We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To elicit predictors of variation in likelihood to purchase foods rich inlong-chain omega-3 fatty acids.
Design, setting and subjects
Responses from a community sample (n =220) were elicited using a computer-administered questionnaire based on anadaptation of Protection Motivation Theory including measures of perceivedrisk and vulnerability to coronary heart disease (CHD). Other measuresincluded health status, body mass index (BMI), perceived risk/benefits ofnovel technologies and sociodemographics. Descriptions of model productswere presented, including farmed fish fed fishmeal (FFFF); farmed fish fedgenetically modified (GM) oilseed (FFFGM); bread, milk and supplementscontaining fish oil (SFO) or GM oilseed. It was hypothesised that perceivedvulnerability to CHD would enhance acceptance of GM products (H1).Furthermore, information describing the benefits of LCO3FA, limitations tofish supply and potential alternatives was given to a treatment group (50%)and hypothesised to have a positive effect on the acceptance of GM products(H2).
Results
No evidence was found to support H1 or H2. FFFF was most likely to bepurchased (P < 0.01), followedby SFO and FFFGM. Multivariate regression analysis identified significant(P < 0.05) predictors(standardised β) forlikelihood to purchase FFFF: self-efficacy 0.56; behaviour (product)efficacy 0.19; belief that fishmeal is unnatural −0.14 (R2 = 0.44) and for FFFGM:self-efficacy 0.65; perceived severity of CHD 0.15; BMI −0.13;significant other has/had arthritis 0.11; belief that GM oilseed isunnatural 0.11 (R2 =0.49).
Conclusions
Self-efficacy (confidence to consume) was the most important predictor oflikelihood to purchase all products.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.