To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This introductary chapter elaborates on the problem statement of this book and its ambition throughout Chapters 1 – 4 . It outlines the relationship between law and ethics and the importance of the latter in the regulatory analysis of human (mood) enhancement technologies. It defines the material scope, the novelty of the research on human mood enhancement technology and its impact and relevance for policymakers, lawmakers, technology developers and the academic research community. It also discusses the roles of the person(s) administering the enhancement technology (the enhancer) and the role of the person on whom the enhancement procedure is performed (the enhanced), as well as the desirability of developing human (mood) enhancement technologies. The final section of this chapter presents the methodology used to provide answers to the main research questions and associated sub-questions that guided the analysis in this book.
PROBLEM STATEMENT AND AMBITION
1. Political institutions on both sides of the Atlantic commissioned extensive reports to predict what emerging and future technologies with the potential to improve or change human capacities might look like. These reports urge the development of guidelines and recommendations for policies, regulation and governance of human enhancement technologies (hereinaft er: HETs) in a socially desirable way. Furthermore, academics, including legal scholars and ethicists, amongst others, discussed HETs from their respective specific angles. However, these analyses oft en lack a broader exploration and an overall perspective on the ethical and legal issues associated with a particular type of human enhancement technology.
To conceptualize data commodification – as per the following chapter – I first need to be able to rely on an appropriate foundational framework. The identification of it constitutes the object of the present Chapter 1. I first introduce the key notions connected to markets and commodification as a process leading ultimately to markets as well as commodification studies as the strand of the literature that analyzes these processes. Then, I introduce the seminal conceptualization of commodification by Radin, which constitutes the foundational framework for this book. At this point, it remains to be further explained and justified why it is relevant for my present endeavor. The justification is threefold and pertains, in turn, to the following elements: The justification of commodification studies as a field; the comparability of data with sex, body parts and babies in that they are also ‘contested commodities‘, which calls to mind Radin‘s spectrum approach to commodification; and finally, the justification of the specific relevance of Radin‘s approach amidst commodification studies, given the existence of other spectrum approaches to the commodification phenomenon.
Part I was dedicated to the understanding of the data commodification phenomenon. Based on the seminal work of Radin on commodification, I designed a data commodification spectrum, ranging from data complete commodification to data complete non-commodification. To do that, I adapted the ‘commodification indicia‘ to the specificities of data commodification, leading to four ‘data-commodification indicia‘. They pertain to the identification of the commodity – and thus the relevant resource and object at stake, the identification of the relevant actors, of the relevant framework and, finally, of the value(s) at stake. To form the data commodification spectrum, I clustered data governance normative arguments where I could identify a significant portion of the literature as falling into the ‘efficient data market paradigm‘ while the ‘fair data market paradigm‘ is also a prominent portion of the debate – with internal variations. Other than that, I could find no consistent and well-developed paradigm. I analyzed the data commons literature, yet a rather immature and scattered one but full of teachings. An element learned from the data commons literature that bears significance for the present book is the conscious deliberation over what should be considered as the relevant resource that contrasts with the focus on ‘data‘ (and data only) in both the efficient and the fair data markets paradigms. Finally, I identified a burgeoning cluster that I referred to as ‘societal data governance‘ that essentially draws data governance conclusions from the characterization of data commodification as a key and problematic element of data capitalism.
This chapter analyses different proposals for defining human enhancement technologies presented by academics from various scientific fields (legal scholars, ethicists, philosophers, engineers, medical scholars, amongst others) and international institutions (such as the European Parliament). Based on their analyses, the chapter provides a stipulative definition that will be used for this research. Moreover, the proposed definition‘s feasibility for the application by the legislator is also examined towards the end of this chapter. While analysing definitions of human enhancement, two main challenges associated with them are distilled and further elaborated. These include reference to the term‘normality ‘ and its implications for being used in a definition, as well as the relevance of the distinction between therapy and enhancement for the ongoing and future policymaking and lawmaking debate on human enhancement.
INTRODUCTION
46. People have been trying to become smarter, advance their skills and knowledge, or improve themselves in many different ways, respects, and degrees. All of these improvements could come in different shapes and formats. One may think of a person following a healthy diet to improve their health, someone reading a book to advance their knowledge on a given topic, or running every evening to prepare their body strength to finish a marathon.
47. More recently, people have also been striving to improve themselves using different technological tools. For example, new and emerging technologies are used to improve sports performances, concentration at work, overall health, and similar. The term ‘ technologies ‘ should mean the application of scientific knowledge to the practical aims of human life.
WHAT THIS BOOK DOES NOT CONTAIN AND WHAT IT DOES CONTAIN
Beyond online platforms, data are nowadays used as key economic resources in a broad array of contexts. Huge amounts of data are, for example, generated in sectors as disparate as agriculture, home appliances and wearables. In the agriculture sector, data collected in farms can inform on the quality of soils and thus on the need for intrants or to ‘monitor crop development‘. In the home appliances sector, data generated throughout the use of ‘smart‘ devices may for example reduce electricity consumption and support individuals in their cooking experience. Data generated through the use of wearable fitness trackers can provide information, for example, on the sleeping patterns of individuals wearing them, which could be used for medical purposes.
That data are valuable economic resources has become so self-evident that every book on data worthy of the name is expected to start with a discussion on this phenomenon together with a metaphor that, according to the author, best describes data as economic resources. Are data ‘the new oil‘insofar as they are turned into the infrastructure for today‘s economy and society? Or are they squarely‘the lifeblood‘ of society? Or, alternatively, should data be compared as air, speaking to their volatility? Or maybe data are best described as rivers, that concern all the persons through the property of whom they flow? Or yet another flourishing metaphor views data as labor.
