We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
Two broad aims drive weed science research: improved management and improvedunderstanding of weed biology and ecology. In recent years, agriculturalweed research addressing these two aims has effectively split into separatesubdisciplines despite repeated calls for greater integration. Although someexcellent work is being done, agricultural weed research has developed avery high level of repetitiveness, a preponderance of purely descriptivestudies, and has failed to clearly articulate novel hypotheses linked toestablished bodies of ecological and evolutionary theory. In contrast,invasive plant research attracts a diverse cadre of nonweed scientists usinginvasions to explore broader and more integrated biological questionsgrounded in theory. We propose that although studies focused on weedmanagement remain vitally important, agricultural weed research wouldbenefit from deeper theoretical justification, a broader vision, andincreased collaboration across diverse disciplines. To initiate change inthis direction, we call for more emphasis on interdisciplinary training forweed scientists, and for focused workshops and working groups to developspecific areas of research and promote interactions among weed scientistsand with the wider scientific community.
In this paper, we consider a single-server queue with stationary input, where each job joining the queue has an associated deadline. The deadline is a time constraint on job sojourn time and may be finite or infinite. If the job does not complete service before its deadline expires, it abandons the queue and the partial service it may have received up to that point is wasted. When the queue operates under a first-come-first served discipline, we establish conditions under which the actual workload process—that is, the work the server eventually processes—is unstable, weakly stable, and strongly stable. An interesting phenomenon observed is that in a nontrivial portion of the parameter space, the queue is weakly stable, but not strongly stable. We also indicate how our results apply to other nonidling service disciplines. We finally extend the results for a single node to acyclic (feed-forward) networks of queues with either per-queue or network-wide deadlines.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.