The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument – Short (CASI-S) is a brief cognitive screening test. However, there is limited information regarding its applicability in primary care.

To ascertain whether the CASI-S differentiates between dementia patients and normal controls in primary care; to examine its correlation with other cognitive instruments, to analyze its internal consistency, test-retest stability, and diagnostic accuracy.

In a case-control study, carried out at two Primary Care Units (PCUs) in the eastern region of the city of São Paulo, 47 older adults were diagnosed with dementia according to DSM-IV criteria (mean age = 76.81 ± 7.03 years), and 55 were classified as normal controls (mean age = 72.78 ± 7.37 years), by a multidisciplinary panel which had access to results from a comprehensive cognitive battery and the patients’ health data. The present analyses included results from the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The CASI-S was not used to determine diagnostic status.

The CASI-S was easily applied in the primary care setting. There was a significant performance difference (p < 0.001) between dementia patients (15.57 ± 7.40) and normal controls (26.67 ± 3.52) on the CASI-S. CASI-S scores correlated with age (ρ = −0.410, p < 0.001), educational level (ρ = 0.373, p < 0.001), and MMSE score (ρ = 0.793, p < 0.001). The internal consistency of the CASI-S was high (α = 0.848) and the correlation between test and retest was 0.688, suggesting adequate temporal stability. In the ROC curve analyses, scores of 22/23 generated an area under the curve of 0.907, with sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 81%.

The CASI-S can be useful for dementia screening in primary care in Brazil.

Identifying dementia in primary care could minimize the impact of a late intervention; however, it shows high rates of misdiagnosis. One of the reasons seems to be the lack of knowledge of adequate cognitive screening instruments. This is a systematic review of the available instruments for the primary care context.

For this systematic review, articles were collected according to the following combined key terms: “cognitive screening” and “dementia” and “primary care” and “review”. Studies should be reviews focusing on cognitive screening instruments best used in primary care setting.

Thirteen reviews were selected. In total, it was considered 34 cognitive screening instruments. Half of the instruments can be applied in an adequate time-limit for primary care context. Memory is the most commonly assessed cognitive function (91%). Almost half of the tests are mentioned to have influence of education or cultural factors (44%).

Tests such as 6CIT, AMT, GPCOG, Mini-Cog, MIS, MoCA, and STMS seem to be good alternatives to the use of the Mini-Mental State Examination when considering factors such as application time, sensitivity, specificity, and number of studies. However, there is a wide range of tests with different characteristics, therefore it is recommended that the professional gets some expertise in a few number of instruments in order to be able to choose which to use, or use in combination, depending on the setting and the profile of the patient.