We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In (4) J. F. C. Kingman and A. P. Robertson introduced the idea of thin sets in certain ℒ1 spaces. Thin sets are extreme cases of sets which are not total, and so the problem naturally arises of partitioning a measure space relative to a given set of integrable functions in such a way that on each element of the partition, the set of functions is either thin or total in a sense which is made precise below. In the present note, such partitions are obtained in §2 for finite or totally σ-finite measure spaces. In §3 the basic ideas are reformulated in terms of Radon measures on locally compact spaces, leading to an extension of the results of §2 in this context.
Let E be a separated locally convex barrelled space with continuous dual E′ and algebraic dual E* and let M be a subspace of E* with and dim Robertson, Tweddle and Yeomans have recently considered the question of barrelledness under the Mackey topology τ(E,E' + M) when E is given to be barrelled under its original topology τ(E,E') [5], [6], [7].
The recent papers (6), (7) of J. T. Marti have revived interest in the concept of extended bases, introduced in (1) by M. G. Arsove and R. E. Edwards. In the present note, two results are established which involve this idea. The first of these, which is given in a more general setting, restricts the behaviour of the coefficients for an extended basis in a certain type of locally convex space. The second result extends the well-known weak basis theorem (1, Theorem 11).
In (12) we introduced the concept of essential separability and used it to define two classes of locally convex spaces, δ-barrelled spaces and infra-δ-spaces, which serve as domain and range spaces respectively in certain closed graph theorems (12, Theorems 3 and 7). In this note we continue the study of these ideas. The relevant definitions are reproduced below.
The main aim of the present note is to compare C(X) and C(υX), the spaces of real-valued continuous functions on a completely regular space X and its real 1–1 compactification υX, with regard to weak compactness and weak countable compactness. In a sense to be made precise below, it is shown that C(X) and C(υX) have the same absolutely convex weakly countably compact sets. In certain circumstances countable compactness may be replaced by compactness, in which case one obtains a nice representation of the Mackey completion of the dual space of C(X) (Theorems 5, 6, 7).
Let E be a Hausdorff locally convex space with continuous dual E1 and let M be a subspace of the algebraic dual E* such that M ∩ E1 = {0} and dim M = ℵ0. In the terminology of [4] the Mackey topology τ(E, E1 + M) is called a countable enlargement of τ(E, E1). There has been some interest in the question of when barrelledness is preserved under countable enlargements (see [4], [5], [6], [8], [9]). In this note we are concerned with the preservation of the quasidistinguished property for normed spaces under countable enlargements; this was posed as on open question by B. Tsirulnikov in [7]. According to [7] a Hausdorff locally convex space E is quasidistinguished if every bounded subset of its completion Ê is contained in the completion of a bounded subset of Ê (equivalently, in the closure in Ê of a bounded subset of E). Any normed space is clearly quasidistinguished and remains so under a finite enlargement (dim M < χ0) since the enlarged topology is normable. (See the Main Theorem of [7] for a general result on the preservation of the quasidistinguished property under finite enlargements.) We shall write QDCE for a countable enlargement which preserves the quasidistinguished property.
Let E be a barrelled space with dual F ≠ E*. It is shown that F has uncountable codimension in E*. If M is a vector subspace of E* of countable dimension with M ∩ F = {o}, the topology τ(E, F+M) is called a countable enlargement of τ(E, F). The results of the two previous papers are extended: it is proved that a non-barrelled countable enlargement always exists, and sufficient conditions for the existence of a barrelled countable enlargement are established, to include cases where the bounded sets may all be finite dimensional. An example of this case is given, derived from Amemiya and Kōmura; some specific and general classes of spaces containing a dense barrelled vector subspace of codimension greater than or equal to c are discussed.
If E is a Hausdorff barrelled space, which does not already have its finest locally convex topology, then the continuous dual E′ may be enlarged within the algebraic dual E*. Robertson and Yeomans [10] have recently investigated whether E can retain the barrelled property under such enlargements. Whereas finite-dimensional enlargements of the dual preserve barrelledness, they have shown that this is not always so for countable-dimensional enlargements E′+M. In fact, if E contains an infinitedimensional bounded set, there always exists a countable-dimensional M for which the Mackey topology τ(E, E′+M) is not barrelled [10, Theorem 2].
We show that for some closed graph theorems each countable codimensional subspace of a domain space may also serve as a domain space. This provides a general principle from which we are able to extract some of the known results on the inheritance of topological vector space properties by subspaces of countable codimension. We make use of a result of Savgulidze and Smoljanov on B-completeness for which we provide a new and simpler proof.
The purpose of this note is to prove a result which is known to hold for Fréchet spaces [1, Chapitre II, §5, Exercise 24]. M. M. Day [2, p. 37] attributes the Banach space case to H. Löwig, although the earliest version that we have been able to find is that given by G. W. Mackey in [7, Theorem 1-1]. Recently H. E. Lacey has given an elegant proof for Banach spaces [5]. It is perhaps interesting to note that the non-locally convex case can be deduced from these known results which are established by duality arguments.
Our main purpose is to describe those separated locally convex spaces which can serve as domain spaces for a closed graph theorem in which the range space is an arbitrary Banach space of (linear) dimension at most c, the cardinal number of the real line R. These are the δ-barrelled spaces which are considered in §4. Many of the standard elementary Banach spaces, including in particular all separable ones, have dimension at most c. Also it is known that an infinite dimensional Banach space has dimension at least c (see e.g. [8]). Thus if we classify Banach spaces by dimension we are dealing, in a natural sense, with the first class which contains infinite dimensional spaces.
Much attention has been devoted to the classification of the behaviour disorders of childhood, and various authors have identified what they consider to be clinically homogeneous groups. The alternative to a clinical approach to classification is a multivariate approach in an attempt to identify more scientifically the main dimensions underlying the wide range of behaviour disorders that occur in children. A model for a multivariate classification was pioneered by Hewitt and Jenkins (1946), who delineated three behaviour syndromes: