An increasing number of women of childbearing age are treated for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Limited evidence exists on risk of pregnancy loss associated with ADHD medication use in early pregnancy.

To assess whether ADHD medication use during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of miscarriage.

We conducted a nationwide, register-based, case–control study, using linked Norwegian data from Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Norwegian Patient Registry, Norwegian Control and Payment of Health Reimbursements Database and Norwegian Prescription Database. Among pregnant women with ADHD, those with miscarriage (n = 2993 cases) were matched with up to four live births (n = 10 305 controls) by maternal age and year of conception. ADHD medication exposure during pregnancy was defined as any use (one or more filled prescriptions) and categorised into tertiles of total defined daily doses (DDDs) as a proxy for dose. The main outcome was miscarriage (pregnancy loss before 20 weeks). Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals, adjusting for psychiatric comorbidities, psychotropic and teratogenic medications, and maternal age at conception.

Of 13 298 pregnancies, 1389 (10.5%) were exposed to ADHD medications. Any ADHD medication use was associated with increased miscarriage risk (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.41–1.83). Methylphenidate (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.35–1.79), lisdexamfetamine (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.06–3.10) and atomoxetine (aOR 2.34, 95% CI 1.41–3.89) were associated with increased risks. Higher levels of medication exposure, categorised by DDD tertiles, were associated with increased odds of miscarriage, increasing from 1.14 (95% CI 0.91–1.42) for the lowest tertile to 2.11 (95% CI 1.71–2.60) for the highest.

ADHD medication use during pregnancy is associated with increased miscarriage risk. However, filled prescriptions may not reflect actual use. Further research is needed to clarify these associations and refine risk estimates.

Previous studies have not investigated response rates after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in patients with non-psychotic treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

To assess and compare the response rate of ECT for patients with TRD and non-TRD, in a large and clinically representative patient sample.

Patients aged ≥18 years, who were treated for a unipolar, non-psychotic depressive episode with at least one ECT session as part of a first-time, index ECT series between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2017 were included from the Swedish National Quality Register for ECT. Patients who had initiated a third consecutive trial of antidepressants or add-on medications before start of ECT were classified as having TRD. Patients not meeting criteria for TRD were classified as non-TRD. The main outcome was response to ECT according to the Clinical Global Impressions – Improvement Scale (CGI-I), scored as 1 or 2 (‘very much’ or ‘much improved’ after ECT, respectively). Logistic regression was used to compare outcome measures between TRD and non-TRD, adjusting for potential confounders.

A total of 4244 patients were included. Of these, 1121 patients had TRD and 3123 patients had non-TRD. The CGI-I response rate was 65.9% in the TRD group compared with 75.9% in the non-TRD group (adjusted odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.54–0.75). Older age and more severe depression were predictors of response in patients with TRD.

A clear majority of patients with TRD, as well as patients with non-TRD, responded to ECT, although the response rate was somewhat lower for TRD.