We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Consider a locally cartesian closed category with an object $\mathbb{I}$ and a class of trivial fibrations, which admit sections and are stable under pushforward and retract as arrows. Define the fibrations to be those maps whose Leibniz exponential with the generic point of $\mathbb{I}$ defines a trivial fibration. Then the fibrations are also closed under pushforward.
A homotopical category is a category equipped with some collection of morphisms traditionally called “weak equivalences” that somewhat resemble isomorphisms but fail to be invertible in any reasonable sense, and might in fact not even be reversible: that is, the presence of a weak equivalence X → Y need not imply the presence of a weak equivalence Y → X. Frequently, the weak equivalences are defined as the class of morphisms in a category K that are “inverted by a functor” F : K → L, in the sense of being precisely those morphisms in K that are sent to isomorphisms in L. For instance:
– Weak homotopy equivalences of spaces or spectra are those maps inverted by the homotopy group functors π∗ : Top → GrSet or π∗ : Spectra → GrAb.
– Quasi-isomorphisms of chain complexes are those maps inverted by the homology functor H∗ : Ch → GrAb.
– Equivariant weak homotopy equivalences of G-spaces are those maps inverted by the homotopy functors on the fixed point subspaces for each compact subgroup of G.
The term used to describe the equivalence class represented by a topological space up to weak homotopy equivalence is a homotopy type. Since the weak homotopy equivalence relation is created by the functor π∗ , a homotopy type can loosely be thought of as a collection of algebraic invariants of the space X, as encoded by the homotopy groups π∗X. Homotopy types live in a category called the homotopy category of spaces, which is related to the classical category of spaces as follows: a genuine continuous function X → Y certainly represents a map (graded homomorphism) between homotopy types. But a weak homotopy equivalence of spaces, defining an isomorphism of homotopy types, should now be regarded as formally invertible.
In their 1967 manuscript Calculus of fractions and homotopy theory, Gabriel and Zisman [100] formalized the construction of what they call the category of fractions associated to any class of morphisms in any category together with an associated localization functor π : K → K[𝑊−1] that is universal among functors with domain K that invert the class 𝑊 of weak equivalences. This construction and its universal property are presented in §2.2.