We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Rachel Thomasson, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences,Elspeth Guthrie, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences,Allan House, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences
Psychosis is a core area of practice across all psychiatric sub-specialties, each with its own challenges. This chapter illustrates some of the complexities involved in assessment and treatment of psychosis in general hospital settings. The intersection between schizophrenia and physical health risks is highlighted as a starting point before examining the approach to diagnosis and the range of presentations in different areas of the general hospital. Management of common queries is discussed, taking a bio-psycho-social approach. Finally, legal aspects of treating patients with psychosis are outlined using practical tips.
Edited by
Rachel Thomasson, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences,Elspeth Guthrie, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences,Allan House, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences
Historically, the boundaries between neurology, neuropathology and psychiatry were somewhat blurred as clinicians were encouraged to see disorders of brain and mind as arising from a common organic denominator. It was not uncommon to see psychiatrists at the microscope making landmark discoveries (Alois Alzheimer and Solomon Carter-Fuller, to name just two of them), yet the twentieth century saw these three disciplines fractionate. Neurology and neuropathology retained collaborative threads as neurology became established as the speciality of organic brain disease, while psychiatry did not regain traction as a credible medico-scientific discipline for several decades. Thankfully, the boundaries between the three disciplines are once again blurred as it has become clear that many neurological conditions include symptoms commonly recognised and treated by psychiatrists. This chapter outlines how to approach assessment and diagnosis and gives an overview of psychiatric presentations in several core neurology topics including stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease and autoimmune disorders.
Evidence shows that research-active trusts have better clinical patient outcomes. Psychiatric trainees are required to develop knowledge and skills in research techniques and critical appraisal to enable them to practice evidence-based medicine and be research-active clinicians. This project aimed to evaluate and improve the support for developing research competencies available to general adult psychiatry higher trainees (HT) in the North-West of England.
Method
General Adult HT in the North–West of England completed a baseline survey in November 2019 to ascertain trainee's experience of research training provision. The following interventions were implemented to address this feedback:
A trainee research handbook was produced, containing exemplar activies for developing research competencies and available training opportunities, supervisors and active research studies.
The trainee research representative circulated research and training opportunities between November 2019 – August 2020.
Research representatives held a trainee Question and Answer session in September 2020.
All General Adult HT were asked to complete an electronic survey in November 2020 to evaluate the effect of these interventions.
Result
18 General Adult HT completed the baseline survey in November 2019. 29.4% of trainees thought they received enough information on research competencies and 88.9% wanted more written guidance. 38.9% of trainees knew who to contact about research within their NHS Trust and 33.3% were aware of current research studies. Identified challenges for meeting research competencies included lack of time, difficulty identifying a mentor and topic and accessibility of projects.
20 General Adult HT completed the repeat survey in November 2020. 50% of trainees wanted to be actively involved in research and 35% wanted to develop evidence-based medicine skills. A minority of trainees aimed to complete only the minimum ARCP requirements. All trainees thought the handbook was a useful resource for meeting research competencies and would recommend it to other trainees. In trainees who received the handbook, 94.7% thought they had received adequate support on meeting research competencies and 94.7% knew who to contact about research in their trust. 68.4% of trainees would like further written guidance on meeting research competencies. Trainees highlighted ongoing practical difficulties with engaging with research and concern about lacking required skills for research.
Conclusion
Trainees are motivated to engage with research on various different levels, not purely for ARCP purposes. Simple interventions can help trainees feel adequately supported with meeting research competencies. Further work to support trainee involvement in research and improve trainee confidence in engaging with research is required.
Post injection syndrome (PIS) is a serious complication that can occur after Olanzapine Long Acting Injection (LAI). It can occur without any derangement in physical observations. It is important that patients are monitored appropriately following administration of Olanzapine LAI to ensure that symptoms of PIS are appropriately identified and managed. This project aimed to evaluate the current level of knowledge about PIS in two staff groups within an Adult Forensic Service – in-patient nursing staff and junior doctors and advanced practitioners (APs) providing medical cover to inpatient wards.
Method
Electronic surveys evaluating knowledge about the symptoms of PIS, monitoring requirements and management of possible PIS were circulated to inpatient nursing staff, junior doctors and APs working within an Adult Forensic Service in the North West of England.
Result
1) Nursing staff knowledge – 26 nursing staff completed the survey. 4.5% of nurses correctly identified all symptoms of PIS and 72.7% believed that tachycardia or hypotension occur in PIS. 22.7% of nurses identified the correct management plan if a patient feels unwell following Olanzapine LAI. 40.9% would only request a medical review if physical observations were abnormal. 2) Junior doctor and AP knowledge – 6 doctors and 6 advanced practitioners completed the survey. 17% of doctors and APs correctly identified all symptoms of PIS. 50% believed hypotension or tachycardia were symptoms of PIS. 25% of doctors and APs identified correct management of PIS and 16.7% believed that the patient should be managed on the psychiatric ward unless physical observations became abnormal.
Conclusion
Levels of knowledge about the symptoms and management of PIS are low within this Adult Forensic Service. Knowledge of PIS and management of suspected PIS needs to be improved in nursing staff, junior doctors and advanced practitioners to ensure correct identification and safe management. In response to these findings, a care plan for monitoring of patients after Olanzapine LAI was developed. This included a structured monitoring proforma for completion post depot administration and instructions for managing suspected PIS. This care plan is kept in the front of the drug chart of all patients prescribed Olanzapine LAI. One-page educational summaries on PIS were written and circulated to nursing staff, junior doctors and APs. Information on Olanzapine LAI use and PIS were included in junior doctor induction materials and on-call handbook, to improve trainee awareness and knowledge.