Innovation is needed for the growing number of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is effective in improving exercise tolerance and quality of life, but these benefits do not appear to be sustained. This highlights the need for cost effective methods to maintain benefits on completion of therapy. The findings of a large trial from the UK are reported.

A two-center randomized controlled trial of patients discharged from PR compared the costs and benefits of PR maintenance with standard care. National Health Service (NHS) resource use, personal expenditure, and societal costs were recorded over one year, and bottom-up costing was undertaken for the PR maintenance program. Changes in health-related quality of life were recorded using the EQ-5D-5L, and differences were compared with the level identified as significant for COPD. A cost utility analysis was undertaken from an NHS perspective; uncertainties in cost and outcome data were incorporated into a sensitivity analysis. Cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) were computed.

The study included 116 patients who had finished PR within the last four weeks. The economic analysis showed that mean healthcare costs per patient for PR maintenance were approximately GBP139.72 (EUR165.57) lower than for usual care. The observed 0.118 advantage in mean quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (p<0.05) was above the threshold (0.051) for COPD significance. CEACs indicated there was a 97 percent chance of achieving GBP20,000 (EUR23,699.80) per QALY (NICE acceptance level ≤GBP30,000 (EUR35,549.70). Patient and societal costs increased this percentage. It was estimated that if patients with COPD completed a maintenance program following PR, the NHS could save up to GBP28.6 million (EUR33.89 million).

Our findings confirm that a structured PR maintenance program is highly cost effective in extending the benefits of short-term PR. The trial, undertaken during COVID, also signals the potential for emerging digital innovations to provide future transformative change in delivering self-management programs to sustain health and reduce NHS costs for people living with chronic conditions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed a move from face-to-face to online delivery of services by hospitals and primary care providers, but little is known about the impact of digital transformation in organizations supporting unpaid caregivers. The value of care provided by informal caregivers since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic has been estimated at EUR111 billion in England.

The study assessed the impact of digital transformation in an English caregivers’ support organization covering a population of 0.98 million. A retrospective mixed method study was conducted of digital and non-digital support service utilization among caregivers in city and rural geographical areas from January 2019 to June 2021. Organizational performance and service quality indicators were compared for two financial years: 2019-2020 and 2020-2021. A survey of users was conducted to evaluate barriers to and facilitators of digital service uptake, computer proficiency among caregivers, and preferences for future digital service provision.

The number of caregivers registered with the organization rose by 36 percent to 20,237 in 2021. Monthly contacts rose by 225 percent to 6,500, with remote contacts rising from 65 to 85 percent. Observed behavior patterns differed between city and rural caregivers. Overall, one-to-one contacts increased by 89 percent and caregiver assessments by 21 percent, with no expansion in staffing. User-reported service quality improved in five out of eight indicators (p<0.05). The demographic characteristics of survey respondents (152 caregivers) were similar to all registered caregivers. The mean short form Computer Proficiency Questionnaire score of 25.61 indicated a relatively high computer proficiency. Qualitative analysis confirmed a preference for face-to-face and online options. The most highly rated online services were peer support groups and wellbeing assessment and support needs checks.

Considering the economic importance of unpaid caregivers, more attention should be paid to the organizations supporting them and the potential for technology to enhance caregivers’ access to and benefit from such services. This initial assessment of digital transformation in one such organization demonstrates the potential for cost-effective service transition. Further research is required to inform sustainable future solutions.

The incidence of facial palsy has been rising worldwide, with recent evidence emerging of links to COVID-19 infection. To date, guidance on cost-effective treatments is limited to medication (prednisolone). In terms of physical therapy, neuromuscular retraining (NMR) to restore balanced facial function has been most widely evaluated, but not in terms of cost effectiveness. The added value of telerehabilitation is unknown.

A multistage technology assessment was conducted, which included the following:

• • a national survey of current therapy pathways in the UK and patients’ and clinicians’ views on the benefits and challenges of telerehabilitation;

• • a systematic review of clinical effectiveness trials evaluating facial NMR therapy;

• • calculation of long-term morbidity costs (national economic burden) based on incidence, patient recovery profiles, health-related quality of life, and national facial palsy treatment costs (valuation of clinical improvements in monetary terms was provided by a national Delphi panel); and

• • evaluation of the cost effectiveness of telerehabilitation (remote monitoring wearables) added to current face-to-face NMR delivery.

Nationally, approximately five percent of patients with facial palsy (17% of unresolved cases) are referred for facial NMR. The long-term economic burden associated with unresolved cases is estimated to range from GBP351 (EUR417) to GBP584 (EUR692) million, indicating substantial savings if long-term recovery can be improved. Medical treatment costs are GBP86.34 (EUR102) million per annual cohort, and physical and psychological therapy costs are GBP643,292 (EUR762,561). Economic modeling showed that telerehabilitation was cost effective, producing a health gain and a cost-saving of GBP468 (EUR555) per patient. If scaled to the national level for all patients who do not recover fully, an annual saving of GBP3.075 (EUR3.65) million is possible.

Economic modeling indicates that NMR could improve patient outcomes and reduce costs. The national survey demonstrated that access to NMR therapy services is limited, so introduction of telerehabilitation could improve access for currently underserved populations. Future clinical trials need to incorporate economic evaluations to help inform decision-making.

In the United Kingdom (UK), 23,000 people annually are diagnosed with facial palsy (acute onset facial paralysis). For nearly one third this will result in a permanent disability, including in some the inability to smile. In addition to initial pharmacological therapy, guidelines recommend tailored facial exercise (TFE) therapy repeated every day. However, not all patients are currently able to access such specialist physical therapy. ‘Smart specs’ (using miniaturized sensors in the frames to measure facial movement) are currently being developed. Linked to a smartphone, these could allow people to practice TFEs discreetly, provide immediate feedback, and supply data on outcomes to the patient and their clinician.

Modelling of introduction of Facial Remote Activity Monitoring Eyewear (FRAME) into treatment pathways for patients with facial palsy. This included: (i) review on effectiveness of TFE therapy; (ii) national surveys (medical staff, facial therapy specialists and patients) to gather data on access to TFE therapy; (iii) Delphi Exercise to identify consensus on key outcome measures; and, (iv) economic modelling to estimate cost-effectiveness and determine a range of acceptable costs for the technology. In parallel, research to examine target markets to inform product development, and production of integral commercialization plan.

Searches short-listed ten studies to add to the three included in the 2011 Cochrane review. Surveys indicate approximately thirteen percent of eligible UK patients access personalized TFE therapy. Estimated annual expenditure on hospital treatments for facial palsy patients is currently >GBP 80 million (>USD 106 million) compared with <GBP 0.5 million (<USD 0.66 million) on TFE therapy. Patients with permanent defects can suffer a loss of up to two quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

Findings from this study, particularly in relation to costs and benefits, will inform the design of a subsequent randomized controlled trial. A novel wearable technology could make a major difference to people's lives, as well as generating potential efficiencies for healthcare.