of entailment relations among them provide the basis for a principled account of the tense systems of English and Spanish. While each feature, each lexical item, and each vocabulary item has a unified representation, surface polysemy is shown to arise from the mappings between them. Crosslinguistic variation is shown to arise from the different features chosen by each language and from the ways in which each language assembles its features into lexical items and vocabulary items. In addition, the presence or absence of a dependent feature F in a given language is shown to have important consequences for the semantic interpretation of the feature dominating F. These three possible differences interact to produce the significant superficial differences between the tense systems of the two languages.
By centering the experiences of minoritized community members, this study explores how Good Samaritan laws (GSLs) impact health behaviors related to opioid overdose response. Most states have GSLs that address overdose response. However, their scope can perpetuate structural racism by extending inequitable protection through rigid requirements and exclusions. In this paper, we look at Indiana’s GSL, Aaron’s Law, and consider how its limitations impact Black Indianapolis residents. We analyzed 50 semi-structured one-on-one interviews with Black residents of four urban Indianapolis zip code areas. We engaged the Health Belief Model using directed qualitative content analysis to consider participants’ evaluation of perceived benefits and barriers as they relate to calling 911 following an opioid overdose. We explore participants’ feelings about calling 911 and interacting with law enforcement, and their understanding of Aaron’s Law and its practical application in their neighborhoods. We demonstrate structural racism’s presence in the impressions and applications of policies and highlight how addressing them can improve health outcomes in minoritized communities. Finally, we make recommendations for GSLs nationwide that address the impact of structural racism on overdose fatalities and strengthen their protections, making laypeople more likely to call 911 after an overdose.