The final chapter of this book provides an overview of the main conclusions stemming from analyses performed in the previous chapters and elaborates on the ethical and legal recommendations for policymakers and lawmakers at the UN, CoE, and EU levels concerning the current regulatory framework dealing with mood HETs. Another section at the end of this chapter provides several final high-level remarks about conducted research on human (mood) enhancement technologies, as well as suggestions for further research on this topic. Finally, an annexe to this chapter provides an informative summary of all the analysed pieces of legislation.
THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
593. Based on the findings from the research performed in this book, this final chapter provides a summary of the main conclusions that were established at the end of some of the preceding chapters. This chapter also develops normative recommendations on how ethical issues, analysed in Chapter 2 , and legal uncertainties, outlined in Chapter 3 , associated with mood HETs could be tackled to answer the main research question of this book:“How should policymakers and lawmakers address the main ethical and regulatory challenges of human mood enhancement technology?“.
594. Before discussing ethics and the law of mood HETs, some notions and concepts needed to be clarified first. The notion of mood falls, together with notions of emotions and feelings, within the umbrella term of affective states of people.
“Always a working Swapfiets for a fixed monthly fee.”
– Website Swapfiets
INTRODUCTION
425. Obligation to ensure the availability of the product/service as main obligation of the PSS supplier – The main obligation of the PSS supplier in a PSS contract is to ensure the availability of the product and/or the service to the PSS user. This obligation falls into two sub-obligations. First, the PSS supplier must make the product/service available to the PSS user, which generally implies a delivery obligation. Depending on the contractual qualification of this obligation, the risk regime, which essentially boils down to the question which party bears the risk of loss or damages to the product due to force majeure, will also diff er. These questions are discussed for the main three types of PSS in section 4.2. Second, it does not suffice to make the product/service available to the PSS user, this delivered product/service must also be in conformity with the PSS contract. Therefore, section 4.3. analyses the conformity requirements, the rules on liability for non-conformity and the available remedies for non-conformity for the three main types of PSS contracts. Section 4.4 evaluates the legal framework for these two sub-obligations and proposes normative solutions. Finally, section 4.5 sets out model clauses on the obligation to ensure the availability of the product/service for both use-oriented and result-oriented PSS contracts.
“Is consumer law as it was developed in the consumer society the problem? Is ‘irresponsible’ behaviour of consumers the problem? Is the consumer the problem? Are we the problem?”
– Hans-W. Micklitz
INTRODUCTION
800. Ownership, moral hazard, and end-of-life of the product – An essential characteristic of use-oriented and result-oriented PSS (and contrary to product-oriented PSS where ownership is still transferred) is that the PSS supplier wishes to retain the ownership of the product. The first section of this chapter (section 7.2) therefore deals with the question of how the PSS supplier can protect its right of ownership of the product. The second section of this chapter (section 7.3) discusses moral hazard, i.e. the risk that PSS user will treat the product less carefully then if he were the owner of the product. Here, particular attention is given to how this risk can be (contractually) mitigated. Finally, the third section (section 7.4) deals with the end-of-life stage of the product. Here, the responsibilities of the PSS supplier regarding collection, repurposing, and/or disposal of the product in use-oriented and resultoriented PSS are discussed compared to the responsibilities of the PSS supplier in product-oriented PSS. Additionally, this section also analyses how circular guarantees can be incorporated into the PSS contract.
“If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck!”
– The “duck test”
INTRODUCTION
352. Importance of contractual qualification – PSS contracts are usually concluded between two parties: a) the PSS supplier and b) the PSS user. Yet more complex constructions are also possible. For example, PSS contracts can be offered through a platform, or a third party can be involved in the financing of the product. The parties to a PSS contract derive rights and obligations from both EU law and national law. To determine which rules apply to PSS contracts, it is therefore important to consider their contractual qualification.
353. Qualification under EU law – When considering the qualification of the PSS contract under EU law, the CRD is the first legal instrument that comes to mind. This directive makes a distinction between a “sales contract” and a “services contract”. According to the CRD, a “sales contract” means “any contract under which the trader transfers or undertakes to transfer the ownership of goods to the consumer and the consumer pays or undertakes to pay the price thereof, including any contract having as its object both goods and services.”
80. PSS under general contract law – This chapter sets out some basic principles of general contract law and applies them to PSS contracts. This provides the necessary context, concepts and legal building blocks that allow the following chapters to delve deeper in the contractual rights and liabilities of the PSS user and the PSS supplier.
First, the formation of the PSS contract is discussed. Section 2.2 analyses the requirements for the validity of the PSS contract, such as consent, capacity, object and cause. It also discusses the process of formation of the PSS contract, such as offer and acceptance, pre-contractual information, and the conclusion of the contract through representation.
Second, this chapter looks at the widespread use of standard contracts and general terms and conditions for PSS. Section 2.3 explores the role, function, and risks of using standard contracts for PSS contracts, as well as the requirements for incorporation/enforceability of the terms and conditions into the PSS contract. Furthermore, it deals with the (un)fairness of the terms and conditions, mainly through an analysis of the Unfair Contract Terms Directive (“UCTD”) and its national implementation in Belgian and the Netherlands.
The PSS user-consumer's right of withdrawal is examined in section 2.4. Here, there is a particular focus on the diff erence between the right of withdrawal for product-oriented PSS (which qualify as sales contracts for the purposes of the CRD) and use-oriented and result-oriented PSS (which qualify as service contracts for the purposes of the CRD).