This paper addresses a joint pricing and inventory control problem for a batch production system with random leadtimes. Assume that demand arrives according to a Poisson process with a price-dependent arrival rate. Each replenishment order contains a single batch of a fixed lot size. The replenishment leadtime follows an Erlang distribution, with the number of completed phases recording the delivery state of outstanding orders. The objective is to determine an optimal inventory-pricing policy that maximizes total expected discounted profit or long-run average profit. We first show that when there is at most one order outstanding at any point in time and that excess demand is lost, the optimal reorder policy can be characterized by a critical stock level and the optimal pricing decision is decreasing in the inventory level and delivery state. We then extend the analysis to mixed-Erlang leadtime distribution which can be used to approximate any random leadtime to any degree of accuracy. We further extend the analysis to allowing three outstanding orders where the optimal reorder point becomes state-dependent: the closer an outstanding order is to its arrival or the more orders are outstanding, the lower selling price is charged and the lower reorder point is chosen. Finally, we address the backlog case and show that the monotone pricing structure may not be true when the optimal reorder point is negative.

This article considers the optimization and optimality of single-item/location, infinite-horizon, (s,S) inventory models. Departing from the conventional approach, we do not assume the loss function describing holding and shortage costs per period to be quasiconvex. As the existing optimization algorithms have been established on the condition of quasiconvexity, our goal in this article is to develop a computational procedure for obtaining optimal (s,S) policies for models with general loss functions. Our algorithm is based on the parametric method commonly used in fractional programming and is intuitive, exact, and efficient. Moreover, this method allows us to extend the optimality of (s,S) policies to a broader class of loss functions that can be non-quasiconvex.