To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Our previous chapters focused on the functional morphology, life cycles and ecology of a wide range of animal parasites. One of our aims in these chapters was to highlight the complexity and fascination of the parasitic life style. Another was to introduce the idea that the seemingly infinite diversity of parasite life cycles and adaptations could be interpreted under an ecological umbrella. Armed with this background knowledge, we now consider unifying principles of ecology and evolution that can be applied to the phenomenon of parasitism.
We begin our transition with a consideration of the complex nature of parasite populations and the general ecological characteristics of the individuals that comprise them. We highlight the nature of enquiry at this level by first considering two examples. In a field survey, Cornwell & Cowan (1963) monitored the transmission of gut helminths into 180 canvasback ducks, Aythya valisineria, sampled from a small wetland in western Canada. The authors controlled for sampling heterogeneity by restricting their collections to ducklings within individual clutches. Their results showed that even within a single clutch, individual siblings harbored between 90 and 6000 worms! In another field survey, Valtonen et al. (2004) censused adult acanthocephalan populations in individual ringed seals, Phoca hispida, collected from the Baltic Sea. Although the collections spanned a 22-year period when the seal and intermediate host populations varied extensively, the prevalence of acanthocephalans was always 100% and the mean number of worms fluctuated within a single order of magnitude. Thus, on the one hand, mean parasite infrapopulation sizes can vary tremendously, even within very narrow spatial and temporal scales. On the other hand, population sizes can be remarkably stable, barely fluctuating around an equilibrium value. Characterizing this extreme variation at both narrow and broad temporal and spatial scales and understanding the underlying mechanisms that determine it are the central objectives of parasite population ecologists and ecological epidemiologists.