We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
Like many other naturalists, Charles Darwin did not find the finches to be very interesting. During his five-week visit to the Galapagos Islands, Darwin saw many finches and collected some of them, but they were so different in outward appearance that he failed to recognize that they all came from the same family. Instead, he initially called one a finch, another a blackbird, and another a grosbeak. After his return to England, the ornithologist John Gould (1839), who analyzed and described Darwin’s ornithological collection, convinced Darwin that the finches merited more interest. In the first edition of the Voyage of the Beagle (1839), Darwin noted the similarities among the finches (see Plate XXXIV).
The biological importance of the finches had made an impression on Darwin in the years since his brief encounter with them: “These birds are the most singular of any in the archipelago,” but in most respects of form and function, they remained uninteresting. Nevertheless, the beaks of the various species did capture Darwin’s (1839c) attention: “It is very remarkable that a nearly perfect gradation of structure in this one group can be traced in the form of the beak, from one exceeding in dimensions that of the largest gros-beak, to another differing but little from that of a warbler.”
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.